Georgia governor expected to sign 'Riley Gaines Act,' which bans trans athletes from entering girls' sports
S.B. 1, also known as the "Riley Gaines Act of 2025," requires middle school, high school and college student athletes to compete on sports teams that align with their biological sex.
Restrooms, locker rooms and sleeping quarters will also be restricted to only allow biological boys in the spaces designated for boys and biological girls in the spaces designated for girls.
The bill now heads to Republican Gov. Brian Kemp's desk, and he is expected to sign the legislation. The measure was a priority for House Speaker Jon Burns and Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, both of whom are Republicans.
"The General Assembly sent a clear message—biological men are not welcome in girls' sports or spaces here in Georgia," Burns said, according to Fox 5 Atlanta.
Jones said the General Assembly "made a historic step toward achieving a critical goal for this session, the protection of women's sports," according to the outlet.
"I want to thank all of the brave women and girls who shared their personal stories and helped shape this legislation," Jones continued. "Their courage is commendable and ensures that the rights of female athletes are preserved and protected by law. I look forward to standing with Gov. Brian Kemp, Speaker Jon Burns and female athletes with their families around the state when the 'Riley Gaines Act of 2025' is signed into law."
The bill is named after Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer who was put into the public spotlight when she criticized the participation of biological males in girls' sports after she competed against Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer who Gaines and other female athletes were forced to share a locker room with.
"Such a tremendous honor. There are few causes more worthy than protecting opportunities for the next generation," Gaines wrote on X after the bill passed the Georgia House and Senate on Monday.
More than 25 other states already prohibit biological males from participating in girls' sports.
The measure was passed on Transgender Day of Visibility, in which transgender people and their supporters march and hold community gatherings and rallies against legislation targeting LGBTQ+ people.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge tosses defamation lawsuit against Nancy Mace
A federal judge on Wednesday tossed a defamation lawsuit against Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) filed after she took to the House floor to accuse a man of being a predator. U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel ruled that even if the lawsuit could proceed, federal law entitles the Justice Department to step in and largely make Mace immune from damages. Gergel did not address whether Mace actually defamed the man, Brian Musgrave, and acknowledged the ruling means he may have no ability to recover damages even if the congresswoman falsely destroyed his reputation, as Musgrave claims. 'Congress has weighed the risks and benefits….and concluded that libel and related claims against federal officials acting within the scope of their employment are barred under federal law. It is this Court's duty to uphold the rule of law,' the judge wrote. Gergel was nominated to the bench by former President Obama. Musgrave sued Mace in March after she gave a stunning speech on the House floor that included a series of allegations of sexual abuse and voyeurism. Mace, who is now running for governor of South Carolina, celebrated the ruling. 'Today the court proved the US Constitution is the LAW OF THE LAND,' Mace said in a statement. 'They came after me because I stood up for victims and demanded crime be prosecuted. Today's court decision proves their lies and attacks won't break me. I've put my career on the line to fight crime and drafted legislation to strengthen our laws. And I'll never stop fighting for law and order.' Musgrave was one of four men whom Mace singled out in a stunning speech on the House floor in February, in which she lobbed accusations of sexual abuse and voyeurism. In addition to Musgrave, Mace had accused her ex-fiancé and two other men of wrongdoing. Eric Bland, Musgrave's attorney, said the decision allows politicians to 'say and do anything they want' but vowed to 'keep fighting' to clear his client's name. 'It seems patently unfair that a United States citizen who lives a law-abiding life can be grouped and called a rapist and a predator without any proof, and it can be done over and over again with immunity (and impunity),' Bland said in a statement. Mace in the speech claimed to have found a hidden camera on a property that Musgrave owns with Mace's ex-fiancé that had intimate photos of women taken without their knowledge or consent. Musgrave's suit said he didn't place the camera and never had knowledge of it. While he was not the subject of Mace's more serious allegations in the speech, such as her belief she was raped after being 'purposefully incapacitated,' Mace labeled Musgrave along with the three other men as a 'predator.' The lawsuit took aim at the speech, Mace's social media posts and a poster displayed outside her congressional office titled 'PREDATORS' with images of the four men. The case also included claims against some of Mace's congressional staff. Last month, the Justice Department sought to step in and largely replace Mace and the staffers as the defendant by certifying they were acting in the scope of their jobs, making them immune and leaving taxpayers on the hook for damages. Gergel, the judge, agreed that the government could do so on all but one claim: that Mace owes Musgrave damages for violating his constitutional rights, known as a Bivens action. But the judge went on to dismiss that claim, too, finding it isn't permitted in defamation cases and that Mace was protected anyway by the U.S. Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause. Mace has made her accusations against the men a central part of her political identity in recent months. In a May subcommittee hearing she led on private spaces, she showed a blurry screenshot of what her 'naked silhouette' that she said was recorded on a hidden camera on the property that was mentioned in her speech. She launched a bid for governor of South Carolina this month. Among her primary opponents is South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson (R), who she accused of not adequately investigating her allegations. Wilson's office at the time said that Mace 'either does not understand or is purposefully mischaracterizing' Wilson's role.
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas can't require Ten Commandments in some districts, judge rules
A district judge ruled Wednesday that Texas can't require posters of the Ten Commandments to go up in certain school districts where parents have challenged the move. U.S. District Judge Fred Biery sided with a group of families fighting against a new law set to take effect Sept. 1 that would have put posters of the Ten Commandments in easily readable letters in every public school classroom in Texas. 'They just want to be left alone, neither proselytized nor ostracized, including what occurs to their children in government run schools,' the judge wrote in his decision. While this lawsuit only affects 11 districts, another legal challenge to the law is working its way through the courts. 'Today's ruling is a major win that protects the constitutional right to religious freedom for Texas families of all backgrounds,' said Tommy Buser-Clancy, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing.' The Hill has reached out to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's (R) office for comment. Texas is the third state to suffer a court loss over laws for the Ten Commandments to be hung in public school classrooms, following Louisiana and Arkansas. Critics say Republicans are hoping to take these cases to the Supreme Court. 'I don't think anybody is surprised that these policies, these laws in the states that seek to put the Ten Commandments back in schools, have been challenged in court. They're making their way through the proper channels, and we still are very confident that at the end of the day, when these cases get to the Supreme Court, that they're going to uphold them based on the new history-and-tradition test,' Matt Krause, of counsel with the First Liberty Institute, previously told The Hill.
Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
MAGA erupts after Israeli official charged in child sex ring flees U.S.
MAGA is pushing the Trump administration to explain why an Israeli official who was arrested in an undercover child sex sting in Nevada was allowed to leave the U.S. after posting bail. Why it matters: The outrage marks the latest fissure between Israel and MAGA, which already faces a generational divide over how much the U.S. should support Israel amid the war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Driving the news: Tom Artiom Alexandrovich, a senior Israeli cybersecurity official, was arrested during an undercover operation in Nevada targeting "child sex predators," the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department announced Friday. Alexandrovich posted a $10,000 bail without appearing before a judge and quickly fled to Israel, raising questions about why his passport was not confiscated. Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that the handling of the case was "standard," and the State Department denied that the U.S. government intervened. But acting U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah, whose jurisdiction covers Nevada, posted on social media: "The individual who fled our country should have had his passport seized by the state authorities. He must be returned immediately to face justice." Chattah said that Attorney General Pam Bondi was "outraged" and placed calls to both her and FBI Director Kash Patel. What they're saying: MAGA influencers are up in arms, demanding the Trump administration push Israel for Alexandrovich's swift extradition to the U.S. to stand trial. "DOJ should file federal charges and demand immediate extradition," podcaster Jack Posobiec wrote on X. Two House Republicans known for their criticism of Israel — Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — also posted about the case. "What is going on here? Why would the United States allow a foreign government official charged with a child sex crime to avoid prosecution?" Tucker Carlson wrote in his newsletter. Some voices have taken specific aim at Chattah, who was born in Israel. "The U.S. attorney general who released him is Israeli-born Sigal Chattah. Makes sense now!" posted Candace Owens, who misstated Chattah's role. Chattah's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the backlash. Between the lines: Parts of MAGA's base have long obsessed over the "Deep State," which originally referred to a supposed cabal of pedophilic elites who control the government. A slice of the far-right also promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories about Israel and Jews secretly pulling the strings in Washington. Those two threads intersected with the case of Jeffrey Epstein, who some conspiracy theorists allege was an Israeli intelligence asset who used his underage sex trafficking ring to blackmail global elites. Zoom out: It's not just conspiracy theorists fueling MAGA's growing skepticism of the U.S. relationship with Israel.
