
Uncounted ballots, thousands of cookies and the role of WEC: The latest on Madison clerk investigation
The city contends the Wisconsin Elections Commission does not have the authority to order the tasks and changes in practice, which the commissioners discussed at a July meeting. But commission staff attorneys say the actions by the former clerk warrant such orders, and state law allows the commission to issue them.
Madison City Attorney Michael Haas, a former administrator of the state elections commission, said his understanding of the commission's authority is that it is "limited to ordering a local election official to comply with the election laws.""When the Commission is presented with an error that can be corrected in real time, such as a decision whether to certify nomination papers or to order a recall election, the Commission is well within its authority to order local officials to take immediate action to conform their conduct to the law," Haas wrote in an Aug. 6 letter to WEC attorney Angela Sharpe."But regardless of whether there is still an opportunity to fix the error (and here there is not), the Commission's authority does not extend to requiring the future implementation of specific procedures in excess of those required in the statutes."
Madison attorney says Election Commission orders would not improve how elections are run
Haas said the orders require Madison clerk staff to perform duties not mandated in other municipalities.One example Haas noted is in the commission's second proposed order, which requires the Madison clerk to provide WEC with a detailed plan showing which clerk staffer is responsible for each task outlined in state law and naming back-up staffers who will take over those roles in the event of absences. "While this idea may seem wise in theory, it is a broad mandate that clearly interferes with the authority of the municipal clerk and there are reasons why it is likely not an exercise conducted by any of Wisconsin's 1,850 municipalities, especially those with Clerk's staff of any significant size," Haas wrote.
Haas said the city continues to overhaul its practices to ensure all votes are counted properly and that the 2024 episode does not occur again. He said requiring Madison to perform tasks other municipalities don't "runs the risk of increasing, rather than decreasing, inconsistency of local election practices."
Orders "created in a vacuum" that are not required by statute is not a good approach for making improvements, he wrote."That approach tends to put the responsibility on the Commission to account for all aspects of local election administration and decision points related to staffing, budgeting, resources and supervision, a result that I believe we can agree is not productive, appropriate or sustainable."
Elections Commission says Madison issues were 'structural' and need its intervention
The potential action from the state's top election officials comes after a commission investigation found former Madison Clerk Maribeth Witzel-Behl acted unlawfully when she failed to ensure nearly 200 absentee ballots were counted during the 2024 presidential election.The findings that were released in July in a scathing report outlined how Witzel-Behl refused to acknowledge "significant errors" in how absentee ballots were handled and did not take any action after learning 193 ballots went uncounted — instead going on vacation.
Emails obtained by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel under the state's public records law show after Witzel-Behl learned uncounted ballots were discovered, she opted to take vacation time to bake thousands of cookies for dozens of city offices and the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
"The seriousness of Clerk Witzel-Behl's actions, and the fact that it resulted in almost 200 voters being disenfranchised, warrants a detailed order from the Commission correcting her office's policies and procedures, and ensuring those issues are actually fixed before the next statewide election," Sharpe wrote in a memo to commissioners ahead of the Aug. 15 meeting. "It was clear from the investigation that some of the contributing factors did not rest solely with Clerk Witzel-Behl and included actions of the City Clerk staff, as well as structural problems in that office," Sharpe wrote. "Staff believe it is necessary to require the City Clerk's office to affirmatively correct specific problems to ensure that they do not persist in future elections."Sharpe said commission staff do not believe the purpose of state law governing such actions "is achieved by allowing a municipal clerk, whose actions were found to be contrary to law and an abuse of discretion, to correct their own actions entirely unsupervised by the Commission by being told simply not to do it again."
The Wisconsin Elections Commission is scheduled to meet Friday, Aug. 15, to discuss the proposed orders for the Madison clerk's office.
Investigation into uncounted ballots is first in commission's history
Don Millis, a Republican elections commissioner, said the discovery of the cookie baking, which was first reported by Votebeat, made the episode "more outrageous − her neglect."
"It seems outrageous that she couldn't be bothered to put down the cookie cutter and come to the office to figure out why, initially, 68 voters' ballots weren't counted and then eventually 193 ballots weren't counted," Millis said. "To me that's just dereliction of duties."
"The two biggest problems are you had some people not able to exercise their right to vote − and it's terrible for those people − but it just undermines confidence in our elections," he said. "At a time when we have all the tools at our disposal to make sure that everyone's counted. There is no fraud or very little fraud − we seem to have mistakes like this. It just seems like people didn't care."
WEC launched the investigation into the Madison clerk's office after commissioners learned the 193 ballots had not been counted. The probe lasted six months while commission staff reviewed nearly 2,000 pages of documents and conducted 13 depositions of city and county staff.
It was the first time WEC used its investigative authority in the commission's eight-year history. Ann Jacobs, the Democratic chairwoman of the commission, and Millis, a Republican-appointed commissioner, conducted the depositions. Both are attorneys.
Among the commission's investigative findings included learning that two bags of uncounted absentee ballots likely never made it to wards to be counted and may have been added to a ballot storage cart and supply tote after being discovered. Chief inspectors at the two wards with uncounted ballots credibly testified they did not see bags containing the ballots in their materials on Election Day.
Witzel-Behl did not act urgently to count the ballots after discovering them, even though they still could have been included in vote tallies at the time, according to the investigation.
Haas is asking the commission to seek an opinion from Attorney General Josh Kaul or the state Legislature's attorneys on the scope of their authority related to the orders.
The uncounted ballots in Madison did not impact the results of any federal, state, or local race or referendum question in the November 2024 election. More than 1.5 million absentee ballots were cast in the election and results were reviewed during the weeks-long certification process at the city, county and state levels.
Molly Beck can be reached at molly.beck@jrn.com.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Madison objects to WEC orders over clerk who didn't count ballots
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom calls Nov. 4 special election to counter GOP redistricting push
California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that his state would hold a special election on Nov. 4 to ask voters to approve a mid-decade redistricting plan. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district," said Gov. Gavin Newsom in a press conference on Aug. 14 to announce the vote on California's Election Rigging Response Act. The proposed redrawn district maps could be released as early as Friday, Aug. 15, according to media reports. For weeks, Newsom and California Democratic lawmakers have been floating plans for this mid-decade redistricting. It's in response to Trump and White House officials who've urged Texas Republican leaders to redraw voting maps to gain five new Republican-friendly seats to the U.S. House of Representatives, USA TODAY reported. In California, congressional district maps are drawn by the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission — not legislators — which was created when voters passed the Voters First Act in 2008. California has 52 congressional districts, nine of which are currently represented by Republican congressmen. 'We tried to play by a higher set of standards and rules with our independent redistricting, and we believe in that and we are not talking about eliminating that commission,' Newsom said in an earlier press conference on Aug. 8. 'We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas and we will nullify what happens in Texas. We will pick up five seats with the consent of the people.' Polling shows that most Californians do not favor Newsom's proposed legislative redistricting, as they support the 2008 and 2010 initiatives that separated legislative officials from the drawing of congressional districts. Thus, Newsom is rallying Californians to support this initiative and trust officials to draw the state's lines. Here's what to know about the proposed plan to redistrict California. Newsom officially launches California's Election Rigging Response Act 'Today is liberation day in the state of California,' Newsom said at the beginning of his press conference speech. The Election Rigging Response Act would require a two-thirds vote in both chambers of the Legislature to appear on the ballot. If approved for the ballot, it would need a simple majority of voters to pass and would impact congressional elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030. Newsom made it clear that this proposal is a temporary pathway to combat the redistricting efforts of other states. Newsom emphasized that legislative control over redistricting in California is temporary and intended solely to counter Republican efforts to gain additional Congressional seats. He added that California would withdraw from this approach if Texas were to end its redistricting maneuvers. The move isn't just for California's benefit—it's meant to set an example for other states, Newsom said. He hopes blue states will respond to red-state redistricting in kind. While the plan shifts redistricting power to the government, Newsom emphasized it ultimately empowers voters. California's process will be transparent and public, unlike Texas's more private approach. Voters will see the proposed maps before casting ballots and have the final say on their adoption. 'We are about to get power back to the people. You have, on Nov. 4 in California, the power to stand up to Trump. You have the power to declare that you support a system that is not rigged." Who among California's elected officials support the Election Rigging Response Act? California Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff both spoke at the conference in support of Newsom and the act. Padilla and Schiff agreed that California must fight against Donald Trump to defend democracy. Schiff said, 'You come after our votes in California, and we will fight you tooth and nail. Donald Trump, you do not poke the bear. Not while we are around.' Assembly member Isaac Bryan, member-elect of the California State Senate Sabrina Cervantes, and chairman of the House Democratic Caucus Pete Aguilar also gave speeches before Newsom's appearance. Cervantes said that if other states had established independent election committees like California's, this strategic redistricting would not be happening in red states. She also stated that the upcoming midterms could be the "last chance to check Trump's abuse of power." Who is not in support of the Election Rigging Response Act? In response to Newsom's announcement, Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo, Vice Chair of the Assembly Committee on Elections, issued a statement calling the act a "power-grab" to make national headlines. 'Californians demand and deserve transparency from their government. Governor Newsom's sinister redistricting scheme is the opposite. There is no public input," read the statement. Additionally, Macedo said in the statement that Newsom is attempting to dismiss and take power away from the California Citizens Redistricting Commission. Who else spoke at Newsom's press conference? In addition to members of the California legislature, a series of speakers representing a diverse number of interest groups spoke at the press conference. Each speaker explained how different Americans could be affected if Republicans successfully take control of the House through redistricting measures. Jodie Hicks, president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, spoke about the overturn of Roe v. Wade. She said that a federal abortion ban could happen if Republican states successfully redistrict to rig elections. To protect reproductive freedom, she said, fighting back with legislative redistricting is the answer. Hicks said, 'You take away our freedoms? We'll take away your seats.' Erika Jones, elementary school teacher and Secretary Treasurer of the California Teachers Association, spoke to how students are under the threat of ICE and Trump is defunding education. She said that, with more Republicans in the House, these conditions would worsen for her students. Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, said that Trump is not pro-worker, and David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union, California, had a similar sentiment. He said that Republicans' goal is to silence working people and serve corporations. Huerta said, 'California voters must be allowed to save our democracy. And I trust that California voters will save our democracy.' When will the special election for the Election Rigging Response Act take place? Newsom called for a special election on Nov. 4, 2025, for voters to decide on the congressional maps before the 2026 midterms. These maps would remain through the 2030 elections. It would take a simple majority of voters to pass the redistricting act. What do California polls say about redistricting proposal? A recent POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll shows that nearly two-thirds of Californians prefer to retain the independent commission, with only 36% supporting legislative control over redistricting. Newsom acknowledged the uphill battle but argued that 'inaction is not an option' if partisan gerrymandering continues unchecked in other states. What do current California congressional district maps look like? Sarah Sadhwani, commissioner from the California Redistricting Commission, spoke about how she drew the district lines that are currently in place. She claimed the maps are fair, nonpartisan, and competitive, but she said they must be redrawn to "level the playing field" in the next election cycle. Sadhwani said she is in support of Newsom's legislation 'with the expectation that this is a one-time occurrence. That this does not subvert the will of California.' See the current congressional district maps in California: Which California Congressional districts are represented by Republicans? California has 52 congressional districts, nine of which are currently represented by Republican congressmen: Doug LaMalfa, 1st Congressional District of California Kevin Kiley, 3rd Congressional District of California Tom McClintock, 5th Congressional District of California Vince Fong, 20th Congressional District of California David Valadao, 22nd Congressional District of California Jay Obernolte, 23rd Congressional District of California Young Kim, 40th Congressional District of California Ken Calvert, 41st Congressional District of California Darrell Issa, 48th Congressional District of California These lawmakers said in a joint statement in late July that they'd 'fight any attempt to disenfranchise California voters by whatever means necessary to ensure the will of the people continues to be reflected in redistricting and in our elections.' 'The Commission received feedback from tens of thousands of Californians as to their communities of interest, which shaped the current set of congressional districts,' they said. 'Districts that represent the local communities that they live in, rather than the whims of one political party. A partisan political gerrymander is NOT what the voters of California want, as they clearly stated when they passed the VOTERS FIRST Act and participated in the Citizens Redistricting Commission process.' This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Newsom Announces Nov. 4 Vote on California Redistricting Plan


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Schumer finds himself in ‘tough situation' as 'imaginary friends' come to light, says ‘Ruthless Podcast' host
'Ruthless Podcast' hosts weigh in on Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's imaginary friends, Democratic New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and more on 'The Will Cain Show.'


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
One-on-One: Secretary Condoleezza Rice: 'We Keep Striving'
'The case for America is not that America is perfect. The case for America is we keep striving.' – Condoleezza Rice. In this exclusive interview, Bret speaks to the former Secretary of State to President George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice, the first-ever Black American Woman to hold the title. Secretary Rice tells the story of how she was able to rise to prominence in an era where Jim Crow laws prohibited millions from a fair shot at the American dream, and why she grew to love her country despite that. Secretary Rice also discusses the difficulties she faced in helping run a nation with hundreds of conflicting views, the role America must play in international politics, and why millions across the globe still strive for American citizenship. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit