
Sharp dressed man: Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the sartorial switch for NATO
US rock band ZZ Top stormed the charts in 1983 with a song about a "Sharp Dressed Man," lyrics that this week could apply to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Zelenskyy is currently in The Hague attending this year's NATO summit in a bid to ensure continued Western military support for his country, which, more than three years since Russia's full-scale invasion, is still trying to repel Moscow's forces.
And this time around, the Ukrainian president looks more formal than he has been since Russia's all-out war against Ukraine started in early 2022.
Gone are the army fatigues Zelenskyy has worn since then; in their place is a blazer (albeit with military overtones), dress pants, and a dress shirt, sans necktie.
But why the switch? There are several possible reasons. But first, let's take a quick look at why Zelenskyy ditched the more usual presidential attire of suit, dress shirt and tie in the first place.
Between his election to the Ukrainian presidency in 2019 and the Russian full-scale invasion, Zelenskyy dressed much like any other head of state: he was clean-shaven and wore tailored suits, dress shoes, shirts and ties.
But after the 2022 invasion, Zelenskyy opted for a sartorial switch, favouring instead sweatshirts, cargo pants and work boots. He has also worn a military-style vyshyvanka — a traditional Ukrainian embroidered shirt that is part of the country's cultural heritage.
The choice of clothes partly reflects the fact that he is Ukraine's commander-in-chief and is also a sign of solidarity with Ukraine's armed forces.
"Zelenskyy dresses demonstratively. But the only message he wants to convey with his clothing is: 'In my country, there is a war,'" Ukrainian fashion historian Zoya Zvynyatskivska told The Kyiv Independent newspaper.
"Everyone wants to forget. Everyone wants to move on. But he keeps reminding them."
The Trump factor
One occasion where no one was allowed to forget Zelenskyy's choice of clothes was a disastrous meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House on 28 February.
That meeting started badly...and then got worse. Trump and his Vice President JD Vance were in confrontational mode, berating Zelenskyy in front of journalists for not being grateful enough for US military support for the war effort and for "gambling with World War III."
Zelenskyy was encouraged by Trump's team prior to the Oval Office meeting to wear a formal suit, something he declined to do, a decision that reportedly offended Trump.
When Zelenskyy arrived at the White House, Trump greeted him with "You're all dressed up today."
And Zelenskyy's combat attire was raised again by a journalist in the Oval Office.
"Why don't you wear a suit? You're at the highest level in this country's office and you refuse to wear a suit," Brian Glenn, chief White House correspondent for Real America's Voice TV channel asked.
"Do you own a suit? A lot of Americans have problems with you not respecting the office," Glenn continued.
Zelenskyy replied simply: "I will wear (a suit) after this war finishes."
Royal reception
Another reason for Zelenskyy's more formal attire in The Hague may be related to the Dutch royal family.
Prior to the start of the summit, NATO delegates were welcomed at the Huis ten Bosch royal palace for an official dinner with King Willem-Alexander and Queen Maxima.
There, Zelenskyy sported a military-style black jacket and dress shirt, perhaps seen as more appropriate to the setting than the olive-green sweatshirt and combat pants he tends to wear.
But this type of black jacket, Zelenskyy has worn in public at least twice before.
The first time was in April when he headed to Rome for the funeral of Pope Francis. In keeping with the solemnity of that occasion, Zelenskyy chose to wear a formal dress shirt underneath the jacket.
It was seen again just two days ago, when he was invited to a private meeting and lunch with King Charles III at Windsor Castle.
Zelenskyy wore the jacket again for that meeting, but interestingly, it was absent the first time he met the king at Sandringham in March. At that meeting, Zelenskyy chose only to wear a black sweatshirt.
High-stakes summit
A final reason for Zelenskyy's more formal choice of clothing may be the importance being attributed to this NATO summit.
Several media outlets have already called it the most consequential meeting of NATO allies in the alliance's 76-year history.
Defence spending, the threat from Russia and Trump's commitment to European security are all seen as hot-button topics this year, and several delegates will be wary of upsetting the famously unpredictable Trump.
However, Trump may well go into this summit in a more benign mood than usual. He'll be riding high on the back of what he sees as a successful ceasefire deal ending 12 days of fighting between Iran and Israel and trumpeting that Iran's nuclear facilities have been "completely and totally obliterated."
Prior to his arrival in The Hague, Trump shared a series of gushing text messages he'd received from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte praising him for his military action against Iran and putting pressure on the alliance's allies to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP.
"Mr President, dear Donald, congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer," one of the messages read.
Zelenskyy's position at the summit and whether he will be able to secure continued American support for Ukraine remain unclear, but he would certainly be mindful of that February meeting at the White House and be more inclined to dress to impress.
Clothes may not make the man, but this time around, they may make all the difference.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
From Iran to Gaza, Macron's diplomatic crusade is strewn with pitfalls
Diplomats had believed it possible: French President Emmanuel Macron would, they said, have a private meeting with United States President Donald Trump during the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit, held in The Hague, Netherlands on Tuesday, June 24 and Wednesday, June 25. There, he was expected to make Europe's voice heard on Iran, Gaza and Ukraine. According to the Elysée, the two leaders had maintained a "special relationship" for years, one marked by firm handshakes and knee slaps, as they displayed in their meeting in Washington last February. Yet nothing happened: No words were exchanged, no one-on-one meeting took place at The Hague. "I did not have the opportunity to speak with him there," Macron told journalists as he left the summit. The connection, based on personal relations between the French and American presidents, had grown weak. In Paris, Macron's advisers tried to downplay the disparaging remarks Trump made after leaving the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, on June 16, when the American president described his French counterpart as a man who "always gets it wrong" and is constantly "seeking publicity." "It does not bother me," Macron replied. Yet a source at the Elysée could not recall when the two last spoke by phone. The "hug diplomacy" had reached its limits, quipped former French foreign affairs minister Dominique de Villepin.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Iran vetting body okays bill suspending cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog
Iranian lawmakers voted in favour of the bill on Wednesday, a day after a ceasefire ended a 12-day war with Israel that saw Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Since the start of the war on June 13, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the International Atomic Energy Agency for failing to condemn the strikes. Iran has also criticised the watchdog for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing it of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations. Iranian officials say the censure motion was "one of the main excuses" for the Israeli and US attacks. "The government is required to suspend all cooperation with the IAEA to ensure full respect for the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran," Guardian Council spokesman Hadi Tahan Nazif told the official IRNA news agency. He said the move was prompted by the "attacks... by the Zionist regime and the United States against peaceful nuclear facilities." The bill, which will now be submitted to President Masoud Pezeshkian for final ratification, would allow Iran "to benefit from all the entitlements specified under... the Non-Proliferation Treaty especially with regard to uranium enrichment," Nazif said. Key Tehran ally Moscow had earlier spoken out against the move to suspend coooperation with the IAEA. "We are interested in continuing cooperation between Iran and the IAEA, so that everybody respects Iran's repeated statements that Iran does not have and will not have plans to develop a nuclear weapon," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told a news conference. Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in a post on X that cooperation with the watchdog was "not possible" at this time until security at Iran's nuclear facilities "is ensured." Israel launched a major bombing campaign on June 13 that targeted Iranian nuclear and military facilities and killed top scientists and commanders. On Sunday, Israel's ally the United States launched unprecedented strikes of its own on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took effect on Tuesday.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
In Finnish border town, worry mounts over Russian military build-up
Finland, which dropped decades of military non-alignment to join NATO in 2023, shares a 1,340-kilometre (830-mile) border with Russia. Recent satellite images obtained by media outlets including the New York Times, Finnish public broadcaster Yle and Swedish broadcaster SVT have revealed an expansion of Russian military infrastructure in various locations near the Finnish border. Speculation is rife that Russia could be preparing for future military action against Finland once its war in Ukraine is over. Moscow has repeatedly warned Finland of repercussions since it joined NATO after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "We have now noticed some new organisational changes, such as new divisions which are beginning to appear near Finland's borders," military expert Emil Kastehelmi, of Finland-based Black Bird Group which analyses Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the Russian forces near NATO's eastern border, told AFP. "Russia continues to build, prepare and train in the vicinity of Finland's and NATO's eastern border," he said. Kastehelmi said the Russian activity was a reaction to Finland's NATO accession, as well as an attempt to step up recruitment of soldiers and a result of the re-establishment of the Leningrad Military District near the border last year. In May, the Finnish Defence Forces told AFP that "Russia is building more infrastructure to be able to bring in more troops after the war (in Ukraine) is over". Finnish Defence Minister Antti Hakkanen told AFP that Helsinki was "closely monitoring and assessing Russia's activities and intentions" together with its allies. Preparing for different scenarios In the small border town of Kuhmo, around 600 kilometres north of Helsinki, 49-year-old Samuli Pulkkinen was selling seasonal berries and vegetables outside a grocery store. He said locals were increasingly worried about another war with Russia -- the last one, in 1939-1940, saw Finland cede 11 percent of its territory. "After a long period of peace, everyone is of course now talking about war and the threat of war," Pulkkinen told AFP. "It's really sad that it's as if this time of peace is already over, that there is a constant threat that something bad will happen or will happen in the next few years." "I myself think it's very likely," he added ominously. Kuhmo, with a population of less than 10,000, is located some 60 kilometres from the closed Vartius border crossing. The proximity to Russia has always influenced Finland's eastern border regions. Many locals have family on both sides of the border, and tourism and cross-border trade were important sources of income before 2022. "I'm not worrying too much, because living with fear is challenging in one's daily life," said a 67-year-old man who asked to remain anonymous. "But thinking about the future generations, children and grandchildren, I worry about their future." Closed border Finland is building a 200-kilometre border fence aimed at preventing Russia from "instrumentalising migrants" across its border to destabilise Finland. The Nordic country shut its border with Russia in December 2023 until further notice, after the arrival of around 1,000 migrants without visas. Helsinki said the surge was orchestrated by Russia -- a claim Moscow denied. Tomi Tirkkonen, deputy commander of the Kainuu border guard district which includes Kuhmo, said the border guard was monitoring activity along the eastern border on a daily basis, and was "very well updated about the situation on the Russian side." "There is no reason to be scared, the situation is completely under the control of the Finnish border guard," he told AFP during a visit to the Vartius border crossing, located amidst lush forest. "We are prepared for the many different kinds of scenarios," Tirkkonen said, unable to divulge "operational and classified" details. Finland has beefed up its military investments and preparedness since joining NATO, and has urged citizens to increase their civil preparedness. 'No immediate threat' The Nordic country backs NATO's five percent spending target and has launched a reform of its defence forces to tackle the security threat. Pirjo Rasinkangas, who was visiting relatives in Kuhmo, said she supported Finland's decision to shut the border and build the border fence, saying it gave her a "sense of safety". "I am still trying to be a bit positive and think that it won't get worse at least," she said. "Of course we discuss what comes next with my family. Because it feels like there are such bleak prospects cropping up all the time," the 54-year-old added. Analyst Kastehelmi said the increased Russian military activity posed no immediate threat to Finland's security nor indicated Russia was preparing a military attack. Finnish President Alexander Stubb assured in a CNN interview in May that Russia's military bases along the border were nothing new and "there is a normal build-up" of troops there. "The most important question is what happens when the war in Ukraine ends," Kastehelmi said. "It (would be) a very worrying sign if, for example, Russia doesn't discharge or demobilise soldiers after the active military operations in Ukraine end." © 2025 AFP