Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capeheart quits editorial board over dispute with white colleague: ‘Robbing me of my humanity'
A black Washington Post opinion writer said he quit the newspaper's editorial board over a dispute with a white colleague about a piece concerning Georgia's voting laws that he didn't agree with — accusing her of 'robbing me of my humanity,' according to a report.
Jonathan Capehart, who was the only African American member of the editorial board when he quit in 2023, writes in a new book titled 'Yet Here I Am: Lessons from a Black Man's Search for Home,' that he stepped down over a dispute with another opinion editor, Karen Tumulty, the news site Semafor reported.
In his book, Capehart, who remains a columnist at the paper, writes that he clashed with Tumulty over an editorial which took issue with then-President Joe Biden's criticism of a 2021 Georgia voting law.
Biden described the law as 'Jim Crow 2.0' — a characterization that the Washington Post editorial board deemed to be 'hyperbolic.'
That didn't sit well with Capehart, who agreed with Biden's view of the law and was upset that the editorial may make it appear as if he supported the board's position that it was 'hyperbolic,' according to Semafor.
According to the book, Capehart was incensed when Tumulty later did not apologize to him for publishing it. He wrote that he felt additionally put off when Tumulty said Biden's choice of words was insulting to people who had lived through racial segregation in the South.
'Tumulty took an incident where I felt she ignored and compounded the insult by robbing me of my humanity,' he wrote in the book, which was published last week.
'She either couldn't or wouldn't see that I was black, that I came to the conversation with knowledge and history she could never have, that my worldview, albeit different from hers, was equally valid.'
Capehart left the editorial board after complaining about the incident to human resources and other senior figures at the paper, Semafor reported.
Capehart's frustrations were notable enough that after the piece was published, opinion editor David Shipley was asked to meet privately with the Rev. Al Sharpton to discuss the incident and alleged shortcomings in the paper's opinion coverage, Semafor reported.
The claims made by Capehart in his new book have also reportedly rankled Washington Post staffers, according to Semafor.
Capehart's description of the incident in his book as well as a recent discussion that he held with former Biden administration official Susan Rice at a local Washington, DC, bookstore last week has been the subject of internal recriminations at the newspaper in recent days, Semafor reported.
According to two Washington Post staffers, staff have complained privately that the book publicly pitted current colleagues against each other and appeared to run afoul of the Post's editorial guidelines around collegiality, as well as rules that restrict staff from publicly disclosing internal editorial conversations.
The Post has sought comment from the Washington Post, Tumulty and Capehart.
In a statement to Semafor, Tumulty noted that the paper had repeatedly published opinion pieces criticizing Georgia's 2021 voting laws limiting ballot access, but said she would not comment further on the book or the Post's editorial processes.
'I have a very different recognition of the events and conversations that are described in this book, but out of respect for the longstanding principle that Washington Post editorial board deliberations are confidential I am not going to say anything further,' Tumulty told Semafor.
Some current and former staff told Semafor that they felt Capehart's decision to go after Tumulty in a book and on his book tour over an editorial disagreement, as well as the actual description of the incident, was unfair to her.
'Ed board members, current and former, are honor bound not to discuss specific deliberations publicly,' former deputy opinion editor Chuck Lane said in a text to Semafor.
'I can only say that Karen took an unsought leadership role when the paper needed her, and performed it superbly and 100 percent honorably, despite extraordinary health challenges — for which I admire her greatly.'
The Washington Post editorial board has undergone considerable upheaval in the last nine months.
Just before the Nov. 5 presidential election, billionaire owner Jeff Bezos blocked the editorial board from endorsing the Democratic nominee, then-Vice President Kamala Harris.
Earlier this year, Bezos overhauled the opinion section so that it would promote 'personal liberties' and 'free markets' — a move that prompted the resignation of Shipley.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Clearmind Medicine Engages Leading Government and Political Affairs Firm to Advance Psychedelic Therapeutics
Vancouver, Canada, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Clearmind Medicine Engages Leading Government and Political Affairs Firm to Advance Psychedelic Therapeutics Clearmind Medicine Inc. (Nasdaq: CMND), (FSE: CWY0) ('Clearmind' or the "Company"), a clinical-stage biotech company focused on discovery and development of novel psychedelic-derived therapeutics to solve major under-treated health problems, today announced it has engaged a prominent government and political affairs consulting and lobbying firm to support its mission of advancing psychedelic-based treatments. As psychedelics gain traction in the pharmaceutical industry for their potential to treat conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other mental health disorders, Clearmind recognizes the importance of navigating complex regulatory landscapes and fostering greater acceptance among policymakers in the U.S. The Company has partnered with the esteemed firm to help advance the integration of psychedelic therapies into mainstream healthcare by advocating for informed, science-based regulatory frameworks. 'We are pleased to collaborate with a team of seasoned government affairs experts to help shape the future of psychedelic medicine,' said Dr. Adi Zuloff-Shani, Chief Executive Officer of Clearmind Medicine. 'Psychedelics hold immense promise for transforming mental health treatment, but their novelty requires proactive engagement with regulators and policymakers to ensure safe and equitable access. This partnership underscores our commitment to driving progress in this rapidly evolving field.' The consulting firm, known for its expertise in navigating federal and state regulatory environments, will work closely with Clearmind to educate policymakers on the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, support the development of balanced regulations, and foster strategic alliances to advance the Company's innovative pipeline, including its lead candidate, CMND-100, currently in Phase I/IIa clinical trials for AUD at prestigious institutions like Yale School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University. About Clearmind Medicine Inc. Clearmind is a clinical-stage psychedelic pharmaceutical biotech company focused on the discovery and development of novel psychedelic-derived therapeutics to solve widespread and underserved health problems, including alcohol use disorder. Its primary objective is to research and develop psychedelic-based compounds and attempt to commercialize them as regulated medicines, foods or supplements. The Company's intellectual portfolio currently consists of nineteen patent families including 31 granted patents. The Company intends to seek additional patents for its compounds whenever warranted and will remain opportunistic regarding the acquisition of additional intellectual property to build its portfolio. Shares of Clearmind are listed for trading on Nasdaq under the symbol "CMND" and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol 'CWY0.' For further information visit: or contact: Investor Relations invest@ Telephone: (604) 260-1566 US: CMND@ General Inquiries Info@ Forward-Looking Statements: This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and other securities laws. Words such as 'expects,' 'anticipates,' 'intends,' 'plans,' 'believes,' 'seeks,' 'estimates' and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based upon management's current expectations, beliefs and projections, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain. Such expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith. However, there can be no assurance that management's expectations, beliefs and projections will be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from what is expressed in or indicated by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. For a more detailed description of the risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, reference is made to the Company's reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC'), including, but not limited to, the risks detailed in the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2024 and subsequent filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, subsequent events or circumstances, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If the Company does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that the Company will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements. References and links to websites have been provided as a convenience, and the information contained on such websites is not incorporated by reference into this press release. Clearmind is not responsible for the contents of third-party in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Rare Lustron home for sale in Clintonville
Here's your chance to own a quirky piece of history: A Lustron home is currently for sale in Clintonville. Why it matters: It's one of about 2,500 built by a defunct Columbus company that tried to revolutionize the housing market with affordable, prefabricated models made of enameled steel. The asking price: $379,900 for the 1,021-square-foot home with two bedrooms, one bathroom and a 2 1/2-car garage. The listing says it's in "exceptionally good condition" as far as Lustrons go. Flashback: The Lustron Corporation, founded in 1946, hoped to address America's post-World War II housing shortage as soldiers came home. Its goal: mass-produce steel starter homes that could be assembled in neighborhoods in just three days. The factory was just north of Whitehall. Lustron "was considered a great leap forward in the viability and desirability of mass-produced housing," per the Ohio History Connection. Yes, but: Lustron faced many financial issues and its homes actually took much longer than that to build. It went bankrupt in 1950. The intrigue: So few remain that there's a Wikipedia list of those still standing. It's somewhat rare for one to hit the market, though this home on Arden Road previously changed hands in 2022. Zoom in: A low-maintenance Lustron is ideal for both first-time buyers and folks wanting to age in place, as everything is on one floor and there are no outdoor stairs,Re/Max listing agent Mike McLaughlin tells Axios. It's been on the market for three weeks and has had several showings, but no takers. What he's saying: So far, tourers seem "more interested in seeing a Lustron home than actually being in the market to purchase," McLaughlin says.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bluesky is backfiring. Mark Cuban says the ‘lack of diversity of thought' is actually pushing users back to X
Billionaire Mark Cuban, who has been an active Bluesky user and supporter for several months now, said this week he thinks the social media platform has gotten 'ruder and more hateful.' Its liberal-heavy user base makes it challenging to raise questions or have debates with other users, even if their political ideologies align, he said. After Elon Musk bought Twitter (now X) in late 2022, the vibes on the platform started changing, and many accounts that were verified lost their status. But the mass exodus from X came in late 2024 following the U.S. presidential election and Musk throwing his support—and millions—behind Donald Trump. By December 2024, the platform had lost about 2.7 million active Apple and Android users in just two months, with competitor Bluesky absorbing nearly all of those users. Colloquially, it became somewhat of a safe haven for liberal users who wanted to drown out the noise of President Trump's reelection. 'It's people wanting to just try something new. It's people finding their community here,' Bluesky CEO Jay Graber told Vox Media's Peter Kafta in a June 4 podcast. 'I think in general it's both people looking for something and people looking to get away from something.' Between November 2024 and this May, Bluesky grew from about 10 million users to 30 million, according to a Pew Research Center analysis. Many news influencers—people who regularly post about current events on the platform—lean left politically, according to the analysis. One such figure was billionaire Mark Cuban, who supported former Vice President Kamala Harris during her presidential run in 2024, although he didn't give her a penny for her campaign, he said. Cuban became a regular Bluesky user, having posted nearly 2,000 times since November 2024. When he first joined the platform, he famously posted: 'Hello Less Hateful World.' But Cuban has changed his tune. In a series of posts this week, Cuban argued Bluesky has become too much of an echo chamber, and is sending more users back to X. 'Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to agree with me or you are a nazi fascist,' Cuban wrote. 'We are forcing posts to X.' The former Shark Tank star and Dallas Mavericks owner also said he thinks Bluesky users have 'grown ruder and more hateful.' 'Even if you agree with 95% of what a person is saying on a topic, if there is one point that you might call out as being more of a grey area, they will call you a fascist etc.,' said Cuban, whose current net worth is about $8.33 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bluesky did not respond to Fortune's request for comment. Cuban also reposted a Washington Post opinion article published Sunday titled 'The Bluesky bubble hurts liberals and their causes.' Author Megan McArdle argued Bluesky's left-leaning user base segregates it into a political silo. Cuban agreed. 'The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage,' Cuban wrote in a separate Bluesky update including the Washington Post article. 'The moderation and block tools on here are so advanced, if you see someone you don't want to see on here, just block them. Don't attack them.' 'There used to be great give and take discussions on politics and news. Not so much any more,' Cuban added. 'Doesn't have to be this way.' This story was originally featured on