Weekly summer car shows rolled out in Geneva
Steve Aris of St. Charles has always had a love of vintage cars and dropped by the first car show in the series on Thursday.
'I have vintage cars including a '66 Corvette and a '69 Imperial and a '69 Mercury. Even though I'm from England, there was too much American TV when I was growing up,' Aris said Thursday evening in Geneva.
The shows, which organizers said can draw more than 200 cars, will run every Thursday from 5 to 8 p.m. through the end of August.
Johanna Patterson, communications director for the Geneva Chamber of Commerce, said the summer shows 'date back at least a decade' adding that 'it's a fun, informal way to share your classic cars.'
'There's live music, there's food provided for purchase and a chance to vote on your favorite classic car,' she said. 'This is very popular because of the laid-back atmosphere. You don't have to qualify to be in the show and it's just a casual way to share what you're working on with your car or what class of car you have. People will say, 'I used to have that car in high school or my buddy always worked on that car.' Again, it's just fun.'
Aris said the passion for cars 'was all about freedom.'
'It's that and design and the smells of them, but for me, I think cars today are just as interesting,' he said.
Aris' wife Tracy said she is also a car aficionado, saying that she 'had a '71 Volkswagen Karmann Ghia named Murphy.'
'I love cars because of the design and it's nostalgic and I like to hear the stories that are behind the cars and who has passion for them,' she said. 'There's a whole parking lot of people here who showed up early so there's others out there like me.'
Bryan Bransky of Geneva brought his own car – a 1969 SC Rambler – to the event that was painted red, white and blue.
'I've had that car for about four months but these are tough to get,' he said. 'Over the years, I've had more than 50 cars. We grew up in the business and our dad was a collector and it rubbed off on us. I like to buy and sell and do moderate restorations. You just see something that you got a little itch for and you sell something and replace it with something else.
'There's no cure for this disease. It's just too much fun,' Bransky said. 'When the weather turns nice and you can put the top down and roll down the windows and hear the rumble of the engine, it's just a cool driving experience.'
Tammie Jarka of Geneva said she is definitely a car enthusiast.
'I love to see cars that remind me of when I was a little girl,' she said. 'I remember when I was young my stepdad had a light-yellow GTO and then we had a turquoise Thunderbird, so I just look for things like that. Those are the cars I remember. They're nostalgic. They were so cool looking then. Today, they look all alike.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My husband and I left our stable income of over $200,000 and moved to Mexico. I've never had so much freedom over my life — it's a blessing.
Tired of chasing the American dream, Bianca Ramos and her husband moved to Mexico in 2024. They both earned six figures in the US, but since moving to Mexico they've downsized their life. Since the move, Ramos has more time to spend with her children and feels less stressed. This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with 36-year-old Bianca Ramos about moving from the US to Mexico. The following has been edited for length and clarity. My husband and I are both Mexican-American. In our culture, we were taught to put our heads down and work hard to make a name for ourselves. We both made six figures, so our household income was over $200,000, but I don't know if we were really happy. My father-in-law moved to America so my husband and his siblings could build a better life. When my husband and I got married in 2018, our aim was to keep pursuing the American dream by moving up the corporate ladder. But we were stressed and exhausted. It felt like no matter how hard we worked, it would never be enough to meet our American dream. In 2024, we moved our family to Mexico. We're earning less money and downsized our lifestyle, but I have more time with my kids and get to redefine what success means to me. It's been worth it. I started to struggle with the idea of the American dream In the US, I pursued a career in HR, focusing on inclusion and diversity. My husband worked in sales. Before kids, all I thought about was moving up the corporate ladder. I had a vision to be a VP of HR. We bought a four-bedroom house in Austin. He drove a Tundra, and I drove an Audi. A lot of our money was spent on paying the nanny for our two kids. I felt pressure to keep upgrading our lives: a bigger house, nicer cars, and more things, because that's what I thought success was. Every upgrade meant working harder and losing time with my kids. We initially struggled to have children. We finally had our son in 2021 and daughter in 2022. Having my son completely shifted my values. Time with my children felt more important than working in a corporate job to afford more stuff. We decided to leave the US Although I worked remotely in the US, back-to-back meetings made spending time with my kids difficult. Around the same time, I also started thinking more about my identity as a Mexican-American. We began to think moving to Mexico could help our kids understand more about their cultural identity. In 2022, my husband and I started talking about leaving America. We spent two years having long conversations about moving. We cut back on our finances, started saving, and got our documentation for moving to Mexico. We slowly sold our things, including both of our cars, and put our house up for rent. We both handed in our resignations and moved to Mexico in August 2024. Telling our families was difficult. My husband's family left Mexico to come here, so sitting them down and saying we were moving back was terrifying. We were afraid they'd feel like we were failing them. We've made sacrifices financially My husband, who dabbled in day trading before the move to Mexico, has decided to pursue it full-time. His pay is less predictable, but the flexible hours mean he can spend more time with us. When I resigned from my job, my company offered me the option to move to a part-time, remote role with them. Now, I have the flexibility to focus on my family while also pursuing content creation. My ultimate goal is to build an online community for people who want more freedom and balance in their lives. We make $2,400 from renting out our house in the States, but our professional incomes are less than they were in the US. Both of our businesses are in their infancy, but we have a big vision for our future. We don't consume just to consume anymore. In the States, I enjoyed interior design and filling my house with stuff, but in Mexico, my kids share a room and the decorations don't match like they used to. Having everything looking pristine is no longer important or financially realistic. While most things are less expensive in Mexico than in the States, branded shoes and clothing are more expensive here. We live in a two-bedroom condo in Playa del Carmen, which is smaller than our old home. We pay $1,300 a month for rent, which is less than our monthly mortgage payment. We live a 10-minute walk from the beach, and our kids love sharing a room. It's made me realize we never needed a big house to begin with. I'm redefining success outside the corporate ladder My life's taken a dramatic turn. I have more time to be present with my children because I'm not stressed and always checking my emails. I've never had so much freedom. I'm responsible for creating my own success and pursuing my business dreams. It's a blessing to be able to grab control of my life. In the US, work is always a part of your identity. When you meet new people, the first thing they'll ask is what you do. In Mexico, people work to live instead of living to work. When you meet people, they ask about your family or invite you for a drink. Walking away from my corporate dreams was one of the hardest things I've had to do. I worked so hard to get to where I was, and had more climbing to do. But I'm glad I'm betting on myself and redefining what the future looks like for me and my family. Do you have a story to share about leaving America? Contact this reporter at ccheong@ Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Is The King Of The Highway
I'm probably the wrong guy to test this $160,400 ride. When a vehicle weighs over 9,000 pounds and costs as much as two years' salary and change for the average working American, you need a king or a mogul or a fatcat to ride shotgun and give input. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Many mornings I would emerge from my house and walk around this giant, quick-as-hell (0-60 in a little over 4 seconds) Fort Knox-like machine and feel like an ant. Even Tony Soprano, a big guy who famously drove and escaped an assassination attempt in an Escalade, might take pause at the sheer size of the IQ. Last night, for example, I passed an older Escalade and marveled at how small it was. Let's take a closer look. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ is visually gargantuan, but it's deceptive. From a distance, it looks like a standard SUV, but up close, its elephantine proportions are truly apparent. The fastback roofline starts at the B-pillar, and the long dash-to-axle ratio gives it a sleek stance. Curiously, though, over a week's test, I didn't get one stare, one honk or one compliment. This is arguably GM's finest interior ever—excluding the upcoming $340K Celestiq. The cabin is, again, massive, refined and free of parts-bin plastics. A sweeping 55-inch curved screen spans from A-pillar to A-pillar up front. Material quality and design flourishes abound, from the 42 speaker grills to the Executive Rear Seat package with massaging second-row seats. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Thanks to the absence of a transmission tunnel, exhaust or fuel lines, the interior space feels open and unencumbered. Lousy day? Get in, boss. You'll feel fine pretty soon. There's no ignition. You just sit and belt up and you're ready to roll. Look left, look right. You're the biggest cat in the jungle, everywhere you roll. Tech and Sound System The 55-inch curved display offers 8K resolution for the driver and 4K for the passenger. It's matched by a class-leading 42-speaker AKG Studio Reference sound system that envelops the cabin in crystal-clear audio. Super Cruise hands-free driving comes standard and performed well in testing, though I probably did not give it its proper due because of traffic everywhere I drove - I simply didn't need it. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ With Arrival Mode for diagonal moves, Low Ride mode for dramatic exits, and air suspension paired with MagneRide dampers, the tech delivers real benefits, not gimmicks. It's a lot to know and a lot to get used to. Motor Dual motors produce a whopping 680 hp and 615 lb-ft of torque. Engage Velocity Max mode via the red V button and output jumps to 750 hp and 785 lb-ft. Power is fed by a 205-kWh usable battery pack that's one of the biggest, and is one reason the vehicle weighs so much. The result? A claimed 460 miles of range. Cadillac reports a peak charging rate of 352 kW, with 204 miles added in just 20 minutes. 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ The Drive At 9,134 pounds, the Escalade IQ is the heaviest passenger vehicle I've ever sat behind the wheel of. Even the Hummer H1 I had back in the 00s weighed a little over 7,000 pounds. But you'll never know it. In a straight line, it's quicker than the Escalade-V: 0–60 in 4.6 seconds versus 4.7. The ride is serene—Cadillac aimed for 'isolated precision'—and got it. With four-wheel steering and a sub-39-foot turning radius, it's surprisingly nimble. Braking distance is 133 feet from 60 mph—acceptable given the mass. Up and down the mountain terrain part of its test took place in, it hugged the road. You'll need to get used to the acceleration's abrupt flavor, but you'll also get off on calculating when and how much to back off your right foot when approaching stopped traffic to halt the vehicle. It's an art, and it's just part of the fun of driving the IQ. Room for improvement That mass remains the elephant in the room. It affects braking, energy use, and environmental impact. There's no way around it - you are one of the reasons some people loathe SUVs. No one can see around you. You hit something, that something is definitely going to feel it more than they would in a Rav4 or Honda Civic. With this giant machine comes giant responsibility. For long trips, it's a sweetheart. But when you've got to do several errands around town like the supermarket, the post office, the gym and Target, the sheer bulk gets tiresome. If you buy the IQ, you should also buy a scooter to do those things, and leave the big boy for long trips. The IQ's center console is the pinnacle of the 'kitchen sink' mentality of auto design, and if that's your jam, you'll have hours of pleasure finding out what each feature does. If you're the more burger and fries type of simpleton, like yours truly, you may find yourself a little irritated by some of its features, like making you go into the software and through two screens to open the glove compartment. Safety 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Though the Escalade IQ exceeds 10,000 pounds when you factor in a full load of passengers, cargo and fluids, which exempts it from some NHTSA testing, it includes advanced driver aids like automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring, and Super Cruise. Warranty Cadillac offers a limited warranty covering four years or 50,000 miles, and a powertrain warranty of six years or 70,000 miles. EV components get eight years or 100,000 miles. Cadillac also provides complimentary maintenance for the first visit. Conclusion: It took a few days to grow on me - or the other way around - but when I fell, I fell hard. If you've got the coin and the desire to be king of the road, this is a honey of an SUV.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
EPA moves to repeal finding that underpins current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants
President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday proposed revoking a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule rescinds a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the proposed rule change on a podcast ahead of an official announcement set for Tuesday in Indiana. Repealing the endangerment finding 'will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America,' Zeldin said on the Ruthless podcast. Zeldin called for a rewrite of the endangerment finding in March as part of a series of environmental rollbacks announced at the same time in what Zeldin said was 'the greatest day of deregulation in American history.'' A total of 31 key environmental rules on topics from clean air to clean water and climate change would be rolled back or repealed under Zeldin's plan. He singled out the endangerment finding as 'the Holy Grail of the climate change religion' and said he was thrilled to end it 'as the EPA does its part to usher in the Golden Age of American success.'' Tailpipe emission limits also targeted The EPA also called for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Three former EPA leaders have criticized Zeldin, saying his March proposal would endanger the lives of millions of Americans and abandon the agency's dual mission to protect the environment and human health. 'If there's an endangerment finding to be found anywhere, it should be found on this administration because what they're doing is so contrary to what the Environmental Protection Agency is about,' Christine Todd Whitman, who led EPA under Republican President George W. Bush, said after Zeldin's plan was made public. The EPA proposal follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. Conservatives and some congressional Republicans hailed the initial plan, calling it a way to undo economically damaging rules to regulate greenhouse gases. But environmental groups, legal experts and Democrats said any attempt to repeal or roll back the endangerment finding would be an uphill task with slim chance of success. The finding came two years after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling holding that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. A 'kill shot' to invalidate all climate regulations David Doniger, a climate expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, said it was virtually 'impossible to think that the EPA could develop a contradictory finding (to the 2009 standard) that would stand up in court.' Doniger and other critics accused Trump's Republican administration of using potential repeal of the endangerment finding as a 'kill shot'' that would allow him to make all climate regulations invalid. If finalized, repeal of the endangerment finding would erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could prevent future administrations from proposing rules to tackle climate change. 'The Endangerment Finding is the legal foundation that underpins vital protections for millions of people from the severe threats of climate change, and the Clean Car and Truck Standards are among the most important and effective protections to address the largest U.S. source of climate-causing pollution,'' said Peter Zalzal, associate vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund. 'Attacking these safeguards is manifestly inconsistent with EPA's responsibility to protect Americans' health and well-being,'' he said. 'It is callous, dangerous and a breach of our government's responsibility to protect the American people from this devastating pollution.'
