
Stocks slump, oil prices surge as Middle East erupts
Gold rose 1.4% to US$3,431 per ounce, nearing its April peak of US$3,500 as conflict boosted safe haven demand. (AP pic)
NEW YORK : World stock markets fell on Friday, and oil prices surged, as Israel launched military strikes on Iran, sparking inflows into safe havens such as gold and the dollar.
Early on Friday, US President Donald Trump urged Iran to make a deal over its nuclear programme – the primary target of the strikes – saying there was still time for the country to prevent further conflict with Israel. But later in the day, Iran fired missiles at Israel in response to the attacks; explosions were heard over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as sirens sounded on Friday night across the country.
Worries that the conflict could disrupt Middle Eastern oil and gas supplies pushed prices sharply higher. Global benchmark Brent crude futures settled 7% higher at US$74.23 a barrel, after earlier soaring over 13%, while US crude finished at US$72.98 a barrel, up 7.62%.
US natural gas climbed about 3% and European gas prices jumped over 5% to their highest intraday level in 10 weeks.
Gold, a safe haven in times of global uncertainty, rose 1.4% to US$3,431 per ounce, bringing it close to the record high of US$3,500.05 from April.
ADVERTISEMENT VIDCRUNCH
Next Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Quality
Auto
Back
360p
240p
144p
Auto
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
/
Skip
Ads by
The rush to safety was matched by a dash out of risk assets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.8%, the S&P 500 dropped 1.1%, and the Nasdaq Composite lost 1.3%. European shares dropped 0.9%, briefly hitting its lowest level in three weeks, and in Asia, major bourses in Japan, South Korea, and Hong Kong fell over 1% each.
An escalation in the Middle East – a major oil-producing region – adds uncertainty to financial markets at a time of heightened pressure on the global economy from President Trump's unpredictable trade policies.
'The re-emergence of major conflict in the Middle East should raise geopolitical stress, including sharply higher oil prices,' Sameer Samana, head of global equities and real assets at Wells Fargo Investment Institute, said in an email. Samana added, though, that the conflict should represent a buying opportunity for long-term investors, including in US large-cap stocks and commodities.
Investors will also keep close watch on planned protests across US cities on Saturday, amid heightened concerns following immigration raids in Los Angeles.
Two-way pull for bonds
US 10-year Treasury yields rose 5.6 basis points to 4.413%, as markets absorbed a sudden shock to commodity and stock prices, reversing some of the declines after four days mainly in the red.
'This is a flight-to-safety event. But markets are struggling a bit, and in the fixed income space you have an oil-price shock that is inflationary, and so you should see markets expecting an even more hawkish Fed,' said James Rossiter, head of global macro strategy at TD Securities.
'On the other hand, you have the flight to safety, which should push bond yields lower.'
Some traders were attracted to the dollar as a haven, with the dollar index up about 0.5% to 98.16, retracing most of Thursday's sizeable decline.
The Swiss franc briefly touched its strongest level against the dollar since April 21, before trading 0.1% lower at around 0.811 per dollar.
Another safe haven, the Japanese yen, fell 0.34% to about 144 per dollar, giving up earlier gains of 0.3%.
The euro was down 0.3% at US$1.15, after rising on Thursday to the highest since October 2021.
'Clearly if the conflict in the Middle East is short term in nature, the weakness in USD will likely continue,' Arun Bharath, chief investment officer at Bel Air Investment Advisors, said in an email. If not, he added, the fundamental factors that suggest further weakness for the dollar might be offset by a geopolitical premium for it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Baghdad asks Iran to avoid strikes on US targets in Iraq: Official
BAGHDAD: Baghdad has asked Tehran not to target US interests on Iraqi soil, a senior security official said Saturday, as Washington's ally Israel and Iran traded blows, heightening tensions across the region. The government in Baghdad is a close ally of Tehran but also a strategic partner of Iran's arch-foe the US, which has some 2,500 troops in Iraq as part of an anti-jihadist coalition. Fearing being caught up in a regional escalation, the Iraqi government asked Tehran not to strike in its territory, a senior Iraqi security official told AFP. "The request was made. They promised us positive things," said the official, requesting anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. The official added that Tehran has shown understanding with regards to Baghdad's request. Before the current escalation, which began early Friday, June 13, 2025, with a series of Israeli attacks on military and nuclear sites in Iran, Tehran had threatened to strike military bases hosting US forces in the region in the event of a conflict triggered by the possible failure of nuclear talks with Washington. Throughout the Gaza war, which began in October 2023 and has pitted Israel against Iran-backed Palestinian group Hamas, Tehran-aligned armed factions have launched dozens of rocket and drone attacks targeting US forces in Iraq and in neighbouring Syria. Before the wave of attacks began, the US on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, announced it was reducing staffing at its Baghdad embassy, citing security reasons. Several pro-Iran groups in Iraq called on Friday, June 13, 2025, to accelerate the departure of US forces from the country, with the powerful Kataeb Hezbollah warning of "additional wars in the region." — AFP

Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Israel's Iran strikes hint at bigger goal: Regime change
JERUSALEM, June 14 — Israel's surprise attack on Iran had an obvious goal of sharply disrupting Tehran's nuclear programme and lengthening the time it would need to develop an atomic weapon. But the scale of the attacks, Israel's choice of targets, and its politicians' own words suggest another, longer-term objective: toppling the regime itself. The strikes early on Friday hit not just Iran's nuclear facilities and missile factories but also key figures in the country's military chain of command and its nuclear scientists, blows that appear aimed at diminishing Iran's credibility both at home and among its allies in the region — factors that could destabilise the Iranian leadership, experts said. 'One assumes that one of the reasons that Israel is doing that is that they're hoping to see regime change,' said Michael Singh of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former senior official under President George W. Bush. 'It would like to see the people of Iran rise up,' he said, adding that the limited civilian casualties in the initial round of attacks also spoke to a broader aim. In a video address shortly after Israeli fighter jets began striking Iranian nuclear facilities and air defence systems, Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, appealed to the Iranian people directly. Israel's actions against Iran's ally Hezbollah had led to a new government in Lebanon and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, he said. The Iranian people had an opportunity too: 'I believe that the day of your liberation is near. And when that happens, the great friendship between our two ancient peoples will flourish once again,' said Netanyahu. But despite the damage inflicted by the unprecedented Israeli attack, decades of enmity toward Israel — not only among Iran's rulers but its majority-Shi'ite population — raises questions about the prospect for fomenting enough public support to oust an entrenched theocratic leadership in Tehran backed by loyal security forces. Singh cautioned that no one knows what conditions would be required for an opposition to coalesce in Iran. Friday's assault was the first phase of what Israel said would be a prolonged operation. Experts said they expected Israel would continue to go after key Iranian nuclear infrastructure to delay Tehran's march to a nuclear bomb — even if Israel on its own does not have the capability to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme. Iran says its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that it was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty. Israel's first salvoes targeted senior figures in Iran's military and scientific establishment, took out much of the country's air defence system and destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Iran's nuclear site. 'As a democratic country, the State of Israel believes that it is up to the people of a country to shape their national politics, and choose their government,' the Israeli embassy in Washington told Reuters. 'The future of Iran can only be determined by the Iranian people.' Netanyahu has called for a change in Iran's government, including in September. US President Donald Trump's administration, while acquiescing to Israel's strikes and helping its close ally fend off Iran's retaliatory missile barrage, has given no indication that it seeks regime change in Tehran. The White House and Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the matter. Ending nuclear programme beyond reach, for now Israel has much further to go if it is to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, and military analysts have always said it might be impossible to totally disable the well-fortified sites dotted around Iran. The Israeli government has also cautioned that Iran's nuclear programme could not be entirely destroyed by means of a military campaign. 'There's no way to destroy a nuclear programme by military means,' Israel's National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi told Israel's Channel 13 TV. The military campaign could, however, create conditions for a deal with the United States that would thwart the nuclear programme. Analysts also remain sceptical that Israel will have the munitions needed to obliterate Iran's nuclear project on its own. 'Israel probably cannot take out completely the nuclear project on its own without the American participation,' Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, told reporters on Friday. While setting back Tehran's nuclear programme would have value for Israel, the hope for regime change could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, potentially throwing the Iranian security establishment into confusion and chaos. 'These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime,' said Shine. 'In the ideal world, Israel would prefer to see a change of regime, no question about that,' she said. But such a change would come with risk, said Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East who is now at the Atlantic Council. If Israel succeeds in removing Iran's leadership, there is no guarantee the successor that emerges would not be even more hardline in pursuit of conflict with Israel. 'For years, many in Israel have insisted that regime change in Iran would prompt a new and better day - that nothing could be worse than the current theocratic regime,' Panikoff said. 'But history tells us it can always be worse.' — Reuters


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump seems to reverse course on Chinese students in US, saying he supports them
US President Donald Trump reiterated his support for Chinese students in America on Thursday and pledged to help them remain in the country after graduation, distancing himself from initiatives that his administration has announced to limit or block international students because of national security concerns. 'I've always been strongly in favour of it. I think it's a great thing,' Trump said on Thursday, referring to Chinese nationals seeking to study in the US. 'It's also good for our schools. It's good for our country.' Trump added that he was in favour of 'letting them stay' and being hired by American companies. 'I'm all for making sure that people like that can go to work for all of our great companies,' he said. If not allowed to remain in the US, he noted, such graduates and entrepreneurs would return to their countries and starting their businesses there. 'This is happening all the time because they're not allowed to stay, and I think we'll probably end up doing something about that, right?' he added. Last month, the Trump administration ordered US embassies worldwide to halt scheduling new student visa interviews, including in China, as part of a broader plan to expand social media vetting for visa applications. Secretary of State Marco Rubio then announced plans to 'aggressively revoke' visas for Chinese students, particularly those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or studying in 'critical fields'. The policy specifically targeted students from mainland China and Hong Kong. Trump has promoted student visas as a pivotal factor in a much-anticipated trade deal that he has said is 'done' once Chinese President Xi Jinping approves it. Intensifying the review of Chinese student visa applicants has been part of a broader Trump crackdown on US academia's links with China, a campaign that dates back to his first term, when policymakers began raising alarms about whether these educational contacts were giving Beijing a technological edge. But Trump's latest comments appear to flip the narrative into one suggesting that Chinese students are needed for US technological progress. According to the US State Department, 277,398 Chinese students attended US schools during the 2023–2024 school year, a four per cent decrease from the previous year. Additionally, India overtook China as the top source of international students in the US, with 331,602 students – an increase of 23 per cent year-over-year. Chinese students had been the largest foreign student group in the US since the 2009–2010 school year, but their numbers have steadily declined since 2019–2020. While his remarks implied that Trump was now open to cooperation, many in Congress remain sceptical of Beijing's intentions. Earlier on Thursday, during a congressional hearing, US lawmakers accused China of stealing advanced semiconductor technology and exploiting relationships with American universities, as well as loopholes in export controls, to strengthen its military capabilities. Beijing is 'trying to dominate these critical technologies by any means necessary – through state subsidies, forced tech transfers, economic espionage, chip smuggling, and exploiting access to the West's most innovative AI labs and universities', Representative Bill Huizenga, a Michigan Republican who chairs a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on South and Central Asia, contended. The hearing was held to review the proposed 2026 budget for the Bureau of Industry and Security, the Commerce Department agency that enforces export controls. The budget calls for a 133 per cent increase in enforcement funding, after BIS saw about a third of its staff cut by Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency'. Defending the budget request, Jeffrey Kessler, the department's undersecretary for industry and security, insisted that additional resources were essential to improve enforcement. 'We could do a lot more with the additional resources that we're requesting ... I'm concerned that many instances of wrongdoing go undetected, and that's what the budget request is about,' Kessler said. During his testimony, Kessler warned against underestimating China's ambitions. 'China is investing huge amounts to increase its AI chip production, as well as the capabilities of the chips that it produces. 'So it's critical for us not to have a false sense of security, to understand that China is catching up quickly,' Kessler said. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST