
Controversial 'robot trees' removed from Cork City centre
The so-called 'robot trees' installed in Cork City centre nearly four years ago to help clean pollutants from the air have been removed.
The five devices, which were erected in August 2021 as part of a local authority initiative to provide more greening of the city, were removed from their locations on St Patrick's Street and the Grand Parade early on Sunday morning.
The hexagonal platforms on which they stood remain in place.
The trees, which were created by a German biotech firm called Green City Solutions, had cost taxpayers around €350,000. Their cost was covered as part of a €4m funding allocation from the National Transport Authority (NTA) to Cork City Council.
Designed to filter the air and absorb the toxic pollutant called particulate matter from the air via moss filters, the trees came equipped with in-built sensors used to collate air quality data for analysis.
PM2.5, known as particulate matter, is all solid and liquid particles suspended in air, such as dust, pollen, soot, smoke, and liquid droplets. They also contained 40-inch TV screens used to disseminate information about air quality in Cork City.
In recent months, the trees had begun to show signs of wear and tear.
The council spokesperson said that the existing seating around where the trees stood "will remain and additional planting will be undertaken in both locations". File Picture: Larry Cummins
The devices have been a source of controversy since their installation.
The same month they were erected, Dean Venables, a researcher at the Centre for Research into Atmospheric Chemistry at University College Cork, labelled them 'a costly and ineffectual gimmick'.
In September 2023, UCC emeritus professor of chemistry, John Sodeau, also criticised the robot trees, saying they were waste of funds.
'If I had been asked about the city trees, I would have said 'don't bother'," he said at the time.
Prof Sodeau also said that, pending the outcome of a data analysis of the robot trees' effectiveness, he believed the planting of hedging along the street would have been more effective at removing particulates from the air, and it would be better to tackle the root cause of air pollution, rather than trying to clean the air.
"I have looked at these devices in other cities and couldn't see how they could do what they said on the tin, so to speak," he said.
In November 2023, Cork City council published a report on the data collected from the robot trees which summarised the findings of two studies on their effectiveness. The data was inconclusive.
Asked why exactly they were removed, a spokesperson for Cork City Council told the Irish Examiner: "The 'City Trees' on St Patrick's Street and Grand Parade are being removed this weekend".
The council spokesperson said that the existing seating around where the trees stood "will remain and additional planting will be undertaken in both locations".
"Cork City Council will be partnering with the UCC/MTU Joint Cork Centre for Architectural Education (CCAE) to explore a re-purposing of the structures," they added.
Read More
Cork City designated special EU status to unlock major funding to achieve climate neutrality by 2030
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
14 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
How Cork City Council can move on from its robotrees fiasco
There has been a lot of misinformation and misconception thrown into the public domain recently regarding the 'death of the robotrees'. It's time to put the record straight. But where to begin? The very best way to get clean air in St Patrick's Street in Cork is to remove the sources of the pollutants. In other words, prevent all road transport driving along there. To start with, you need to ban all combustion engines… then later all vehicles, because tyre wear also releases the small particles that can kill us or put us into hospital. Cleaning up polluted air is, very much, a second-best strategy. My own way of thinking about this process is to imagine brewing a cup of tea. And then adding a drop of milk. Then trying to take all the milk out. Impossible. In other words, don't add the milk in the first place! Real trees, bedding plants, and 'CityTrees' on St Patrick's Street in Cork. Prof John Sodeau recommends none of the above as filters for toxic particles released by exhausts and tyres, saying chest-high hedging would be relatively effective — with the caveat that any level of particulates above zero can harm our health. Picture: Larry Cummins Air cleaning devices like the robo trees (also known as CityTrees or moss walls) were therefore unlikely to prove very effective in removing the small toxic particulates and nitrogen oxides released from road transport to the air. Starting in 2018, CityTrees were tested in Amsterdam. By 2019, they had been removed because they proved useless. Many other European cities had the same experience. There is even a Wikipedia page devoted to the history of CityTrees. Now we know the end result is just the same for Cork. The question is — why did Cork City Council undertake such an 'experiment' starting in 2021, given that the approach was not innovative or novel, and studies had already been published to show the devices were a total failure when located in the real world? Of course it's good and forward-thinking to try new things and experiment to improve our environment. But not if you know the approach is unoriginal and furthermore does not work. Whatever the council's initial motivations, there was absolutely no need to throw money down the drain over the last four years for running costs. Two of the City Trees, generally referred to as 'robotrees', on Grand Parade in Cork. They were intended to filter harmful pollutants out of the air. Picture: Larry Cummins The irony is that Cork houses the leading laboratory in air pollution chemistry in Ireland at UCC. Why did they not contact them — especially as the council apparatchiks involved in writing the National Transport Authority proposal had no appropriate scientific background in air science? If they had phoned me, then I think I could have come up with a better way of achieving their clean-up aims in a couple of hours. My answer would have been focussed on hedging the streets; not planting trees as has recently been suggested. That is because trees are not effective in removing small toxic particles and nitrogen oxides from road traffic emissions. Their main function in the urban environment is to remove the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, and to beautify the surroundings. Hedges could help Nature can still be the answer, but in the form of chest-high hedges. These act as a physical barrier to the small, toxic particles released by exhausts and tyres from reaching pedestrians. Such a height is particularly effective for protecting small children and babies in prams, who are especially vulnerable. Although it should be noted that any amount of small particulates above zero can harm our health. So, no matter how low the levels in Cork City are, they can still kill or give us cardio problems, promote asthma attacks, or cause cancer. Cork City Council officials and then lord mayor Colm Kelleher speaking to media at the cluster of City Trees on St Patrick's Street in August 2021. Picture: Larry Cummins Sadly, for whatever reasons, council representatives and employees have kept on defending the robotrees rather than owning the mistake. But things can be made good, in my opinion. Firstly, the council should make an apology to the tax-paying public for wasting money on a device that was known to not work. Then they must learn the lesson of always consulting scientific experts on matters arising outside internal expertise. Then for the public to forgive. Air pollution science is complicated. The CityTrees were badly named: They were never designed to do what real trees do for our atmosphere and our climate. But we should still keep planting trees. The ultimate answer to help improve air quality in the city is simple. Ban all road transport driving along St Patrick's Street. Instead, run communal electric trolley buses like they do in Geneva. Or build a Luas, as in Dublin. Finally, local authorities should lead and innovate by all means possible, but additionally use proven approaches to meet the complex environmental challenges we face today. • John Sodeau is emeritus professor of chemistry at UCC


Irish Examiner
18-05-2025
- Irish Examiner
Controversial 'robot trees' removed from Cork City centre
The so-called 'robot trees' installed in Cork City centre nearly four years ago to help clean pollutants from the air have been removed. The five devices, which were erected in August 2021 as part of a local authority initiative to provide more greening of the city, were removed from their locations on St Patrick's Street and the Grand Parade early on Sunday morning. The hexagonal platforms on which they stood remain in place. The trees, which were created by a German biotech firm called Green City Solutions, had cost taxpayers around €350,000. Their cost was covered as part of a €4m funding allocation from the National Transport Authority (NTA) to Cork City Council. Designed to filter the air and absorb the toxic pollutant called particulate matter from the air via moss filters, the trees came equipped with in-built sensors used to collate air quality data for analysis. PM2.5, known as particulate matter, is all solid and liquid particles suspended in air, such as dust, pollen, soot, smoke, and liquid droplets. They also contained 40-inch TV screens used to disseminate information about air quality in Cork City. In recent months, the trees had begun to show signs of wear and tear. The council spokesperson said that the existing seating around where the trees stood "will remain and additional planting will be undertaken in both locations". File Picture: Larry Cummins The devices have been a source of controversy since their installation. The same month they were erected, Dean Venables, a researcher at the Centre for Research into Atmospheric Chemistry at University College Cork, labelled them 'a costly and ineffectual gimmick'. In September 2023, UCC emeritus professor of chemistry, John Sodeau, also criticised the robot trees, saying they were waste of funds. 'If I had been asked about the city trees, I would have said 'don't bother'," he said at the time. Prof Sodeau also said that, pending the outcome of a data analysis of the robot trees' effectiveness, he believed the planting of hedging along the street would have been more effective at removing particulates from the air, and it would be better to tackle the root cause of air pollution, rather than trying to clean the air. "I have looked at these devices in other cities and couldn't see how they could do what they said on the tin, so to speak," he said. In November 2023, Cork City council published a report on the data collected from the robot trees which summarised the findings of two studies on their effectiveness. The data was inconclusive. Asked why exactly they were removed, a spokesperson for Cork City Council told the Irish Examiner: "The 'City Trees' on St Patrick's Street and Grand Parade are being removed this weekend". The council spokesperson said that the existing seating around where the trees stood "will remain and additional planting will be undertaken in both locations". "Cork City Council will be partnering with the UCC/MTU Joint Cork Centre for Architectural Education (CCAE) to explore a re-purposing of the structures," they added. Read More Cork City designated special EU status to unlock major funding to achieve climate neutrality by 2030


Irish Daily Mirror
10-05-2025
- Irish Daily Mirror
Soviet spacecraft crashes to Earth after Ireland listed in 'danger zone'
A Soviet-era spacecraft plunged to Earth on Saturday, more than half a century after its failed launch to Venus. The European Union Space Surveillance and Tracking confirmed Kosmos 482's uncontrolled re-entry, based on analysis and no-shows of the spacecraft on subsequent orbits. The European Space Agency's space debris office also indicated that the spacecraft had re-entered after it failed to appear over a German radar station. It was not immediately known where the spacecraft came in or how much, if any, of the half-tonne spacecraft survived the fiery descent from orbit. Experts said ahead of time that some if not all of the object might come crashing down, given it was built to withstand a landing on Venus, the solar system's hottest planet. The chances of anyone getting clobbered by spacecraft debris were exceedingly low, scientists said. Maps released by the EU Space Surveillance and Tracking listed Ireland as one of the potential 'danger zones'. Launched in 1972 by the former Soviet Union, the spacecraft known as Kosmos 482 was part of a series of missions bound for Venus. But this one never made it out of orbit around Earth, stranded there by a rocket malfunction. Much of the spacecraft came tumbling back to Earth within a decade of the failed launch. No longer able to resist gravity's tug as its orbit dwindled, the spherical lander – an estimated 3ft across – was the last part of the spacecraft to come down. The lander was encased in titanium, according to experts, and weighed more than 1,000lbs (495kg). After following the spacecraft's downward spiral, scientists, military experts and others could not pinpoint in advance precisely when or where the spacecraft might come down. Solar activity added to the uncertainty as well as the spacecraft's deteriorating condition after so long in space. As of Saturday morning, the US Space Command had yet to confirm the spacecraft's demise as it collected and analysed data from orbit. The US Space Command routinely monitors dozens of re-entries each month. What set Kosmos 482 apart — and earned it extra attention from government and private space trackers – was that it was more likely to survive re-entry, according to officials. It was also coming in uncontrolled, without any intervention by flight controllers who normally target the Pacific and other vast expanses of water for old satellites and other space debris.