Former treasury boss looking past logging to expanded carbon credit scheme
The former Treasury Department boss grew up on the Mid North Coast, where his father logged native forests as a worker in the timber industry.
"On the weekends I would go out with my father and my brothers to places where he worked as a contractor," Dr Henry said.
"We would talk to him about what he was doing and why he was doing it.
"I've had this interest in the condition of the natural environment since I was a kid."
Dr Henry says he is now focused on the environment full-time after leaving the public service.
(
ABC News: Jack Ailwood
)
That nature-loving child would go on to become one of Australia's most prominent economists, serving as treasury secretary during the years of the Rudd and Howard governments.
Photo shows
A graphic showing a range of reader comments about potential issues in Australia's 2025 federal election.
What do you need to know before you vote in the upcoming federal election? What would you ask the candidates? Have Your Say.
But his passion for the environment never faded.
During his decade-long Canberra career, he would rescue injured animals and nurse them back to health on his family's property outside the capital.
Nearly 15 years after leaving the public service, he is now focused on the environment full-time.
A new effort to keep carbon in forests
As chairman of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation, the architect of the 'Henry Tax Review' is now pursuing another ambitious plan aimed at protecting native forests from logging.
"We have been developing a carbon method that would pay the managers of these forests to store carbon in the forests," he said.
"
It sounds like I'm saying money grows on trees — and in a way, I am.
"
The plan aims to keep carbon stored in living trees, with the concept proposed to the Commonwealth by the NSW government.
(
ABC News: Jack Ailwood
)
The NSW government further developed the concept and proposed it to the Commonwealth.
Under the proposal, state forests would be added to the nation's existing carbon credit scheme, which allows businesses or individuals to earn credits through projects that reduce or avoid emissions, such as reforestation.
The state government agencies that manage the forests could then earn carbon credits by slowing or stopping logging.
Big industrial polluters could then buy those credits to offset their emissions as the nation moves towards its goal of reaching net zero by 2050.
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
Modelling commissioned by the climate group found about 1,700 full-time jobs could be created in NSW if the money was reinvested in forest management and bushfire mitigation.
"We estimate over the next 15 years that would generate revenue of around $100 million a year," Dr Henry said.
The plan has been criticised by the timber industry and the federal opposition.
(
ABC News: Jack Ailwood
)
Timber industry has grave concerns
Last year, Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen confirmed the proposed carbon credit method was one of four selected for priority development by experts from the environment department.
The plan has been criticised by the timber industry and the federal opposition.
The Australian Forest Products Association (AFPA) argues the proposal would lead to mass job losses — claiming there are 8,900 hardwood workers in NSW alone.
AFPA CEO Diana Hallam told the ABC the sector provided valuable products to the housing industry — such as decking and flooring.
She argued Australia would be forced to import more wood if the logging of native forests slowed or stopped, claiming plantation timber was much lower quality than native hardwood and therefore not an adequate substitute.
"Where is that timber going to come from?" she said.
"We have some of the most stringent environmental standards in the world here when we harvest our forests."
The Australian Forest Products Association argues the proposal would lead to mass job losses.
(
ABC News: Jack Ailwood
)
'Not founded on the best science'
Shadow Environment Minister Jonno Duniam described the proposed method as a "backdoor way for Labor to shut down our world-leading, sustainable native forest harvesting industry".
"The method may sound good to some, but, in reality, it is not founded on the best science and evidence," he said in a statement to ABC News.
Western Australia and Victoria banned the logging of native forests last year, but the operations are ongoing in NSW, Queensland and Tasmania.
The NSW government pledged $80 million to establish a Great Koala National Park.
(
ABC News: Donal Sheil
)
The NSW Forestry Corporation manages about 2 million hectares of state forest and logs around 1 per cent each year, according to its website.
The NSW government has indicated — if the proposed method is approved — it will consider using it to earn credits for the Great Koala National Park, which it has vowed to create on the state's Mid North Coast.
Tasmania's Resources Minister Eric Abetz has previously confirmed the state would not support the proposal.
Loading
Having trouble seeing this form? Try

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Albanese wants childcare to be his legacy but the problem is bigger than access
It was during the election campaign, at the ABC's leaders' debate, that Anthony Albanese declared the political achievement he'd most like to be remembered for: "the universal provision of affordable childcare." For parents facing the frustration of trying to find a childcare place and the money to pay for it, elevating this issue to the stuff of prime ministerial legacy-building was no doubt welcome. A sign of Labor's seriousness. Albanese described his vision for a world in which "it is as natural to have your child have access to childcare as it is to have access to a public school". But this was also a limited goal. The focus on improving access is only one part of the problem when it comes to childcare, as the government has discovered. Improving safety and quality standards has now become an even bigger immediate concern. The ABC's Adele Ferguson has been exposing systemic failures in childcare standards for months, but it was the case revealed three weeks ago involving shocking allegations of abuse by a childcare worker in Victoria that finally spurred state and federal governments into urgent action. In the first Question Time of the new parliament yesterday, there was a concerted show of bipartisanship to lift standards. One of the first bills introduced aims to strengthen powers to carry out spot checks and strip funding if centres aren't meeting minimum standards. Further steps will be taken next month when the Commonwealth, states and territories meet to discuss a national register of childcare workers, mandatory child safety training, and the roll-out of CCTV cameras. Details are still to be thrashed out, but there's now widespread acceptance the system is broken, regulation has been too loose, and a range of steps must be taken. Spot checks, funding threats, and greater transparency around the work history of staff will all help. But will it be enough to fix a sector that's evolved (or devolved) into a confusing mess of not-for-profit and stock-exchange-listed operators, regulated by different state and federal bodies, and largely funded by taxpayer-funded subsidies? "They will likely have a positive short-term impact on safety and quality, but they won't address the deeper, systemic problems that got us to this point," says Andrew Hudson, CEO of public policy think tank the Centre for Policy Development, which was chaired by Sam Mostyn until her appointment as governor-general last year. Hudson gives the government credit for its efforts to guarantee families three days of subsidised care, improve the pay of childcare workers, and provide $1 billion to expand services where they're needed. But ultimately, he says, the government must "stop treating early learning as a market — and start building it as a universal public service". That means "directly funding providers" rather than relying on subsidies to parents that "inflate costs without improving outcomes". It means "stepping in to establish public or not-for-profit options in communities where access is limited". The idea is not to completely ban on private operators. Rather, it's about the government playing a much more direct role in funding low-fee, high-quality providers. But the think tank isn't the only one identifying the profit motive as a problem in childcare. The government's own newly appointed Minister for Early Education Jess Walsh agrees, at least in part. "There are some repeat offenders who continue to put profit ahead of child safety," the minister said yesterday. Indeed, Walsh has repeatedly made this point since taking the portfolio. She is acknowledging the profit motive is, in some cases, putting child safety at risk. Education Minister Jason Clare, who's responsible for childcare at the cabinet level, says "overwhelmingly higher levels" of quality are found in the not-for-profit sector. But he's not yet flagged any move to push profit makers out of the industry. More than 90 per cent of the centres opened over the past decade are run by providers trying to make a profit, chasing taxpayer funds now worth $16 billion every year. This is what makes the childcare sector nothing like the public school system. The prime minister wants improving access to childcare to be his legacy. Andrew Hudson from the Centre for Policy Development reckons he could be far more ambitious. "This is the moment to transform early learning from a patchy, profit-driven market into a universal system — one that delivers affordable, high-quality care for every child, in every community". David Speers is national political lead and host of Insiders, which airs on ABC TV at 9am on Sunday or on iview.


The Advertiser
2 days ago
- The Advertiser
'Big weapon' wielded to strengthen childcare safety
Childcare centres that fail to meet standards could soon be stripped of their funding under reforms fast-tracked in response to horrifying abuse allegations. The changes were introduced to the House of Representatives on the first day of parliamentary business since the May election. They follow widespread calls for change after a Victorian childcare worker was charged with dozens of sex offences involving children. State regulators can already shut a centre on the spot if there is an imminent threat to safety. But Education Minister Jason Clare said the Commonwealth could also try to lift standards through its available levers. "We have to do everything that we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk or when they're carried through the doors of an early education and care service," he told parliament on Wednesday. "Funding is the big weapon that the Australian government has to wield here. "The real purpose of this legislation isn't to shut centres down, but to raise standards." Any childcare operators that fail to meet quality, safety and compliance standards could be prevented from opening new centres and might be cut off from receiving government subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees. Providers would be issued with a formal notice requiring an explanation within 28 days with the Department of Education able to cancel or suspend an operator's approval. "Providers that can improve their services to meet the standard will get the chance to do that," Mr Clare said. "Services that don't or can't or won't will lose their access to funding." The bill also expands commonwealth powers to publish information about providers that are sanctioned for non-compliance. State, territory and federal ministers are expected to meet in August to discuss other changes, including mandatory CCTV in childcare centres, establishing a national worker registry and mandatory child-safety training. Information on centres for which childcare subsidy approvals have been suspended or cancelled can already be viewed on the department's website. But the legislation would also allow for information to be made public when compliance action is taken against providers, like when an infringement notice is issued. Commonwealth-authorised officers would also be given more powers to do their jobs through the ability to enter premises without consent during operating hours to detect non-compliance across the sector. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the coalition would need to examine the legislation closely. "I wanted this issue to be above politics, as somebody who's dropped my own children off at child care and now sees my children dropping their children at child care," she told ABC News. "I'm incredibly concerned, so I do want to be constructive, but that being constructive doesn't mean giving the government a blank cheque when it comes to goodwill on this issue." Mr Clare said parents were "not interested in excuses, they expect action". There were still issues with sharing information on working-with-children checks between jurisdictions, he added, and more work would be done at an upcoming meeting of state and federal attorneys-general. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Childcare centres that fail to meet standards could soon be stripped of their funding under reforms fast-tracked in response to horrifying abuse allegations. The changes were introduced to the House of Representatives on the first day of parliamentary business since the May election. They follow widespread calls for change after a Victorian childcare worker was charged with dozens of sex offences involving children. State regulators can already shut a centre on the spot if there is an imminent threat to safety. But Education Minister Jason Clare said the Commonwealth could also try to lift standards through its available levers. "We have to do everything that we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk or when they're carried through the doors of an early education and care service," he told parliament on Wednesday. "Funding is the big weapon that the Australian government has to wield here. "The real purpose of this legislation isn't to shut centres down, but to raise standards." Any childcare operators that fail to meet quality, safety and compliance standards could be prevented from opening new centres and might be cut off from receiving government subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees. Providers would be issued with a formal notice requiring an explanation within 28 days with the Department of Education able to cancel or suspend an operator's approval. "Providers that can improve their services to meet the standard will get the chance to do that," Mr Clare said. "Services that don't or can't or won't will lose their access to funding." The bill also expands commonwealth powers to publish information about providers that are sanctioned for non-compliance. State, territory and federal ministers are expected to meet in August to discuss other changes, including mandatory CCTV in childcare centres, establishing a national worker registry and mandatory child-safety training. Information on centres for which childcare subsidy approvals have been suspended or cancelled can already be viewed on the department's website. But the legislation would also allow for information to be made public when compliance action is taken against providers, like when an infringement notice is issued. Commonwealth-authorised officers would also be given more powers to do their jobs through the ability to enter premises without consent during operating hours to detect non-compliance across the sector. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the coalition would need to examine the legislation closely. "I wanted this issue to be above politics, as somebody who's dropped my own children off at child care and now sees my children dropping their children at child care," she told ABC News. "I'm incredibly concerned, so I do want to be constructive, but that being constructive doesn't mean giving the government a blank cheque when it comes to goodwill on this issue." Mr Clare said parents were "not interested in excuses, they expect action". There were still issues with sharing information on working-with-children checks between jurisdictions, he added, and more work would be done at an upcoming meeting of state and federal attorneys-general. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Childcare centres that fail to meet standards could soon be stripped of their funding under reforms fast-tracked in response to horrifying abuse allegations. The changes were introduced to the House of Representatives on the first day of parliamentary business since the May election. They follow widespread calls for change after a Victorian childcare worker was charged with dozens of sex offences involving children. State regulators can already shut a centre on the spot if there is an imminent threat to safety. But Education Minister Jason Clare said the Commonwealth could also try to lift standards through its available levers. "We have to do everything that we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk or when they're carried through the doors of an early education and care service," he told parliament on Wednesday. "Funding is the big weapon that the Australian government has to wield here. "The real purpose of this legislation isn't to shut centres down, but to raise standards." Any childcare operators that fail to meet quality, safety and compliance standards could be prevented from opening new centres and might be cut off from receiving government subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees. Providers would be issued with a formal notice requiring an explanation within 28 days with the Department of Education able to cancel or suspend an operator's approval. "Providers that can improve their services to meet the standard will get the chance to do that," Mr Clare said. "Services that don't or can't or won't will lose their access to funding." The bill also expands commonwealth powers to publish information about providers that are sanctioned for non-compliance. State, territory and federal ministers are expected to meet in August to discuss other changes, including mandatory CCTV in childcare centres, establishing a national worker registry and mandatory child-safety training. Information on centres for which childcare subsidy approvals have been suspended or cancelled can already be viewed on the department's website. But the legislation would also allow for information to be made public when compliance action is taken against providers, like when an infringement notice is issued. Commonwealth-authorised officers would also be given more powers to do their jobs through the ability to enter premises without consent during operating hours to detect non-compliance across the sector. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the coalition would need to examine the legislation closely. "I wanted this issue to be above politics, as somebody who's dropped my own children off at child care and now sees my children dropping their children at child care," she told ABC News. "I'm incredibly concerned, so I do want to be constructive, but that being constructive doesn't mean giving the government a blank cheque when it comes to goodwill on this issue." Mr Clare said parents were "not interested in excuses, they expect action". There were still issues with sharing information on working-with-children checks between jurisdictions, he added, and more work would be done at an upcoming meeting of state and federal attorneys-general. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Childcare centres that fail to meet standards could soon be stripped of their funding under reforms fast-tracked in response to horrifying abuse allegations. The changes were introduced to the House of Representatives on the first day of parliamentary business since the May election. They follow widespread calls for change after a Victorian childcare worker was charged with dozens of sex offences involving children. State regulators can already shut a centre on the spot if there is an imminent threat to safety. But Education Minister Jason Clare said the Commonwealth could also try to lift standards through its available levers. "We have to do everything that we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk or when they're carried through the doors of an early education and care service," he told parliament on Wednesday. "Funding is the big weapon that the Australian government has to wield here. "The real purpose of this legislation isn't to shut centres down, but to raise standards." Any childcare operators that fail to meet quality, safety and compliance standards could be prevented from opening new centres and might be cut off from receiving government subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees. Providers would be issued with a formal notice requiring an explanation within 28 days with the Department of Education able to cancel or suspend an operator's approval. "Providers that can improve their services to meet the standard will get the chance to do that," Mr Clare said. "Services that don't or can't or won't will lose their access to funding." The bill also expands commonwealth powers to publish information about providers that are sanctioned for non-compliance. State, territory and federal ministers are expected to meet in August to discuss other changes, including mandatory CCTV in childcare centres, establishing a national worker registry and mandatory child-safety training. Information on centres for which childcare subsidy approvals have been suspended or cancelled can already be viewed on the department's website. But the legislation would also allow for information to be made public when compliance action is taken against providers, like when an infringement notice is issued. Commonwealth-authorised officers would also be given more powers to do their jobs through the ability to enter premises without consent during operating hours to detect non-compliance across the sector. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the coalition would need to examine the legislation closely. "I wanted this issue to be above politics, as somebody who's dropped my own children off at child care and now sees my children dropping their children at child care," she told ABC News. "I'm incredibly concerned, so I do want to be constructive, but that being constructive doesn't mean giving the government a blank cheque when it comes to goodwill on this issue." Mr Clare said parents were "not interested in excuses, they expect action". There were still issues with sharing information on working-with-children checks between jurisdictions, he added, and more work would be done at an upcoming meeting of state and federal attorneys-general. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028


Perth Now
2 days ago
- Perth Now
'Big weapon' wielded to strengthen childcare safety
Childcare centres that fail to meet standards could soon be stripped of their funding under reforms fast-tracked in response to horrifying abuse allegations. The changes were introduced to the House of Representatives on the first day of parliamentary business since the May election. They follow widespread calls for change after a Victorian childcare worker was charged with dozens of sex offences involving children. State regulators can already shut a centre on the spot if there is an imminent threat to safety. But Education Minister Jason Clare said the Commonwealth could also try to lift standards through its available levers. "We have to do everything that we can to ensure the safety of our children when they walk or when they're carried through the doors of an early education and care service," he told parliament on Wednesday. "Funding is the big weapon that the Australian government has to wield here. "The real purpose of this legislation isn't to shut centres down, but to raise standards." Any childcare operators that fail to meet quality, safety and compliance standards could be prevented from opening new centres and might be cut off from receiving government subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees. Providers would be issued with a formal notice requiring an explanation within 28 days with the Department of Education able to cancel or suspend an operator's approval. "Providers that can improve their services to meet the standard will get the chance to do that," Mr Clare said. "Services that don't or can't or won't will lose their access to funding." The bill also expands commonwealth powers to publish information about providers that are sanctioned for non-compliance. State, territory and federal ministers are expected to meet in August to discuss other changes, including mandatory CCTV in childcare centres, establishing a national worker registry and mandatory child-safety training. Information on centres for which childcare subsidy approvals have been suspended or cancelled can already be viewed on the department's website. But the legislation would also allow for information to be made public when compliance action is taken against providers, like when an infringement notice is issued. Commonwealth-authorised officers would also be given more powers to do their jobs through the ability to enter premises without consent during operating hours to detect non-compliance across the sector. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the coalition would need to examine the legislation closely. "I wanted this issue to be above politics, as somebody who's dropped my own children off at child care and now sees my children dropping their children at child care," she told ABC News. "I'm incredibly concerned, so I do want to be constructive, but that being constructive doesn't mean giving the government a blank cheque when it comes to goodwill on this issue." Mr Clare said parents were "not interested in excuses, they expect action". There were still issues with sharing information on working-with-children checks between jurisdictions, he added, and more work would be done at an upcoming meeting of state and federal attorneys-general. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028