We survived sex trafficking. Don't protect men who exploit women like us.
California must crack down on predatory sex buyers to stop trafficking. Survivors like us have fought for accountability that reaches not just our traffickers but also men who used us like objects.
In May, the California Capitol erupted in acrimonious debate over Assembly Bill 379, a proposal to make purchasing a 16- or 17-year-old for sex punishable as a felony. Now, opponents are trying to weaken a separate, equally important piece of that bill, to make it a misdemeanor to loiter with the intent to purchase commercial sex.
California must crack down on predatory sex buyers to stop sex trafficking. For decades, survivors like us have fought for accountability that reaches not just our traffickers, but also the men who bought and used us like objects.
These buyers, the ones who made the demand for human flesh profitable, have operated with near impunity, shielded by stigma that falls harder on victims than perpetrators.
AB 379, originally authored by Assemblymember Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento, and now authored by Assemblymember Nick Schultz, D-Burbank, is a historic opportunity to change that.
Don't shield men who buy sex
Standing in the way are opponents attempting to weaponize the federal government's cruel deportation sweeps and legitimate public fear to weaken this vital legislation. They claim that AB 379's loitering provision should be removed because it would create a new deportable offense.
That argument is legally doubtful. Following its recommendation would shield sex buyers statewide at the expense of victims of the sex trade. It also would deprive California of an important tool for getting a handle on the sex trafficking industry.
That is not safety nor is it justice. That would be an abdication of lawmakers' responsibility totheir constituents.
Opinion: I work with sex trafficking victims. Here's how Diddy's trial could help them.
Let us be clear: AB 379 does not target undocumented people or victims in the sex trade. It purposefully targets those who knowingly and willfully seek out vulnerable human beings, some of whom are immigrants themselves, for exploitation through paid rape.
It is unconscionable to use the trauma of immigrant families as a political shield for sex buyers − many of whom are affluent White men. And yet, that's what's happening.
We were badly abused as victims of sex trafficking
This is the truth that the public and our elected officials must face: The sex trade is not 'empowerment.' On the street, it is almost all the result of trafficking. It is violence, and the buyers are not harmless 'johns' ‒ they are predators who rely on the silence of society and the shame of survivors to keep operating freely.
Buyers call us names like 'meat,' 'holes,' 'property,' 'whore,' 'slut,' 'worthless,' 'slave" and much worse than can be comfortably described here for the everyday reader.
We've been choked and strangled, degraded, urinated on, burned, beaten and stabbed. We've been robbed, raped with physical body parts and objects, spit on and laughed at. We've been thrown out of moving vehicles naked and scared, and we've been left for dead on multiple occasions of severe assault.
Opinion: A sex trafficking survivor nearly died trying to get out. How she turned her life around.
We've been told we were 'lucky' anyone would pay for us. We've been told that they could do anything to us and no one would care, that they could kill us and no one would come looking.
We were children. Or barely adults. And every name we were called sank into our skin like a scar we still carry.
Failing to hold buyers accountable only worsens these harms and creates more demand and need for supply.
AB379's reinstatement of the loitering piece for the buyer is not radical. It is justice for everyone being trafficked and abandoned on our streets.
To every state senator still on the fence: We are not asking for pity. We are demanding protection, accountability and truth. We're asking you not to forget us just because the politics are complicated.
We survived the buyers who raped and abused us, insulted us, filmed us, and discarded us like garbage. Now we are surviving a political process that threatens to discard us yet again.
Please don't let that happen. We've come too far. Stay strong, stand with survivors and pass AB 379 intact, and with the survivor-led accountability it was built to deliver.
Marjorie Saylor, Ashley Faison-Maddox and Christina Rangel are survivor leaders with lived experience of sex trafficking in California.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
11 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
White receives probation in scheme to defraud rental assistance
A woman who pled guilty in a scheme to defraud the federal rental assistance program of a Merrillville-based not-for-profit agency has received probation. Along with 24 months of probation, Gloria White will be required to repay Geminus Corp. $177,800, United States District Court Judge Philip P. Simon ruled at her Thursday morning sentencing in Hammond. White, 60, who entered a plea in November, initially was facing 21 to 27 months in prison. Simon told White he feels 'like a broken record' in dealing with cases involving public funds because he views them as a 'breach of public trust.' 'During the pandemic, when people were genuinely afraid, Congress finally did something to stem the tide of impending disaster and came up with this construct — rental assistance — to keep people in their homes,' he said. 'I'm really offended by this behavior of people taking advantage of these systems, and I think most fair-minded people feel the same way.' White and fellow employee Valencia Franklin were accused of misappropriating Emergency Rental Assistance funds destined to help renters hang on to their residences during the pandemic by creating false landlords to fraudulently request money from the program, according to an independent audit by an Indianapolis accounting firm. Geminus Corp. discovered discrepancies in its records which led to finding out about the potential fraud in July 2022, according to Bill Trowbridge, president and CEO of Geminus and its umbrella organization, Regional Care Group, the Post-Tribune previously reported. The nonprofit service agency based in Merrillville immediately contacted the U.S. Department of the Treasury and fired Franklin, as well as alerted the accounting firm that does its annual audit. The audit, released in January 2023, covered fiscal years ending in June 2021 and 2022. The $636,000 figure is what Geminus 'had strong suspicions' was fraudulent and reported to the feds and the agency's auditors, Trowbridge said. Geminus received $40 million in federal funding for the Emergency Rental Assistance program as a pass-through agency, distributing the money throughout Lake County during the pandemic. Franklin was sentenced to two years in prison earlier this month. Simon credited White's attorney, Luis Sanchez, for counseling her to 'do the right thing' and cooperating with the U.S. Attorney's office. 'When you're in a hole, you need to stop digging, and you did that,' Simon said. 'You've earned (probation as the sentence) through cooperation. 'You're a lovely woman who made a really bad decision — rarely do I see someone come before me with not so much as a parking ticket — but you do have the burden of being a convicted felon now.' White apologized to Simon, the court, her family, friends, community, and twin sister for her crime.
USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
We survived sex trafficking. Don't protect men who exploit women like us.
California must crack down on predatory sex buyers to stop trafficking. Survivors like us have fought for accountability that reaches not just our traffickers but also men who used us like objects. In May, the California Capitol erupted in acrimonious debate over Assembly Bill 379, a proposal to make purchasing a 16- or 17-year-old for sex punishable as a felony. Now, opponents are trying to weaken a separate, equally important piece of that bill, to make it a misdemeanor to loiter with the intent to purchase commercial sex. California must crack down on predatory sex buyers to stop sex trafficking. For decades, survivors like us have fought for accountability that reaches not just our traffickers, but also the men who bought and used us like objects. These buyers, the ones who made the demand for human flesh profitable, have operated with near impunity, shielded by stigma that falls harder on victims than perpetrators. AB 379, originally authored by Assemblymember Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento, and now authored by Assemblymember Nick Schultz, D-Burbank, is a historic opportunity to change that. Don't shield men who buy sex Standing in the way are opponents attempting to weaponize the federal government's cruel deportation sweeps and legitimate public fear to weaken this vital legislation. They claim that AB 379's loitering provision should be removed because it would create a new deportable offense. That argument is legally doubtful. Following its recommendation would shield sex buyers statewide at the expense of victims of the sex trade. It also would deprive California of an important tool for getting a handle on the sex trafficking industry. That is not safety nor is it justice. That would be an abdication of lawmakers' responsibility totheir constituents. Opinion: I work with sex trafficking victims. Here's how Diddy's trial could help them. Let us be clear: AB 379 does not target undocumented people or victims in the sex trade. It purposefully targets those who knowingly and willfully seek out vulnerable human beings, some of whom are immigrants themselves, for exploitation through paid rape. It is unconscionable to use the trauma of immigrant families as a political shield for sex buyers − many of whom are affluent White men. And yet, that's what's happening. We were badly abused as victims of sex trafficking This is the truth that the public and our elected officials must face: The sex trade is not 'empowerment.' On the street, it is almost all the result of trafficking. It is violence, and the buyers are not harmless 'johns' ‒ they are predators who rely on the silence of society and the shame of survivors to keep operating freely. Buyers call us names like 'meat,' 'holes,' 'property,' 'whore,' 'slut,' 'worthless,' 'slave" and much worse than can be comfortably described here for the everyday reader. We've been choked and strangled, degraded, urinated on, burned, beaten and stabbed. We've been robbed, raped with physical body parts and objects, spit on and laughed at. We've been thrown out of moving vehicles naked and scared, and we've been left for dead on multiple occasions of severe assault. Opinion: A sex trafficking survivor nearly died trying to get out. How she turned her life around. We've been told we were 'lucky' anyone would pay for us. We've been told that they could do anything to us and no one would care, that they could kill us and no one would come looking. We were children. Or barely adults. And every name we were called sank into our skin like a scar we still carry. Failing to hold buyers accountable only worsens these harms and creates more demand and need for supply. AB379's reinstatement of the loitering piece for the buyer is not radical. It is justice for everyone being trafficked and abandoned on our streets. To every state senator still on the fence: We are not asking for pity. We are demanding protection, accountability and truth. We're asking you not to forget us just because the politics are complicated. We survived the buyers who raped and abused us, insulted us, filmed us, and discarded us like garbage. Now we are surviving a political process that threatens to discard us yet again. Please don't let that happen. We've come too far. Stay strong, stand with survivors and pass AB 379 intact, and with the survivor-led accountability it was built to deliver. Marjorie Saylor, Ashley Faison-Maddox and Christina Rangel are survivor leaders with lived experience of sex trafficking in California.
Indianapolis Star
2 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Hoosier evangelicals slowly going solar,\u00a0but they're not talking about climate change
The Rev. Robert Whitaker is part of growing movement across Indiana encouraging evangelical congregations to pursue clean energy, but his talking points don't start with climate change. He said the focus is on fresh air, clean water, a biblical mandate, and the kicker: Lower utility bills leave churches more money to spend on their missions. The movement is slowly picking up steam statewide, but it hasn't been easy to get evangelicals on board, said Whitaker, who is senior pastor at Christ Community Church, an evangelical congregation in Bloomington. At least some of that reluctance is because climate change is a political minefield in some religious circles. Evangelicals make up the largest group of Christians in Indiana, and they're also the least likely religious group to view climate change as a serious problem, according to the Pew Research Center. But the wedge between evangelicals and environmentalism has less to do with theology and more to do with politics, according to Katharine Hayhoe, a climate scientist who studies the intersection of faith and climate change. "The problem itself is the result of decades and even centuries of politicization of faith in America," she told IndyStar. The Pew Research Center also reported 85 percent of White evangelicals identify with or lean toward the GOP, and Republicans are far less likely than Democrats to say dealing with climate change should be a top priority for the federal government. So despite spreading the news of a Creation Care Partners grant program that can help evangelical churches cover the costs of going green, Whitaker has only seen a handful of congregations apply. 'I have to be honest, I've been a little disappointed that more evangelical churches haven't taken it on,' he said. 'But it's been successful for us.' Whitaker hasn't always been a vocal supporter of solar energy. For much of his life, it wasn't a priority. 'It was just one of those back burner issues for me, theologically, and could easily be stereotyped as radical, left wing, tree hugger,' said Whitaker, who grew up in a religious tradition during the 1970s that didn't put much emphasis on environmentalism. But his son slowly helped him expand his worldview. Hours of road-trip chats about film, philosophy and theology evolved into conversations about climate change and clean energy. After that, Whitaker said it didn't take long for him to see the truth about the condition of the earth. Whitaker approached his church board and then members with news of a grant to go green, making it explicit the project costs wouldn't come from the church budget. Most people were on board. Within a matter of weeks, the congregation raised an additional $24,000 dollars. But some people grumbled, and others probably left the church, Whitaker said. Still, "what happened in the end is most people caught on," he added. The church installed solar panels during the summer of 2022 and is finishing up an overhaul of the HVAC system to increase energy conservation. Not all evangelicals have made the same pivot, even after years-long efforts to engage religious groups in Indiana with energy conservation. Fifteen years ago, Madeline Hirschland cofounded Hoosier Interfaith Power and Light, which was an multi-faith network across the state, to help congregations reduce their energy usage and install solar panels. Fossil fuels account for over 75 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, which linger in the earth's atmosphere and trap the sun's heat. The world is warming faster now than ever in recorded history, and the globe is starting to feel the effects: heatwaves, wildfires and and floods are all increasing in intensity and frequency, according to NASA. Plus, research has shown air pollution from fossil fuel plants can lead to lung cancer, asthma, and heart disease. Clean energy is one way to reduce the amount of carbon heading into the atmosphere, and for Hirschland, encouraging faith communities to practice energy conservation was an easy connection to make. "It was a natural fit for me," she said. "It feels like a matter of faith." Hirschland, who is Jewish, said 18 different faith traditions were represented among the churches that committed to energy conservation and received funding for solar panels. There were mainline protestants, Catholics, Muslims, and Jews involved — but only a handful of evangelicals. 'There was a sense that actually the missing piece was the largest faith group,' Hirschland said. Evangelicals operate between four and six thousand churches across the state, according to her estimates, but 'evangelicals tend to want to work with evangelicals.' Whitaker, who is an evangelical himself, explained the reaction he heard most often from others was a hesitancy to be involved with interfaith groups, so as not to be grouped in under one faith, theology or agenda. Another reason, he explained, is the politics of going green make solarization a hard sell. 'I think one of the reasons evangelical churches have been reticent to be involved is because the whole project up until now — I think it's changing — became politicized,' Whitaker said. Fewer conservative Republicans believe the climate is warming due to human activity compared to Democrats, according to the Pew Research Center, and less than a third of Republicans say that reducing carbon emissions will make a big difference as world confronts climate change. Hoosier Interfaith Power and Light has since merged with a different network, Faith in Place, but Whitaker, Hirschland and others are still urging evangelical Hoosiers to untangle their theology from their ideology. 'You don't have to be a Democrat or Republican; we don't want to talk about that,' Whitaker said. 'What we want to talk about is a creation mandate that we believe was given to us by God.' Long before Hirschland helped start Creation Care Partners, the organization issuing energy conservation and solar grants to evangelical congregations, she worked in poverty alleviation in rural Kenya. She met parents whose children had died of malaria and learned about changing rainfall patterns and rising heat that helps mosquitos proliferate. She quickly came to believe that climate change was threatening people's livelihoods and lives. When she realized the emissions raising global temperatures were highest in places like the United States, she turned her focus back toward Indiana, where she's become an advocate for faith groups to practice energy conservation across the state. 'It's an issue of faith, it's an issue of caring for the garden,' Hirschland said. 'It's an issue of caring for the least among us, for those who are impacted by what we do but don't have any power over it.' The Evangelical Environmental Network (EEN), a non-profit that encourages churches to pursue creation care, boils down the biblical basis for creation care into four parts: Christ died to reconcile creation to God; all creation belongs to Jesus; to love what God loves fulfills the ten commandments; and Christians are called to care for the poor — who are disproportionally impacted by environmental hazards. 'If there's pollution that's harming someone, do I care about that?' asked Jeremy Summers, the director of church and community engagement at EEN. 'Do I care about the asthma rates increasing in areas where there's high pollution rates? It's a matter of life.' Evangelicals involved in creation care work also point to the mandate given by God in the first book of the bible. 'It starts with a garden, and the human beings are given the charge to be stewards of that beautiful place,' said Whitaker. 'Before all this, I was a consumer, and now I see myself as a caretaker.' Despite what he feels is a moral and spiritual call to care for creation, Whitaker says rhetoric isn't how he cinches the deal with churches. That's where savings come in. 'Quite honestly, the most important thing to me is that we saved energy and didn't pollute the environment,' Whitaker said. 'The savings, in my opinion, are not as important. But you use that as a line to get people going.' Solar installation can be expensive, costing tens of thousands of dollars depending on how many kilowatts a church might install. And a tax credit that helped churches and non-profits save 30 to 40 percent on solarization is on the chopping block in the current text of the Republican megabill. But, luckily for churches, there's still a lot of help out there to go green. For one, Hirschland and Whitaker are helping distribute $500,000 in grants to evangelical churches through Creation Care Partners. The money was obtained through a settlement with American Electric Power. The Creation Care Partners' grant helps congregations reduce their energy use by 25 to 40 percent. Evangelical congregations can receive up to $29,000 to install solar panels or work on energy conservation — which Hirschland says is usually a more cost-effective way to save — through upgrades to LED lights and sealing and insulating their buildings. And once they do, Hirschland said, they'll see their utility bills drop. The money moved away from utility bills can be used to advance mission work the church is supporting. 'It's both a way to care for God's creation, and it's also a way to do more of what they want to be doing,' said Hirschland. St. John's United Church of Christ in Collinsville, Illinois, dropped its electric bills from $2,000 a month to $200 since they installed solar in January, according to Wade Halva, who works with Faith in Place in southern Illinois. Over the next 25 years, the church could save close to half a million dollars. Halva said that when he's working with churches, one of the pivot points is when they discuss how a church has had to adjust its budget to cut costs. 'How many programs have you stopped in the last 10 years because you didn't have this amount of money in your budget? Did you have to let a staffer go? Did you stop a summer food program?' he said he asks different pastors and church leaders. 'Then I ask them to imagine what they could do within an additional this amount of money in their budget every year for the next 20 years.' IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
