
Who do you call if you want to speak to the leader of unionism? It's complicated
unionist
parties to 'show leadership' over parades, bonfires and related tensions. Some of this annual criticism was unfair: unionist leadership was evident at local level in various places, even if it was not always leading people in the direction others would prefer.
The top level of unionist politics is where a strange, unprecedented rudderlessness is apparent. To paraphrase
Henry Kissenger
, who do you call if you want to speak to the leader of unionism?
The official answer is the leader of its largest party,
Gavin Robinson
of the
DUP
. However, the DUP's size no longer conveys dominance. While it still holds a clear majority of unionism's seats, it is clinging on to a bare majority of unionism's votes – 51 per cent in the last assembly and general elections in 2022 and 2024. It managed a more respectable 58 per cent in the 2023 council elections.
There is no sense of a prospective recovery. In opinion polls, the DUP dropped below the majority threshold four years ago and after a rebound has fallen below it again, to just 41 per cent of unionist support, in the latest LucidTalk survey.
READ MORE
The DUP and the UUP jockeyed to be the largest unionist party for decades, but that race appears to be long over. The UUP has been in almost uninterrupted decline for a quarter of a century and is bumping along on half the DUP's vote share. Nobody can foresee it regaining the top spot.
All the growth within unionism this decade has been by the Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV). It does as well as the UUP in opinion polls but only half as well in elections, probably due to its appeal and resources being too thinly spread across the region.
Although unionism has had significant third parties before, this has generally been at times of high drama, such as the mid-1970s or the years around the Belfast Agreement.
Today's three-way split has been driven by Brexit, with voters upset at the DUP's disastrous handling of the issue. However, anger at the sea border has largely subsided to something more like exasperation. The fragmentation of unionism is now sustained not by high drama but by what looks like permanent damage to the DUP's reputation for competence.
[
Unionism must offer a positive future, not hark back to a past that was often dark and divided
Opens in new window
]
An exhausted party system is compounded by unusual circumstances at the top of all three main unionist parties.
Robinson was catapulted to the helm of the DUP last year by the resignation of Jeffrey Donaldson, currently awaiting trial for alleged sexual offences. Although Robinson was seen as a future leader, there is an understandable feeling among the public and some party colleagues that his elevation was rushed.
The DUP believes its leader should sit at Stormont, as that is the overwhelming focus of Northern Ireland politics.
[
Windsor deal an opaque mess, says Democratic Unionist Party leader
Opens in new window
]
But Robinson is stuck at Westminster, leaving leadership at Stormont to Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly, who holds her seat thanks to co-option rather than election. This is all a complicated legacy of the DUP's botched leadership contest in 2021. It continues to undermine the authority of everyone involved.
Neither DUP leader is doing a bad job: a poll in February ranked Little-Pengelly as Stormont's most popular minister. That only underscores the ennui in unionist politics, suggesting voters are so fed up with the DUP it no longer matters who is in charge.
The UUP is also under unorthodox management. A selection row last year caused the resignation of leader Doug Beattie. With no obvious replacement, former leader Mike Nesbitt stepped back into the role, making clear he was doing so as a final duty before retirement. This unavoidably adds to the perception that the UUP is counting down the days until its own demise.
[
Unionists and Sinn Féin have 'common goal' of making NI work, says Ulster Unionist leader
Opens in new window
]
TUV leader Jim Allister so dominates his party it is frequently described as a one-man band. Paradoxically, he has been sidelined by his shock triumph in last year's general election, when he unseated the DUP's Ian Paisley.
This meant Allister had to vacate the TUV's only assembly seat and move to Westminster, where a lone MP struggles to make an impression. The councillor co-opted to replace him at Stormont, Timothy Gaston, is an effective opposition backbencher but that hardly fills unionism's leadership vacuum.
The wider context for unionism's lack of direction is the loss of its overall majority in elections from 2017 and the loss of the first minister's post in 2022. Previous DUP leaders used the office of first minister to present themselves as prime ministers of Northern Ireland, an erroneous but easy way to project leadership by default. Little more by way of vision was required.
Contrary to nationalist suspicions, the DUP has had no difficulty accepting second place at Stormont. It is having great difficulty figuring out how to lead unionism from that position.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on racist attacks: no place for hate on our streets
In recent weeks there has been a disturbing uptick in reports of violent attacks targeting ethnic minorities, particularly affecting members of Ireland's Indian community. Members of that community have spoken of rising verbal abuse and assaults on Irish streets, leading them to feel unsafe. Many such incidents remain unreported to the Garda Síochána, though details have surfaced on local WhatsApp groups. The situation has left many people feeling increasingly vulnerable as they go about their daily lives in what was once seen as a welcoming environment. And last weekend the Indian embassy warned its citizens to take extra precautions for their own security. Indians have become Ireland's fastest-growing immigrant group, with thousands receiving residence permits in the past three years alone. In a relatively short period, the community has grown to become the largest non-white ethnic group in the country, contributing significantly to various sectors of the economy. Particularly notable is the valuable contribution of Indian professionals to the health service and technology industries, where their expertise is in high demand. But many now report feeling a sense of threat. The Garda has responded to the reports of violence with statements emphasising its commitment to addressing the problem. But some victims, especially those who have lived in Ireland for many years, believe that things are getting worse. They point to an increase in hostile, racially charged encounters on the streets, fuelled in part by poisonous rhetoric on social media. All of this forms part of a broader, worrying trend that has seen public spaces and public discourse become sites of escalating toxicity. READ MORE Reports suggest that many perpetrators are minors, complicating the issue of legal accountability. While recently passed hate crime legislation now makes it possible to treat racial animus as an aggravating factor when sentencing, the effectiveness of this as a deterrent remains to be seen. The debate on regulating hate speech remains contentious, as evidenced by last year's controversy over proposed legislation on the issue, which was ultimately abandoned. But alongside legislation and enforcement, civil society and individual citizens also have a role to play in rejecting those who carry out these reprehensible acts. It is concerning that in some cases, bystanders have witnessed assaults but failed to intervene or report them. However, there have also been instances where members of the public have come to the aid of victims and brought the assaults to public attention. Such solidarity sends an unequivocal signal that racist violence is unacceptable. It is everybody's shared responsibility to ensure that no one feels unsafe because of their ethnicity or the colour of their skin.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Fine Gael significantly outspent Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin on elections last year
Fine Gael spent significantly more than either Fianna Fáil or Sinn Féin on elections last year, according to party accounts provided to the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo). Fine Gael was the biggest spender overall on elections in 2024 and also the highest spender on the general election, according to the consolidated accounts of the parties. The accounts, published by Sipo, show Sinn Féin is the richest of the three big parties, with more income, stronger cash balances and an unmatched reserve of €8.7 million at the end of 2024. Sinn Féin, like the other parties, ran a significant deficit last year, in its case amounting to €1.6 million. However, it still finished the year with €4.6 million in cash, down from €5.3 million at the beginning of the year. READ MORE By contrast, Fianna Fáil had just €470,000 in cash at the end of the year. Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil appear to have funded some of their election expenditure through loans, which the two parties will pay back over the coming years as they prepare for the next election, though Fine Gael is in a significantly better financial position than Fianna Fáil. The days when Fianna Fáil outspent everyone at election time are long gone, the figures suggest. This time, the consolidated spending shows Fine Gael spent €3.22 million on elections last year, substantially ahead of Sinn Féin on €1.7 million and Fianna Fáil on €1.69 million. Fine Gael spent more than €2 million on the general election, more than twice as much as Fianna Fáil, which spent less than €950,000, according to the consolidated accounts of both parties. Despite being outspent, Fianna Fáil won 10 more seats than Fine Gael in the general election. Sinn Féin also beat Fine Gael by one seat. [ Three constituencies that show why Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin outperformed Fine Gael Opens in new window ] [ Expect the unexpected: What the 2024 local and European elections have taught us Opens in new window ] Sinn Féin and Fine Gael each spent about €600,000 on the European elections, according to the accounts, with Fianna Fáil's figure much lower at about €320,000. Fine Gael also outspent its rivals at the local elections, with the accounts showing expenditure of €512,000. Fianna Fáil reported spending of €289,000, while Sinn Féin's accounts show it spent just €77,000 on the local elections. All three parties received more than €5 million in State funding last year, while the accounts of all three parties show they are also reliant on fundraising among their members. Sinn Féin has the highest income from donations, with €182,000 raised from individual donations and €52,000 from corporate donations. The party's organisation in Northern Ireland is not governed by the strict rules on political donations that are in place in the South. [ Who is the American who left €535,000 to Sinn Féin's US fundraising group in her trust? Opens in new window ] But it is Sinn Féin's cash pile – likely linked to a mysterious bequest from a reclusive Englishman, William Hampton, who left more than €4 million to the party in 2019 – that sets it apart from its rivals. Along with a substantial property portfolio, it means the party can record 'reserves' of some €8.7 million in its accounts. This is the first year Sipo rules have required the parties to produce consolidated accounts that show the financial dealings of all units of the organisations above a certain size. In a statement, Fine Gael cautioned against comparing the election spend of the different parties in the accounts. [ William Hampton: The life and extraordinary times of Sinn Féin's million-euro donor Opens in new window ] 'It would be inaccurate to use the published annual accounts of political parties without context to compare election expenditure by political parties,' the party said in a statement. It said there 'appears to be significant divergence in the approach to Electoral Act compliance by different political parties ... The extent to which election expenditure is funded by the Party HQ, by party subsidiaries that are required to be reported under the Electoral Act, or by party subsidiaries that are not required to be reported under the Electoral Act, varies for each party and candidate. This also has a bearing on the figures reported.'


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Poland's new president: a thorn in the side of the government
There's presidencies, and there's presidencies. Irish parties mulling over their choices to succeed Michael D Higgins will be taking some comfort from the fact that their successful pick will not be assuming a Trump-like, seemingly omnipotent presidency, shaping their agenda, nor indeed, the half-way house that is Poland's top office. Karol Nawrocki, conservative historian, amateur boxer, and supporter of Donald Trump, who was sworn in on Wednesday, is neither a symbolic figurehead nor an agenda setter. However, his powers of veto and policy prerogatives ensure that he will be a major thorn in the side of Poland' s centrist Europhile government. Backed by nationalist opposition party Law and Justice (PiS), Nawrocki 's shock, wafer-thin, majority in June's election dealt a particular blow to prime minister Donald Tusk's hopes to undo the PiS's legacy of attacks on judicial independence and to improve the country's relationship with fellow EU member states and Ukraine, whose Nato membership the new president can block. Poland is now bracing for a continuation of the deadlock seen under nationalist outgoing president, Andrzej Duda. At his inauguration on Wednesday Nawrocki warned that he is ready to block appointments of judges he does not see as fit to perform their roles, and will create a council dedicated to repairing Poland's constitutional order. He concluded, shouting the Maga-like 'May God bless Poland, long live Poland.' READ MORE Like Trump, Nawrocki brings a rich vein of controversy to his new post. He is the subjects of ongoing criminal probes, and like Trump, will be protected during his presidential term from prosecution. Controversies he has been involved in range from his admitted part in a brawl between football hooligans in 2009, allegations of involvement with gangsters and claims he cheated an old man out of his apartment. He is a political newcomer little known to the public before PiS threw its weight behind him. A bumpy road ahead is likely.