JetBlue is cutting flights and reducing staff hours because people aren't traveling as much
JetBlue will cut more flights and reduce staffing hours after a reported drop-off in domestic U.S. air travel.
The airline's CEO Joanna Geraghty informed staff of incoming cost-cutting measures on Monday, saying that the 'path back to profitability' was taking longer than expected and that breaking even on operating margins this year was 'unlikely.'
'We're hopeful demand and bookings will rebound, but even a recovery won't fully offset the ground we've lost this year and our path back to profitability will take longer than we'd hoped,' Geraghty said in a note to employees, seen by CNBC
'That means we're still relying on borrowed cash to keep the airline running.'
The plans, per CNBC, include cutting off-peak flights as well as getting rid of less profitable routes. Plans to refurbish four older Airbus A320 jets will be put on pause.
According to the memo JetBlue is also assessing its hiring plans, and may combine some leadership roles and rein in travel spending.
Domestic airlines, who previously predicted a positive 2025, were shaken back in April after President's Donald Trump's broad tariffs and a crackdown on government spending upended their optimism.
Tourists and companies reduced spending amid rising economic uncertainty, forcing carriers to cut their first-quarter profit forecasts. A slew of carriers, including American Airlines, Southwest and Delta, withdrew their 2025 financial guidance plans.
Airfare in May was down 7.3 percent compared with last year, according to the U.S. Department of Labor's inflation report.
In addition to the looming cuts JetBlue, last month announced a new partnership with United that will allow customers to book flights on each other's airline, using and earning points on both frequent flyer programs.
Per CNBC, Geraghty said in her memo that while the airline assesses its hiring plans, it will carry on bringing on new frontline employees and fill other positions.
The airline has also pumped more money into its premium-class seats in order to appeal to those willing to spend more on their trips. Geraghty's memo said JetBlue is still planning to include domestic-first class seats onto some of its aircraft and also build airport lounges.
'These are the building blocks of a stronger JetBlue, and they remain in motion,' Geraghty said, per CNBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JANA HOCKING: I spent three days at a 'sex camp' in the desert... here are the mind-blowing secrets I learned
This year, I found myself in the middle of the California desert at an orgasm retreat. I know how that sounds. Even as I was punching the address into my GPS, I couldn't help but second guess what I was getting myself into.
Top Gear
22 minutes ago
- Top Gear
The US and UK have signed an agreement for a 10 per cent tariff on car imports
Business The reduced tariff now applies to the first 100,000 British-made cars imported into the States, but other details are missing Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading President Trump has officially signed an executive order giving the UK a more favourable 10 per cent tariff on car imports. Though, some bits and pieces are yet to be confirmed. More on that shortly. In broad terms, the tariff applies to the first 100,000 British-made vehicles imported by the USA. Now ratified, carmakers can begin to undo the temporary suspensions of their shipments and send stuff across the Atlantic again. The sighs from JLR, counting the US as its biggest market, are especially audible. Advertisement - Page continues below "We welcome the signing of the UK-US deal," the carmaker told "which gives a good level of relief from the steep and sudden US tariffs applied to the UK auto sector in April. We thank both governments and their teams for their work in bringing this deal about." SMMT boss Mike Hawes said: 'This is great news for the UK automotive industry, helping the sector avoid the severest level of tariffs and enabling many manufacturers to resume deliveries imminently.' You might like But it's not all gravy yet. There are still details to be announced 'in coming weeks' according to President Trump. They include confirmation of the tariff on steel and aluminium (a handshake agreement in principle is that the tariff will drop to zero). What's more, EU vehicles – for example, the Mini Countryman built in Germany – will still be liable for the higher 25 per cent blanket tariff. Ouch. Hawes added: 'We wait to see the full details of the deal and how it will be administered but this will be a huge reassurance to those that work in the sector and bolster the confidence of our important US customers. Advertisement - Page continues below "The fact the UK has secured a deal, ahead of many competitors, and which makes automotive a priority, should be recognised as a significant achievement.' Looking for more from the USA? Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will the US-UK trade deal make Starmer popular again?
To general surprise, at least as to the location and the timing, the British prime minister and the American president have confirmed that the US-UK economic prosperity deal (EPD) has indeed been signed and will now be in force. It is the first, and only, trade deal of any kind to have been signed by the Trump administration since 'Liberation Day' on 2 April. It was a notable moment, but for Keir Starmer, one question will be how far it will go in helping his government recover from its rapid fall from grace since the general election... What's with the optics? Obviously, someone – possibly in the British embassy in Washington – came up with the idea of the president and his counterpart springing the announcement on the world's media when they were least expecting it, for maximum impact. So instead of the usual photo-op in the Oval Office, with Trump signing the executive order and then posing with it for the cameras, it was displayed in the open air at an impromptu press conference. The pages fell out of the presidential folder, to be retrieved by Starmer, but that just seemed to add to the easy informality of the occasion. The prime minister was allowed to address the president as 'Donald', and Trump said nice things about him. The British are to be shielded from further tariffs because, as Trump put it, 'I like them', and he thinks Starmer's team are 'great people'. What's missing? Steel, most urgently. The Americans insist that steel 'made in Britain' should be virgin and not dependent on raw materials from, let us say, China or the EU. For the steel works at Port Talbot that implies trouble, because the capacity to make such steel has been lost with the closure of the last blast furnace, now replaced with electric arc technology. So the ruinous 25 per cent tariff on UK steel exports to the US will stay, after all, and will rise to a prohibitive 50 per cent on 9 July. Politically, if Starmer can get the right conditions over the line by then and the threat of such tariffs subsides, it will mean a great deal to the voters in south Wales, who are being enthusiastically, if cynically, courted by Reform UK ahead of next year's Welsh parliament elections. Scunthorpe, too, should benefit from the deal, with a comparable electoral dividend. Any other winners? The car industry, especially Jaguar Land Rover, BMW and Aston Martin in the Midlands, plus Bentley in Crewe, Rolls-Royce in Sussex, and similar centres for export production. Aerospace actually escapes US tariffs completely, which is excellent news for manufacturing centres in Derby, the northwest, north Wales and Bristol. With the orders going in for new rails, girders, and the defence industry, the government can make some claim to be rebuilding the industrial base – although high energy prices remain an obstacle to competitiveness. The government, particularly Ed Miliband, has probably yet to win the argument that renewables are a cheaper and reliable alternative to fossil fuels. Even the farmers, badly disadvantaged in the Australian and New Zealand trade deals, have some protections against low-cost US imports. The economy as a whole? Broadly, on US trade, things are worse than they were under Joe Biden, but better than they would be without a deal. It's only fair to add that if the UK were still in the EU then a trade deal would not yet have occurred, although the EU's collective bargaining strength may in time prove to be a strategic advantage in securing better terms. In terms of growth, the net effects will be small, given that the 10 per cent US 'baseline' tariff implemented by the Trump administration remains on all other UK goods. But, again, the situation is undoubtedly better than it would otherwise have been. For a government and a nation desperate for growth, this partial relaxation of US taxes, the Indian free trade deal, and, most of all, the EU 'reset', should boost overall growth by a modest but useful amount. The EPD also has the promise of more cooperation on everything from financial services to AI. What could go wrong? The NHS uses its huge purchasing power to drive a hard bargain with US pharma giants, and these companies, along with the president, resent the way in which so much of the production of final products, and of the compounds used to manufacture them, has been outsourced by the US. There are vague but ominous-sounding words in the EPD about this: 'The United States and the United Kingdom intend to promptly negotiate significantly preferential treatment outcomes on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients. The United Kingdom confirms that it will endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the United Kingdom.' The treatment of US pharma giants has long been a complaint of Trump's. A net gain in the domestic political balance of trade? Yes. Starmer has done well on the international stage, and all these deals show that his government can actually get things done. It adds some lustre to Starmer's dullish image, and also adds to his 'prime ministerial' air, which contrasts with that of the more inexperienced Badenoch and the 'unserious' Nigel Farage. Starmer could plausibly claim to be the kind of steady, dependable leader needed to steer the country through stormy times, even if he sometimes needs to adjust course. The local economic boost in areas most affected will help, as well as the contribution to growth at the national level. But, as ever, a demanding electorate will want to feel the tangible benefit of growing real wages, stabilised taxes, and improving public services before Labour can dream of catching up with Reform UK. Deals such as this, alongside some dramatic U-turns on the winter fuel payment and the grooming gangs, give the government hope that it's at least possible to win some voters back.
