Army to make new missile-defense radars after year of troubleshooting
The Lower-Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor, or LTAMDS, 'is a huge, significant capability,' Lozano said in an exclusive interview with Defense News at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. 'We anecdotally say it doubles legacy Patriot radar capability and not only does it double it, it provides you 360-degree capability.'
The radar is a major modernization element for the Army's Integrated Air and Missile Defense system along with a fully modernized command-and-control capability called the Integrated Battle Command System, which is already fielded.
Building the radar rapidly – the Army awarded a contract to Raytheon in 2019 to deliver prototypes over five years – 'was always going to be incredibly technically challenging,' Lozano said.
So, Lozano said he asked former Army acquisition chief Doug Bush for another year to mature the system. 'I said, 'Sir, we're really close, but we're just not there yet. I'm not exhibiting the level of performance that I would feel comfortable coming in for a Milestone C production decision,'' he said. Bush, who had the authority to grant such a request, did so, according to Lozano.
The office continued to keep Army and Pentagon leadership apprised of the effort and now, following several successful flight tests, including one that combined other major air and missile defense elements over last fall and early this year, the system is deemed ready for low-rate initial production, Lozano said.
While an Inspector General report recently criticized the program for lacking proper due diligence, Lozano disagreed with the characterization. 'We did provide the requisite oversight and so much so that we, as leaders, knew we needed a little bit more time for the system to mature. We got the time. We did the maturation.'
The program office provided Army decision makers with a brief advocating to approve LTAMDS' for production at the end of February. 'It's our intent to have that signed in the next week or two,' he said.
The Army's low-rate production lot will be roughly 10 radars. The service plans to build 94 radars total over the course of the program. Raytheon will also be building Poland's 10 LTAMDS radars on order simultaneously. Poland is the first foreign customer for the system.
Currently the time to build an LTAMDS is about 40 months on the production line, Lozano said. But the Army is working with Raytheon and has hired the Boston Consulting Group to help work on supply chain management in order to make that 36 months, which is the formal program objective.
'From a cost perspective, I think there's a huge win here,' Lozano said. The program's estimated cost is now $13 billion across its life. 'It's a huge program, and it's likely going to be within the Army inventory for multiple decades. Because it's a digital radar that is software driven, it's going to mature and keep pace with the evolving threat,' he said.
Lozano also noted that with the cost of microelectronics coming down and the efforts to miniaturize components, the level of efficiency will increase, capabilities will increase and costs will continue to come down for the system.
'We build the legacy Patriot radar for $110-$115 million a copy,' he noted. 'Right now the initial cost of the LTAMDS radar is about $125-$130 million a copy. That cost will continue to come down. We're building the newest, most advanced radar at almost the same exact price that we're building the legacy radar.'
The Army low-rate production period will last roughly two-and-a-half years. The service is planning for the LTAMDS initial operational test and evaluation to take place in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026.
After that assessment, the service will send one of the sensors to Guam, which will join two other LTAMDS that are about to be delivered to the island in the coming months. The systems will be a part of a larger air and missile defense architecture there.
The Army plans to reach full-rate production in 2028, Lozano said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why the US military refuses to adopt bullpup rifles
For decades, the U.S. military has flirted with bullpup rifles — compact, futuristic-looking designs that put the action and magazine behind the trigger instead of in front of it. From the Austrian Steyr AUG to the Israeli Tavor, the sci-fi-looking FN F2000, and most recently the RM277 from the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program, the Pentagon has tested them all. And every time, the verdict has been the same: No thanks. So why does the military keep rejecting a rifle style that's seen service from Australia to Israel? What is a bullpup rifle? In a bullpup, the working parts, the chamber, bolt, and magazine, are located in the buttstock, behind the trigger group. This means you can run a full-length barrel in a much shorter overall package. For example, the M4 carbine is just under 30 inches long with a 14.5-inch barrel. The Israeli Tavor X95 is 26 inches with a 16.5-inch barrel. The French FAMAS is roughly the same size as the M4, but has a 19.2-inch barrel. That extra barrel length matters. Longer barrels usually mean higher muzzle velocity, better energy retention, and more reliable terminal effects from rounds like 5.56mm or 6.8mm. And in tight spaces like vehicles, helicopters, and urban combat, shaving a few inches off the gun's overall length makes a real difference. The advantages of a bullpup On paper, bullpups tick a lot of boxes for modern combat. Compactness without losing barrel length: Ideal for close quarters and vehicle crews. Better weight distribution: With the bulk of the rifle close to the shoulder, they can feel lighter and easier to hold at the ready. Suppressed use: Starting with a shorter rifle means a suppressor won't make it unwieldy. So if they look good on a spec sheet, why won't the U.S. use them? The dealbreakers The first problem is ergonomics. Bullpups require a different manual of arms. The magazine sits behind the pistol grip, often under the shooter's armpit or mixed up in body armor. Speed reloads and malfunction drills are harder, especially for troops who've spent years training on the M4/M16 family. Next is trigger feel. With the trigger up front and the firing mechanism in the rear, bullpups rely on a long mechanical linkage to connect the two. That linkage adds friction and flex, resulting in heavier, spongier pulls that aren't ideal for precision shooting. Left-handed shooting is another hurdle. Many bullpups eject to the right by default, which means lefties risk brass in the face unless the rifle is reconfigured, something you can't do mid-fight. Then there's modularity. The M4 has plenty of rail space for optics, lasers, lights, and grips. Bullpups have a shorter fore-end, which means less real estate for accessories without crowding the muzzle or ejection port. Top Stories This Week News Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 By Jeff Schogol News Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' By Patty Nieberg Culture Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant By Matt White Finally, logistics and doctrine. Adopting bullpups would mean rewriting training manuals, changing qualification standards, redesigning load carriage systems, and retraining hundreds of thousands of troops across every service branch. Unless a bullpup offers overwhelming advantages, that level of disruption just isn't likely to be seen as being worth it. The U.S. has tried In 1985, the Pentagon put the Steyr AUG through its paces. What they found were all of the above shortcomings and decided not to purchase them, but that didn't stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from adopting the rifle from 1988 to 2007 before replacing them with AR-style rifles. The Belgian FN F2000, tested by U.S. special operations, offered fully ambidextrous, forward-ejecting operation in a compact package. But its spongy trigger, bulky profile, and incompatibility with existing accessories killed its chances. Most recently, the General Dynamics RM277 was proposed as part of the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program. It is a suppressed, polymer-cased 6.8mm bullpup that, despite impressive ballistics, lost to SIG Sauer's then-XM7, an AR-style rifle that felt more familiar to soldiers and fit better into existing logistics. Other countries made it work… sort of Israel fields the Tavor for infantry and urban ops, but many troops still carry M4s depending on the mission. The country is currently looking to replace the Tavor with a home-built AR-style weapon. France ditched the FAMAS for the HK416. The UK stuck with the SA80 but spent decades and millions fixing its flaws. They're also currently looking for a replacement, and none of the candidates are bullpups. Austria and Australia have stuck with the Steyr AUG, but they operate on a smaller scale and with different mission profiles than the U.S. The bottom line Bullpups aren't bad rifles. In some environments, they're excellent. But they don't offer enough benefit to make the U.S. military scrap its entire small arms ecosystem. They're harder to reload, have less modularity, and often deliver a worse trigger feel. And in a force this large, familiarity and interoperability matter as much as performance. For now, the Army's next standard rifle, the M7, sticks with the AR-style layout. Bullpups will keep showing up in gun shop display cases and in the hands of foreign forces, but for the U.S. military writ large, they remain too weird to issue. We dive into this in more depth in this week's YouTube video, which you can check out here.
Atlantic
5 hours ago
- Atlantic
Is This the Hardest Physical Contest in the World?
The United States Army, in business now for more than 250 years, comprises more than 450,000 soldiers. Of those, about a third are in combat arms, serving in armor, artillery, engineering, cyber, and aviation units. Some 56,000 are in the infantry, the 'Queen of Battle,' serving in units such as the 82nd Airborne Division and the 4th Infantry Division. These are the soldiers who go to battle on foot (or, in the case of Airborne units, by parachute—at least on occasion). Among them are some of the most physically fit humans on the planet—the soldiering equivalent of Olympic decathletes. These are the sort who choose to attend Ranger School, the grueling 61-day Army course at Fort Benning, in Georgia, that is meant to push the body, and the spirit, substantially past the breaking point. Only about half of those who start Ranger School eventually finish, some after trying repeatedly. The most elite of those who graduate, the 1 percent of the 1 percent, show up each April to compete in what's known colloquially as the Ranger Olympics. This event is not well known. It is not televised. Not one participant is sponsored by Nike. But the Best Ranger Competition may be the hardest physical competition in the world. Fifty-two teams of two soldiers each start the Ranger Olympics. Over the course of three days, the field is narrowed as soldiers march and run dozens of miles, crawl through obstacle courses, and navigate swamps at night. They carry 50 pounds in their rucksacks, climb 60-foot ropes, and sleep, at most, for four hours at a time. All told, the average competitor burns more than 30,000 calories. These soldiers are, pound for pound, the fittest, most trained, and most disciplined the world has ever known. They are also, nevertheless, part of what President Donald Trump has called our 'woke military that can't fight or win.' Trump has vowed to remake the armed forces, eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts and excoriating generals (many of whom served in combat) as losers. His secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has moved to push trans service members out of the military ('No more dudes in dresses,' he said in a speech this spring) and has suggested that women should not serve in combat. For three days in Georgia this spring, those culture wars felt very far away, in part because what I saw at Best Ranger belies the idea that the Army is weak or 'woke'; in part because among the 104 soldiers on the starting line at Fort Benning was a 25-year-old first lieutenant named Gabrielle White, a West Point graduate who was the first woman to compete for the Best Ranger title; and in part because, to her opponents on the course, the fact that she was a woman did not seem to matter. The only thing that mattered to the Rangers I met was that she had qualified for the competition. I've covered the military for more than 20 years and have seen soldiers in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. Through my travels, I've come to realize that the political class and civilians in general have little idea who soldiers are or why they serve. In the past, military service was almost an unwritten requirement of the Oval Office, but the only president to have served in the past three decades was George W. Bush (who did not see combat). And although the U.S. has one of the largest active militaries in the world, less than 1 percent of its population serves in the armed forces, which means that most civilians have little contact with the military. During the 20 years of war that began in 2001, the military faced numerous crises of public perception. In fairness, the mission the armed forces were given during the War on Terror was near impossible, with an ever-evolving definition of victory in both Afghanistan and Iraq and competing agendas from administrations of both parties, not to mention a public more comfortable with thanking soldiers for their service than sharing the burden. These days, debates over trans and women soldiers and other 'wokeness' wars dominate the discourse around the military, all of which hides the fact that, in my experience, most people volunteer to serve because they want to be part of something bigger than themselves. Once among the ranks, most consider a soldier's politics or gender identity less important than their ability to do the job. The military must now reinvent itself for a modern battlefield where it could face combat against Russia, China, or North Korea—or perhaps more than one at once. In this context, understanding the current force is crucially important. The Best Ranger Competition offers a glimpse of some of the most elite soldiers at work. A month before the competition, I met the three qualifying teams from the 75th Ranger Regiment, a special-operations unit whose members had won the competition four years in a row. They were training on an indoor turf field with squat racks along one side and cardio machines along the other. When I arrived, the soldiers were finishing a workout—doing planks with a 45-pound plate on their back and carrying 120 pounds 10 yards after a circuit of squats and bench presses. Speakers blared AC/DC and Johnny Cash. Nick O'Brien, who trains the regiment's 3,000 Rangers, looked on with his team of nine coaches, trainers, and dietitians. For months, these six men had paused their day jobs with the regiment to prepare under O'Brien, practicing tasks such as assembling just about every handheld weapon in the American arsenal, marching and running for miles, and navigating the woods at night with just a compass and a map, eating only MREs ('meals ready to eat'), rations supplied by the Army that, over time, do demoralizing things to the standard human digestive tract. First Lieutenants Kevin Moore and Griffin Hokanson, who composed Team 44, were favored to win this year. It was the first time that either man had represented the 75th and the first time they had been paired, but they had competed for other units in the past. Both look, a bit disconcertingly, like action figures. Hokanson, who's originally from Oregon, is a faster runner and more agile on the obstacles; Moore, from New York, is stronger. Both graduated from West Point in 2021. First Lieutenant Gabrielle White was also in their class, and the three started Ranger School together the following year. Moore had noticed that the leaders he respected all had Ranger scrolls on their sleeves. Hokanson had a battalion commander who was a Ranger, and saw that Ranger School was where lieutenants who wanted more of a challenge than what they found in the conventional army went. Neither Moore nor Hokanson has faced combat, but they understand, as all Rangers do, that the battlefield in the age of drone warfare can easily become what a former senior Ukrainian commander called a ' zone of continuous death.' Networks of tunnels mean threats can come from any direction—above or below. The infantry must prepare for action at night, or underground, to avoid detection. Still, no other part of warfare is as unchanging as the soldier on the ground, holding the line, defending it, or taking it. The Ranger motto—said to have originated on D-Day, as German mortars and artillery fell down on Omaha Beach—is 'Rangers lead the way.' Ranger battalions were deactivated at the end of World War II but called back into action again in Korea, where they executed raids, set ambushes, and led the counterattack during the winter of 1950 to regain land lost to the Communist offensive. The first Ranger School class was conducted around this time at Fort Benning, focused on individual combat skills and decision making under pressure, reflecting lessons learned in both World War II and the Korean War. Later, as the armed services were becoming an all-volunteer force in the final years of the Vietnam War, generals saw the need for a specialized infantry unit capable of rapid deployment to troublespots around the world. The 1st Ranger Battalion was activated as a permanent unit in 1974. The idea was to build a unit that would act as a benchmark of excellence for the volunteer force. 'The battalion is to be an elite, light, and the most proficient infantry battalion in the world. A battalion that can do things with its hands and weapons better than anyone,' General Creighton W. Abrams Jr. wrote in what would become the unit's charter. 'Wherever the battalion goes, it must be apparent that it is the best.' In recent decades, Rangers deployed during conflicts including 1991's Gulf War and the War on Terror. Rangers were among the special-operations forces who took part in the Battle of Mogadishu in Somalia in 1993, in which two Black Hawk helicopters were shot down and 18 American soldiers, including members of the 75th, were killed. In 2019, Rangers and Delta Force operators killed the Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. 'I often think how many soldiers are alive today because they were led by a Ranger,' retired Command Sergeant Major Rick Merritt, who served 25 years in the 75th Ranger Regiment, including combat deployments to Panama, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Iraq, told me. Ranger School, Merritt said, is 'the ultimate life-insurance policy for going to combat.' This year's competition started before dawn at Camp Rogers, a training area at Fort Benning, in the pine forest of western Georgia. A crowd of spectators had gathered, a mix of family members, unit mates, and former Rangers. Midway through the first seven-mile run, the competitors picked up a 60-pound sandbag that they would carry for the rest of the race. The 75th Ranger Regiment teams were among the first to return to Camp Rogers, barely pausing after dropping the sandbags before heading to Victory Pond. There, they dove into the frigid water and made their way toward the boat ramp on the opposite shore, about 400 meters away. Some dog-paddled, held up by their life jacket. Others paddled on their back, hoping to conserve energy. One by one, the Rangers shuffled out of the water, soaked and shivering in the cool morning air. 'This sucks,' one of the paratroopers of Team 34 said as they scrambled up the concrete boat ramp and a subsequent hill. Without stopping, his partner answered with the universal infantry rejoinder, 'Embrace the suck.' That meant a day of marching with 50-pound rucksacks as the teams navigated from task to task, earning points for each. In the past, the competition had been linear: Each team followed the same sequence of events. This year's wrinkle—called 'Ranger Reckoning'—left it to the soldiers to complete the remaining objectives in any order. Each task presented a different problem. One was an urban-assault course where teams attacked a two-story building; after throwing a grenade into a makeshift bunker, they would rush forward to a yellow line and perform 20 burpees (an exercise in which a single rep includes a push-up followed by a squat jump). The exercise raised their heart rate, mimicking the stress of combat. Once the burpees were done, the team shot red balloons attached to two targets before moving inside a cinder-block house, where they then faced other targets meant to represent both enemy fighters (to shoot) and civilians (to avoid shooting). In past years, completing events faster meant more time to rest between events. But this new format turned the first day into an endurance competition, O'Brien told me. In all, the teams marched about 35 miles to complete the course. Every task was graded by instructors from the Airborne and Ranger Training Brigade, which runs Ranger School. Retired Lieutenant Colonel Blain Reeves, a two-time competitor who won the Best Ranger competition in 1993 and served with the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq, told me that the first day was a 'smoker.' (Ranger School is meant to 'smoke'—exhaust—its students each day.) Team 38—White and her partner, Captain Seth Deltenre—had a 20-person cheering section that followed them from station to station. White did not agree to an interview; it seemed that she wanted her achievement to speak for itself. Among her supporters was Kris Fuhr, a 1985 West Point graduate who recalled coming of age in a very different military. West Point 'made it very clear that they did not want us there,' she told me. 'We didn't have the protections of equal opportunity' or resources around sexual harassment and assault. 'We had no advocates.' Fuhr has tried to take on that role for younger women in the military, and has run a mentorship program for women attending Ranger School since they were first allowed to do so, in 2015. Later that same year, then–Defense Secretary Ashton Carter announced that all military positions would be open to women. (Although women had served near the front lines for years, this decision removed the remaining formal barriers to direct-combat roles.) The Army reports that 367 women have attempted Ranger School since 2015; 160 have earned the Ranger tab. In recent years, upwards of 1,000 men have earned a Ranger tab each year. In my months of contact with the Army's event organizers leading up to the Best Ranger Competition, no one mentioned Team 38 or Gabrielle White. In different times, the Army might have celebrated White's history-making presence. But under Trump and Hegseth, mentions of historic achievements by women and minorities have been removed from military websites. As of this writing, trans service members have been banned from the military, and the Pentagon has taken the name of the slain gay leader Harvey Milk, a Navy veteran, off of a supply ship. In his 2024 book, The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free, Hegseth wrote that 'women cannot physically meet the same standards as men,' arguing that they will mother soldiers in their units. 'Dads push us to take risks,' he wrote, but 'moms put the training wheels on our bikes. We need moms. But not in the military, especially in combat units.' On a video podcast last year, Hegseth said: 'I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn't made us more effective; hasn't made us more lethal; has made fighting more complicated.' (He has since walked back some of his earlier remarks. On the Megyn Kelly Show in early December, he said, 'If we have the right standard and women meet that standard, roger. Let's go.') During his confirmation process, Hegseth echoed President Trump's desire for a Pentagon focused on 'lethality, meritocracy, warfighting, accountability, and readiness.' It is worth noting that Gabrielle White was given no accommodations or special treatment, and at no point did the Ranger instructors adjust her score because she was a woman. Waiting to start the Malvesti Obstacle Course, Moore and Hokanson bounced from foot to foot and shook out their arms and legs. Both knew they had no more than four minutes of suffering before a break. When they got the order to go, Moore and Hokanson easily knocked out the six chin-ups and shimmied up the 30-foot rope. Jumping down a log ladder with nearly six feet between each rung barely slowed them down. Finishing the monkey bars over water put them on the edge of the notorious 'worm pit,' a shallow, muddy trench covered with barbed wire that would-be Rangers must crawl through—sometimes submerged—on their belly. Hokanson went first. Moore was next, slipping past the last rusty strand of wire and meeting Hokanson on the chin-up bar. Six more chin-ups and a run to the finish line later, they'd completed the obstacle course in three minutes and 35 seconds—a respectable time for rested soldiers, and an astonishing one for people who'd been going for almost 13 hours. They hadn't caught their breath before it was time for a pop quiz, which instructors give after some events to test competitors' cognitive powers. In which three conflicts did Army Colonel Richard Malvesti—the Ranger for whom the course is named—serve? (The answer, which Hokanson and Moore got right, was Vietnam, Grenada, and Operation Just Cause in Panama.) Before a night ruck march, the field would be narrowed to 32 pairs. In the holding area, Moore pulled off his boots and propped his swollen feet, chewed up with blisters from his wet socks, on his rucksack. He was exhausted, but he and Hokanson were in first place and Moore knew all eyes were on them. 'I'm going to act like this is the first thing I'm doing and I'm fresh,' Moore said. 'Everyone's going to look at me and realize that we are here to do business.' Competitors had deliberately not been told how long the ruck march would be, but at least they were hydrated and had gotten something to eat. When it was time, Moore laced up his boots once more. 'You look strong,' Hokanson told his partner. 'I don't know if you're faking it or if you're being serious, but you look strong.' Moore admitted afterward that he'd been faking it a little. Nevertheless, Team 44 took the lead and tore through the first four miles. Hokanson and Moore soon dumped their rucksacks to face the next test: They were each to carry two 45-pound water jugs for an unknown distance using only grip strength—no carrying the jugs on their shoulders, no wrist wraps, no resting the jugs on their feet, no setting them on the ground. As soon as one jug was set down, both men would have to stop and return to the starting line. The test, as the Ranger livestream commentator said, had a steep price for failure. Team 44 came in second, but had the most total points for the competition. Team 38—White and Deltenre—sat near the bottom of the table. Before the second day's events kicked off, the Rangers lay on the grass outside Doughboy Stadium, their boots and socks off. When they walked, they tended to do so with a grimace or a limp. Inside the stadium were six stations, including one where the soldiers had to breach doors with a torch, a saw, and fire-rescue tools. At the first station, teams would toss a 100-pound medicine ball over one shoulder between burpees—30 in all—before hauling a 290-pound yoke 50 meters. Then they'd each climb a 15-foot rope 10 times. Later they'd sprint to a dummy, bandage its fake wounds, and haul it roughly 50 yards on a stretcher sled back to the starting line. At the last station, they would throw axes before they retreated to a neighboring baseball field to throw practice grenades. For Team 44, this was light work. Moore, in particular, seemed to have a well of energy, and the men left the stadium area before lunch, giving them time to rest. More was at stake for White and Deltenre as they entered the stadium to cheers from their supporters; only 16 teams would advance to the third and final day, and Team 38 would need good scores to make it. After each burpee and medicine-ball throw, White and Deltenre encouraged each other to press on. They skipped the rope climb, incurring a penalty but saving energy for other events, and went on to win the axe throwing, which moved them up to 17th place. By the end of the afternoon, they were the only team that still seemed upbeat. They waited for the order to head toward the field where a Black Hawk helicopter would take them to Camp Darby for a mystery event before the night land-navigation test—historically the most difficult part of the competition. Once they got the order, White and Deltenre trotted to the helicopter. For the night event, each team would have five hours to find five points in the tangled swamps near Hollis Branch Creek without using any roads or trails. Hokanson took the lead on navigating for Team 44. Moore followed his partner's chem light as they bushwhacked through the swamp, in mud up to their knees, to the first point. But when they got across the swamp, Hokanson didn't see what he'd expected. Checking the map again, he realized they were going the wrong way. 'Kevin, I love you, but we're going to have to go through this again,' Hokanson said. 'Griff, I'm going to kill you,' Moore said. 'I'm going to wring your neck.' They had planned to hit one point each hour, but it took them almost two hours in the thorn brushes and mud to find the first one. With their bearings finally set, the men found two more points in under two hours and a fourth before the five-hour cutoff, leaving them with a lead of more than 100 points going into day three. (No team found all five points in the allotted time.) Team 38, meanwhile, ranked second in the night navigation event, securing themselves a spot for the final day. At 7:30 the next morning, as the first streaks of light came through the pine trees, the 16 remaining teams prepared to take on the Darby Queen, one of the toughest obstacle courses in the U.S. Army. The course comprises 24 stations made mostly of wood and rope set over a mile of rolling terrain. Some are as tall as three stories; others require crawling through trenches. Hokanson, who scored the fastest official solo time during the regiment's training period this year, moved effortlessly through them all, encouraging Moore as he went. They finished first, extending their lead. Next, the teams retreated to a field where they packed their gear and wrapped it with their ponchos to create a raft before boarding a helicopter for a short flight to Victory Pond. Sitting in the door of the helicopter with his legs dangling, Hokanson was shivering uncontrollably. After two full days of competition, he couldn't wait to complete the final tasks. The helicopter swooped past a rappelling tower and hovered over the middle of the lake. As the crew chief signaled for Team 44 to jump, they pushed their raft into the water before following it out. They swam their rucksacks to shore, then ran to a launch point where inflatable boats waited and paddled against the current, across the lake to the rappelling tower. One more water event and Team 44 could rest before the final run, whose distance the competitors did not know. The Combat Water Survival Assessment, which also must be completed during the beginning of Ranger School, starts at the bottom of a 35-foot-tall metal ladder. From the top, with no safety harness, Moore calmly walked across a log suspended above the pond. He shimmied across a rope, plunged into the water and swam to a dock, then ran back and tagged Hokanson, who started up the 35-foot ladder to the suspended log. Moore, meanwhile, headed for a 70-foot tower. At the top of the tower's staircase, he slid down on a pulley attached to a suspended cable, and crashed into the pond. All of these tasks were timed. Even though their lead was insurmountable this late in the competition, Hokanson and Moore ran through the course at full speed; they didn't want to leave any doubt. They came in fourth for the event, all but assuring their victory. Now the only thing left to do was run the final road race. Team 43—another 75th Regiment team, made up of Sergeants Emerson Schroeder and Tyler Steadman—was in third place but wanted to use this last event to push for second. When it was time to run, they kept a near-superhuman pace after having been almost constantly active for three days, and won the 4.1-mile race in about 30 minutes, becoming the first team to raise its rifles at the finish line. Team 44 came in third in the race, and first in the overall competition. As they approached the finish line, Hokanson was so tired that he couldn't lift his rifle above his head. Tears welled up in his eyes as blood ran from his face onto his bib. The loudest cheers were for Team 38, which finished the run second to last. Overall, though, White and Deltenre ended the competition 14th out of the 52 teams. After raising their rifles, they hugged and went to get checked by the medics, a standard safety precaution. Kris Fuhr was at the finish line with the other Team 38 supporters. Watching White raise her rifle at the end of the race felt like validation, she told me, for the work she and her peers had done to make the military a more hospitable place for the women who came after them. Jackie Munn: I felt more welcome in combat than I did on base For their part, White's opponents seemed to respect her. 'Anyone who makes it to day three and finishes the competition has achieved a standard far beyond anything in the Army,' Hokanson said. In his speech at the awards ceremony, General Randy A. George, the Army chief of staff, asked a question that had hung over the whole three days: Why does the Army put so much time and so many resources into the Best Ranger Competition? 'Our Army is the best in the world,' George told the audience. 'When tested in battle, we prevail time and again. Rangers are the best of our Army.' Later, I asked George whether he thought that this generation of soldiers was less lethal than those that came before. 'I don't buy that,' George said, shaking his head. In fact, he said, if you compare Rangers over the past three decades, today's are at least as capable as their predecessors—maybe even more so. 'Everybody's going to have to shoot, move, and communicate on the modern battlefield,' George said. 'They're going to have to be absolute experts at that. And that's what you get with any Ranger formation.' Toward the end of the awards ceremony, George challenged every Ranger onstage to take what they'd learned and use it to inspire excellence among their peers. 'Go back to your units and build Rangers,' he said. 'Challenge your troops. Test them and push them. Send them to school and set expectations that they come home Ranger-qualified. Hold them accountable to being tough and lethal.' In my conversations with the competitors, I saw this ethic firsthand. The Rangers had trained for months not in the hopes of attaining fame or fortune but for the chance to exceed even their own expectations. Perhaps this is why, after the competition ended, none of the soldiers I spoke with brought up the fact that this year's Best Ranger Competition had made history by being the first to include a woman—not because they did not want to draw attention to White or her performance but because the days-long physical and mental challenge demanded everything they had, leaving them no time to think about anything but putting one foot in front of the other.
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
National Guard troops deployed in D.C. and Dems make redistricting a core issue: Morning Rundown
National Guard troops arrive in Washington, D.C., as Mayor Muriel Bowser strikes a critical tone about Trump. Young men with bachelor's degrees have a tougher time landing a job after college. And a 122-year-old garment company's 'Made in America' identity is a point of pride — amid slimmer profit margins. Here's what to know today. Trump's National Guard deployment a test for D.C. Mayor Bowser President Donald Trump's plan to address crime in the nation's capital moved forward yesterday with the arrival of National Guard troops to the D.C. Armory to report for duty and assist with local law enforcement. The mobilization officially marks the beginning of their deployment, and all 800 soldiers ordered by Trump to the city should be operational by the end of the week, a senior Army official said. A defense official said guard members will specifically be engaged in crowd management, perimeter control, security and communications support for law enforcement. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser struck a critical tone about Trump in remarks to community leaders last night, characterizing his actions as an 'authoritarian push.' But on the whole, her response to the mobilization has been far more measured than those of Democrats, both in the D.C. area and nationally, who have repeatedly and forcefully hammered the Trump administration, reporters Jonathan Allen and Megan Lebowitz write in an analysis. Earlier this week, Bowser pointed out that the city and federal agencies have a long history of working together for special events in the city. She also struck a neutral tone after a meeting yesterday with Attorney General Pam Bondi, saying she was focused on 'how to make the most of the additional officer support that we have.' Bowser's reaction to Trump might have something to do with the law, federal money and a long-standing threat to repeal self-government in the city being lined up behind him, giving the mayor little choice but to comply. And she's at a disadvantage as her administration fights to get Congress and Trump to reverse course on a law enacted this year that froze $1 billion in city money. What happens next is being watched closely by municipal leaders across the country, said Justin Bibb, the mayor of Cleveland and president of the Democratic Mayors Association. More coverage of Trump's D.C. takeover: Black civil rights leaders and mayors of several cities said Trump's move is 'fundamentally grandstanding.' And by suggesting that other cities run by Black mayors may be next, Trump was 'playing the worst game of racially divisive politics,' one mayor said. Trump said 'we will give you places to stay' in urging homeless people to leave D.C. But when pressed on where these people would go, the Trump administration suggested existing shelters or jail. Redistricting: the unlikely issue at the center of Democratic politics Redistricting was once an issue that made voters' eyes glaze over. Not anymore. The ongoing standoff between Republicans and Democrats in Texas, as the GOP moves to redraw district maps mid-decade (rather after the new census in 2030) and Democrats seek to stop them, has put the issue in the burning hot center of Democratic politics. And potential 2028 White House candidates are inserting themselves into the fight. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker — whose state is hosting many Democratic lawmakers who left the Texas to deny a quorum in the state House — is taking on the role of protector-in-chief and has vowed to stand in the way of Trump and Texas officials who authorized civil arrest warrants. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to pursue a redraw of his state's congressional maps if Republicans move forward with their plans in Texas. And other governors, including Colorado's Jared Polis, Maryland's Wes Moore and Hawaii's Josh Green, recently spoke about the issue at a National Governors Association Meeting. Any Democrats hoping to draw attention on the national stage must show the base they know how to take off the gloves, says one leader at a progressive grassroots group. Read the full story here. More politics news: Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, a White House official said. The White House is reviewing the Smithsonian's museum exhibitions, materials and operations — and plans to commemorate the country's 250th anniversary — to ensure it aligns with Trump's views of history. The national debt surpassed $37 trillion, years sooner than pre-pandemic projections. College-educated young men struggle in a slowing job market With hiring by employers slowing and fewer jobs than anticipated being added to the economy, one group of workers is finding it difficult to get their foot in the job market: young men with bachelor's degrees. An NBC News analysis found that they are slightly likelier to be unemployed than young men with just high school diplomas. Data also shows the unemployment rate for young men with bachelor's degrees is 6%, compared to 3.5% for young women with the same level of education. This shift in employment prospects for young men is tied partly to the changing dynamics of the labor market. For one, much of the job growth in the U.S. has been driven by the health care and social services industry, in which 80% of workers are female. At the same time, the tech industry has been hit particularly hard by recent layoffs, and a Bureau of Labor Statistics report showed 11,000 manufacturing jobs were lost last month. For young men such as Emanuel Barcenas, a 25-year-old with a computer science degree from the Illinois Institute of Technology, the search for a job has been a long, frustrating process. Despite having applied for more than 900 jobs, Barcenas has only gotten a handful of interviews. 'I'm trying my best, but I guess my best isn't good enough,' he said. Read the full story here. Read All About It The man suspected of gunning down three people outside a Target store in Austin, Texas, was identified as a 32-year-old man who police found naked, holding a Bible and claiming to be Jesus. Medicare enrollees who buy the optional Part D drug benefit may see substantial premium price hikes next year. Frozen out of the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, European leaders including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy are to push the U.S. president in a virtual call on Wednesday over growing alarm there could be a disastrous agreement for Kyiv. Is 'War of the Worlds' the worst movie of 2025? Some think the movie's tagline, 'It's worse than you think,' pretty much sums things up. Fake German heiress Anna 'Delvey' Sorokin was accused of dumping pet rabbits in a Brooklyn park after a photoshoot, and now she said she has received hundreds of death threats. Staff Pick: Denim-maker's 'Made in the USA' identity is a point of pride Americans spend over $500 billion on clothing a year, but only 2.5% of it is made in the U.S. That number got me wondering: In a time when global sourcing is cheaper and easier than ever, why would a brand choose domestic manufacturing? What does it take to survive? And what could that say about the prospects for reshoring apparel manufacturing? That's when I discovered Round House, a 122-year-old garment maker still sewing jeans in Oklahoma. Their jeans are priced at $70 a pair, more affordable than most 'Made in America' brands, and the company pays their employees above-market wages. It survives not by cutting corners or maximizing profit, but through a devotion to heritage, a commitment to community and a stomach for razor-thin margins. A foreign-made arm of the business also helps keep the lights on. In many ways, the company fits Trump's 'America First' vision, but their story proves just how tough it is to produce clothing domestically. — Jing Feng, business and economy producer NBC Select: Online Shopping, Simplified One simple piece of advice to follow when trying to keep your dog cool: If it's too hot for you, it's too hot for your dog. Here's how to keep them from overheating, according to vets. The NBC Select team also found over 30 college dorm essentials for a comfortable yet organized room, right in time for back-to-school preparations.
