Romualdez holds consultative meeting with Mindanao lawmakers
In a statement, Romualdez said he met the lawmakers in Butuan City, Surigao del Norte to discuss 'local development needs, national policy alignment, and shared legislative goals,' and hold a listening session for the lawmakers to raise urgent concerns, propose policy interventions, and ensure their advocacies are integrated into the national agenda.
The Mindanao lawmakers he met with are:
Jose 'Joboy' Aquino II (Butuan City)
Dale Corvera (Agusan del Norte)
Alfelito Bascug (Agusan del Sur)
Adolph Edward Plaza (Agusan del Sur)
Francisco Matugas (Surigao del Norte)
Romeo Momo (Surigao del Sur)
Alexander Ty Pimentel (Surigao del Sur)
Kaka Bag-ao (Dinagat Islands)
Lordan Suan (Cagayan de Oro City)
Yevgeny Vicente 'Bambi' Emano (Misamis Oriental)
Arlyn Ayon (SWERTE Party-list)
Maria Carmen Zamora (Davao de Oro)
Leonel 'Jhong' Ceniza (Davao de Oro)
Nelson Dayanghirang Jr. (Davao Oriental)
De Carlo 'Oyo' Uy (Davao del Norte)
John Tracy Cagas (Davao del Sur)
The lawmakers hail from the ruling party Lakas-CMD which is led by Romualdez, the Nacionalista Party, the National Unity Party, the Partido Federal ng Pilipinas, and the Liberal Party, as well as an Independent.
'This forum is more than a gathering of colleagues—it is a reflection of our commitment to listening, learning, and legislating for the people. We are united not just by party lines, but by our shared duty to uplift every Filipino,' Romualdez said.
The main topic of the meeting was the House-to-House Agenda, a seven-point framework that outlines the legislative priorities of the 20th Congress towards development:
Food Security - supporting agricultural modernization and regional food systems to ensure accessible and affordable food;
Clean Water Access - expanding infrastructure for safe and reliable water, especially in underserved areas;
Affordable and Stable Electricity - promoting energy reforms and rural electrification to boost local productivity and quality of life;
Reliable Transportation - strengthening connectivity through roads, ports, and transport systems that link communities to opportunities;
Sustainable Livelihood - empowering MSMEs, cooperatives, and local industries to create dignified, long-term employment;
Accessible Healthcare - enhancing public health services, including rural hospitals and barangay health stations; and
Quality Education - improving access through investment in schools, teacher support, and digital learning platforms.
'We are here to listen. We are here to understand your realities, your aspirations, and your solutions. The 20th Congress is committed to being a partner in turning regional visions into national progress,' Romualdez added.
He was joined by former Senior Deputy Speaker Aurelio 'Dong' Gonzales Jr. of Pampanga and Deputy Speaker David 'Jay-jay' Suarez of Quezon.
Romualdez added that the House of Representatives will institutionalize more regional consultations in the months ahead.
At least 283 members of the House have already expressed their support for Romualdez's reelection as Speaker for the 20th Congress, which First Regular Session will open on July 28.
The Davao Region, on the other hand, is considered the bailiwick of former President Rodrigo Duterte and his family. — BM, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos says he's taking all threats very seriously
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said that he has taken all kinds of threats very seriously. In an interview with India's Firstpost, Marcos was asked if Vice President Sara Duterte is capable of hatching an assassination plot against him. The Philippine leader said he is not in a position to say if Duterte is really capable of doing it. ''I don't know, you know... I am really not in a position to say what that's about,'' Marcos said. ''But you have to be careful... but then you know in my position, there always is some kind of threat and we take them all very seriously,'' he added. To recall, Duterte's ''assassination'' statement against Marcos, First Lady Louise ''Liza'' Araneta-Marcos and Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez was made during a virtual press conference in November last year, wherein she slammed the House of Representatives' order to transfer Atty. Zuleika Lopez, her then chief of staff, from the House detention facility to the Correctional Institution for Women in Mandaluyong City. Her remarks were immediately referred to the Presidential Security Command (PSC) for proper action. In response, Duterte clarified that her statement was not a threat, saying that she only highlighted the alleged threat to her security. In February, the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) filed sedition and grave threat complaint against Duterte over the alleged kill order. To recall, one of the seven Articles of Impeachment against the Vice President included the conspiracy to assassinate Marcos. the First Lady, and the Speaker.—AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
4 hours ago
- GMA Network
VP Sara impeachment raps in 2026? Diokno, UP prof say it's possible
A refiling of the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte is possible in 2026 if the Supreme Court (SC) maintains its decision declaring her current impeachment charges unconstitutional, House prosecutor and Akbayan Representative Chel Diokno said Thursday. 'Kung talagang sarado na 'yung lahat ng kalsada para ituloy ang impeachment pansamantala ngayon, yung pinaka-last resort siyempre ay mag-file ulit pagdating ng February 2026,' Diokno told GMA Integrated News' Unang Balita in an interview. (If all avenues are really closed to continue the impeachment for now, the last resort, of course, is to file again by February 2026.) With 19 votes for, four against, and one abstention, the Senate on Monday voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Duterte with some senators citing the SC decision. Voting 13-0, the SC ruled that the articles of impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. It also ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. However, motions for reconsideration were filed in connection with the ruling of the high court. For his part, UP College of Law Assistant Professor Paolo Tamase also sees another filing of an impeachment complaint against Duterte next year if the SC maintains its decision despite the motions. 'Kung babaliktarin ng Korte Suprema ang desisyon niya, maaari may maghahain ng tama ng motion sa Senado upang buhayan ulit ang kaso ng impeachment,' Tamase said. (If the Supreme Court reverses its decision, someone might file a motion in the Senate to revive the impeachment case.) 'Kung hindi po babaliktarin ng Korte Suprema yung desisyon nila sa Duterte v. House, mukhang refiling po ang susunod na mangyayari sa House of Representatives,' he added. (If the Supreme Court does not reverse their decision in Duterte v. House, it looks like the next thing to happen in the House of Representatives is a refiling.) Duterte's camp earlier said that it remains ready should there be a new impeachment complaint filed against her in 2026. "Kung dumating man ang pagkakataon na there will be another impeachment, sabi nga nila, subject to the one-year bar, we will be ready to face those allegations,' said Atty. Michael Poa in a previous interview. (If there will be another impeachment, as they say, subject to the one-year bar, we will be ready to face those allegations.) The vice president was impeached by the House on February 5, with more than 200 congressmen endorsing the verified complaint against her. Duterte was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. She has denied the allegations. –Joviland Rita/ VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
20 hours ago
- GMA Network
House: No bad faith in impeachment of VP Sara
The House of Representatives acted within its authority and in accordance with the Constitution and existing laws in initiating the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte and archiving the first three impeachment complaints filed against her, two House officials said. House spokesperson Princess Abante as well as House prosecution panel spokesperson Audie Bucoy made the position in response to lawyer Ernesto Francisco, Jr.'s statement that the House, in taking its time to act on the first three impeachment complaints against the Vice President, acted in bad faith. 'Our position is that all of the actions of the House of Representatives in filing the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Duterte are all in accordance with the Constitution, the internal rules of the House and prevailing jurisprudence. Walang bad faith kapag sinunod mo yung alituntunin eh,' Abante said in a press conference. (There is no bad faith if you follow the rules.) 'In the [Vice President] Duterte's case and as stated in the Supreme Court decision [that we are appealing], the High Court said that the House followed the timeline required by the Constitution,' Abante added. Impeachment not a rat race Bucoy then stressed that the House, in accordance to its rules and the Constitution, all took action on the first three impeachment complaints alongside the consolidate fourth impeachment complaint by referring it to the Order of Business within 10 session days on February 5, 2025, because the first impeachment complaint filed is not necessarily the most meritorious one. In addition, Bucoy noted that since the consolidated fourth impeachment complaint was already signed off by at least 215 members of the House which is way more than one-third of the House members required by the Constitution for it to serve as Articles of Impeachment and subsequently transmitted to the Senate, the archiving of the first three impeachment complaints after reaching the one-third threshold should not be considered an initiated impeachment complaint. 'Walang paglabag ang Kamara because they have 10 session days to calendar the complaint to the Order of Business. Ang impeachment process, hindi ho yan first to file. The House has the discretion to determine which complaint has the substance. Because if we prioritize the first to be filed, it is just a rat race. Kahit na napaka-whimsical, kahit na sham yung complaint, [ifa-file iyong complaint] if only to defeat a legitimate impeachment complaint,' Bucoy said. (This is not a matter of who gets to file the first impeachment complaint. If so, even though the complaint is whimsical, sham, the House has to act upon it if only to defeat a legitimate impeachment complaint.) 'Ayon sa desisyon ng [Korte Suprema sa] Francisco [v. House] na inulit ng Supreme Court sa Gutierrez [v. House Committee on Justice] case, hindi 'yan unahan. The House has the discretion. Pwede ang sabay-sabay, lilingapin lahat, sabay-sabay i-rerefer [na impeachment complaints]. The fourth impeachment complaint had way beyond the threshold [of one third]. Under the Constitution, this [complaint endorsed by at least one-third] will Constitute the Articles of Impeachment. This [fourth complaint] superseded the first three impeachment complaints. Wala hong abuso ng proseso,' Bucoy added. (Based on the Supreme Court decisions in Francisco v. House and Gutierrez v. House Committee on Justice. The House has the authority to consolidate the complaints. There is no abuse of the process.) In the same press conference, Bucoy then called on the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Duterte pending the resolution on the House's appeal on the Supreme Court decision junking the impeachment case against the Vice President, given that the Senate dragged its foot in starting the impeachment trial of the Vice President to begin with. Bucoy was referring to Article 11, Section 3.4 of the Constitution which states that "in case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed." The consolidated impeachment filed against the Vice President had more than one-third of House members as signatories, way beyond the threshold set by the Constitution that allows the House to directly transmit the Articles of Impeachment so the trial can proceed 'forthwith.' 'Dapat hintayin nila (Senado) kung ano ang magiging desisyon ng mataas na Hukuman sa motion for reconsideration. Otherwise, it will only show na talagang nagmamadali sila, na tapusin. E samantalang dati, 'yung forthwith [na sinasabi ng Constitution], hindi sila nagmamadali,' Bucoy said. (The Senate should wait for the decision of the Supreme Court on our motion for reconsideration. Otherwise, it will only show that they are in a rush to end it when they dragged their feet on starting the trial forthwith [as stated in the Constitution].) 'Bakit ngayon, iba yung kanilang gusto mangyari? Gusto nila, tapusin na. I-dismiss na?' Bucoy added. (Why the sudden change of tune now? Why do they want to end it, dismiss it quickly now?) — BM, GMA Integrated News
