Opinion - It's hurricane season again, and public health hangs in the balance
June marks the beginning of the 2025 Atlantic hurricane season, and forecasters are warning of above-average activity.
More than half of U.S. coastal areas should plan to face a major hurricane of Category 3, 4, or 5. If our 2024 experience is a reliable predictor, we can anticipate more than $100 billion in damage, more than 100 fatalities and an increasingly problematic, if overlooked, element of these disasters: the threat to public health.
Hurricanes and other water-centric events, like flooding, are creating ideal environments for the transmission of infectious diseases, from mold exposure to flesh-eating diseases to mosquito-borne viruses.
Clusters of a potentially fatal infection caused by Vibrio bacteria, which can cause severe diarrhea and necrotizing skin lesions, hit Florida after Hurricane Ian in 2023. Cases in 2024 exceeded that total, with high burdens in Florida counties that experienced the worst flooding from Hurricane Helene.
In Texas last summer, health officials warned the public of the risk of contracting West Nile virus post-Hurricane Beryl.
Mosquito-borne illness is possible wherever there are mosquitoes. Florida, California and Texas all experienced locally acquired cases of dengue fever in 2024.
Chikungunya, which can result in lifelong physical debilitation, is also present in the United States, with travel-associated and locally acquired cases being documented in Gulf states as recently as 2019.
Several deaths from Eastern equine encephalitis occurred last year in northeastern states, with several towns instituting curfews to curb the mosquito-borne threat.
Rises in mosquito populations are a well-documented hazard after hydrologic disasters like hurricanes, tsunamis and floods. These events can compromise sewage pipes, contaminate drinking water and result in diffuse areas of standing water that become breeding grounds for mosquitoes.
Emergency preparedness professionals have long understood the risk. What's changing is the frequency of billion-dollar disasters — and with them, we suspect, greater damage, flooding, and disease risk.
The good news is that we can leverage past experience, predictive models and tools like state and regional medical stockpiles to mitigate some of the worst health impacts. By strategically positioning medical supplies and countermeasures closer to the point of need, health authorities can significantly reduce response time, minimize logistical challenges and save lives.
A number of states already have medical stockpiles for basic medications and personal protective equipment; others are creating or updating legislative authorities for them.
These stockpiles generally lack federal support and medical countermeasures for high-consequence threats. The utility of state or regional caches could be expanded to include emerging needs like vaccines, treatments and diagnostics for vector-borne infections.
Congress authorized the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a pilot program matched by local funds for state stockpiling of medical countermeasures and other supplies for public health emergencies. The Biden administration did not request funding for state stockpiles and Congress has not appropriated funds for the program, however, stagnating the initiative.
Funding is the number one type of support that jurisdictions say they need to help them establish and maintain stockpiles.
Investing in state or regional stockpiles is a cost-effective approach to emergency preparedness. It minimizes the need for last-minute, high-cost procurements during crises, places more autonomy in the hands of states and helps maintain health care system resilience.
President Trump's executive order on preparedness recognizes ownership of preparedness at the state and local level, and calls on federal policy to help empower state and local jurisdictions to make smart infrastructure choices. This same ethos can extend to public health preparedness.
Last year's final report of the congressional Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic concluded that state stockpiles can provide a tailored local complement to the federal Strategic National Stockpile.
As natural disasters increase in frequency and intensity, the federal government can support local decision-makers in meeting their communities' unique public health readiness needs.
During COVID-19, many local officials did not know what was in the federal stockpile. Drawing stockpiles closer to the communities that will need them, tied to input from local, state or regional medical advisory groups, would increase awareness of stockpile contents and enable tailored input to support assets these communities need.
Redundancies built into state or regional caches could allow local health care providers access to critical supplies that allow them to meet medical standards of practice even in a crisis.
State stockpiles could facilitate greater efficacy of vendor-managed inventories and improve the quality and efficiency of supply rotations. Especially for countermeasures that have cold chain requirements or other complicated logistics, the federal role can be to provide the training and best practices to allow jurisdictions to successfully store and distribute these assets when needed.
COVID-19 revealed a national unpreparedness to increase production rationally based on identifiable gaps pre-disaster. For example, better local input on necessary ventilator functionalities would have improved the production of quality devices as demand surged, rather than devices produced by auto manufacturers that were failures.
State and regional stockpiles can reverse this underpreparedness and empower local communities.
Congress should show its federal support by extending the authorized timeline for the state stockpile program and, critically, funding it commensurately in the coming appropriations cycle.
By strategically positioning medical supplies and countermeasures closer to the point of need, a federal-regional-state partnership can significantly reduce response time, minimize logistical challenges and save lives before future hurricane seasons and other regional disasters occur.
Craig Vanderwagen is a former assistant secretary for preparedness and response in the Department of Health and Human Services and the founder and general manager of East West Protection, LLC, which provided private and public sector disaster preparedness support.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
5 hours ago
- Associated Press
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House has passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. 'What sense does that make?' she asked. 'What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?' The measure is part of the version of President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill as it stands would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails — or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry — based largely on their past experience — that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Benefits can be difficult to navigate even without a work requirement Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. 'It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid,' said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. 'If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping.' Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. 'Should I expect the government to take care of him?' he asked. 'I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity.' There's broad reliance on Medicaid for health coverage About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt the ability of them or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. 'Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern,' she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able — but worries about how that would be sorted out. 'It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it,' she said. Some people don't if they might lose coverage with a work requirement Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with 'serious or complex' medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in 'gig' jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. 'I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not have health insurance,' she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. 'There's no way I could have afforded that,' he said. 'I would have lost my foot and probably died.' ___ Associated Press writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut contributed to this article.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mosquito sample with West Nile Virus confirmed in Kern County
The first mosquito sample has been confirmed for West Nile virus in Kern County this year, Kern County Public Health officials said Friday. In a news release, public health said the virus is transmitted to people through the bites of infected mosquitoes. While many mosquito-borne illnesses such as West Nile virus cause only mild symptoms in most people, the infection can cause severe illness and even death in rare cases. While no human cases have been reported in Kern County this year, Kern County Public Health reminds everyone to take precautions to protect themselves from mosquitoes. Reduce mosquito breeding sites: • Remove standing or stagnate water from containers such flowerpots, fountains, birdbaths, pet bowls and wading pools. • Clean/scrub containers that collect water weekly to remove any potential mosquito eggs. • Maintain swimming pools in working condition. • Stock garden ponds with fish that eat mosquito larvae. •Report areas of mosquito infestation to your local vector control district. Decrease risk of mosquito-transmitted infections: • Avoid mosquitoes and mosquito-infested areas at all times of the day. • Wear long-sleeved shirts and long pants when outdoors. • Apply mosquito repellent to exposed skin when outdoors. • Ensure doors and windows have screens in good repair to keep mosquitoes out of your home. Although the first positive mosquito sample has been identified in the 93307 ZIP code, it is important for everyone to take precautions to avoid mosquito bites. Contact your local mosquito and vector control agency if there is a significant mosquito problem where you live, work, or play. Visit KCPH's West Nile Virus and Other Mosquito-Borne Illnesses regularly updated interactive webpage for more information.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
How bad could mosquito season be in Mass.? For some, it's already itchy
Summer is inching closer, but mosquitoes are already buzzing around Massachusetts. In some parts of Western Massachusetts, including Northampton, and on parts of Cape Cod, the blood-sucking insects have been a nuisance for people — despite mosquito season typically worsening deeper in the summer months. There are 52 mosquito species across the Bay State, according to the Central Massachusetts Mosquito Control Project. The presence of any particular mosquito species depends on the type of wetlands nearby, such as permanent swamps or river floodplains, along with containers holding standing water. In these wet habitats, mosquitoes will breed. Studies in March, when the state was still under drought conditions, showed that mosquito larval populations in Western Massachusetts were low, Timothy McGlinchy, a Brimfield resident who's the executive director of the Central Massachusetts Mosquito Control Project, told MassLive. As conditions changed and the rains came in April and May, the chances for more stable, stagnant water for mosquitoes to breed in increased, he continued. Unlike the western end of the state, mosquitoes have not yet emerged in Central Massachusetts. 'Because if it rains hard out in the Pioneer Valley and doesn't rain as hard out in Eastern Massachusetts, you're not gonna have as many mosquitoes in Eastern Massachusetts as you're gonna have in Western Massachusetts,' McGlinchy said. Different mosquito species can emerge, depending on environmental conditions, in early spring, late spring, summer or mid-summer, the Central Massachusetts Mosquito Control Project's website noted. During the summer — and depending on mosquitoes' habitats ― some species can produce several generations, increasing their populations as the summer goes on. The recent spring rains caused rivers to rise and spill out into floodplains. That created the stagnant waters that make the exact kind of breeding grounds for mosquitoes, McGlinchy said. For those on the Cape, the presence of mosquitoes can be strange given the abundance of saltwater. That's because there's a species of mosquitoes — sollicitans mosquitoes — that have evolved to thrive in salt marshes. " They're an aggressive daytime biter as well," McGlinchy said. 'That is a huge difference. Cape Cod works very hard to control these. But we're fortunate that we're inland and we don't have to deal with them.' Typically associated with mosquitoes are mosquito-borne illnesses like West Nike virus and Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE). But an increase in mosquitoes does not mean an increased chance of catching West Nile or EEE, McGlinchy said. In Massachusetts, the number of vector-carrying mosquito species is low and 'not a one-for-one,' he added. At the state level, surveillance and trapping testing of mosquitoes is scheduled to begin on June 16, according to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Testing throughout the summer will dictate the risks humans have of catching mosquito-borne illnesses, McGlinchy said. " So it's too early to make any prognosis on where we're going to be in regard to mosquito viruses this summer," he added. '...I haven't heard of any mosquitoes testing positive [for West Nile virus or EEE] yet. That'll be the coming months. It's not until July that we usually start seeing stuff anyways.' In 2024, 10 people tested positive for West Nile, according to the Department of Public Health. No deaths were reported. The last outbreak cycle of EEE in Massachusetts was between 2019 and 2020, when there were 12 cases and six deaths, according to the Department of Public Health. In 2024, four people in Massachusetts tested positive for EEE. Ultimately, personal prevention keeps people safe from mosquitoes and mosquito-borne illness, the spokesperson said. This includes using repellent that contains an EPA-registered active ingredient any time people are outdoors during mosquito season, covering up with long sleeves to reduce exposed skin when weather permits and rescheduling evening outdoor events to avoid peak mosquito biting times when risk is greatest. Westfield Health Bulletin: This year's Men's Health Month stresses empathy How a machine learning tool could predict postpartum depression risk sooner Baystate Health readies for hospital demolition at Mary Lane site Read the original article on MassLive.
