Global Campuses Head to Mumbai, Vidarbha Left Watching, Say Statehood Activists
The Maharashtra govt's decision to welcome institutions like Aberdeen University, University of York, University of Western Australia, Illinois Institute of Technology, and Istituto Europeo di Design (IED), who have expressed interest in setting up their campuses in Navi Mumbai, has sparked criticism from Vidarbha leaders. They claim the eastern region is being reduced to a spectator in the state's development narrative.
Speaking to TOI, statehood supporters argue that premier institutions could have been set up in Nagpur or Amravati, cities that not only have space but also the potential to transform into knowledge hubs. Instead, Navi Mumbai continues to be the focal point of investment and policy attention, leaving Vidarbha sidelined.
Former MLA Wamanrao Chatap criticised the govt, calling them 'anti-Vidarbha', and claimed that the decision to prioritise Navi Mumbai is politically motivated.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy
IC Markets
Tìm hiểu thêm
Undo
"This is being done to keep alliance partners happy and the govt in power," he alleged, targeting the chief minister for 'compromising Vidarbha's interests'.
Atharv Kothekar, senior digital marketing manager at the Association for Industrial Development (AID), echoed similar sentiments. "Vidarbha lies at the centre of India and has immense logistical value, but it is consistently left out of major policy decisions," he said.
Despite institutions like AIIMS and IIM existing in Nagpur, they are rarely highlighted in development narratives.
Kothekar added that inadequate infrastructure — including limited international air connectivity — and a Mumbai-focused model of development are keeping Vidarbha from progressing. "Mumbai is saturated with educational institutions and companies too. It's time we build an ecosystem in Vidarbha, starting with investment in basic infrastructure," he said.
Another expert on the topic, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the state govt is diverting already strained resources to Mumbai and western Maharashtra. "There is no political will to support Vidarbha. Even with 62 MLAs from this region, the power still lies in the hands of leaders from western parts of the state," he said.
He added that local initiatives like Symbiosis College in Nagpur have proven doubters wrong, showing that the people are ready — it is only the govt that lacks intent. "This imbalance only reaffirms our demand for a separate Vidarbha. Without statehood, these aspirations will never materialise," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor fallout: Airspace row with India costs Pakistan nearly Rs 1,240 crore in two months, reveals report
Pakistan's Ministry of Defence has told its National Assembly that the Pakistan Airports Authority (PAA) lost over Rs 1,240 crore between 24 April and 30 June after banning Indian-registered aircraft from its airspace. The revenue loss came from a sharp fall in overflight fees. The restriction has cut Pakistan's daily transit traffic by almost 20 per cent, affecting between 100 and 150 Indian flights every day. The move was announced on 24 April, a day after India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty . New Delhi's action followed the 22 April terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 people. The attack was blamed on ISI-backed militants operating from Pakistan. Islamabad said its airspace closure was retaliation for the treaty suspension. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program From that date, all Indian-registered aircraft, along with those operated, owned or leased by Indian carriers, were denied overflight rights. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo Economic impact higher than 2019 This is not the first time Pakistan has shut its skies to India. A similar move in 2019 cost around Rs 228 crore. The current closure is proving more expensive. Defence ministry figures show PAA's average daily overflight earnings in 2019 were $508,000, compared with $760,000 this year. Admitting the financial impact, the ministry said in its statement, 'Sovereignty and national defence take precedence over economic considerations.' It added that the restrictions were issued via Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) for 'strategic and diplomatic' reasons. Live Events The closure comes against the backdrop of heightened military tensions earlier this year. Between 7 and 10 May, cross-border hostilities flared after India launched Operation Sindoor . The operation targeted four terror hubs in Pakistan and five in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir with deep precision strikes. India said the strikes were aimed solely at terror infrastructure. Pakistan responded by launching drones and missiles at Indian airbases, military installations and civilian areas. The Indian Air Force countered with strikes on at least nine Pakistani airbases and three radar sites, some near nuclear facilities and command structures. Weapons used included BrahMos, Crystal Maze-2, Rampage and Scalp missiles, delivered by Su-30MKI, Rafale and Mirage-2000 fighters. Pakistan's skies remain open to all other international airlines, but Indian carriers are still banned. The restriction has been extended twice and is now expected to remain in place until the last week of August. India has imposed its own airspace ban on Pakistani-operated, owned or leased aircraft since 30 April, including military flights. Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol confirmed that the NOTAM against Pakistani flights has been extended until 23 August 2025 due to 'prevailing security protocols and strategic considerations.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘We'll all be poorer with Donald Trump's tariffs — but he can't halt clean energy'
Gernot Wagner Gernot Wagner is a climate economist at Columbia Business School and faculty director of its Climate Knowledge Initiative. Speaking to Srijana Mitra Das at Times Evoke, he discusses Donald Trump 's tariffs — and their implications for the net zero movement: Donald Trump has called the Indian economy 'dead' — how do you analyse that? I take Donald Trump's comment about India being a 'dead economy' about as seriously as anything else he says — the 50% tariffs on India and Brazil are now his latest instance of economic arson. Nobody even knows how long these tariffs will last, how high they'll be in a month, who will get exemptions or why. The tragedy is, Trump holds real power to damage the US — and the global — economy. BLOWING IN THE WIND... Donald Trump dislikes wind turbines, which he considers a blot on the landscape — yet, these are actually far better at preserving nature, a fact many nations accept by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This new air conditioner cools down a room in just seconds News of the Discovery Undo What are the key economic implications of Donald Trump's tariffs for America — and the world? The main implication is higher inflation — we will all be poorer for them. 'Price up, quantity demanded down' is a steadfast economic principle. It applies here too. Of course, there are complexities — are there ever smart tariffs, for instance? The answer can be 'Yes' in, say, a climate context with carbon tariffs like the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism ( CBAM ). These are the kind of tariffs which even writers of The Economist can get behind because they help level the playing field for a policy that is a step in the right direction, internalising negative externalities and ensuring the market functions better. Once, John Stuart Mill and Alexander Hamilton, both philosophers of liberalism, wrote favourably about setting tariffs for infant industry protection. A fledgling United States of America was extremely dependent on England — tariffs were the only way to jumpstart certain industries. Today, fastgrowing economies like India can benefit up to a point from intelligently applied targeted tariffs to foster domestic industry. However, things are different with Trump's tariffs — these do not benefit anyone. Consider the deal struck between the European Union (EU) and the US now — tariffs essentially went from almost 0 to 15%. US consumers buying European products are paying more while European consumers buying American products are also doing the same — everyone is poorer. Trump says the tariffs will boost US manufacturing and competitiveness — will they? There might have been a grain of truth to that, had the tariffs not come hand in hand with measures that actually hurt our competitiveness and manufacturing. The One Big Beautiful Bill passed recently removes many incentives that, under the Inflation Reduction Act of the Biden administration, helped onshoring the solar manufacturing supply chain in America. Five years ago, the US produced 13.5 new gigawatts of solar panels — this year, the US surpassed 50 gigawatts worth of domestic solar panel assembly. China dominates the global solar panel manufacturing supply chain. But this change in the US was because of concerted industrial policy, guiding things in the right direction on manufacturing, climate and competitiveness. Now, Donald Trump famously hates wind turbines. He also hates solar panels. Why? These cut into the profits of the fossil fuel industry. So, this is a double whammy for the US clean energy transition. It is now more costly to import solar panels — it is also more costly to manufacture them domest-ically. Yet, the clean energy transition is the inevitable future for business and manufacturing — there is only so much the Trump administration can do to stand in its way. The big winner from all these measures is China — the big loser is the US. The most worrying feature for businesses here is the random process of setting tariff levels, the inadequacy of the reasoning behind them and the erratic nature of it all. Businesses crave policy certainty. If you were to announce a complete phase-out of internal combustion engines by, say, January 1, 2035, as discussed and instituted in the EU, companies can say, 'Alright, that's 10 years from now, let's figure out how to adjust.' They can rework their investments and then strategise how to gain. Here, we have the administration saying, 'Tariffs are coming on this date — oh, now they're delayed by 90 days. Now they're on, now they're off'. Such uncertainty is hardly likely to benefit US competitiveness. How do you see the global energy transition? I am optimistic on some fronts. India and China have net zero goals. However, I am pessimistic about what is happening politically in the US at the federal level — plenty of damage will be done. But while those in charge are taking steps backward in the US, globally, the transition is accelerating in the right direction. You mentioned the EU's CBAM — this was recently rejected by BRICS which called it unilateral and discriminatory. What is your view? Of course those on CBAM's receiving end have obligations to their own citizens and would quite prefer CBAM to not exist. However, there are two important points here. First, the planet benefits overall because CBAM expands the carbon club or the set of nations willing to work on the best policies and nudge things in the right direction. Second, CBAM enables certain countries and industries to gain — for example, the Korean steel industry basically has two major companies. Those two groups export only about 5% of their production to the EU. So, only 5% of South Korea's steel production is directly affected by CBAM. That said, the prospect of CBAM coming along has been in place for a while. This prompted both these leading producers in the South Korean steel industry to invest in lower carbon steel production technologies that will help them avoid those carbon tariffs — CBAM justifies such investments, subsidies and domestic policies, all of which help the planet. BRICS could see that as a key result. India already has many climate-oriented policies, like the electrification of two- and three-wheelers, that are in many ways more advanced than anywhere else in the world. These have a clear rationale to them — electric motors are fundamentally better technology, a much more efficient mode than internal combustion engines. Why shouldn't a rapidly growing economy like India not jump for that, instead of locking itself into inefficient old technology? Why not use CBAM as an opportunity to do exactly that?
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump asked out this Oscar-winning actress the same day she ended her marriage
Over the years, numerous women have publicly described receiving unsolicited attention from Donald Trump . Now, Oscar-winning actress Emma Thompson has added her own story, recalling how the US president phoned her out of the blue, inviting her to 'stay at one of my beautiful places' and have dinner, on the very day she finalized her divorce from actor-director Kenneth Branagh Speaking Saturday(August 9) at the Locarno Film Festival in Switzerland, Thompson recalled taking the call while in her trailer during filming of the 1998 political drama Primary Colors. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program ''Hello, this is Donald Trump,'' she remembered hearing. 'I thought it was a joke and asked: 'How can I help you?'' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 5 Books Warren Buffett Recommends You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo According to Thompson, Trump told her, ''I'd love you to come and stay at one of my beautiful places. Maybe we could have dinner.'' Thompson said she responded politely: 'That's very sweet. Thank you so much. I'll get back to you.' Live Events At the time, Trump had recently divorced his second wife, Marla Maples , with whom he shares daughter Tiffany. Thompson's marriage to Branagh, which began in 1989, ended in 1995 after his affair with actress Helena Bonham Carter during the filming of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. In a 2022 interview with The New Yorker, Thompson said she had been 'utterly blind' to Branagh's other relationships and described herself as 'half alive' when the marriage ended. Thompson is now married to actor Greg Wise, with whom she has two children.
