logo
For one night, the Congressional Women's Softball Game sets aside partisan politics for a greater cause

For one night, the Congressional Women's Softball Game sets aside partisan politics for a greater cause

CBS News15 hours ago
Washington — Marcella Powell is not a huge softball fan, nor is she a political junkie. So why did she travel more than 1,000 miles from her home in Pensacola, Florida, to Washington, D.C., to take part in Wednesday's annual Congressional Women's Softball Game?
"When this came up, I was like, 'I really want to do it.' So, I did it with no hesitation, no effort, no second thoughts," Powell said.
Unlike their male counterparts, whose annual baseball game pits Republicans against Democrats, the congressional women, who begin practicing months in advance, play together with no party affiliation. It's just "Team Congress" against the "Bad News Babes," a team that includes members of the media.
Republican Rep. Kimberlyn King-Hinds, a nonvoting delegate representing the Northern Mariana Islands, has enjoyed the break from partisan politics on the Hill.
"I'll be honest, when you get in there (on Capitol Hill), it's like Team Red or Team Blue, right? And there's a clear delineated line," King-Hinds told CBS News. "But here, man, it's just women coming together, playing for a good cause."
That good cause is why Powell is here. The game is played for a charity, the Young Survival Coalition, which helps young adults with breast cancer.
"To know me is to know me before cancer. I was just this energetic blossom, this ray of sunshine," said Powell, who was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 31. "When cancer came, it kind of like, hid me. YSC helped me find my joy again."
The Young Survival Coalition provided her with resources and connections she couldn't find anywhere else.
Powell now organizes monthly meetings with fellow survivors. She says the meetings have become more than just a support group, but "a family."
Family was among the reasons King-Hinds wanted to play in the softball game. Her mother and sister are both breast cancer survivors.
"You know, when they said that's the cause they were playing for, I was let, 'Bet, I'm down,'" King-Hinds said.
Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida co-founded the game in 2009 after she was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 41.
"I mean it's just very emotional," she said of the annual softball game. "It's so deeply personal. A big part of this is raising awareness about women paying attention to their breast health."
Seventeen games later, the event has raised close to $5 million for the Young Survival Coalition.
"It's a wonderful feeling that everyone can come together for breast cancer," Powell said. "I mean, it's something that can impact anyone."
And for the members of Congress, it's a night to take a break from partisan division and find common ground for a cause.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rare 'flesh-eating' bacteria claims 4 lives in Florida: What to know
Rare 'flesh-eating' bacteria claims 4 lives in Florida: What to know

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rare 'flesh-eating' bacteria claims 4 lives in Florida: What to know

Florida health officials reported that four people died and over a half dozen others were made sick this year by a rare "flesh-eating" bacteria. Vibrio vulnificus, which is found in saltwater, brackish water and inside contaminated raw or undercooked seafood, led to four deaths in four counties across the state and made at least seven people ill, the state's Department of Health announced on July 11. Infection from the bacteria is rare, with an average of 150 to 200 cases reported each year to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cases are most often reported in the Gulf Coast states, though research has shown it migrating north as climate change fuels warmer oceans. Most healthy people exposed to the bacteria experience only mild symptoms. For some, however, the bacteria can be deadly – especially if it enters the bloodstream or kills flesh around an open wound. About one in five people die from the infection, according to the CDC, sometimes within one to two days of becoming ill. Others may require surgery or even amputation after their exposure. Here's what to know about Vibrio vulnificus: Where is Vibrio vulnificus located? Vibrio are bacteria that naturally live in coastal waters year-round. Vibrio vulnificus requires saltwater to live and spread, though it can thrive in brackish water, where a stream or river meets seawater. Most infections occur when people swallow contaminated water or get it in an open wound. Another source of infection is contaminated raw or undercooked seafood, especially shellfish such as oysters. In Florida, which leads the nation in Vibrio vulnificus infections, spikes in cases and deaths coincide with major hurricanes, when seawater is carried on shore, triggering flooding and dumping seawater into freshwater sources. Between 2016 to 2024, an average of 48 Vibrio vulnificus cases and about 11 deaths were reported annually in Florida. In 2022, when Hurricane Ian battered communities along the southwest coast, there were 74 reported cases and 17 deaths. Last year, the state recorded 82 cases and 19 deaths – a surge health officials tied to a pair of damaging hurricanes, Helene and Milton. Why is it called a 'flesh-eating bacteria'? Vibrio vulnificus kills, but does not eat tissue. The bacteria cannot penetrate unharmed skin, but can enter through an existing break. If the bacteria enters the body through a cut, scrape or wound, it can cause necrotizing fasciitis, and the flesh around the infection site could die. Those infected through wounds may require major surgery or limb amputations, according to the CDC. What are the symptoms of Vibrio vulnificus? Common symptoms of Vibrio vulnificus infection include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting and fever, according to the CDC. When open wounds are exposed to contaminated salt or brackish water, Vibrio vulnificus can cause discoloration, swelling, skin breakdown and ulcers. The bacteria can also invade the bloodstream and threaten severe and life-threatening illnesses such as septic shock, especially for those with pre-existing conditions. "Vibrio vulnificus bloodstream infections are fatal about 50 percent of the time," according to the Florida Department of Health. How to avoid Vibrio vulnificus Below are some tips to avoid Vibrio vulnificus, according to the Florida Department of Health and the CDC. Stay out of saltwater and brackish water if you have an open wound or cut. If you get a cut while you are in the water, leave the water immediately. If your open wounds and cuts could come in contact with salt water, brackish water or raw or undercooked seafood, cover them with a waterproof bandage. Cook shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels) thoroughly. Avoid cross-contamination of cooked seafood and other foods with raw seafood and juices from raw seafood. Always wash your hands with soap and water after handling raw shellfish. Seek medical attention right away for infected wounds. Contributing: Natalie Neysa Alund, Thao Nguyen, Gabe Hauari and Mike Snider, USA TODAY; C.A. Bridges, USA TODAY Network - Florida This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Rare 'flesh-eating' bacteria kills 4 people in Florida: What to know Solve the daily Crossword

Michael Madsen cremated, more details about actor's death emerge
Michael Madsen cremated, more details about actor's death emerge

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Michael Madsen cremated, more details about actor's death emerge

Actor Michael Madsen was cremated this week following his death earlier his month, about which more details are now emerging. A number of conditions, including cardiomyopathy — which makes it more difficult for the heart to pump blood throughout the body — along with coronary artery disease and chronic alcoholism all contributed to the cardiac arrest that ultimately killed the 67-year-old 'Kill Bill' star, according to a death certificate issued by Los Angeles County Medical Examiner and obtained by TMZ on Thursday. Thromboembolic disease, when vessels or arteries are blocked by blood clots, was also identified as a significant contributing factor. The death certificate shows that Madsen, who'd reportedly gotten sober in recent months, died less than two months after undergoing coronary angiography, which uses X-rays to look at the heart's blood vessels, per Mayo Clinic. Madsen's manager Ron Smith previously confirmed to NBCLA that Madsen died at his Malibu, California, home on July 3 from cardiac arrest. Days later, Madsen's cardiologist told the outlet that heart disease and alcoholism would be listed as contributing factors to his heart failure. Sister and fellow actor, Oscar nominee Virginia Madsen, remembered her big brother as 'half legend, half lullaby' — 'etched in contradiction, tempered by love that left its mark.' Madsen is survived by four children, including his son Christian, who is also an actor. He was predeceased by one of his sons, Hudson, who died by suicide in 2022.

Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell
Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell

A firing of Jerome Powell by President Trump would likely open up a legal war never before seen in the US, without any guarantee of a courtroom victory for the White House. That may be why Trump hasn't done so. Yet. Powell has made his intentions clear. He said earlier this year that he wouldn't leave if Trump tried to fire him and that his removal is 'not permitted by law.' Fed officials privately have been preparing for a legal battle as far back as Trump's first term, when the president also toyed with removing the chair, according to the Wall Street Journal. The strength of Powell's case is based on some protections of Fed autonomy already embedded in US statute. The Federal Reserve Act, which created the central bank in 1913 and was amended in 1935, states that each member of the Fed board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President." The intention of the "for cause" condition was to enhance the Fed's independence by making it more difficult for a president to fire its board members, who are appointed by the president. There are also signs that the Supreme Court would step in if Trump were to act, although the high court's views on the topic are unclear. In an ambiguous ruling earlier this year, Supreme Court justices allowed Trump to temporarily proceed with the firings of board members at two other independent agencies. In granting the administration's request, the court said that in its judgment, the government "is likely to show" that the fired board members exercised "considerable executive power," a view that suggests the president possesses broader power to remove the officials at will. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Legal challenges from those board members are still playing out at an appeals court. But Powell got a good sign Thursday when a Washington, D.C., district court judge ruled that another Trump firing of FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal and that she should be reappointed. The judge cited a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent that limits the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance. That precedent offers Powell a layer of protection. It was set in a 1935 case titled Humphrey's Executor v. US that challenged President Franklin Roosevelt's termination of the US Federal Trade Commissioner. The court held that the president's authority to terminate agency officials at will was limited to purely executive officers, and not those leading independent agencies that engage in regulation and adjudication. Congress, the court said, had power to limit the president's removal power over those officials "for cause" — then described that term to mean inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. Trump is challenging whether that precedent applies across various independent agencies, but the Supreme Court has not yet made a definitive ruling on whether it should stand. If the precedent falls and leaves no explicit protection for the central bank, a Powell firing could certainly be a lot easier to pull off. 'For cause' Powell does have one major vulnerability, however. That 'for cause' language embedded in the Federal Reserve Act hasn't really been defined or tested in court. The statute also doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors. And the White House has been using a new line of attack against Powell that could offer a path to a 'for cause' dismissal, as the president and his allies raise concerns about a $2.5 billion renovation of the central bank's headquarters. "I mean it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5 billion renovation," Trump told reporters on Wednesday, after saying earlier that the project "sort of is" a fireable offense. He said he wasn't planning to fire Powell but also left the door open, saying, "I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely, unless he has to leave for fraud.' National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett — one of Powell's potential successors — said last Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does." But he also acknowledged it was a 'highly uncertain legal matter.' Politico reported that outside lawyers told the White House counsel's office it would likely lose a legal fight with Powell if Trump removed Powell solely over accusations that he mishandled renovations and that White House officials were also unsure whether it would work. Politico quoted one official who said, 'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know. But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.' The White House is certainly showing no signs of letting up on its pressure. They are seeking a site visit to see the Fed's renovations in person. Powell has asked the Fed's inspector general to review the costs involved. He also sent White House budget director Russ Vought a letter Thursday offering a point-by-point rebuttal of questions raised about the project and denying reports of a VIP elevator and VIP dining rooms. "We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources," he said, and "we have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen.' Case Western Reserve University business law professor Eric Chaffee said he thinks Powell would win any legal battle with the White House on the 'for cause' clause, but he doesn't think such a confrontation will come to pass given that Powell only has 10 months left as chair. "We're just so close to the end of the term that I think the Trump administration is very likely just to wait things out,' he said. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store