logo
Why Is ReBuild NC involved in disaster management in western North Carolina?

Why Is ReBuild NC involved in disaster management in western North Carolina?

Yahoo29-01-2025

Residents of Swannanoa live in campers and tents as their homes remain destroyed or uninhabitable from Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina. (Photo: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News)
This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.
SWANNANOA—People are living in campers in fields of debris off U.S. 70, the main thoroughfare through the small town of Swannanoa, east of Asheville. Cars are buried nose-first under dirt and rock.
On side streets, homes have been gutted and abandoned, emblazoned with official signs that say 'unsafe.' A woman walking her terrier remarked, 'I saw a child's ball. That kid lost everything.'
At Eagle Rock Church, several people sifted through clothing and blankets while others picked from an array of canned food. A man filled large tanks with water from the church's well so he could flush his toilet. Propane tanks and coats were in high demand.
'The outpouring of support has been awesome,' said Pastor Ramona Nix, her dog, Duchess, by her side. She had met President Donald Trump in Asheville the week prior, where he floated the idea of dismantling the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
'We've never asked for government help,' Nix said. 'The red tape you have to go through has been ridiculous. He meant what he said.'
It's been four months since Hurricane Helene flooded and flattened thousands of square miles of western North Carolina. Recovery will likely take decades, and possibly longer, if FEMA is dissolved.
That could leave the state government to fund and manage a complex $60 billion recovery and rebuilding program.
But since 2016, North Carolina has bungled recoveries after Hurricanes Matthew and Florence, as ReBuild NC overspent its $779 million federal budget by more than $220 million, and ran out of money to complete the work.
On his first day in office, Democratic Gov. Josh Stein said publicly that ReBuild NC would not be involved in Hurricane Helene recovery. Instead, the agency would focus on finishing its work in eastern North Carolina, where, because of years of financial and logistical mismanagement, more than 1,100 people have been stranded without permanent homes since Hurricane Matthew in 2016, and Florence two years later, according to current figures.
Gov. Stein reorganized parts of state government and formed the Governor's Recovery Office for Western North Carolina to oversee some of the work.
But in fact, ReBuild NC is working on Helene recovery, state records show. The agency has key responsibilities in case management for storm survivors—even though records and homeowners' accounts show it is still failing to fulfill those same duties for survivors in eastern North Carolina. And even though the state Division of Emergency Management could have activated a contract already in place with an outside company.
An interagency agreement between the N.C. Division of Emergency Management and ReBuild NC obtained under public records law reveals that ReBuild will leverage 'its technical expertise and operational capacity,' will 'act as the operational lead' and administer the Disaster Case Management Program on behalf of NCEM.
Job postings on government websites show ReBuild NC was accepting applications for case managers in mid-January.
ReBuild NC will receive $21.7 million from FEMA via the Division of Emergency Management to do the work, said Justin Graney, a division spokesman. The agreement was signed by Division of Emergency Management Director Will Ray and Jane Gilchrist, who was chief of staff at the Department of Public Safety, the agency over ReBuild NC.
Graney said no current ReBuild NC case managers are working on western North Carolina recovery. The majority of new hires are headquartered at the Buncombe County Disaster Recovery Center, with additional personnel fanned out across western North Carolina, he said, but did not provide names or job titles.
The Division of Emergency Management plans to hire 75 case managers by March, at which point it will be fully staffed, Graney said. They will conduct outreach and meet with long-term recovery groups and disaster survivors living in hotels through the FEMA Transitional Sheltering Assistance Program.
Graney said the case management for Helene, funded by FEMA, differs from ReBuild NC's previous work, which received money and oversight from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
'This is not a construction management type of program, which is what [ReBuild] managed,' Graney said.
However, ReBuild NC was in charge of not just construction but also case management for Hurricane Matthew and Florence survivors. Initially the agency oversaw a contractor, Horne LLP, to do project management, including case management. ReBuild NC then hired its own employees to do that work when the contract with Horne was not renewed. (Jonathan Krebs, an advisor to Gov. Stein for Helene recovery, previously worked for Horne as a managing partner for Government Services.)
Case management has long been in disarray. Homeowners have complained on social media, testified before state lawmakers and written letters to North Carolina officials, including Gov. Stein, when he was attorney general, about the lack of communication and incorrect information they received from case managers.
Graney said the Division of Emergency Management, not ReBuild NC, will manage funds, as well as 'ensure that the program provides suitable customer service to disaster survivors across western North Carolina.'
Stein's office did not answer questions sent by email about whether the governor was debriefed on ReBuild NC's role before announcing the agency would not be working in western North Carolina. Instead, a spokesperson provided a statement: 'Governor Stein is approaching the recovery efforts in western North Carolina with four pillars: urgency, focus, transparency, and accountability.
'In addition, he established an advisory committee that includes people on the ground in western NC—many of whom were personally impacted by Helene—which will allow him to remain agile and ensure our office's work is making a difference in a meaningful way. He looks forward to partnering with the General Assembly so that [ReBuild] can finish the job in eastern North Carolina.'
In late September, as Hurricane Helene barreled up the spine of the Appalachians and destroyed parts of western North Carolina, ReBuild NC was in financial crisis. Beyond overspending its $779 million budget for the previous two storms by more than $220 million, it was chronically late paying stipends to hurricane survivors and owed contractors money. Work on many homes had stopped—or never started—because there was no money to pay the contractors.
To cut costs, ReBuild NC had laid off more than 40 people a month earlier, primarily housing specialists, but also several employees who wrote flood insurance policies for homeowners who lived in 100-year flood plains. The agency stopped placing people in motels, an expensive option for temporary housing, and opted for apartments instead. ReBuild NC has spent nearly $84 million on temporary housing as of this month.
At some point between Helene's landfall and mid-November, emails show leadership at Emergency Management and ReBuild NC began planning to provide disaster case management services for western North Carolina.
On Nov. 18, state lawmakers summoned Laura Hogshead, ReBuild's embattled executive director, to testify before an oversight committee about ReBuild NC's troubled finances. At that hearing, several lawmakers said they could not trust the agency to manage disaster recovery in western North Carolina.
'Why in the world with ReBuild's past history would we give y'all the west?' said Sen. Brent Jackson, a Republican who represents five counties in eastern North Carolina.
Hogshead indicated she wanted ReBuild NC to work on Helene disaster recovery. 'I would submit [ReBuild] has the expertise. We know what to do and what not to do. We can get the funding quicker. We've done this recently and a different entity would have to relearn hard lessons.'
The next day Graney confirmed with Inside Climate News that the Division of Emergency Management had partnered with the North Carolina Office of Recovery and Resiliency, ReBuild's formal name, 'to coordinate and staff the North Carolina Disaster Case Management Program with case managers. NCORR will not be managing FEMA funding and is providing disaster case management services only.'
At the time, FEMA was still reviewing the budget and scope of work for those services, so the document was not finalized.
Two days later, on Nov. 20, Hogshead left the agency. State personnel laws limit what is publicly known about her departure, but at the committee hearing Hoghead told lawmakers she would not resign.
The Division of Emergency Management had another option besides ReBuild NC. It had a 'pre-positioned all-hazard contract' with a consulting firm, North Highland, based in Charlotte. The company works in several industries, and has a division devoted to emergency management.
Agencies can award these advance contracts before an incident occurs, according to the FEMA website, 'to conduct a deliberate procurement process outside of the pressure and immediate demands of a disaster. It also helps to ensure that applicants have contractors ready to perform work quickly after an incident occurs when needed most.'
North Highland officials did not respond to emails seeking comment.
Graney said even with the North Highland contract, it would still take time to execute it, hire personnel and establish the program. 'The decision was made to not execute one of the pre-positioned all-hazard contracts for disaster case management,' Graney said, and to handle it within state government at ReBuild NC.
Back in Swannanoa, a gutted one-story home sat behind two tall, slender fir trees. A wall clock emblazoned with an illustration of a unicorn sat by the door. A QR code on the front of the house read 'Help Mark Rebuild.' And the mailbox stated, in raspberry letters, 'Imagining a Better Future.'
The state legislature is holding two hearings about hurricane recovery:
House Select Committee on Helene Recovery Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2 p.m. Watch the livestream here.
Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations, Subcommittee on Hurricane Response and Recovery Thursday, Jan. 30, 8:30 a.m. Watch the livestream here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones wins race
San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones wins race

Axios

time26 minutes ago

  • Axios

San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones wins race

San Antonio on Saturday elected Gina Ortiz Jones as its next mayor, choosing a Democrat instead of Republican Rolando Pablos for a nonpartisan race that became distinctly about politics. Why it matters: The mayoral election, the city's first in 16 years without an incumbent on the ballot, drew money and influence from across the state and nation. Neither Ortiz Jones nor Pablos have held elected office before, and San Antonio has not elected a mayor who hasn't served on the City Council since Phil Hardberger in 2005. The latest: Unofficial vote results showed Ortiz Jones with 54% of the vote compared to 46% for Pablos. All precincts were counted. What they're saying: Ortiz Jones told supporters at a watch party at The Dakota East Side Ice House that voters "reminded folks what San Antonio stands for," adding "that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind." "But you know what, our country — I think we're going through a blip right now, but San Antonio has had the opportunity to say, you know what? We're going to move past this," she added. Pablos conceded at his watch party, per KSAT. "We tried. I want to thank everybody for your support. It was a tough race, and I'm just happy that everybody came together for this community," he said. State of play: Ortiz Jones, who is believed to be the first openly gay woman elected San Antonio mayor, served as an Air Force undersecretary in the Biden administration and was twice the Democratic nominee for the 23rd Congressional District. During the runoff campaign, both candidates leaned into their families' immigrant backgrounds. Ortiz Jones spoke of being raised by a single mother who immigrated from the Philippines and Pablos of his family moving from Mexico to El Paso when he was 8 years old. Pablos is a former Texas secretary of state who has served as a senior adviser to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Follow the money: Pablos and his supporters appeared to both outraise and outspend Ortiz Jones in the runoff election, campaign finance reports show. Pablos raised nearly $333,000 and spent more than $275,000 from late April through May 28. He got a big boost from the Texas Economic Fund, a political action committee run by Abbott's former political director, which raised $1.35 million and spent over $623,000 during that time. Ortiz Jones raised nearly $249,000 and spent over $133,000 in the same period. She had help from Fields of Change, a national Democratic PAC, which spent more than $160,000 for her campaign. The big picture: The new mayor will lead San Antonio at a pivotal time, as officials seek to gain public support for a new downtown Spurs arena that could be surrounded by a sports and entertainment district. They will also lead the city through the remaining years of the Trump administration, under which San Antonio has lost millions of dollars in federal funding. The city is also expecting a budget deficit. Catch up quick: Mayor Ron Nirenberg reached his term limits after eight years in office, making him the city's longest-serving mayor since Henry Cisneros in the 1980s. San Antonio's next mayor will serve for four years after voters approved increasing term length from two years. They will work alongside several new city councilmembers members. Flashback: Nirenberg's departure left a rare opening that drew a crowded 27-candidate field to replace him. Four sitting city councilmembers struggled to break through the noise as traditional backers in local elections, like the police union, sat out the first round of voting. By the numbers: Voters showed low enthusiasm for the May 3 election, which overlapped with Fiesta, at 9.26%. In the runoff, turnout rose to nearly 17%.

‘The stuff of dictatorships': Trump admin threat to deploy military to LA protest met with angry reactions
‘The stuff of dictatorships': Trump admin threat to deploy military to LA protest met with angry reactions

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘The stuff of dictatorships': Trump admin threat to deploy military to LA protest met with angry reactions

Donald Trump's threats to send the National Guard to Los Angeles to squash anti-ICE protests have drawn a resounding negative reaction from Democrats, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who called the president's plan 'deranged behavior.' The White House on Saturday said that 2,000 National Guard troops will be sent to arrest protesters as tensions grew during a second day of clashes between hundreds of protesters and federal agents following a series of immigration raids by ICE agents on Friday. While the administration said it would deploy the National Guard to 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' it was not immediately clear when the troops would arrive. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened the action, writing on X, 'If violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert.' Meanwhile, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and scores of other Democrats took issue with the Trump administration's plans to handle the protests. ​​'The Secretary of Defense is now threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens,' Newsom wrote. 'This is deranged behavior.' In an earlier message, Newsom called Trump's plan to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops 'purposefully inflammatory.' California Democratic Senator Alex Padilla agreed with the sentiment, writing, 'Couldn't agree more. Using the National Guard this way is a completely inappropriate and misguided mission. He continued: 'The Trump Administration is just sowing more chaos and division in our communities.' Senator Adam Schiff said the Trump administration's calling of the National Guard without the governor's authorization is 'unprecedented.' 'This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation,' he wrote, noting that if the Guard is needed, Newsom would ask for it. 'Violence must stop, and we need to keep the focus on protecting fundamental rights,' Schiff said. 'There is nothing President Trump would like more than a violent confrontation with protestors to justify the unjustifiable — invocation of the Insurrection Act or some form of martial law.' California's Attorney General Rob Bonta took to X to let Californians know: 'There is no emergency and the President's order calling in the National Guard is unnecessary and counterproductive.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass stopped short of criticizing the Trump Administration, but emphasized that no troops have been deployed yet. 'Just to be clear, the National Guard has not been deployed in the City of Los Angeles,' she said. Local leaders in California also expressed outrage over the violent, caught-on-video arrest of David Huerta, the president of the labor union SEIU California. Huerta was hospitalized with injuries after officers aggressively knocked him to the ground during his arrest at the protest Friday. Democrats from outside the Golden State also took issue with Trump's orders. Hawaii Democratic Senator Brian Schatz slammed the Trump administration for the move, calling the threat to call in troops 'the stuff of dictatorships.' 'There is literally no reason to have active duty Marines respond to a street protest,' he wrote. 'Whether or not this takes a terrible turn depends partly on the conduct and the discipline of law enforcement, of community members being peaceful, of media members speaking truth to power, and all of us agreeing that the use of the military for this purpose is the stuff of dictatorships across the planet and throughout history.' Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy noted on X: 'Important to remember that Trump isn't trying to heal or keep the peace. He is looking to inflame and divide. His movement doesn't believe in democracy or protest - and if they get a chance to end the rule of law they will take it. None of this is on the level.'

Gov. Stein is making the conservative case for FEMA
Gov. Stein is making the conservative case for FEMA

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Stein is making the conservative case for FEMA

It's a classic Trump-era irony: The president's polarizing voice has triggered a burst of bipartisan agreement. When President Donald Trump floated the notion of scrapping FEMA entirely after Hurricane Helene, it sounded like the start of another bare-knuckle partisan fight. Instead, it sparked a rare consensus: FEMA is flawed, but it's also essential. Right now, the surprisingly high-profile defender of that notion is North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein. And in another ironic twist, the most liberal governor North Carolina has ever elected is sounding . . . conservative. Over the past two weeks, Stein has launched a media blitz to rescue FEMA from its own dysfunction — and from the president's crosshairs. He's appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, penned an op-ed in USA Today, lobbied Republican U.S. Sens. Thom Tillis and Ted Budd and written directly to the Trump administration with proposed reforms. His argument is simple: Disaster response is a core function of the federal government, and it saves money and gets better results if states don't go it alone. 'It's about streamlining and reforming and improving FEMA, not eliminating it,' Stein said in a recent podcast interview with Spectrum News. That may not sound revolutionary, but in today's political climate, it's a noteworthy response. Where many Democrats, like former Gov. Roy Cooper, may have used Trump's comments to raise money or fire up the base, Stein is taking a different tack. He's responding thoughtfully, and with a message that Republicans might actually hear. FEMA makes for a convenient punching bag. After any disaster, emotions are raw as survivors try to make sense of their losses. When calls go to voicemail or a form gets rejected on a technicality, the natural response is anger. Police officers often talk about trying to give people grace because they recognize they're meeting everyone on the worst day of their life. FEMA workers are in the same position but may not always realize it, or be equipped to respond. That doesn't mean FEMA gets a pass, of course, and there were plenty of problems with its response to Hurricane Helene. Red tape kept people waiting for temporary housing. It took multiple calls from elected officials to get FEMA to extend hotel vouchers to keep people from being turned out into a snowstorm. North Carolina's own shortcomings made matters worse. An after-action report from the state's Emergency Management Division showed deep cracks in the response to Helene — unclear communications, insufficient coordination with counties and a lack of planning around debris and housing. FEMA may have failed in some areas, but so did the state. Still, it would've been easy — even expected — for Stein to point fingers or escalate the fight as President Trump continues down the path toward eliminating FEMA. Instead, he's lowering the temperature. Trump's proposal to eliminate FEMA might be a negotiation tactic rather than a policy plan. He's known for throwing rhetorical grenades to draw people to the table. Some see that as bluster, while others see leverage. Either way, if the goal is to force FEMA to improve, there's plenty of common ground. And Stein is proving to be an effective messenger. He's called for FEMA to be faster, more flexible, and less redundant. He wants a single application process, more upfront money for permanent repairs and greater use of block grants to give states more discretion. This isn't the burn-it-down approach of the MAGA right, nor is it a progressive defense of bureaucracy. It's something rarer these days: a sober, statesmanlike argument for targeted federal responsibility and reform. As a conservative, I've long believed in limiting federal power. I've written before that North Carolina should stop waiting on Washington and take control of its own future. So I sympathize with Trump's instinct to scrap FEMA entirely. There's philosophical merit to the idea. The federal government tries to do too much. State governments are more nimble, more accountable. Pushing power down is almost always the right move. But not in every case. President Reagan famously said the nine scariest words in the English language were: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' And yet Reagan also signed the Stafford Act — the law that governs FEMA to this day. That law has real flaws, and some of them are exactly what we're grappling with now. That's another classic Trump-era irony. The liberal governor of North Carolina is defending FEMA with a Reaganesque argument, to preserve a program the Gipper helped create. I still believe in federalism. But on this one, Stein has convinced me. FEMA needs to stay.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store