Will the truce between India and Pakistan resolve differences over Kashmir?
That was after 26 tourists were killed in Indian-administered Kashmir last month.
India has accused Pakistan of backing the fighters, a claim Islamabad denied.
Why has the Kashmir region been a source of hostility between the two countries since independence from British rule in 1947?
How far can colonial legacy be blamed for the conflict? And what lies ahead?
Presenter:
Sami Zeidan
Guests:
Victoria Schofield – British biographer, historian and author of books on Kashmir.
Radha Kumar – Author, academic and an Indian government-appointed negotiator appointed to resolve the Kashmir crisis
Ayesha Jalal – Professor at Tufts University and expert on South Asian history.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Haiti declares three-month state of emergency as gang violence spikes
Haiti's government has announced a three-month state of emergency in several parts of the country as it battles surging gang violence. The measure will cover the West, Centre and Artibonite departments, the latter of which is known as Haiti's 'rice basket' and has experienced an increase in attacks by armed groups in recent months. In a statement on Saturday, the government said the state of emergency would allow the Haitian authorities to 'continue the fight against insecurity and respond to the agricultural and food crisis'. 'Insecurity has negative effect both on the lives of citizens and on the country's different sectors of activity. Given the scale of this crisis, it is imperative to decree a major mobilisation of the state's resources and institutional means to address it,' it said. Haiti has reeled from years of violence as powerful armed groups, often with ties to the country's political and business leaders, have vied for influence and control of territory. But the situation worsened dramatically after the July 2021 assassination of President Jovenel Moise, which created a power vacuum. Nearly 1.3 million people have been displaced across the country, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) said in June, while the United Nations estimates that 4,864 people were killed from October 2024 to June of this year. Efforts to stem the deadly gang attacks, including the deployment of a UN-backed, Kenya-led police mission, have so far failed to restore stability. While much of the focus has been on Haiti's capital, Port-au-Prince, where up to 90 percent of the city is under the control of armed groups, the violence has also been spreading to other parts of the country. Between October 2024 and the end of June, more than 1,000 Haitians were killed and 620 were kidnapped in the Artibonite and Centre departments, according to the UN's human rights office. In late April, dozens of people waded and swam across the Artibonite River, which cuts through the region, in a desperate attempt to flee the gangs. Meanwhile, the government on Friday appointed Andre Jonas Vladimir Paraison as interim director of Haiti's National Police, which has been working with Kenyan police officers leading the UN-backed mission to help quell the violence. 'We, the police, will not sleep,' Paraison said during his inauguration ceremony. 'We will provide security across every corner of the country.' Paraison previously served as head of security of Haiti's National Palace and was on duty as a police officer when Moise was killed at his private residence in July 2021. He replaced Normil Rameau, whose tenure of just more than a year was marked by tensions with a faction of the Transitional Presidential Council, notably Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aime. Rameau had repeatedly warned about the police force's severe underfunding. The change comes as Laurent Saint-Cyr, a wealthy businessman, also took over this week as president of the Transitional Presidential Council, which is charged with holding elections by February 2026.
Al Jazeera
15 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
India says six Pakistani aircraft shot down during May conflict
India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during fighting in May, India's air force chief says, the first such statement from the country since the deadly conflict with its neighbour. Air force chief Amar Preet Singh made the announcement on Saturday, weeks after India's military acknowledged that an unspecified number of its own jets were also shot down by Pakistan during their heaviest fighting in decades. It involved fighter planes and cruise missiles and killed dozens of people. The conflict was triggered after armed men killed 26 tourists in India-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam town on April 22. Speaking at a military lecture in the southern city of Bengaluru on Saturday, Singh said India's S-400 air defence systems took down most of the Pakistani aircraft. 'We have at least five fighters confirmed killed and one large aircraft,' he said, adding that the large aircraft, which could have been a surveillance plane, was shot down at a distance of 300km (186 miles). 'This is actually the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill that we can talk about. Our air defence systems have done a wonderful job,' he was quoted as saying by several Indian media outlets. Air Chief Marshal Staff Singh did not mention the type of fighter jets that were downed but said air strikes also hit an additional surveillance plane and 'a few F-16' fighters that were parked in hangars at two airbases in southeastern Pakistan. Half of the F-16 hangar at the Shahbaz Jacobabad airbase in Sindh province was destroyed, he said. Islamabad, whose air force primarily operates Chinese-made jets and US F-16s, has previously denied that India downed any Pakistani aircraft during the May 7-10 fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours. There was no immediate reaction to Singh's statements from Pakistan. During their conflict, Pakistan said it downed six Indian military jets, including at least three Rafale fighters – a claim one Indian military official described as 'absolutely incorrect'. Both India and Pakistan claim Kashmir in full but administer only parts of the Muslim-majority Himalayan territory, which has been a continuing source of tension between them. Armed groups in the India-administered portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. India accuses Pakistan of backing some armed groups, but Islamabad says it provides only diplomatic support to the Kashmiris' struggle for self-determination. Since India and Pakistan declared a ceasefire in May, intermittent fighting has continued in the area between Indian troops and fighters. On Saturday, Indian officials said two Indian soldiers and a suspected fighter were reported killed late on Friday in the India-administered Kashmir district of Kulgam. According to Indian military officials, two soldiers were also injured.
Al Jazeera
21 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Attack on people's memory': Kashmir's book ban sparks new censorship fears
Srinagar, India-administered Kashmir – Hafsa Kanjwal's book on Kashmir has just been banned, but it's the irony of the moment that strikes her the most. This week, authorities in India-administered Kashmir proscribed 25 books authored by acclaimed scholars, writers and journalists. The banned books include Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir: State‑Building under Indian Occupation. But even as the ban was followed by police raids on several bookstores in the region's biggest city, Srinagar, during which they seized books on the blacklist, Indian officials are holding a book festival in the city on the banks of Dal Lake. 'Nothing is surprising about this ban, which comes at a moment when the level of censorship and surveillance in Kashmir since 2019 has reached absurd heights,' Kanjwal told Al Jazeera, referring to India's crackdown on the region since it revoked Kashmir's semiautonomous status six years ago. 'It is, of course, even more absurd that this ban comes at a time when the Indian army is simultaneously promoting book reading and literature through a state-sponsored Chinar Book Festival.' Yet even with Kashmir's long history of facing censorship, the book bans represent to many critics a particularly sweeping attempt by New Delhi to assert control over academia in the disputed region. 'Misguiding youth' The 25 books banned by the government offer a detailed overview of the events surrounding the Partition of India and the reasons why Kashmir became such an intransigent territorial dispute to begin with. They include writings like Azadi by Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy, Human Rights Violations in Kashmir by Piotr Balcerowicz and Agnieszka Kuszewska, Kashmiris' Fight for Freedom by Mohd Yusaf Saraf, Kashmir Politics and Plebiscite by Abdul Gockhami Jabbar and Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora? by Essar Batool. These are books that directly speak to rights abuses and massacres in Kashmir and promises broken by the Indian state. Then there are books like Kanjwal's, journalist Anuradha Bhasin's A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370 and legal scholar AG Noorani's The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012, which dissect the region's political journey over the decades. The government has blamed these books for allegedly 'misguiding youth' in Kashmir and instigating their 'participation in violence and terrorism'. The government's order states: 'This literature would deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting a culture of grievance, victimhood, and terrorist heroism.' The dispute in Kashmir dates back to 1947 when the departing British cleaved the Indian subcontinent into the two dominions of India and Pakistan. Muslim-majority Kashmir's Hindu king sought to be independent of both, but after Pakistan-backed fighters entered a part of the region, he agreed to join India on the condition that Kashmir enjoy a special status within the new union with some autonomy guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. But the Kashmiri people were never asked what they wanted, and India repeatedly rebuffed demands for a United Nations-sponsored plebiscite. Discontent against Indian rule simmered on and off and exploded into an armed uprising against India in 1989 in response to allegations of election fixing. Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir sheds light on the complicated ways in which the Indian government under its first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, consolidated its control over Kashmir. Some of Nehru's decisions that have come under criticism include the unceremonious dismissal of the region's leader Sheikh Abdullah, who advocated for self-rule for Kashmir, and the decision to replace him with his lieutenant, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, whose 10 years in office were marked by the strengthening of New Delhi's rule of Indian-administered Kashmir. Kanjwal's book won this year's Bernard Cohn Book Prize, which 'recognizes outstanding and innovative scholarship for a first single-authored English-language monograph on South Asia'. Kanjwal said the ban gives a sense of how 'insecure' the government is. 'Intensification of political clampdown' India has a long history of censorship and information control in Kashmir. In 2010, after major protests broke out following the killing of 17-year-old student Tufail Mattoo by security forces, the provincial government banned SMS services and restored them only three years later. At the height of another civil uprising in 2016, the government stopped Kashmir Reader, an independent publication in Srinagar, from going to press, citing its purported 'tendency to incite violence'. Aside from prohibitions on newspapers and modes of communication, Indian authorities have routinely detained journalists under stringent preventive detention laws in Kashmir. That pattern has picked up since 2019. 'First they came for journalists, and realising they were successful in silencing them, they have turned their attention to academia,' said veteran editor Anuradha Bhasin, whose book on India's revocation of Kashmir's special status in 2019 is among those banned. Bhasin described the accusations that her book promotes violence as strange. 'Nowhere does my book glorify terrorism, but it does criticise the state. There's a distinction between the two that authorities in Kashmir want to blur. That's a very dangerous trend.' Bhasin told Al Jazeera that such bans will have far-reaching implications for future works being produced on Kashmir. 'Publishers will think twice before printing anything critical on Kashmir,' she said. 'When my book went to print, the legal team vetted it thrice.' 'A feeling of despair' The book bans have drawn criticism from various quarters in Kashmir with students and researchers calling it an attempt to impose collective amnesia. Sabir Rashid, a 27-year-old independent scholar from Kashmir, said he was very disappointed. 'If we take these books out of Kashmir's literary canon, we are left with nothing,' he said. Rashid is working on a book on Kashmir's modern history concerning the period surrounding the Partition of India. 'If these works are no longer available to me, my research is naturally going to be lopsided.' On Thursday, videos showed uniformed policemen entering bookstores in Srinagar and asking their proprietors if they possessed any of the books in the banned list. At least one book vendor in Srinagar told Al Jazeera he had a single copy of Bhasin's Dismantled State, which he sold just before the raids. 'Except that one, I did not have any of these books,' he shrugged. More acclaimed works on the blacklist Historian Sumantra Bose is aghast at the suggestion by Indian authorities that his book Kashmir at the Crossroads has fuelled violence in the region. He has worked on the Kashmir dispute since 1993 and said he has focused on devising pathways for finding a lasting peace for the region. Bose is also amused at a family legacy represented by the ban. In 1935, the colonial authorities in British India banned The Indian Struggle, 1920-1934, a compendium of political analysis authored by Subhas Chandra Bose, his great-uncle and a leader of India's freedom struggle. 'Ninety years later, I have been accorded the singular honour of following in the legendary freedom fighter's footsteps,' he said. As police step up raids on bookshops in Srinagar and seize valuable, more critical works, the literary community in Kashmir has a feeling of despondency. 'This is an attack on the people's memory,' Rashid said. 'These books served as sentinels. They were supposed to remind us of our history. But now, the erasure of memory in Kashmir is nearly complete.'
