NYC lawmakers of both parties urge Trump admin to step in, tackle sanctuary laws
The council's Common Sense Caucus penned a letter to US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday asking to take legal action against New York City for its policies on illegal immigrants that limit cooperation between local law enforcement and the federal government.
'We understand the Department of Justice (DOJ), under your direction, is already suing the state of New York for violating federal statutes by impeding communication between state and federal authorities on immigration enforcement,' the caucus wrote in the letter obtained by The Post.
'We ask the DOJ to expand this legal action to include New York City's so-called 'sanctuary city laws,' which shield criminal aliens from federal immigration authorities, place the public at risk and severely undermine efforts by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and our own law enforcement agencies to coordinate on issues of national security.'
3 Attorney General Pam Bondi is being urged to expand her legal action against New York to include NYC.
Getty Images
The DOJ filed a federal suit against the Empire State in February targeting the 2019 'Green Light Law,' which allows illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses and bars the feds from accessing any of the state DMV data.
'Our Constitution specifically grants the federal government the power to establish laws to protect our borders and regulate immigration, and New York City cannot willfully ignore these laws,' said David Carr (R-Staten Island), who led the effort.
'I believe the courts would side with the Department of Justice in a lawsuit to compel local authorities to comply with federal law enforcement agencies like ICE, and AG Bondi is the right person to lead this effort.'
The city started rolling out its pro-immigrant policies in 2011, when it enacted a ban on detainer requests from ICE unless they come with a judicial warrant and the person had been convicted of serious crimes within the prior five years.
3 David Carr (R-Staten Island) led the charge on the legal action.
Paul Martinka
Over the next few years, five more laws were put on the books restricting the coordination between the New York City Police Department and the city's Department of Correction.
The group of lawmakers, who have repeatedly tried to roll back the laws, claims the 'reckless, ill-conceived policies' are a threat to New Yorkers.
'These so-called 'sanctuary city' laws are only giving sanctuary to dangerous criminals who prey on New Yorkers,' said Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (Queens). 'That's why we've been fighting for years to repeal them. Now that we have a President and a federal administration that actually prioritizes the safety of Americans, we are hoping that can finally happen.'
3 The Council Minority leader Joann Ariola believes the current federal administration will help overturn the laws.
Michael Nagle
Trump-friendly Mayor Eric Adams has repeatedly stood by the laws, arguing that they actually make the city safer.
'We tell you, if you are a victim of a crime, call the police and report it. We tell you that if you need medical attention, go to the hospital and get that medical attention,' the Dem mayor said during a radio appearance last month.
The DOJ did not respond for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
22 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Joke Of No Elections In 2028 — People React
On Monday, Donald Trump met with several European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and made some remarks that left the internet saying, "WTF." When asked if he was open to holding an election once peace is achieved, Zelenskyy replied, "Yes, of course." He explained there aren't elections during wartime as they're focused on security, but the goal is "truth everywhere, in the battlefield, in the sky, in the sea," so people can resume democratic, legal elections. Trump interrupted the Ukrainian leader to confirm the bit about no elections during wartime. "Three and a half years from now, if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections," he said. "Oh, that's good," he concluded. Good for who??? I really don't like this little smile at the end. Notably, this happened on the same day Trump made headlines for showing off his "Trump 2028" and "4 more years" merch. Obviously, people had a lot to say about this: "A sitting US President 'jokes' about manufacturing a war to stop democracy and stay in power. Crazy how this shit is not a MUCH bigger deal and will instead be forgotten or dismissed," one X (formerly Twitter) user wrote. Another person said, "You can practically see the dim little lightbulb flicker on above his head. 'Wait a second... if my country is in a war... I don't have to leave the White House... EVER?! THAT'S GOOD!' It's the giddy, amoral excitement of a child who has just discovered a brand new and fantastic way to cheat at the game. Except the game is the Constitution of the United States." "It's not funny.... Cause you know DAMN well it has already crossed his mind, that to me is scary!!! YOU'RE NOT FUNNY TRUMP!!!!" "Democrats need to step up and meet this loser and loser gop party where they are at! Ethics are no longer a part of the Republican party and everyone needs to realize that." And finally, "Don't get your hopes up, fuck-face. We've had elections during every war we've ever fought. And we've fought a lot of wars." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below!
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Gabbard slashing intelligence office workforce, cutting budget by more than $700 million
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will dramatically reduce its workforce and cut its budget by more than $700 million annually, the Trump administration announced Wednesday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a statement, 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence.' She said the intelligence community 'must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people and the U.S. Constitution by focusing on our core mission: find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers.' The reorganization is part of a broader administration effort to rethink its evaluation of foreign threats to American elections, a topic that has become politically loaded given President Donald Trump's long-running resistance to the intelligence community's assessment that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 election. In February, for instance, Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded an FBI task force focused on investigating foreign influence operations, including those that target U.S. elections. The Trump administration also has made sweeping cuts at the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which oversees the nation's critical infrastructure, including election systems. Gabbard's efforts to downsize the agency she leads is in keeping with the cost-cutting mandate the administration has employed since its earliest days, when Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency oversaw mass layoffs of the federal workforce. It's the latest headline-making move by a key official who just a few months ago had seemed out of favor with Trump over her analysis of Iran's nuclear capabilities but who in recent weeks has emerged as a key loyalist. She's released a series of documents meant to call into question the legitimacy of the intelligence community's findings on Russian election interference in 2016, and this week, at Trump's direction, revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former government officials. The ODNI in the past has joined forces with other federal agencies to debunk and alert the public to foreign disinformation intended to influence U.S. voters. For example, it was involved in an effort to raise awareness about a Russian video that falsely depicted mail-in ballots being destroyed in Pennsylvania that circulated widely on social media in the weeks before the 2024 presidential election. Notably, Gabbard said she would be refocusing the priorities of the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which her office says on its website is 'focused on mitigating threats to democracy and U.S. national interests from foreign malign influence.' It wasn't clear from Gabbard's release or fact sheet exactly what the changes would entail, but Gabbard noted its 'hyper-focus' on work tied to elections and said the center was 'used by the previous administration to justify the suppression of free speech and to censor political opposition.' The Biden administration created the Foreign Malign Influence Center in 2022, responding to what the U.S. intelligence community had assessed as attempts by Russia and other adversaries to interfere with American elections. Its role, ODNI said when it announced the center's creation, was to coordinate and integrate intelligence pertaining to malign influence. In a briefing given to reporters in 2024, ODNI officials said they only notified candidates, political organizations and local election offices of disinformation operations when they could be attributed to foreign sources. They said they worked to avoid any appearance of policing Americans' speech. Sen. Tom Cotton, the Republican chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, hailed the decision to broadly revamp ODNI, saying it would make it a 'stronger and more effective national security tool for President Trump.'
Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Prices for Common Groceries Have Changed Since Trump Took Office
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, grocery prices at the national level have remained elevated and, in many categories, are rising even further. Federal forecasts and multiple price trackers show continuing inflation for common items such as eggs and beef, and the USDA Economic Research Service projected overall food prices will increase over the remainder of this year and 2026. Why It Matters Food represents a large and visible share of household spending, and high grocery bills influence public perceptions of the economy and the administration's performance. A mid-2025 poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that a majority of Americans reported stress over grocery costs, and retailers have reported shoppers shifting purchases toward cheaper brands and smaller sizes. Roughly 53 percent of respondents said grocery costs were a "major" stressor. Vegetables on display in a grocery store on August 15 in Delray Beach, Florida. Vegetables on display in a grocery store on August 15 in Delray Beach, To Know Trump campaigned on promises of lowering grocery costs, but federal forecasts and private trackers showed only modest easing overall and price gains in several food staples. The USDA Economic Research Service reported that the all-food Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.3 percent from May to June and was 3 percent higher than June 2024. It also projected overall food prices would rise 2.9 percent this year and 2.7 percent in 2026. "Most headlines lean on 'core CPI,' which excludes food and energy," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "That's fine for economists, but for real households, those are the two biggest non-discretionary expenses. So when they say prices are 'stabilizing,' it leaves out the areas where people actually feel it the most." The exact price increases vary by grocery item. NBC News' grocery-price tracker showed eggs, chicken and beef remained higher year-over-year in the most recent update. While eggs were up 64 cents, chicken cost 81 cents more and beef had seen an increase of 67 cents. The USDA projected egg prices to have strong volatility, with a 24.6 percent change forecast for 2025, and beef and veal prices were anticipated to rise substantially, 8.8 percent, this year. "The reality is that inflation is weighted across categories," Thompson said. "If your personal diet leans heavy on protein, beef, chicken, coffee, or soda, you've likely felt double-digit increases while the official number is closer to 3 percent. Everyone's 'personal inflation' is different, and for many it feels far higher than the reported average." Trump previously warned of short-term effects from trade policy, saying, "We may have, short term, a little pain." What People Are Saying Trump said during his campaign: "When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One." Thompson also told Newsweek: "Tariffs during Trump's presidency did raise costs on imported goods, and new tariffs under the current administration are continuing that trend. Immigration policy does have some effect on labor costs in agriculture and food processing, but the bigger driver of food prices has been weather, disease, and global supply chain issues not immigration directly." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "All of the inflationary pressures that were in place prior to 2025 have largely remained the same, with some everyday items actually going higher in price, if only incrementally so. The prevailing problem is the pricing structure on many consumer goods is formed through a domino effect which includes costs of production, shipping, stocking, and everything in between. "In order for prices to go lower, not only do you have to have falling demand, but also the series of transactions that make it ready to buy have to trend lower in order for businesses to continue to generate a profit. Until this happens, we're going to continue to see higher costs." What Happens Next The USDA ERS forecasts and monthly CPI releases from the Bureau of Labor Statistics will remain primary sources to measure whether grocery prices fall back, stabilize or resume faster growth in coming months. Since Trump's tariffs have gone into effect, the higher costs will likely be passed down to the consumer, Thompson said: "Businesses may absorb some costs in the short term, but over time those costs show up in the checkout line. The current tariff environment has raised the baseline market price, which means U.S. producers can charge more too, capturing extra margins. "Going forward, unless there's a consistent and predictable tariff policy, shoppers should expect continued price volatility. Once markets adjust to a clear set of rules, prices may stabilize, but likely at a higher level than before."
