logo
Several legislative priorities died this year in exchange for tax cuts, retirement reforms

Several legislative priorities died this year in exchange for tax cuts, retirement reforms

Yahoo06-04-2025

As the sun set on the 2025 legislative session, by Thursday, it ended pretty much in stalemate between the Mississippi House of Representatives and the Senate.
That stall of the legislative process came mostly over disagreements over a local projects funding bill, a $200-to-$400-million bill to fund project requests all over Mississippi, and the state's $7 billion budget, which died by a legislative deadline after lawmakers could not agree on a final budget proposal and died again when lawmakers couldn't agree to revive the budget.
Those issues also appeared to arise from beefs developed during other debates such as income tax elimination, grocery sales tax cuts, gas tax increases and state retirement reforms. As a result, several other major priorities for the year died either once or repeatedly throughout the session.
"Republicans had a lot of big issues this session, and that took their attention," said Spence Flatgard, chairman of Ballot Access Mississippi, a statewide nonprofit advocacy group and someone who has been observing the Legislature for decades. "There are things that matter to people, but it's not a lot of people's No. 1 issue. I think the reason that (issues such as ballot initiatives) didn't move (as easily) is taxes and big picture stuff, priority list things."
Tax cut finale: Mississippi governor signs income tax elimination bill. How are you affected?
Because of those financial issues not getting solved, and huge tax cut debate this session, the fact of the session is that other than sweeping changes to the state's tax structure and changes to the retirement system, not a whole lot of major legislative big to-dos got done.
"I think the priority this year was the elimination on personal income tax, because, for some reason, our state leaders wanted the elimination of personal income tax," said Derrick Simmons, Senate minority leader. "Also, what we saw was the really big national issues (with President Donald J. Trump) like DEI, our state leaders just got caught up in that."
Several big issues laid out by House Speaker Jason White, R-West, Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann, in January just didn't happen this year. Among them Medicaid expansion, restoring ballot initiatives to the people, restoring voting rights to certain nonviolent felony holders, education reforms such as expanding school choice and legalizing mobile sports betting.
One of the reasons for those bills' death could have been, according to Simmons, due to more hot-button issues, such as tax cuts and PERS reforms, becoming as controversial as they did throughout the session and that allowed other issues to fall through.
Simmons also said that because of the conservative nature of the top two issues of the session, Democrats were largely left out of the big discussions between House and Senate leadership, leaving roughly a third of the Legislature in the dark as the supermajority pushed some legislative priorities forward and left others behind.
"Democratic leadership has not been at the table for the priorities of Republican leadership," Simmons said.
That sentiment was shared by House Minority Leader Robert Johnson, D-Natchez, in a March press conference when he noted how House leadership was essentially ignoring concerns from the Democratic caucus regarding tax cuts.
"Nobody has talked to us," Johnson said during the February press conference in the Mississippi State Capitol. "Nobody wants to hear what we have to say about it. We (Democrats) represent 40% to 50% of the state of Mississippi, and nobody has said a word about how (tax cuts) will impact your community (and) what can we do to help."
Below is how those bills died:
PERS reforms: New retirement benefits incoming for MS employees. See how you are affected
Early in the session, both ballot initiatives and disenfranchisement died in the House chamber after passing out of committee.
Both ideas were heavily pushed for by House leadership in the 2024 session, with several proposals being advanced to the Senate before dying either in a committee or were left to die on the Senate calendar.
Simmons said this year he believed a serious effort was in underway in both chambers to address those issues, but because a few key lawmakers opposed those ideas, as well as energies spent elsewhere on the tax cut, they just didn't make it.
Flatgard, in talking about ballot initiatives, said it is likely legislative efforts were saved for larger debates. Simultaneously, Flatgard said that a few key senators opposition to it killed ballot initiative legislation.
"I know a lot of things were collateral damage, but even without the tax deal, I just think there's some senators that aren't there yet (on ballot initiatives)."
This would be the second year that disenfranchisement had become a priority for the House but died by legislative deadlines. It's the fourth year in a row that restoration of the ballot initiative will die in the Legislature.
Up until 2020, the state had a ballot initiative process. That changed when a group led by long-time Madison Mayor Mary Hawkins-Butler sought to challenge Initiative 65, which legalized marijuana, and the entire initiative process in court. The law, they argued, was outdated because it required signatures to come in equal proportion from the state's "five" congressional districts. The state had dropped to four congressional districts in 2001.
Disenfranchisement has its roots deep in the soil of Jim Crow South. During the 1890 constitutional convention in Mississippi, the practice was adopted to prevent Black voters from reaching the polls, according to Clarion Ledger records and reporting.
At the time of the bills' deaths, House Constitution Chairman Price Wallace, R-Mendenhall, said he let both bills die because of a lack of interest in the Senate.
Throughout the 2025 session, both the House and Senate kept a "dummy bill" alive that had the ability to expand Medicaid should the opportunity have presented itself.
The prerequisites for that were decisions made by Congress and Republican President Donald Trump regarding federal spending cuts and Medicaid funding. Even though the federal government has begun making massive cuts to federal spending, the Medicaid program and its federal-to-state Medicaid funding structure have remained largely untouched.
Meanwhile in the Legislature, the Medicaid dummy bills died by a legislative deadline as the tax cut debate became the big issue of the session.
"Off the heels of the 2024 regular session, the very first piece of legislation that we would have wanted to see on the Senate side and the House side was to pass both chambers with a Medicaid expansion, but it was not," Simmons said.
While tax cuts and retirement reforms were the big attraction this session, school choice and education reforms were a major contender for the spotlight as lawmakers moved past the first few legislative deadlines.
By March, approximately five separate proposals to reform education policies in Mississippi had died in the Senate after passing the House. For that, the House killed several Senate education priorities as well.
The most notable of those proposals were several bills seeking to expand school choice, a loaded term for expanding education options for parents' children through various methods, including funneling public dollars to private schools.
School choice dies: MS House Speaker says school choice bill doesn't have consensus among House GOP. See why
When all was said and done, House Speaker Jason White said the Legislature might not have been ready to broach full school-choice expansion, but he will continue pushing the idea to give parents more options for their children's educations.
"We have shown here in the House and last year and this year, a measured approach at looking at ways to move the ball down the field that the average Mississippian feels in their everyday life, and school choice, whether anybody in this Capitol likes it, is coming," White said at the time.
Examples of those bills that failed were ones to allow students to spend state education dollars on private schools in failing school districts, increasing tax-incentive programs that allow people to donate money to private schools in exchange for a tax break and a bill just to allow students to more easily move between school districts.
A bill that would have allowed mobile sports betting died in several versions that were sent from the House to the Senate, where they were killed by legislative deadlines.
This is the second year in a row the House sent a proposal over to the Senate to allow people to bet on sports using mobile devices, such as smartphones. Currently, players can only bet on their phones while at physical casinos.
The idea has been pegged by proponents to be both a method to curb some illegal mobile sports betting taking place in Mississippi while also generating more than $50 million in new state revenue via lottery taxes.
Much of the reason given for the Senate's hesitance to consider mobile sports betting has been laid on the state's casino operators. According to Senate Gaming Chairman David Blount, D-Jackson, about half of the state's casinos have opposed mobile sports betting on the grounds it could drive away their business.
Grant McLaughlin covers the Legislature and state government for the Clarion Ledger. He can be reached at gmclaughlin@gannett.com or 972-571-2335.
This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Tax cuts, retirement issues took spotlight while other issues got left behind

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says
Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says

CNBC

time25 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says

Elon Musk's official role in the Trump administration recently came to an end. Many Republicans won't be sad to see less of him, according to the results of Quinnipiac University's latest public opinion survey. While a majority of Republicans still hold a favorable view of Musk, the number fell to 62% in the poll out Wednesday, down from 78% in March, Quinnipiac said. Overall, the Quinnipiac poll found that 30% of self-identified voters surveyed in the U.S. hold a favorable opinion of Musk, according to polling from June 5 to June 9. Republican and Democratic voters remain deeply divided in their views of the world's richest man, who contributed nearly $300 million to propel President Donald Trump back to the White House. Only 3% of Democrats surveyed said they held a favorable of view of the Tesla CEO, who was once seen as an environmental leader appealing to liberal values. Musk didn't respond to a request for comment. Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week that started with Musk's disapproval of the president's spending bill and escalated into an all-out war of words that played out on social media. Musk said on Wednesday that he regretted some of the posts he made about Trump last week, adding that "they went too far." Even with a slide in his favorability, Musk is still popular among Republicans after his time running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an effort to dramatically slash the size of the federal government. Among the Republican respondents to the early June poll, 80% rated Musk and DOGE's work as either excellent or good, while 13% said it was either not so good or poor. In the March poll, 82% of Republicans surveyed said they thought Musk and DOGE were helping the country. Read the full survey results here.

Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment
Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment

Washington Post

time28 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the Trump administration has excluded him and his family from a picnic at the White House in what he believes to be an act of retribution, politicizing an annual celebration of bipartisanship over Paul's refusal to support the president's signature legislation. 'We just tried to get our tickets today, and they said, 'You were not invited,' ' Paul told reporters outside the Capitol on Wednesday. While he said he did now know exactly who left him out, he added, 'I think that it's somebody acting in a very petty way.'

Embattled DNC vice chair decides not to run after diversity re-vote called
Embattled DNC vice chair decides not to run after diversity re-vote called

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Embattled DNC vice chair decides not to run after diversity re-vote called

David Hogg, the 25-year-old progressive firebrand, will not compete in the new Democratic National Committee (DNC) vice chair elections that were decided today after a majority of members voted for a new election. After three days of submitting electronic ballots, DNC members voted to uphold the Credentials Committee's resolution proposed by longtime Democratic Party activist Kalyn Free to host a re-election for two vice-chair positions, currently held by Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta. Seventy-five percent of those who cast a ballot voted in favor of the resolution, while 25% voted against it. A total of 89% of DNC members cast a ballot. "The DNC will immediately move to administer new ballots for the final two Vice Chair positions, one of which must be held by a male and one of which may be held by a candidate of any gender," said the DNC's Deputy Press Secretary Nina Raneses. "The election for the male Vice Chair position will commence tomorrow morning at 10:00AM ET." Democrats' Vice Chair Gets Ultimatum: Stay Neutral In Primaries Or Step Down From Party Leadership With Hogg's withdrawal, Kenyatta is now the only candidate for the male vice chair slot. The DNC's decision is the latest political blow to Hogg, who stirred up intraparty divisions this year for his $20 million pledge to primary-challenge older Democrats in safe blue districts he said are "asleep at the wheel" through his outside political action group, Leaders We Deserve. Read On The Fox News App "I came into this role to play a positive role in creating the change our party needs," Hogg wrote in a statement to the New York Times. "It is clear that there is a fundamental disagreement about the role of a Vice Chair — and it's OK to have disagreements. What isn't OK is allowing this to remain our focus when there is so much more we need to be focused on." "Ultimately, I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters," Hogg added. Meanwhile, Hogg also published a lengthy X thread explaining his decision not to run for reelection and criticizing many aspects of the Democratic Party, but deleted it shortly after posting. Hogg's decision to leave the DNC comes on the heels of a damning Politico report, which included leaked audio from a Zoom meeting of DNC Chair Ken Martin lamenting Hogg's fallout at the DNC, claiming it has made it harder for Democrats to do their jobs and for Martin to demonstrate his ability to lead. "No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to put ourselves in a position to win," Martin told Hogg on the May 15 Zoom call. "I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating," But the criticism didn't stop Hogg from defying advice and wading into additional Democrat primaries by endorsing Virginia state Del. Irene Shin in the special election to replace the late Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. Dnc Chair Ripped David Hogg Over Party Infighting In Leaked Meeting Audio: 'Really Frustrating' Martin affirmed the DNC would stay neutral in Democratic primaries following Hogg's multimillion-dollar announcement. And the DNC chair gave Hogg the ultimatum to either rescind his vice-chair position or forego his political influence through his PAC. "I commend David for his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation, and while I continue to believe he is a powerful voice for this party, I respect his decision to step back from his post as Vice Chair," Martin said in a statement following Hogg's announcement he would not seek reelection as DNC vice chair. "I have no doubt that he will remain an important advocate for Democrats across the map. I appreciate his service as an officer, his hard work, and his dedication to the party." While DNC officials, past and present, said the vote to host vice chair re-elections had nothing to do with Hogg personally, the progressive Gan Z activist framed the DNC's vote as an expedited plan to remove him as vice chair. Hogg said Martin's newly proposed "neutrality pledge" was "trying to change the rules because I'm not currently breaking them." David Hogg Slams 'Fast-track' Effort To Oust Him As Dnc Vice Chair "While this vote was based on how the DNC conducted its officers' elections, which I had nothing to do with, it is also impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party which loomed large over this vote," Hogg said after the Credentials Committee voted to elevate Free's complaint before the full committee. Free submitted her complaint following the DNC's Feb. 1 officer elections, in which Hogg and Kenyatta were elected vice chairs. Free claimed the DNC's tabulation method violated the charter's provision and parliamentary procedure and "discriminated against three women of color candidates." Last month, the Credentials Committee found the vice-chair officer elections violated parliamentary procedure and voted to recommend the DNC conduct a new election for the two vice-chair positions. Now that the full DNC has called for a new vote, they will conduct a re-election from June 12-17. One vice-chair position may be filled by a male and one may be a candidate of any gender, according to the DNC. Only the candidates who were eligible for the third ballot during the Feb. 1 election qualify for the re-election, which includes Kenyatta, Free, Jeanna Repass and Shasti Conrad. Kenyatta is reportedly the only male. "This was never about Malcolm Kenyatta or David Hogg," Free told Fox News Digital after the Credentials Committee elevated her complaint. "For me, this was about ensuring that the Democratic Party lives up to our ideals as the only political party to believe in and stand up for election integrity and a free and fair democracy." But Kenyatta, who picked up the most votes during the Feb. 1 election, has criticized Hogg for playing "fast and loose with the facts without rebuttal." "Any story about this that neatly places this into a narrative about David Hogg is wrong," Kenyatta said of the re-election buzz. "I worked my a-- off to get this role and have done the job every day since I've held it. This story is complex, and I'm frustrated — but it's not about @davidhogg111. Even though he clearly wants it to be."Original article source: Embattled DNC vice chair decides not to run after diversity re-vote called

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store