logo
Several legislative priorities died this year in exchange for tax cuts, retirement reforms

Several legislative priorities died this year in exchange for tax cuts, retirement reforms

Yahoo06-04-2025

As the sun set on the 2025 legislative session, by Thursday, it ended pretty much in stalemate between the Mississippi House of Representatives and the Senate.
That stall of the legislative process came mostly over disagreements over a local projects funding bill, a $200-to-$400-million bill to fund project requests all over Mississippi, and the state's $7 billion budget, which died by a legislative deadline after lawmakers could not agree on a final budget proposal and died again when lawmakers couldn't agree to revive the budget.
Those issues also appeared to arise from beefs developed during other debates such as income tax elimination, grocery sales tax cuts, gas tax increases and state retirement reforms. As a result, several other major priorities for the year died either once or repeatedly throughout the session.
"Republicans had a lot of big issues this session, and that took their attention," said Spence Flatgard, chairman of Ballot Access Mississippi, a statewide nonprofit advocacy group and someone who has been observing the Legislature for decades. "There are things that matter to people, but it's not a lot of people's No. 1 issue. I think the reason that (issues such as ballot initiatives) didn't move (as easily) is taxes and big picture stuff, priority list things."
Tax cut finale: Mississippi governor signs income tax elimination bill. How are you affected?
Because of those financial issues not getting solved, and huge tax cut debate this session, the fact of the session is that other than sweeping changes to the state's tax structure and changes to the retirement system, not a whole lot of major legislative big to-dos got done.
"I think the priority this year was the elimination on personal income tax, because, for some reason, our state leaders wanted the elimination of personal income tax," said Derrick Simmons, Senate minority leader. "Also, what we saw was the really big national issues (with President Donald J. Trump) like DEI, our state leaders just got caught up in that."
Several big issues laid out by House Speaker Jason White, R-West, Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann, in January just didn't happen this year. Among them Medicaid expansion, restoring ballot initiatives to the people, restoring voting rights to certain nonviolent felony holders, education reforms such as expanding school choice and legalizing mobile sports betting.
One of the reasons for those bills' death could have been, according to Simmons, due to more hot-button issues, such as tax cuts and PERS reforms, becoming as controversial as they did throughout the session and that allowed other issues to fall through.
Simmons also said that because of the conservative nature of the top two issues of the session, Democrats were largely left out of the big discussions between House and Senate leadership, leaving roughly a third of the Legislature in the dark as the supermajority pushed some legislative priorities forward and left others behind.
"Democratic leadership has not been at the table for the priorities of Republican leadership," Simmons said.
That sentiment was shared by House Minority Leader Robert Johnson, D-Natchez, in a March press conference when he noted how House leadership was essentially ignoring concerns from the Democratic caucus regarding tax cuts.
"Nobody has talked to us," Johnson said during the February press conference in the Mississippi State Capitol. "Nobody wants to hear what we have to say about it. We (Democrats) represent 40% to 50% of the state of Mississippi, and nobody has said a word about how (tax cuts) will impact your community (and) what can we do to help."
Below is how those bills died:
PERS reforms: New retirement benefits incoming for MS employees. See how you are affected
Early in the session, both ballot initiatives and disenfranchisement died in the House chamber after passing out of committee.
Both ideas were heavily pushed for by House leadership in the 2024 session, with several proposals being advanced to the Senate before dying either in a committee or were left to die on the Senate calendar.
Simmons said this year he believed a serious effort was in underway in both chambers to address those issues, but because a few key lawmakers opposed those ideas, as well as energies spent elsewhere on the tax cut, they just didn't make it.
Flatgard, in talking about ballot initiatives, said it is likely legislative efforts were saved for larger debates. Simultaneously, Flatgard said that a few key senators opposition to it killed ballot initiative legislation.
"I know a lot of things were collateral damage, but even without the tax deal, I just think there's some senators that aren't there yet (on ballot initiatives)."
This would be the second year that disenfranchisement had become a priority for the House but died by legislative deadlines. It's the fourth year in a row that restoration of the ballot initiative will die in the Legislature.
Up until 2020, the state had a ballot initiative process. That changed when a group led by long-time Madison Mayor Mary Hawkins-Butler sought to challenge Initiative 65, which legalized marijuana, and the entire initiative process in court. The law, they argued, was outdated because it required signatures to come in equal proportion from the state's "five" congressional districts. The state had dropped to four congressional districts in 2001.
Disenfranchisement has its roots deep in the soil of Jim Crow South. During the 1890 constitutional convention in Mississippi, the practice was adopted to prevent Black voters from reaching the polls, according to Clarion Ledger records and reporting.
At the time of the bills' deaths, House Constitution Chairman Price Wallace, R-Mendenhall, said he let both bills die because of a lack of interest in the Senate.
Throughout the 2025 session, both the House and Senate kept a "dummy bill" alive that had the ability to expand Medicaid should the opportunity have presented itself.
The prerequisites for that were decisions made by Congress and Republican President Donald Trump regarding federal spending cuts and Medicaid funding. Even though the federal government has begun making massive cuts to federal spending, the Medicaid program and its federal-to-state Medicaid funding structure have remained largely untouched.
Meanwhile in the Legislature, the Medicaid dummy bills died by a legislative deadline as the tax cut debate became the big issue of the session.
"Off the heels of the 2024 regular session, the very first piece of legislation that we would have wanted to see on the Senate side and the House side was to pass both chambers with a Medicaid expansion, but it was not," Simmons said.
While tax cuts and retirement reforms were the big attraction this session, school choice and education reforms were a major contender for the spotlight as lawmakers moved past the first few legislative deadlines.
By March, approximately five separate proposals to reform education policies in Mississippi had died in the Senate after passing the House. For that, the House killed several Senate education priorities as well.
The most notable of those proposals were several bills seeking to expand school choice, a loaded term for expanding education options for parents' children through various methods, including funneling public dollars to private schools.
School choice dies: MS House Speaker says school choice bill doesn't have consensus among House GOP. See why
When all was said and done, House Speaker Jason White said the Legislature might not have been ready to broach full school-choice expansion, but he will continue pushing the idea to give parents more options for their children's educations.
"We have shown here in the House and last year and this year, a measured approach at looking at ways to move the ball down the field that the average Mississippian feels in their everyday life, and school choice, whether anybody in this Capitol likes it, is coming," White said at the time.
Examples of those bills that failed were ones to allow students to spend state education dollars on private schools in failing school districts, increasing tax-incentive programs that allow people to donate money to private schools in exchange for a tax break and a bill just to allow students to more easily move between school districts.
A bill that would have allowed mobile sports betting died in several versions that were sent from the House to the Senate, where they were killed by legislative deadlines.
This is the second year in a row the House sent a proposal over to the Senate to allow people to bet on sports using mobile devices, such as smartphones. Currently, players can only bet on their phones while at physical casinos.
The idea has been pegged by proponents to be both a method to curb some illegal mobile sports betting taking place in Mississippi while also generating more than $50 million in new state revenue via lottery taxes.
Much of the reason given for the Senate's hesitance to consider mobile sports betting has been laid on the state's casino operators. According to Senate Gaming Chairman David Blount, D-Jackson, about half of the state's casinos have opposed mobile sports betting on the grounds it could drive away their business.
Grant McLaughlin covers the Legislature and state government for the Clarion Ledger. He can be reached at gmclaughlin@gannett.com or 972-571-2335.
This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Tax cuts, retirement issues took spotlight while other issues got left behind

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas
Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas

Axios

time30 minutes ago

  • Axios

Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas

Even as Tesla deliveries plunged nationally this year amid Elon Musk's very visible (if short-lived) alliance with President Trump, there was at least one state where Tesla registrations were up: Texas. Why it matters: The registration data, obtained by Axios through public information requests, indicates loyalty to the brand in its home base, including Texas' large urban and suburban counties. The depth of conservatives' enthusiasm for Musk's automobiles now faces a major test amid the absolute meltdown last week between the Tesla CEO and the president. By the numbers: Texans registered 12,918 new Teslas in the first three months of 2025, a period when Musk, who contributed more than $250 million to a pro-Trump super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, was enmeshed in the Trump administration as the overseer of DOGE, the president's cost-cutting initiative. Over the same period in 2024, Texans registered 10,679 Teslas. That's a 21% increase year over year. The intrigue: The spike in Texas registrations came as Tesla was flailing elsewhere. Tesla's vehicle deliveries plunged 13% globally in the first quarter of 2025 (336,681 electric vehicles) compared with Q1 2024 (386,810). Tesla vehicles were torched at showrooms and the brand's reputation cratered. Zoom in: Tesla saw year-over-year improvements in its sales in some of the most populous Texas counties. In Travis County, new Tesla registrations grew from 1,369 in the first quarter of 2024 to 1,424 during the first quarter of 2025. In Harris County, they grew from 1,526 to 1,837 during the same period. Tesla registration grew from 1,316 to 1,546 in Collin County and from 990 to 1,146 in Dallas County. In Bexar County, registrations grew from 631 to 664. What they're saying:"It's homegrown pride," is how Matt Holm, president and founder of the Tesla Owners Club of Austin, explains the car company's resilience to Axios. "And regardless of all the drama going on these days, people can differentiate between the product and everything else going on, and it's just a great product." "Elon has absolutely and irreversibly blown up bridges to some potential customers," says Alexander Edwards, president of California-based research firm Strategic Vision, which has long surveyed the motivations of car buyers. "People who bought Teslas for environmental friendliness, that's pretty much gone," Edwards tells Axios. Yes, but: The company had been enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Musk was viewed favorably by 80% of Texas Republicans polled by the Texas Politics Project in April — and unfavorably by 83% of Democrats. In what now feels like a political lifetime ago, Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. "In some pockets, like Austin, you have that tech group that loves what Tesla has to offer, can do some mental gymnastics about Musk, and looks at Rivian and says that's not what I want or might be priced out," Edwards says. Between the lines:"Being in the state of Texas, you're naturally conditioned to think you're better than everyone else in the U.S. And when you buy a Tesla" — a status symbol — "that's what you're saying. It doesn't surprise me that there's an increase in sales" in Texas, Edwards says. Plus: Tesla's resilience in Texas could have practical reasons as well, Edwards says. Texas homes — as opposed to, say, apartments in cities on the East Coast — are more likely to have a garage to charge a car in, he adds. What's next: Musk said late last month that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound in demand" — without providing specifics. But that was before things went absolutely haywire with Trump and Tesla stock took a bath last week.

Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt
Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Miguel Uribe, a conservative Colombian presidential hopeful, was in critical condition on Monday after being shot in the head from close range during a rally at the weekend. In a statement, doctors said the 39-year-old senator had 'barely' responded to medical interventions, that included brain surgery, following the assassination attempt that has had a chilling effect on the South American nation. Uribe was shot on Saturday as he addressed a small crowd of people who had gathered in a park in Bogota's Modelia neighborhood. On Sunday hundreds of people gathered outside the hospital where Uribe is being treated to pray for his recovery. Some carried rosaries in their hands, while others chanted slogans against President Gustavo Petro. 'This is terrible' said Walter Jimenez a lawyer who showed up outside the hospital, with a sign calling for Petro's removal. 'It feels like we are going back to the 1990's,' he said, referring to a decade during which drug cartels and rebel groups murdered judges, presidential candidates and journalists with impunity. Petro has condemned the attack and urged his opponents to not use it for political ends. But some Colombians have also asked the president to tone down his rhetoric against opposition leaders. The assassination attempt has stunned the nation, with many politicians describing it as the latest sign of how security has deteriorated in Colombia, where the government is struggling to control violence in rural and urban areas, despite a 2016 peace deal with the nation's largest rebel group. The attack on Uribe comes amid growing animosity between Petro and the Senate over blocked reforms to the nation's labor laws. Petro has organized protests in favor of the reforms, where he has delivered fiery speeches referring to opposition leaders as 'oligarchs' and 'enemies of the people." 'There is no way to argue that the president… who describes his opponents as enemies of the people, paramilitaries and assassins has no responsibility in this' Andres Mejia, a prominent political analyst, wrote on X. The Attorney General's office said a 15-year-old boy was arrested at the scene of the attack against Uribe. Videos captured on social media show a suspect shooting at Uribe from close range. The suspect was injured in the leg and was recovering at another clinic, authorities said. Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez added that over 100 officers are investigating the attack. On Monday, Colombia's Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo said that minors in Colombia face sentences of up to eight years in detention for committing murders. Camargo acknowledged that lenient sentences have encouraged armed groups to recruit minors to commit crimes. However, she said that Colombian law also considers that minors who are recruited by armed groups are victims, and is trying to protect them. 'As a society we need to reflect on why a minor is getting caught up in a network of assassins, and what we can do to stop this from happening in the future' she said.

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market
This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, published a guest essay in The New York Times Thursday arguing against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. Amodei argues that a patchwork of regulations would be better than no regulation whatsoever. Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation, and this case is no different. If Amodei gets his way, Anthropic would face less competition—to the detriment of AI innovation, AI security, and the consumer. Amodei's op-ed came in a response to a provision of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would prevent any states, cities, and counties from enforcing any regulation that specifically targets AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems for 10 years. Senate Republicans have amended the clause from a simple requirement to a condition for receiving federal broadband funds, in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, which in Politico's words "blocks anything but budgetary issues from inclusion in reconciliation." Amodei begins by describing how, in a recent stress test conducted at his company, a chatbot threatened an experimenter to forward evidence of his adultery to his wife unless he withdrew plans to shut the AI down. The CEO also raises more tangible concerns, such as reports that a version of Google's Gemini model is "approaching a point where it could help people carry out cyberattacks." Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology fellow at the Cato Institute, tells Reason that the stress test was "very contrived" and that "there are no AI systems where you must prompt it to turn it off." You can just turn it off. He also acknowledges that, while there is "a real cybersecurity danger [of] AI being used to spot and exploit cyber-vulnerabilities, it can also be used to spot and patch" them. Outside of cyberspace and in, well, actual space, Amodei sounds the alarm that AI could acquire the ability "to produce biological and other weapons." But there's nothing new about that: Knowledge and reasoning, organic or artificial—ultimately wielded by people in either case—can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them. An AI that can model three-dimensional protein structures to create cures for previously untreatable diseases can also create virulent, lethal pathogens. Amodei recognizes the double-edged nature of AI and says voluntary model evaluation and publication are insufficient to ensure that benefits outweigh costs. Instead of a 10-year moratorium, Amodei calls on the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies. In lieu of federal testing standards, Amodei says state laws should pick up the slack without being "overly prescriptive or burdensome." But that caveat is exactly the kind of wishful thinking Amodei indicts proponents of the moratorium for: Not only would 50 state transparency laws be burdensome, says Mittelsteadt, but they could "actually make models less legible." Neil Chilson of the Abundance Institute also inveighed against Amodei's call for state-level regulation, which is much more onerous than Amodei suggests. "The leading state proposals…include audit requirements, algorithmic assessments, consumer disclosures, and some even have criminal penalties," Chilson tweeted, so "the real debate isn't 'transparency vs. nothing,' but 'transparency-only federal floor vs. intrusive state regimes with audits, liability, and even criminal sanctions.'" Mittelsteadt thinks national transparency regulation is "absolutely the way to go." But how the U.S. chooses to regulate AI might not have much bearing on Skynet-doomsday scenarios, because, while America leads the way in AI, it's not the only player in the game. "If bad actors abroad create Amodei's theoretical 'kill everyone bot,' no [American] law will matter," says Mittelsteadt. But such a law can "stand in the way of good actors using these tools for defense." Amodei is not the only CEO of a leading AI company to call for regulation. In 2023, Sam Altman, co-founder and then-CEO of Open AI, called on lawmakers to consider "intergovernmental oversight mechanisms and standard-setting" of AI. In both cases and in any others that come along, the public should beware of calls for AI regulation that will foreclose market entry, protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors, and reduce the incentives to maintain market share the benign way: through innovation and product differentiation. The post This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store