Donald Trump administration pulls U.S. from World Health pandemic reforms
Mr. Trump on returning to office on January 20 immediately began his nation's withdrawal from the U.N. body, but the State Department said the language from last year would still have been binding on the United States.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who is a longtime critic of vaccines, said the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.'
'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said in a joint statement.
Mr. Rubio and Mr. Kennedy disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations, which provide a legal framework for combatting diseases, agreed last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva.
'We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,' WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X.
He stressed the amendments 'are clear about member states sovereignty,' adding that the WHO cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures.
The changes included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity' in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies.
Countries have until Saturday (July 19, 2025) to lodge reservations about the amendments. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in Britain and Australia, which both have left-leaning governments, have waged public campaigns against the changes.
The amendments came about when the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics.
Most of the world finally secured a treaty this May, but the United States did not participate as it was in the process of withdrawing from the WHO.
The United States, then under Ppresident Joe Biden, took part in the May-June 2024 negotiations, but said it could not support consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development.
Mr. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken had welcomed the amendments as progress.
In their rejection of the amendments, Rubio and Kennedy said the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship — most notably from China — during outbreaks.'
WHO's Ghebreyesus said the body is 'impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Hidden $1000 fee at your doctor's office? Here's the sneaky charge Americans just found out about
Americans have their heads out of the sand as they discover a strange extra fee on their doctor bills. Many people in the U.S. have found surprise charges after simple visits to the doctor. These charges are called 'facility fees' or 'outpatient hospital services.' They are often not explained clearly and can cost from hundreds to even $1,000 depending on the type of visit, as per the NBC News. A family in Minnesota was shocked by a $423 charge. They visited their doctor for their daughter's stomach pain. The 15-minute visit cost $201, but a separate fee of $423 was added for 'outpatient hospital services.' Another man in Ohio paid $645 in extra charges. He visited an ear, nose, and throat specialist and got charged $645 as a 'facility fee', as per the The Wall Street Journal. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Operations Management MBA Project Management Others Product Management CXO Data Science Cybersecurity Design Thinking Public Policy Technology healthcare MCA Finance Management others Leadership Digital Marketing Data Science Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Data Analytics PGDM Degree Skills you'll gain: Quality Management & Lean Six Sigma Analytical Tools Supply Chain Management & Strategies Service Operations Management Duration: 10 Months IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in Strategic Operations Management & Supply Chain Analytics Starts on Jan 27, 2024 Get Details ALSO READ: Intel to axe 24,000 jobs — is your state or country on the layoff list? Here's who's affected most by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo One patient paid as much as $1,000 just in added fees. This happened during a urology appointment, which already had its own doctor fee. Cleveland Clinic in Florida is also under fire for charging these fees. Patients were charged $95 to $174 just in facility fees for basic visits like family medicine or a specialist consultation, as per The Sun report. Many patients feel shocked and confused One patient, Brandy Macaluso-Owens, said the charge made her heart drop. She visited a gastroenterologist in Port St. Lucie, Florida, for 15 minutes and later received a $174 bill from Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland Clinic responded by saying that the fees are legal and necessary. They said these charges follow government rules and help fund outpatient clinics and 24/7 emergency care, as per the report by NBC News. Live Events These types of fees are becoming more common in the U.S. Hospitals are hiring more doctors, and some insurance plans now make patients pay more upfront before full coverage starts. There are no laws controlling how high these fees can be. Christine Monahan from Georgetown University said most states don't have limits, so hospitals can charge whatever amount they want. Who should pay these extra fees? Hospitals and insurance companies are fighting over who should pay. The American Hospital Association says insurance should cover it. But insurance companies argue these fees don't add any real value to care. What should you do if you can't afford the charge? Patricia Kelmar from the US Public Interest Research Group says to call your doctor's office — sometimes they remove the fee. If not, call your insurance company for help or discounts, as stated by NBC News report. ALSO READ: Jazz world mourns: Chuck Mangione dies at 84 — here's what we know about his final days Surprise fees aren't only in hospitals — restaurants have them too. A breakfast chain had added a 50-cent fee to a menu item, then removed it after complaints. Other restaurants are adding things like 'living wage' fees of 18%, causing some customers to boycott, according to the reports. FAQs Q1. What is a facility fee on a doctor bill? A facility fee is an extra charge some hospitals add for using their clinic space during a doctor visit, even if the visit is short. Q2. Why are patients being charged $1,000 or more after doctor visits? Some hospitals add high 'outpatient' or 'facility' fees, which are not regulated and can vary based on the location or type of care.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Trump's approval ratings lowest for second term, close to first presidency bottom
Amid immigration crackdown that has triggered mass protests and backlash over 'Epstein files', US President Donald Trump's approval rating has fallen to the lowest point of 37% of his second term, which is barely above the all-time lowest point of his first term. read more Six months into his second term, US President Donald Trump appears to be in a race to the bottom as his approval rating currently stands at the lowest point of 37 per cent in his second term, according to a Gallup survey. This is just above the lowest point Trump hit in his first term —34 per cent— towards the end of his term. Notably, towards the end of term, he egged on his supporters on January 6, 2021, to attack the US Capitol to hijack the certification of the 2020 election and illegally overturn the result in his favour. The backlash at the time —which has eroded now— was such that Trump was a pariah even among those who are his yes-men how. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Gallup survey, whose findings were published on Thursday, is in line with other surveys in recent weeks that have shown that Trump's approval has taken a hit as he has gone about implementing his extremist agenda. More from World A Yahoo News/YouGov survey late last month found that the blowback was such that Trump's disapproval on immigration —his strongest area— rose to 52 per cent with just 44 per cent Americans approving it. Trump faces blowback on his top agenda Trump has seen a sharp blowback over items on the top of agenda, such as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and immigration crackdown. Notably, Independents have driven low approval ratings of Trump as he has lost 17 percentage-point support among them, as per the Gallup survey. This is the lowest in either of Trump's terms. Compared to previous surveys, Trump has seen a 14 percentage-point fall in the approval of the federal budget and an 8 percentage-point fall in immigration. Trump scored the highest marks for his handling of the conflict with Iran (42 per cent) and foreign affairs (41 per cent). He earns the highest marks for his handling of the situation with Iran (42%) and foreign affairs (41%).
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Donald Trump doesn't want FAANG to hire in India, but supply gap means companies may not listen to him
US President Donald Trump, a day ago, urged tech giants like Google and Microsoft to stop hiring in India and 'focus on Americans'. His comments immediately went viral, with people posting the clip of him slamming tech companies for having a 'globalist mindset.' His comments were also rather clear and stark: he said that tech companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta and others should put Americans first and should have their offices in America rather than setting them in India. advertisement'Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and stashing profits in Ireland, you know that,' said Trump. 'Under President Trump, those days are over.'The question then is this: Will Google, Microsoft and others follow and heed the call put forth by Trump? Will they stop hiring tech engineers and software developers in India? More significantly, will they look to set up new offices in America instead of in India? The answer to most of these questions is — unlikely. That is because the reality of tech talent supply, demand, and cost tells a different story. The US simply doesn't produce enough engineers to meet the growing needs in its tech sector, and hiring in India offers huge financial advantages. So, despite political pressure, tech hiring in India by FAANG and others is likely to enough tech engineers in the USLet's look at the numbers. Each year, according to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, the US produces around 150,000 engineering graduates at the bachelor's level. In addition, around 50,000 students complete their master's in engineering, and roughly 12,000 receive doctorates. These sound like large numbers, but they're not enough when you consider how many people the tech industry needs. Just to give you a hint of the scale: Google employs around 1,80,000 employees. According to forecasts by the US Bureau of Labour Statistics, STEM jobs — especially in areas like software development — are expected to grow by about 11 per cent every year through 2032. In comparison, non-STEM jobs are expected to grow at just 2 per cent a year. That means demand for engineers is rising far faster than America can train and supply this creates is a talent gap. There are simply not enough American engineers to meet the demand of growing tech companies, particularly at this time, as they get into an AI race with each other as well as the rest of the world. And this gap forces companies to look outside the country, with India being one of the top choices. advertisementCompared to the US, the number of Indian engineering graduates is extremely high. According to estimates by India's Ministry of Education and AICTE, India produces over 1.5 million engineering graduates every year. While not all of them are in tech and software, and not all of them have the skillset that top tech companies look for in their employees, the sheer number of graduates itself is an attractive proposition for hiring managers working with global giants. At the same time, there is also a perception that fresh Indian IT engineers, particularly from top institutes like IIT, are eager and ready to grind in a way that US graduates are not. Then there is the cost factor Along with the mismatch in demand and supply, another reason why tech giants love to have their offices in India is the cost. Hiring Indians in India is simply more cost-effective for tech giants. Take salaries, for example. The median annual salary of a software developer in the US is typically around $120,000 - $140,000 (roughly Rs 1 - Rs 1.2 crores). In cities like San Francisco or Seattle, the pay is even higher, often ranging between $150,000 - $200,000 (roughly Rs 1.3 - Rs 1.73 crores) annually. advertisementMeanwhile, an Indian software developer earns significantly less. The average salaries of Indian software developers working in the US are around $75,000 (about Rs 65 lakh) per year, and in many cases, they are even India, the salaries for the same role and same work are even lower. In some cases, they can be as low as Rs 20 lakh (around $25,000), or even lower for positions that are open to only trainees and interns. The lower cost is one of the biggest reasons why companies continue to hire from India. For the same skills and productivity, firms can hire more people, manage larger projects, or simply reduce expenses. Tech companies likely to ignore TrumpThe US President is the world's most powerful person. But even he cannot compel any private tech company to hire or not hire people in some other country. The US government can surely force the companies with some specific laws, but the Trump administration is unlikely to do that because it would hit the US tech companies adversely. That means Trump can only suggest, and that is precisely what he did on July 24. The logic and ground realities mean that tech companies such as Google and Meta will simply ignore his comments. At best, they may, as a measure of reverence, hire a few more people in the US. But in general, Trump's comments are unlikely to change anything in connection with the FAANG hiring policies in India. The US currently just doesn't have enough engineers, and is definitely not cheap to hire, to fill all the vacancies that the tech companies have.- Ends
