Boosting Social Security: A simple way to increase the average payment up to $1,000
Boosting Social Security: A simple way to increase the average payment up to $1,000
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Social Security uncertainty and policy changes are driving more people to file
With a significant rise in Social Security applications, retirees face financial decisions influenced by legislation and economic concerns in today's climate.
Scripps News
Your monthly Social Security benefit is based primarily on your career earnings and when you claim benefits. The first one is pretty straightforward: The more you earn over the years, the more you pay in Social Security payroll taxes (up to a certain amount), and the larger you can expect your monthly benefit to be.
Increasing your earnings, however, is much easier said than done. On the other hand, you're likely to have more control over the timing of your claim, and waiting until after your full retirement age (FRA) to collect Social Security will increase your monthly benefit.
It's a simple move that could increase the average retiree's monthly payment by $1,000 or more.
How delaying claiming benefits affects how much you receive
Your FRA is the age at which you qualify for your full monthly benefit, or primary insurance amount (PIA). Think of your PIA as your base benefit, and from there, the Social Security Administration adjusts what you ultimately receive based on whether you claim before or after FRA.
Delaying benefits past your FRA increases them by 2/3 of 1% monthly, or 8% annually, relative to your PIA. These delayed retirement credits will stack up until you reach age 70.
But just as your benefit increases when claiming after FRA, it decreases if you claim before FRA. You can start collecting Social Security at 62, but doing so will reduce your monthly check by as much as 30%, again relative to your PIA.
To see this dynamic in action, let's assume your PIA is $2,000 (the average monthly benefit for retired workers as of April was $1,997.97), and your FRA is 67. Claiming right at 62 would get you a benefit of $1,400. However, if you delay until 70, you'd be eligible to receive $2,480. So, for someone entitled to the average benefit as their PIA, waiting until 70 to claim is enough to get them more than $1,000 per month versus claiming at 62.
For someone expecting a PIA of $3,000 instead of $2,000, the monthly difference between claiming at 70 ($3,720) versus 62 ($2,100) increases to $1,620.
And you don't have to claim at only the extreme ends of this timeline. With the same $3,000 PIA, claiming at 69 gets you $3,480 while claiming at 63 gets you $2,250 — a $1,230 difference.
If you want to do your own calculations, you can check your estimated benefit at different ages with your online Social Security Administration account.
Should everyone delay benefits until 70?
Although a higher monthly benefit is attractive and delaying benefits until 70 is a simple enough strategy, in theory, it's not the right move for everyone. First and foremost, if you need Social Security to cover essential expenses, then claim as soon as necessary. Stability should be your top priority.
Even if you have other income streams (retirement accounts, pension, etc.), delaying Social Security until 70 may not be the best route if you're in poor health. This is why I always recommend people look at their break-even age to help with their decision. Your break-even age is when the total lifetime benefits from claiming at one age equals those from claiming at another age.
If we continue with our first example and are deciding between claiming at 62 and claiming at 70 for someone collecting the average retired worker benefit, the break-even age is around 80 years and 5 months:
Monthly Benefit Total Received at
Age 80
Total Received at
Age 80 and 5 Months Total Received at
Age 81 $1,400 (claim at 62) $302,400 $309,400 $319,200 $2,480 (claim at 70) $297,600 $309,760 $327,360
In other words, for the decision to claim at age 62 versus age 70, this person only gets more in lifetime Social Security benefits if they live until at least 80-and-a-half years old. Even with an extra $1,080 per month when claiming at age 70, it takes time to make up for the years of missed benefits from waiting.
Break-even age isn't the only factor to consider, but it's a helpful data, in addition to things like your health, savings and retirement goals.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Denmark Raises Retirement Age to 70 - Could The US Do The Same?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Workers in Denmark have been rocked by the news that the government has approved raising the retirement age to 70 - the highest in Europe. For now, the Danish can retire with their public pension at 67, but that threshold will gradually climb to 70 by 2040. Reports indicate that some Danes are unhappy with the decision, with protests taking place in the capital, Copenhagen, in the lead-up to the vote in May. Across the world, retirement ages increase because people live longer, placing strain on pension systems. Fewer workers support more retirees, prompting reforms to ensure financial sustainability. Longer work lives boost productivity and tax revenue. However, this shift can disadvantage those in physically demanding jobs or with health issues who can't delay retirement, experts have explained to Newsweek. Retirement in the U.S. The news from Denmark comes as the U.S. full retirement age (FRA) also changes, albeit to 67, for those born in 1960 and after. The FRA has been steadily rising since legislation was passed by Congress in 1983, a move made to help shore up the Social Security trust funds that pay benefits to more than 70 million Americans in 2025. This means that anyone claiming benefits before reaching this age will face a permanent financial penalty, reducing their Social Security payments for the rest of their life. If retiring at 67, older Americans can get their full insurance amount, and if they retire later, they can get even more. Even as the U.S. retirement age has already crept up, some lawmakers have indicated they want it raised even further. The Republican Study Committee, comprising 170 GOP lawmakers, published a budget proposal in 2024 that advocated for "modest adjustments to the retirement age for future retirees, to account for increases in life expectancy"—raising the retirement age to 69. In December, Senator Rand Paul introduced an amendment to the Social Security Fairness Act to raise the full retirement age all the way to 70, proposing three-month annual increases until reaching that threshold, but it was not adopted. These have been touted as solutions to the looming Social Security funding issue. As it stands, in 2035, the funds that help pay for benefits along with payroll taxes will run dry, forcing a 17 percent across-the-board cut in benefit payments unless Congress acts to shore up the system by increasing its revenue, reducing benefits or a combination of both. Other options include raising payroll taxes, cutting benefits for future recipients, or a combination of all three. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that increasing the FRA to 70 would address roughly half of the system's 75-year shortfall. "Raising the retirement age is part of the solution, but not a standalone fix," Jeremy Clerc, co-founder and CEO of Assists and a contributing writer at Assisted Living Magazine, told Newsweek, given the huge impact it could have on future retirees. Steep, Dangerous and Complex Regardless of whether raising the retirement age is chosen as the path to helping Social Security toward longstanding solvency, a later FRA could see different types of workers face potentially unfair disparities. "Not everyone reaches their late 60s in the same shape — physically, financially, or emotionally," Clerc said. "In senior living, we see the disparities up close. For some, two extra years of work is manageable; for others, it's a steep, even dangerous, climb. Reform needs to reflect that complexity." For Clerc, the answer is clear. "Absolutely—and significantly so," Clerc said when asked whether lower-income and blue-collar workers would suffer disproportionately. "They live shorter lives, reducing their years to collect benefits. They're also more likely to perform physically demanding, manual labor, which limits the ability to work longer." Jonathan Price, senior vice president and retirement practice leader at benefits consultancy Segal, agrees. "Delaying Social Security's retirement age will put additional stress on those in physically demanding roles," he explained to Newsweek. "They will likely need to drop out of the labor force and claim Social Security prior to the new retirement age. "Delaying Social Security normal retirement age would likely have an oversized impact," particularly on those who are forced to retire and claim benefits earlier than 67 - or in a raised FRA scenario, 69. IMAGE TO BE REPLACED. IMAGE TO BE REPLACED. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Clerc said that raising the FRA could slash average lifetime benefits by nearly 20 percent, according to research from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "It's hard to justify asking a warehouse worker or home health aide to stay on the job into their late 60s or 70s," he said. "These are the same people who burn out early, face chronic pain, and often die younger—yet they'd be the ones asked to wait longer for benefits they've paid into their whole lives." Price warns that policy changes could also ripple through the workforce in unexpected ways. "If SSA's retirement ages were to be delayed, then Americans may need to work longer," he said. "What impact will that have on their employers, opportunities for colleagues moving up through the ranks, and overall labor participation? People and organizations will need time to prepare for those types of changes. It's going to be a big adjustment." How Do Americans Feel? Despite repeated calls from some policymakers to raise the retirement age, most Americans aren't buying it. Polls conducted in recent years indicate strong opposition to a higher FRA. A Data For Progress survey from 2023 found that only 8 percent of voters supported the idea of raising the FRA over 67. Clerc said that if it were to happen, it requires being done with care and that raising the retirement age "must be implemented gradually, equitably, and as part of a holistic reform package." "If we push people to work longer, we need to think about what that means—for them, for their families, and for the economy," Price said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Retiree are fearing for the future of Social Security — here's what they can do to protect themselves
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Retirees are anxious about the future of Social Security as they navigate extreme market volatility and high levels of policy uncertainty. Even some House Republicans are concerned — breaking ranks to warn President Donald Trump of the potential consequences of further cuts. Rep. Nicole Malliotakis and 14 of her Republican colleagues sent a letter to the new Commissioner of Social Security, voicing worries over 'inadequate customer service provided by the Social Security Administration (SSA).' The average wait time for phone calls in 2025 has jumped over 40%, to a staggering 86 minutes. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) And seniors are just as concerned: An Associated Press poll showed 30% of respondents aged 60 and over aren't confident about the availability of Social Security benefits when they need them. 'It's a worry that I'm sure everybody is having right now,' Kathie Sherrill, a 74-year-old retiree, told the Detroit Free Press on March 26. Insecurity around Social Security isn't necessarily new. After all, the program's trust funds may only be able to fully support retirement benefits until 2035 before they are reduced, according to the SSA's 2024 trustees report. Politicians have mused over the years how Social Security should be reformed. But the Trump administration is simultaneously seeking to make cuts within the SSA, while implementing policies that experts say risk fueling inflation, potentially slowing the global economy. Some experts believe President Donald Trump's proposals may speed up Social Security's insolvency. Given that SSA data shows people over 65 derive about 31% of their income from Social Security, these factors are unsurprisingly fueling retirees' fears. In the meantime, Sherrill and her friends are cutting back on life's little luxuries, such as eating out and entertainment. 'That wasn't my plan, but that's what I've been doing,' she said. If your benefits are disrupted, you don't need to be caught off guard. There are measures you can take to reduce your reliance on Social Security benefits, and bolster your retirement savings without relying on government policies. Unfortunately, for many, a cut in benefits requires rethinking what your retirement is going to look like. You may need to downsize your lifestyle, or in extreme cases return to work. Another option is tackling rising insurance premiums by shopping around. makes comparing multiple insurance companies easier than ever. They'll ask you some quick questions then sort through leading insurance companies in your area, ensuring you find the lowest rate possible. The process is 100% free and won't affect your credit score. Similarly, can help you get great rates to protect your home. All it takes is two minutes for them to comb through over 200 insurers, for free, to find the best deal in your area. The process can be done entirely online. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — To start, you want to make sure you have a cash cushion for any potential emergencies. One way to build cash quickly is with a high-yield savings account. With a high-yield savings account, you earn much higher interest rates than a traditional savings account, without sacrificing the key banking features we all expect from any bank. If you need income now, you could consider a reverse mortgage, which lets you tap into your home equity to supplement your income, pay off debt or fund renovations. You can choose to borrow funds as a lump sum or fixed monthly payment, and then spend it however you please. If your head is spinning with financial possibilities it might be a good idea to sit down with an advisor to adjust your retirement plans. With Vanguard, you can connect with a personal advisor who can help assess how you're doing so far and make sure you've got the right portfolio to meet your goals on time. Vanguard's hybrid advisory system combines advice from professional advisers and automated portfolio management to make sure your investments are working to achieve your financial goals. All you have to do is fill out a brief questionnaire about your financial goals, and Vanguard's advisers will help you set a tailored plan, and stick to it. Once you're set, you can sit back as Vanguard's advisors manage your portfolio. Because they're fiduciaries, they don't earn commissions, so you can trust that the advice you're getting is unbiased. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs Millions of Americans now sit on a stunning $35 trillion in home equity — here's 1 new way to invest in responsible US homeowners This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
An Aggressive Social Security Garnishment Is Underway for Over 1,000,000 Beneficiaries -- Here's How You Can Legally Avoid It
Between 80% and 90% of retirees count on their Social Security income, in some capacity, to cover their expenses. The Trump administration has ended the Joe Biden-era overpayment and recovery rate of 10% and implemented a monthly clawback rate of 50% on Social Security overpayments. Beneficiaries who've received an overpayment letter from the Social Security Administration have multiple options available that can waive or reduce the amount they'll need to repay. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › In May, nearly 53 million retired workers brought home a Social Security check, with the average payout making history by cresting $2,000 for the first time ever. Though this is a relatively modest amount of monthly income, it's imperative to the financial well-being of most aging Americans. For more than 20 years, national survey-taker Gallup has polled retirees annually to gauge their reliance on Social Security income. Without fail, 80% to 90% of retirees have consistently responded that their monthly check was a necessity, in some capacity, to make ends meet. For beneficiaries, nothing is more important than knowing how much they're going to receive each month and having their payout keep pace with the inflationary pressures they're contending with on a year-to-year basis. But based on a new policy recently implemented under President Donald Trump, more than 1 million beneficiaries can expect their Social Security checks to shrink by up to 50%. With so many beneficiaries reliant on Social Security income to cover their expenses, this is income some can't afford to lose. Since Trump took office for his nonconsecutive second term, he's overseen a number of critical changes to America's leading retirement program. This includes beefing up personal identification methods, signing an executive order to eliminate paper Social Security checks, and creating the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which encouraged the Social Security Administration (SSA) to slash 7,000 jobs and shutter some of its locations to reduce its administrative expenses. But what's making headlines above all else are the two Social Security garnishments that the Trump administration has improved. For instance, by "sometime this summer," a 15% monthly garnishment is expected to be reinstated for the roughly 452,000 delinquent federal student loan borrowers who are currently receiving a Social Security benefit. Federal student loan payments ceased in March 2020 during the height of the pandemic and haven't recommenced. Between 2017 and 2023, the number of federal student loan borrowers aged 62 and above surged by 59% to roughly 2.7 million, based on data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But a 15% monthly garnishment is peanuts compared to the 50% garnishment rate that's currently underway for beneficiaries who were overpaid. Keep in mind that "beneficiaries" encompass retired workers, survivors of deceased workers, and workers with disabilities. Under the Joe Biden administration, Social Security clawbacks for overpayments were reduced to 10% per check, which is down from the 100% clawback rate that existed when President Barack Obama was in office, as well as during Donald Trump's first term. Based on statements from then-acting SSA Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi in 2023, the agency overpaid more than 1 million beneficiaries in fiscal 2022 (the federal government's fiscal year ends on Sept. 30) and over 980,000 recipients in fiscal 2023. With the garnishment rate slashed to just 10% under President Biden and having no new overpayment data published since fiscal 2023, it's likely safe to assume that more than 1,000,000 beneficiaries are still making good on their overpayments. Social Security overpayments can occur for a number of reasons. Sometimes, these errors are entirely the fault of the SSA and result in beneficiaries receiving too much per month. But they can also be caused by a recipient not updating their income. For example, non-blind workers with disabilities can earn up to $1,620 per month in wages and salary without having their long-term Social Security disability benefit stopped in 2025. If a worker with disabilities began collecting $3,000 in monthly income and didn't report this income change to the SSA, their federal tax filing would show they received Social Security disability benefits they weren't due, thusly resulting in an eventual clawback from the SSA. For the more than 1,000,000 beneficiaries who've received a letter from the SSA informing them they've been overpaid, there are options. The most desirable of these options is to request and be approved for an overpayment waiver (Form SSA-632BK, "Request for Waiver of Overpayment Recovery"). If the overpayment wasn't your fault and repaying the added benefits you received would lead to financial hardship -- you'll often need to supply documentation of your income and qualified expenses -- there's the possibility that the SSA will grant your request and waive your need to refund the overpayment. Along these same lines, beneficiaries can also file Form SSA-561, which is officially known as a "Request for Reconsideration." This route is taken by beneficiaries who don't agree with the SSA's decision that they've been overpaid and essentially want to appeal, as well as those who admit they've been overpaid but don't agree with the amount presented by the SSA. If your appeal is granted, you won't have to refund a dime to America's leading retirement program. Your appeal may also reduce how much you'll have to repay. The third option available to beneficiaries who've received a notice informing them of eventual clawbacks due to overpayment is to negotiate a different payment rate. Going this route is an admission that you've been overpaid but that removing 50% from your check on a monthly basis would create a financial hardship. Filing Form SSA-634 ("Request for Change in Overpayment Recovery Rate") with the SSA requires you to explain your financial situation, which includes documentation of your income and qualified expenses. Though the SSA typically aims to recover an overpayment within 12 months, some payment plans extend payments up to 60 months (five years) out. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. An Aggressive Social Security Garnishment Is Underway for Over 1,000,000 Beneficiaries -- Here's How You Can Legally Avoid It was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
