Lawyer's link to famous Lebanese kid-snatch
Don't miss out on the headlines from Lifestyle. Followed categories will be added to My News.
EXCLUSIVE
As a divorce lawyer Pierre Hawach, estranged husband of Sally Singleton-Hawach, knows well the workings of the court system.
It was his appearance as a witness in the NSW Supreme Court in 2006 however that stands today as perhaps his most famous court appearance.
Hawach is the brother of Joseph Hawach who, in July 2006, during a custody visit with his two young children, fled to Lebanon taking the children without their mother Melissa's permission.
The story of Canadian-born mother Melissa Hawach's battle to recover her two daughters made headlines around the world inspiring first a website, helpbringhannahandcecarhome.com, and later a book, Flight of the Dragonfly, after the courageous mother executed a daring operation to recover her daughters from Lebanon.
Sally Singleton-Hawach to her wedding to Pierre Hawach in Rome. Instagram.
Melissa Hawach outside Supreme Court in Sydney with parents Jim and Judy Engdahl 30 Nov 2006.
The girls, Hannah and Cedar, who have dual Canadian-Australian citizenship, lived in Calgary, Canada, with their parents from 2003.
When Joseph and Melissa's six-year marriage failed in 2005, Joseph moved home to Australia but Melissa remained in Canada with her daughters, of whom she retained sole custody.
The girls were aged just five and three when their mother agreed they could spend three weeks in Australia with their father in July 2006 on a custody visit. The Hawach family is a Lebanese-Australian family from Sydney's Rose Hill.
It was then that father Joseph disappeared with the girls and cut off communication with his ex-wife.
Joseph Hawach, Lebanese-Australian who abducted his two daughters Hannah and Cedar from estranged Canadian wife Melissa.
Melissa Hawach leaves the NSW Supreme Court in Sydney.
It would take the determined mother seven months to recover her children in an operation involving four former members of elite Australian and New Zealand special forces who ran an undercover surveillance exercise established outside Beirut where the girls' father had them secreted at a resort.
Two of the operatives would be jailed for obstructing justice for their part in the operation while another two ex-soldiers would escape.
They were released from jail in 2007.
Melissa Hawach's story, and the terrifying seven-week recovery mission, took mother and daughters through a series of safe houses in Lebanon before the trio fled home to Canada via Syria and Jordan.
Once home, they went into hiding.
Prior to the successful retrieval operation, Melissa Hawach launched legal action in the NSW Supreme Court seeking information from her ex-husband's family about her daughter's whereabouts.
In December 2006, Pierre Hawach told the Supreme Court he did not know where his brother and the children were located in Lebanon.
He revealed he had spoken to Joseph on the phone and his brother had told him he was not planning to return from Lebanon.
Mr Hawach's father Elias Hawach, speaking through an Arabic interpreter, informed the court his wife Gladys had been visiting family in the Lebanese village Harf-Miziara for a three-month period.
Sally Singleton-Hawach pictured right with father John Singleton
Pierre Hawach and Sally Singleton at the Magic Millions
Joseph Hawach was later charged with two counts of child abduction by the Lebanese court and international warrants issued for his arrest. No adverse findings were made by the Supreme Court against Pierre and Elias Hawach.
Joseph Hawach's relatives got on with their lives. His brother, Pierre, married singer Sally Singleton-Hawach in a lavish ceremony in Rome in 2015.
Among wedding guests were her high profile parents, multi-millionaire retired ad boss John Singleton and his ex wife, 1972 Miss World Belinda Green.
The couple are parents to three young children - Lewis, seven, Mirabel, six and four-year-old Johnny, named after his grandfather.
On March 25 Parramatta court issued an interim domestic apprehended violence order preventing Pierre Hawach from approaching Sally.
The DVO matter returns to court on Tuesday. No charges have been laid. Mr Hawach is not accused of any wrongdoing.
He has been approached for comment.
Originally published as Top lawyer is linked to infamous Lebanese child-snatching case
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
30 minutes ago
- Herald Sun
Two bodies found at Sydney Northern Beaches granny flat in Forestville
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Two bodies have been found in a granny flat on a property in Sydney's Northern Beaches. Officers found two bodies inside the home when they searched the property on Cannons Parade in Forestville on Wednesday evening. A police spokeswoman said a 'concern for welfare' was reported on Wednesday about 9.30pm. It has been reported neighbours raised the alarm after not seeing the home's occupants for several days, as per Today. A crime scene has been set up at the property. Picture NewsWire / Gaye Gerard. A crime scene has been established at the property, with police yet to determine the circumstances of the deaths, the spokeswoman said. 'Officers attached to Northern Beaches Police Area Command attended and found the bodies of two people located in a granny flat at the rear of the property,' they said. 'The bodies are yet to be formally identified.' More to come Originally published as Two bodies found at Sydney Northern Beaches granny flat
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Erin Patterson trial: Alleged mushroom poisoner to return to witness box for eighth day of evidence
Alleged triple-murderer Erin Patterson has denied she led health authorities on a 'wild goose chase' as they probed the mushroom poisoning of her four lunch guests. Ms Patterson returned to the witness box at her Supreme Court trial in Morwell this week for her second week of giving evidence. The 50-year-old is facing trial after pleading not guilty to the murder of three of her husband's family members and the attempted murder of a fourth. Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson, died after eating a meal at Ms Patterson's home on July 29, 2023, in the country Victorian town of Leongatha. Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson survived after spending about a month and a half in hospital. Prosecutors allege Ms Patterson deliberately poisoned the guests with death cap mushrooms while her defence argues it was a tragic accident. Giving evidence last week, Ms Patterson maintained she used dried mushrooms in the deadly lunch which she had bought from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's east in about April 2023. She told the court she initially planned to use them in a pasta dish, but decided they would be too overpowering and stored them in a Tupperware container in her pantry. She said she now believes she may have added foraged wild mushrooms to that container. Facing questions from Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC on Wednesday, Ms Patterson was asked if she was worried about them being too strong for the beef Wellington. 'No, I didn't think that. I thought it was the perfect dish for them,' she responded. Dr Rogers went on to probe the exchange Ms Patterson had with Department of Health officer Sally Ann Atkinson about the Asian grocer. Ms Atkinson gave evidence she communicated with Ms Patterson over several days in earlier August amid a public health probe into the poisoning. Text messages and calls between the pair showed the public health officer attempting to narrow down the location of the store. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'very familiar' with the area, owning a home in Mount Waverley and having previously worked for Monash City Council. The accused woman disputed this, but did say she was familiar with the adjoining areas of Glen Waverley, Oakleigh and Clayton. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'deliberately vague' about the location of the Asian grocer because it was a lie. 'Incorrect,' Ms Patterson responded. 'I was doing my best to remember when it happened, but I think I was clear at all times that I didn't have a memory of the actual purchase.' The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Schoolkids don't need smartphones: A Sydney mum's ban on her teenager having a phone should not baffle educators
A 13-year-old boy is being teased by classmates. Not for his clothes, his grades, or his hairstyle - but because he doesn't have a smartphone. Sydney mother of three and primary school teacher, Monica Cura, made the decision years ago to hold off. No screen time before age five. An iPad at nine, purely for schoolwork. And phones? That's a firm not yet. 'It wasn't even something we discussed,' Ms Cura told me. 'It just didn't occur to us to give him one. He'll get one when he can afford to buy it himself. Until then, there's no need.' Her stance is clear, consistent, and deeply rational: her son doesn't need a phone, she can't adequately monitor one, and frankly, he's still a child. But apparently, that makes Ms Cura, and her son, a target. 'He does get comments from other kids' she said. 'His friends call him 'iPad boy' because that's what he uses at home to talk to them.' What's more disturbing is that the comments aren't just coming from other kids. 'Teachers have made comments to him suggesting it was odd that he didn't have a phone," she told me. 'His sporting coach pulled my husband aside to ask why he wasn't on the team group chat with the other children'. This is where the story stops being quirky and starts being concerning. Because when adults are reinforcing the idea that every child should have a smartphone, and subtly shaming those who don't, we've lost our way. As a child psychologist, I hear stories like hers far too often. What used to be a considered parenting decision - to delay giving a child a phone - has now become something a parent feels they must defend. Ms Cura's son isn't isolated or unsafe. He trains at an elite level in soccer, catches public transport independently, and communicates with friends at home via his iPad - with appropriate boundaries in place. And yet, he's being made to feel like an outsider, not just by his peers, but by the very adults meant to support his wellbeing. 'He doesn't even nag us about it,' Ms Cura said. 'He knows where we stand. He did try to make a case - he said he needs it for training updates or because he catches the bus. But we get the emails too. 'And he can actually walk to school if he wants. He just thought maybe that excuse would convince us.' But she and her husband held firm. 'We've had parents come up to us and say, 'Wow, that's amazing, I wish I'd done that.' Others have said they gave their kids phones and now regret it.' I see the clinical consequences of early, unrestricted smartphone access every week. Kids who are anxious, distracted, emotionally volatile. Children as young as 10 exposed to violent pornographic content. Pre-teens addicted to dopamine-driven social media feedback loops. And parents bewildered at how fast they lost control. As of 2023, 37 per cent of Australian children under the age of 12 own a smartphone, an increase from 22 per cent in 2018. According to a global OECD report, Australian teenagers average 49 hours a week on digital devices, placing them among the heaviest users worldwide. Notably, 12 per cent of Australian teenagers spend over 80 hours weekly on screens. That's the equivalent of a full-time job - plus overtime - spent staring at a screen. For a generation still forming its identity, attention span, and social skills, this level of exposure isn't just excessive; it's developmentally catastrophic. Smartphones aren't neutral tools. They're highly sophisticated devices designed to hold adult attention - let alone that of a still-developing brain. From a neurological standpoint, the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control, planning, and risk assessment, continues developing into the mid-20s. Children and early teens are simply not equipped to self-regulate their usage, navigate social comparison, or resist the pull of addictive algorithms. Giving them unfiltered access to that kind of power is, quite literally, developmentally mismatched. And yet culturally, we're doing exactly that - en masse. The problem isn't just that kids want phones. It's that adults have normalised this want as a need. Teachers ask why a child doesn't have a phone, instead of asking why so many do. Coaches expect group chats with 13-year-olds, instead of communicating with parents. We act like having a device is a developmental milestone, rather than a lifestyle choice. Ms Cura, to her credit, has stood her ground. 'We just don't see why he needs one,' she said. 'They're on screens all the time at school. Homework's online. That's already enough. Outside of that, they need to be looking around, being present. But instead you see kids and adults walking around with their heads down, staring at screens.' She's right. The presence of a phone changes the entire ecology of a child's world. It alters how they interact with peers, with parents, with boredom, with the physical world itself. And often, it robs them of things that are developmentally essential - creativity, stillness, resilience, even real friendship. Some parents justify early phone use for safety. Ms Cura doesn't buy it. 'People say, 'Oh, they need it to get picked up from school.' But there are phones that just receive calls,' she said. 'There are other ways to manage that. You don't need a smartphone with access to everything.' She's right again. The real reason most kids have phones isn't necessity. It's convenience. It's conformity. It's because the rest of us gave in. But Ms Cura's story shows something powerful: you cansay no. You can delay. And your child will not combust. They may, in fact, turn out better for it. We need more parents like her, not fewer. Parents who don't outsource boundaries to the crowd. Who understand that development doesn't speed up just because society has. And who are willing to put up with the teasing, the eye-rolls, and the awkward silences because they care more about raising a whole child than a popular one. And if you're a parent holding out, or wanting to, let this story be your reminder: you're not crazy. You're just ahead of the curve. Clare Rowe is a Sky News contributor.
