Utah international students and ACLU sue DHS over abrupt visa terminations
The Orrin G. Hatch United States Courthouse is pictured in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, April 9, 2025. (McKenzie Romero/Utah News Dispatch)
Eight international students in Utah whose permits to study in the country were revoked have sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for the 'unilateral' and abrupt termination of their legal status in the country, forcing them to lose school time and jobs while subjecting them to detention and deportation.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the lawsuit in federal court in Utah on behalf of the students on Friday, asking for a temporary restraining order halting the removal of the individuals' records from Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVIS), a database that tracks their visa compliance and allows them to stay in the country while they complete their studies, or in the case of recent graduates, maintain an early career job.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
That, after more than 50 students were reported to be impacted by status revocations in Utah, many without any type of notice. Some of them didn't have links with protests or a criminal background, generating confusion on campuses.
According to the suit, the Department of Homeland Security action violated the students' rights for due process since they didn't get a chance to contest the decision. It also alleges that erasing the SEVIS records was against federal law and violated the Constitution.
'(The students) were following all their visa requirements and had committed nothing that should have changed their status,' Aaron Welcher, communication director for the ACLU of Utah, said on Friday.
The ACLU declined to release some details about the students to protect their privacy. However, the organization said they are from China, Nigeria, Mexico and Japan and are attending different universities across the state, including the University of Utah, Brigham Young University and Ensign College. A ninth student from BYU-Idaho was also included in the complaint.
Cox asks for clarity from Trump administration on revoked student visas
The students have been experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety after learning about their status terminations, and are uncertain about their futures, including fears of being labeled a national security or foreign policy threat, forbidding them from reentering the United States or other countries.
'The abrupt and unexplained termination of these students' lawful SEVIS registration is profoundly concerning. These students now face deportation or worse, placing their education and futures in jeopardy,' Tom Ford, staff attorney at the ACLU of Utah, said in the release. 'Coordinated attacks on due process are paving the way for the kind of tyrannical government our Constitution was meant to prevent — and the ACLU of Utah is taking action to stop that abuse of power and keep rights intact for all of us.'
The termination of SEVIS records effectively ends the students' permits to be in the country. While the students have the option to apply for reinstatement of status with USCIS, according to the lawsuit, the federal government has informed multiple schools that they will deny all reinstatement applications for students in this specific situation.
The new process of removing SEVIS records was also criticized in the suit.
'If ICE believes a student is deportable for having a revoked visa, it has the authority to initiate removal proceedings and make its case in court,' the lawsuit reads. 'However, it cannot misuse SEVIS to circumvent the law, strip students of status, and drive them out of the country without process.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
L.A. immigration raids draw California Gov. Gavin Newsom back into the fight with Trump
Gov. Gavin Newsom resisted a fight with President Trump over transgender youth in women's sports. He forced his way onto a runway tarmac to make peace with the Republican leader after the Los Angeles wildfires. Just last week, he hesitated before speaking out when rumors swirled about a massive federal funding cut to California. Newsom's restraint ended when Trump usurped the governor's authority over the weekend by deploying the California National Guard to the streets of Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids. "I'm still willing to do what I can to have the backs of the people I represent and whatever it takes to advance that cause, I'll do, but I'm not going to do it when we see the trampling of our Constitution and the rule of law," Newsom said in an interview with The Times. "So we all have our red lines. That's my red line." Newsom said the arrival of troops in the largest city in the Golden State escalated tensions between protesters and law enforcement, which he blamed Trump for intentionally inflaming to sow chaos. Whether Newsom likes it or not, the president's actions also catapulted the governor to the front lines of a Democratic resistance against Trump that he has been reluctant to embrace after his party lost the presidential election in November. On Monday, Trump said his border czar Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. The president has cast California as out of control and Newsom incompetent for not stepping in and ending the unrest, or protecting federal immigration agents from protesters. "I would do it if I were Tom," Trump said. "I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing. He's done a terrible job." Newsom also baited Homan: "Come and get me, tough guy." Read more: Breakdown between Trump and Newsom fueling Los Angeles crisis Newsom's position as the leader of a state that has become an immigration target for the federal government offers both risks and rewards for a governor considering a 2028 run for the White House. Democrats and progressives are thirsty for a leader to challenge Trump and his controversial policies. The National Democratic Party quickly took to social media to publicize the governor's challenge to Homan to arrest him. Being carted away in handcuffs by officials in Trump's Justice Department would probably elevate Newsom to Democratic martyr status. "In a way, he was channeling Trump, because he knows how much Trump benefited in the Republican Party from his own criminal conviction," said John Pitney, the Roy P. Crocker Professor of American Politics at Claremont McKenna College. Even without an arrest, the political battle is likely to boost Newsom's standing with Democrats. But immigration is one of Trump's best policy issues with voters and it's not an ideal political fight for any Democrat with presidential aspirations. "This is the brilliance of Donald Trump," said Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at UC San Diego. "He's picking these fights over executive power and over the power of federal government on a political terrain in which he's most popular: immigration, transgender athletes, DEI, 'woke' universities. He's picking these governance fights where he thinks he can win on the politics." Read more: Amid Trump's order, California tries to not play into his hands For Newsom, the raids provide an opportunity to challenge the president's narrative that his immigration policy is all about removing criminals and protecting the border, Kousser said. In interviews, Newsom has repeated that the Trump administration is targeting children in elementary school classrooms and law-abiding citizens who have been in California for a decade or more. He's also framing Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles as about more than immigration. "This is something bigger," Newsom said. "This is certain power and control over every aspect of our lives. This is about wrecking the constitutional order. This is about tearing down the rule of law. This is about, literally, the cornerstone of our founding fathers, and they're rolling in their graves." Trump's Los Angeles takeover could derail the work the governor has put in to showcase his more moderate policy positions to America. While judiciously picking and choosing his battles with Trump, Newsom used his podcast this year to air his belief that it's unfair for transgender athletes to compete in women and girls' sports. Through interviews with controversial conservative figures such as Stephen K. Bannon, the governor attempted to demonstrate his ability to be cordial with anyone regardless of their political affiliation. Newsom has been strategic about the attacks he makes against Trump, such as criticizing the tariffs that are a political vulnerability for the president. Read more: California will sue Trump over 'unlawful, unprecedented' National Guard deployment "Anybody who wants to lead the Democratic Party needs the support or at least the acquiescence of the progressive wing of the party, but Democrats need to appeal to the broader general public, and so far, this situation is not helping," Pitney said of the battle over immigration. The images streaming out of Los Angeles also create an electoral vulnerability for the governor. "Perchance Newsom were the Democratic nominee in 2028, you would expect to see pictures of burning Waymos on the streets of Los Angeles with the tagline of 'what Newsom did for California, he'll do for America,"' Pitney said. Kousser contends that Newsom, in a presidential campaign, will be held responsible for all of California's shortcomings, regardless of whether he stood up to Trump's immigration raids. Although the governor is fighting in the courts with a lawsuit announced Monday, by supporting peaceful protests and using his public podium, there's little he can do to stop the federal government. The situation highlights the challenge for Newsom and any state leader with interest in the White House. "This is the blessing and the curse of a governor who wants to run for higher office. When something happens in their state, they get the eyes of the nation upon them even if it's not the political ground on which they'd rather fight," Kousser said. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Barabak: Putting the bully in bully pulpit, Trump escalates in L.A. rather than seeking calm
When four Los Angeles police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King, President George H.W. Bush expressed the shock and horror many Americans felt. "What you saw and what I saw on the TV video was revolting," Bush said in a nationally televised speech from the Oval Office. "I felt anger. I felt pain. I thought: How can I explain this to my grandchildren?" Bush spoke after dispatching National Guard troops to Los Angeles following three days of civil unrest sparked by the not-guilty verdicts — some of the worst domestic violence the country had ever seen. He acted at the request of California Gov. Pete Wilson and Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley. Bush offered no apologies. To the contrary, he said "there can be no excuse ... for the murder, arson, theft, and vandalism that have terrorized the law-abiding citizens of Los Angeles." At the same time, however, Bush sought to address some of the underlying issues — the racist history of the LAPD, chief among them — that festered for decades before exploding into molten rage. And he promised to use Washington's power to pursue justice, which eventually led to a federal trial of the officers who battered King. Read more: The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A. That is, historically, what presidents have done: Facing volatile circumstances, confronting crises, they summon the powers of their office to explain, to ameliorate, to reassure and above all, to try to calm the situation. Not Donald Trump. Anger and aggrievement are the twin engines that power the president's glowering soul. He used the pretense of some relatively modest, scattered protests to seize control of California's National Guard and unilaterally dispatch troops to Los Angeles — launching an assault on the Constitution and the limits of presidential power yet again. He demonstrated anew his eagerness to divide and conquer and, with swagger, put the bully into bully pulpit. "He does not see that calming role as being very integral to what he does," said Julian Zelizer, a Princeton historian and author of a book on Trump's first term. "He is definitely willing to provoke conflict and to fuel division rather than to move in the opposite way. ... Instead of calming a situation, it's the opposite. It's ramping up a situation." Before we continue, let's be clear. As Bush said, there's no excuse for arson, theft or vandalism. Violent protest doesn't bring about justice. It only begets more violence. It justifies crackdowns like the one Trump has so eagerly employed — playing into the president's hands, as Gov. Gavin Newsom put it. Moreover, waving the flag of a foreign country isn't prideful, or politically smart in the least. Rightly or wrongly, it's inciteful, serving only to distract from and hurt the pro-migrant cause the flag-wavers profess to champion. And, to be clear, there are some people who use protests like the ones against Trump's immigration raids as a cover and excuse to pursue an extraneous agenda of violence and anarchy. They're doing more than just physical damage. None of which, however, justifies the conduct of a president who, when faced with flames, comes running with gasoline. Instead of a steady hand or the consoler-in-chief, we have a political arsonist residing in the White House. The fact Trump dispatched troops to tamp down protests in Los Angeles, the biggest blue megalopolis in the nation's biggest blue state, cannot be ignored. "The president loves to take symbolic acts," said George Edwards, a presidential scholar at Texas A&M University, in this instance targeting California and an enduring nemesis, Gov. Gavin Newsom, and using immigration — long an issue at the heart of his political agenda — as his sword and shield. "Aside from an incidental goal of keeping peace," Edwards said, "I think that's important in his mind." You can practically see Trump salivate. And there is something else worth noting, as the president calls in the Guard and positions himself as the savior of law-and-order. "They spit, we hit!'" Trump blustered, warning demonstrators of the consequences they would face if they assaulted police and troops in such a manner. This from a president who unconditionally pardoned 1,500 criminals convicted in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and its peace officers — one of whom attacked a policeman by plunging a stun gun multiple times into his neck. "You tase, we're unfazed!" — is that how it's going to be, so long as the violence is conducted on Trump's behalf? Read more: Breakdown between Trump and Newsom fueling Los Angeles crisis In the decade since his descent down a gilded escalator — and emergence as the most dominant and consequential political figure of the 21st century — Trump has proven himself a peerless master of distraction and deflection. And so it is again. Elon who? But in looking out for his own interests, and conflating policy with personal grudges, Trump has abdicated one of the major responsibilities of a president: to dampen unruly passions, to quell violence and, as the preamble of the Constitution states, to "insure domestic tranquility." "Any moment like this is very dangerous," Zelizer said, "because the more force that that is there, the more potential there is for something bad to happen." We can hope for the best. But this will probably not end well. Get the latest from Mark Z. BarabakFocusing on politics out West, from the Golden Gate to the U.S. me up. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge says man held at Cumberland County Jail to stay in US pending deportation appeal
Jun. 9—A federal judge in Portland has paused a Maine resident's challenge against his immigration detention while the nation's highest immigration court considers his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture as a native of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Eyidi Ambila, 44, has been in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement since September when he finished serving a criminal sentence for two misdemeanors. The American Civil Liberties Union of Maine filed a habeas corpus petition on Ambila's behalf on May 23, arguing his detention at the Cumberland County Jail was unlawful because the ACLU didn't believe ICE was able to deport him. An attorney for the Department of Justice recently said they've had the paperwork since March to deport Ambila, who they said was confirmed for a flight to the DRC before a federal judge temporarily halted the removal process on May 27. "The DRC is ready and willing to accept him," Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lizotte wrote in court records. "It has issued travel documentation to that effect." Ambila's attorneys have said they are not swayed that those temporary travel papers — which expire in September — were enough. On Monday, U.S. District Judge Nancy Torresen ruled that Ambila's habeas corpus case — and his removal — will remain on pause while the Board of Immigration Appeals considers his larger request for protection under the United Nations' Convention Against Torture, which prevents the U.S. from sending people to places where they would suffer torture. Ambila is represented in that court by lawyers at the Refugee and Human Rights Clinic through the University of Maine School of Law. The attorneys said Ambila is entitled to protection "because it is more likely than not that he will be tortured or killed" due to his status as a "deportee from the U.S. with a criminal record who has spent decades outside of the country," according to filings provided by the ACLU. Ambila was 7 years old when he arrived in the United States with his sister and father, the latter of whom was tortured in the DRC as a result of his political activities, according to the filing. After coming to the United States, Ambila's grandfather was "brutally murdered by poisoning as a result of his political beliefs," the filing states. He and his family were granted asylum based on political persecution. His lawyers say he has spent most of the last three decades in Maine and Massachusetts. The Department of Homeland Security issued a final order of removal against Ambila in 2007 for a felony conviction in 2005. Yet he has legally remained in the United States under an order of supervision requiring him to report regularly to ICE. He was also required to apply for the appropriate travel permission from the DRC, the ACLU said, but was always denied because that country hasn't recognized his citizenship. Ambila's legal team wrote in court records that they were concerned by the temporary status of the embassy travel papers and his lack of citizenship. Coupled with existing conflict in the DRC and his years away, they wrote that Ambila "is likely to face torture by government officials or by violent non-state actors to whom the government turns a blind eye if returned to the DRC." "Not only has the DRC government failed to prevent torture by non-state actors, the government itself arbitrarily arrests, detains, and tortures vulnerable people and those perceived as a threat to the government," the lawyers said. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less
