&w=3840&q=100)
Sony WF-C710N review: Big on sound, smart features with budget sensibility
I have been using the WF-C710N as my daily driver for the past few weeks, and here is how they held up across everyday use, long listening sessions, and daily commutes.
Design and Fit
The Sony WF-C710N earbuds stand out with a unique translucent design that lends them a distinct look. Unlike other earbuds that feature a partially transparent aesthetic (like those from Nothing), the WF-C710N goes all in, revealing most of its internal components, both on the earbuds and the charging case. This definitely gives them a personality of their own, though the flashy styling might not be to everyone's taste. This design is limited to the blue colour (review unit). For a more understated look, Sony also offers standard Black and White color options that resemble traditional wireless earbuds.
In terms of build, both the buds and the case are made entirely of plastic. While the materials do not scream premium, they do offer a degree of resilience. That said, the lid on the charging case feels a bit flimsy and squeaky, which slightly undercuts the overall feel.
A practical design highlight is the pill-shaped charging case, which fits easily into pockets and tight spaces, making it convenient to carry around.
When it comes to in-ear fit, the WF-C710N feels lighter than it looks. The seamless, rounded design takes clear inspiration from the more premium Sony WF-1000XM5, and it pays off. These are comfortable to wear for extended periods. However, they are not ideal for high-movement activities. The buds tend to loosen during runs or intense workouts, even though Sony includes three ear tip sizes for a better fit. Simply put, these are better suited for casual, day-to-day listening than as workout companions.
Connectivity
The Sony WF-C710N earbuds connect via Bluetooth 5.3 and support SBC and AAC audio codecs. While this is fairly standard for the price, some competitors do offer support for more advanced codecs like LDAC (Lossless Digital Audio Coding), which could be a downside for Android users seeking higher-quality streaming. That said, iPhone users will not feel the absence, as Apple restricts third-party audio accessories to the AAC codec anyway.
In everyday use, the connection experience is smooth and reliable. Pairing with both Android and iOS devices was seamless, and I did not experience any sudden drops or connectivity hiccups. The earbuds also come with Google Fast Pair for Android, Swift Pair for Windows 11 devices, and support multi-point connectivity for you to stay connected to two devices simultaneously.
Sound
Right out of the box, the Sony WF-C710N earbuds deliver a pleasant and well-balanced sound profile across a variety of genres. The audio feels rich and full, with bass that is punchy but restrained enough not to overpower the mids and highs. While the treble lacks some sparkle and detail, a bit of fine-tuning using the custom equalizer in the companion app significantly improves the overall listening experience.
What stands out most is the clarity in the midrange, particularly in vocal-centric tracks or live acoustic sessions, where individual layers come through distinctly. For a pair of earbuds priced under Rs 10,000, the level of sound separation and tonal balance is genuinely impressive.
Features
To truly get the most out of the Sony WF-C710N, the Sony Sound Connect companion app is essential as it offers a wide array of customisation options.
Beyond basics like firmware updates, battery status, and ambient sound level controls, one of the standout features here is Adaptive Sound Control. Borrowed from Sony's higher-end audio lineup, this smart feature automatically adjusts the noise cancellation based on your activity and location. In my testing, for example, ANC kicked in much more aggressively while commuting in a noisy metro compared to when I was working in a quieter office – without any manual adjustment. Overall, the ANC performance is quite effective in most daily environments. However, the transparency mode was underwhelming, delivering an unnatural and somewhat muffled voice pass-through.
The app also includes a five-band equaliser with multiple presets and the ability to create and save your own profiles. There's a 'Clear Bass' slider for tuning low-end frequencies to your preference, and it works well for those who want a deeper sound without muddying the mids. Sony's 'Find Your Equalizer' feature is also included, offering a personalised sound profile based on your listening preferences through a quick set of tests. While this often yields better results than presets, you'll likely still want to fine-tune depending on the genre.
The earbuds support Sony's 360 Reality Audio, which offers spatial sound based on a scan of your ear shape. However, its practical value is currently limited since major platforms like Spotify and YouTube Music do not support the format.
Also onboard is DSEE (Digital Sound Enhancement Engine), which helps upscale compressed or lower-quality audio files. It's not as advanced as DSEE Extreme or Ultimate found on Sony's flagship models, but the standard version still makes a noticeable improvement when streaming lower-bitrate content.
Calling experience
The Sony WF-C710N comes equipped with onboard microphones that handle voice calls reliably. In quieter environments, call quality is crisp, with voices sounding clear and natural on both ends. In noisier settings, the microphones do a reasonably good job at suppressing background noise, ensuring that your voice remains intelligible even in moderately busy outdoor or transit conditions. While it doesn't match the clarity of premium flagship earbuds, the performance is more than adequate for calls on the go.
Battery
Sony claims up to 40 hours of total battery life with the WF-C710N when factoring in top-ups from the charging case. With Adaptive Sound Control turned on for most of my use, I still managed over 30 hours of real-world usage.
For charging, the earbuds support USB-C and also benefit from quick charge. You can expect nearly 20 per cent battery in under 10 minutes, which is great in a pinch. The one notable omission is wireless charging, which might disappoint some users but is not uncommon at this price point.
Verdict
Price: Rs 8,990
The Sony WF-C710N are solid all-around wireless earbuds that strike a balance between sound quality, features, and battery life. With a rich, well-balanced sound profile, excellent mid-range clarity, and support for custom EQ tuning, they are genuinely enjoyable to listen to for long stretches. Features like Adaptive Sound Control and DSEE add value, and the battery life holds up impressively even with ANC enabled.
They also offer reliable microphones for calls and effective noise cancelling for the price, making them a compelling option for anyone looking for an everyday pair of TWS earbuds under Rs 10,000.
That said, they are not without flaws. The transparency mode feels unnatural enough that you will often prefer to just remove a bud, and their fit is not the most secure for intense workouts, something that a simple silicone fin could have addressed. But if you are after great sound, decent ANC, and dependable day-to-day performance, the WF-C710N will not disappoint.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple in China: A Story of Innovation and Vulnerability
AI-generated audio summary; not verified by the edit team. Excerpts: Q. What prompted you to write this book, especially given the abundance of existing material on Apple ? A. There's this perception that there's so much on Apple, but I really don't think there is. Sure, there are blogs devoted to daily Apple coverage and even newspapers with Apple beat reporters, so you'd think there's not much left to uncover. Weirdly, no one has told the basic story: Apple was near bankruptcy in 1996—how did it come back to become the world's biggest company? Name the book that tells that story. From iMac to iPod to iPhone—you'd think that narrative would fill a dozen books. But mostly we have biographies. What we don't have is a corporate history of Apple in the 21st century, which is strange. And we rarely think of Apple as a manufacturer. Of course, they orchestrate the manufacturing rather than do it themselves—there's no building with a bitten apple outside and machines inside. But that's still the DNA of the company. By the late 1990s, Apple had three manufacturing sites—in the US, Ireland, and Singapore—and how they 'discovered' outsourcing and offshoring was also an untold story. The third story that hasn't been told in any detail is China. Everyone knows the iPhone is built there, but what did China actually offer? Who made the decisions? Any one of those three stories could have been a solid book. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bank-Repossessed Cars in the Philippines at Bargain Prices! SUV Deals | Search Ads Search Now Undo But the chance to tell all three in one felt like a huge opportunity. Q. As you point out, it's been a bumpy ride—not just in entering new territories, but also in how much they're willing to bend. Isn't it? A. Okay, so Apple really is in a major bind here—it's become a bargaining chip between the two superpowers, Beijing and Washington. Its operational dependence on China is extreme. There's no other company making $400 billion in revenue with 90% of its products built in China. That makes Apple uniquely vulnerable to geopolitical shifts. And while there's pressure to shift the supply chain to places like India or Vietnam—possibly Mexico, though that's not really on Apple's radar—it's difficult. Neither Beijing nor Washington wants that. Washington, especially under Trump, dreams of reshoring to the US. And Beijing is actively blocking a meaningful shift to India, where, frankly, Apple should be going. Their success is their vulnerability. Other companies use China for production but don't rely on the local market. Apple, by contrast, has a $70 billion business in China. That success makes them a target—if Apple is seen as the Western company most visibly de-risking from China, it risks backlash from 1.4 billion Chinese who view the iPhone as an indigenous product. So when I look at Apple's risk, I'm less concerned about antitrust or lagging in AI—those are issues, but not existential. What is existential is the fact that if something goes wrong in China, Apple has no Plan B. And that's an astonishing thing to say about a company that, over 25 years, built the world's most sophisticated, inspiring supply chain. Q. You point out in your book that they're trying to diversify—building in India and Mexico. But they've tried moving into Mexico before, and it didn't really work out, did it? A . No, and that's what's so fascinating. Because we haven't really focused on Apple as a manufacturer, I was able to tell a narrative that few people know. Even book reviewers and Apple enthusiasts have said they didn't know this history—and many in Apple's own supply chain were surprised by it. Between 1996 and 2003, Apple was essentially scouring the globe for the right partners. The translucent iMac in 1998–99, for instance, was built by LG in South Korea. When it became a huge success, Apple expanded production to Mexico and Wales. That turned out to be a disaster, despite being a sound strategy. It was around then that Foxconn came on board. There was a meeting of minds between its founder, Terry Gou, and Tim Cook, then SVP of operations. Foxconn began assembling the iMac in mainland China. That was significant, but its impact only became clear later. They also built in the Czech Republic for Europe, and in Fullerton, California. At the same time, laptops and early iPods were made in Taiwan, while other operations continued in Singapore and California. Some iMacs were even made in Germany. So Apple had manufacturing in eight or nine countries—a kind of 'long march to China' before full consolidation. They embraced outsourcing late—long after the rest of the PC industry. But as with MP3 players and smartphones, they arrived late and then outperformed everyone. While companies like Dell and HP saw China as a source of volume and low cost, Apple saw something more: abundant labour enabling unconstrained design. Most companies design products for easy machine assembly. Apple did the opposite—they made products maddeningly intricate, knowing they had the labour to build them by hand on conveyor lines. That's the story of how Apple discovered China—a marriage of skill and scale. Q. The sheer amount of labour required—even at the design stage—was, in a sense, made possible by China's vast workforce, wasn't it? A. Yeah, absolutely. It's funny—some 90-second soundbites have circulated on social media and, unfortunately, given the impression that I'm not giving credit to China. But in the book, I give a lot of credit. I don't think Apple could have found a better partner. In China, not only was the labour force abundant, hardworking, and doing 12-hour shifts, but the country also had world-class industrial policy. On top of that, the communist system worked a bit like American federalism—many decisions were made locally. Local cadres in Shenzhen, for example, might follow broad directives from Beijing, but how they executed them was up to them. They'd compete to secure factory orders and benefit economically from growth. So, there were many reasons why China made sense. If you were Apple's partner—Foxconn, for instance—you could work with local officials to access free land, machinery, and labour. Apple simply took advantage of what was, in theory, available to everyone—but did it better than anyone else. Ironically, it wasn't Apple orchestrating all this; it was Foxconn. They realised Apple's complex designs required a highly skilled workforce, so they had US engineers fly in and train workers directly. Terry Guo became so savvy that someone like Tony Fadell—the 'Podfather'—would show up one day to find an entirely new group on the factory floor. Everyone he'd trained had been reassigned to other clients, and it was like a new semester had begun, with Apple engineers teaching Engineering 101 all over again. So it wasn't just Apple and China—it was the people on the ground who made it a remarkable, even riveting, story. Q. Given how tech giants today often align with govts, could Apple's relationship with China be seen as an early example of a tech company in strategic partnership with a nation? A. Yeah, I think it's the mother of all examples. You don't get bigger than Apple. Even a company like Walmart may, in some years, order more goods from China—but Walmart isn't in factories training workers to make action figures or kitchenware. They don't need the govt connections that Apple needs. What many people didn't realise is that Apple doesn't just wait around for suppliers to innovate. It works hand-in-glove with hundreds of factories, co-inventing and helping suppliers push beyond their capabilities. In the early 2000s, many suppliers couldn't afford hundreds of millions in machinery, so Apple began funding it. A paradigmatic example: in 2008, Apple developed the unibody MacBook, milled from a single slab of aluminium. CNC machines were typically used only for prototypes, but Apple bought 10,000 of them—each costing nearly $1 million—and installed them in suppliers' factories. That gave Apple massive influence over China's supply chain. This is where the argument gets bold: Apple has trained 28 million people since 2008 and invested $55 billion in Chinese factories by 2015. That outweighs some of history's biggest nation-building efforts. Apple, in effect, played the role of a nation builder in China—not in infrastructure or agriculture, but in advanced electronics, Xi Jinping's priority sector. So my argument, which took time even for me to reach, is that Apple became the largest supporter of Made in China 2025—Xi Jinping's strategy to reduce reliance on the West and become self-sufficient in automation, robotics, and electronics. Q. You describe Tim Cook and a few colleagues standing in that hallowed, secret space in China. What were they there to sign? A deal promising $275 billion in investment over five years? This was unheard of, wasn't it? A. Yeah, it's really crazy. What makes it slightly less so is that some people see the $275 billion figure as a quid pro quo—like, 'here's a load of cash, now leave us alone.' And while there's a bit of that sentiment, the reality is more nuanced. When Xi Jinping came to power in 2013, he viewed Apple as an exploitative force. He pushed the idea that companies had to be 'in China for China'—meaning, what are you giving back? Public filings made it seem like Apple wasn't doing much. In 2003, when Apple consolidated into China, it was a small company with 1.1% margins. That year, Foxconn actually made more money than Apple. But by 2012, Apple's margins had grown 25 times while Foxconn's had halved. From that view, Apple looked like it was profiting massively without returning much to China. Fearing a fate like Facebook or Google—blacklisted—Apple moved to flip the narrative. In 2016, Tim Cook went to Beijing's political heart and showed that unlike companies like Samsung with a few dozen joint ventures, Apple was working closely with hundreds of suppliers, installing machinery and training millions. At that time, 3 million people in China were indirectly working on Apple products. Apple's message to Beijing was clear: you have no idea how deeply integrated we are—we're more 'in China for China' than any other company. The $275 billion figure came from Apple's internal supply chain audit. They were already spending $55 billion a year, so they pledged to continue at that level for five years. So it wasn't really a quid pro quo. It was Apple quantifying what it was already doing. Some within Apple say it was just smart marketing—not a new commitment. But the size of the figure makes it undeniably revealing.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Viral: Apple CEO Tim Cook gifts a 24K gold and glass statue to Donald Trump, netizens react
Image credits: X/@yipfella There are over 2.2 billion active Apple devices worldwide. From phones to tablets, the company dominates various categories across the globe. One of the largest markets in the world for Apple has been the US, where in 2023, there were over 150 million active iPhones. With an ever-increasing market, the company's production base has been in China since the 2000s. Over the recent years, Apple has shifted some of its production to Vietnam, Thailand and India. Amidst all these initiatives, the company has not invested in building a major product in the United States. However, just as it is with many things under the Trump administration, things are about to change. Apple has recently announced that it will heavily invest in the American Manufacturing Program (AMP), which aims to bring advanced manufacturing to the United States. As a symbol of its investment in the US, the CEO of the company, Tim Cook, presented the POTUS Donald Trump with a custom-made gift. The unique unit of one consists of a circular glass made by Corning and a 24K gold base made in Utah, designed and built in the US. The mentions on the glass include "President Donald Trump" with an Apple logo, Tim Cook's signature and "Made in USA" with the year 2025. According to Cook's statement, Apple will be investing $600 billion over four years and launching a new American Manufacturing Program. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Stylish New Mobility Scooters Available for Seniors (Prices May Surprise You) Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Search Now Undo Netizens react to Tim Cook's gift to Donald Trump Image credits: X The video of the gesture is going viral all over social media, with people comparing it to various moments and traditions in history. "These are like the gifts that Politburo members used to give to Brezhnev," wrote one, referencing the gesture. "Holy smokes that is 24k gold. For all you non-science folks out there. That means it's pure gold. 99.9% at least. That thing is literally worth more than all ya'll house. Siiiick!" commented another. "This feels like something you do for Kim Jong Un to avoid having your family fed to pigs. I guess that's where we are now," quipped one. "Mongols with tributes of horses for China's Emperor (the dynasty collapses soon)," pointed one out. "I've seen a server do what Tim Cook just did at a Michelin-star restaurant. They describe the dish and origin of the ingredients, then build it in front of you," shared one humorously.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
35 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Apple leads global tech rally as Trump spares key chipmakers from tariffs
Global technology stocks advanced on Thursday in a relief rally after the latest tariff salvo from US President Donald Trump largely exempted industry heavyweights from his threat to impose 100 per cent levy on chips and semiconductors. Trump said the new tariff rate would apply to "all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States," but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the US or were in the process of doing so. Apple stock rose 2 per cent, clawing back most of its losses since the Liberation Day selloff back in April, after Trump's announcement on Wednesday that the company will invest an additional $100 billion in the US, a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries and Broadcom - Apple's partners in the investment effort - climbed between 1.3 per cent and 5.5 per cent. Other US-listed chipmakers also rose, with Advanced Micro Devices up 3.1 per cent and Nvidia 1.4 per cent, respectively. "From a high level, the 100 per cent headline number seems intimidating, but in practice we expect a much lower impact," BofA Global Research analysts led by Vivek Arya said in a note. Intel, however, fell 1.4 per cent after Trump called for the immediate resignation of Intel's new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan. European chipmakers also joined the rally, with ASML and ASMI up more than 3 per cent each. BE Semiconductor Industries climbed 4.7 per cent. analysts expect the proposed 100 per cent semiconductor tariff would not be stacked on top of the 15 per cent baseline tariff agreed between the European Union and the US last week. According to EU officials, the framework trade deal will have zero-for-zero tariffs on semiconductor-making equipment. Germany's Infineon said it could not speculate on possible semiconductor tariffs, as no details have been disclosed yet. Its shares were up 0.9 per cent. Trump's latest on semiconductor tariffs seemingly rules out Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC, which makes chips for most US companies, including Nvidia, as it has factories in the US "The market remains keen to buy TSMC on dips. Investors also believe they need to remain positioned in AI - with or without tariffs," UBS analysts said. TSMC shares closed almost 5 per cent higher to hit all-time highs, while Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix climbed 2.5 per cent and 1.4 per cent, respectively. South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix will also not be subjected to 100 per cent tariffs on chips, the country's top trade envoy said. Samsung has invested in two chip fabrication plants in Austin and Taylor, Texas, while SK Hynix has announced plans to build an advanced chip packaging plant and research and development facility for artificial intelligence products in Indiana. Since stepping into the White House in January, Donald Trump has made several tariff threats, specifically on semiconductors, aimed at reshaping the supply chain of the industry and spurring domestic production. "The (100 per cent tariff) figure fits Trump's approach of 'open high, negotiate down' and the final figure could be similar to reciprocal tariffs to limit inflation in consumer goods, given that many have chips," said Phelix Lee, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. Not everyone has come out of the latest blitz on the right side, with the Philippines and Malaysia looking to find out more details about the tariff rate. Dan Lachica, the president of the trade body for the Philippine semiconductor industry, said 70 per cent of its electronics exports are semiconductors and the new tariff rate would be "devastating". Philippine stocks were down 0.1 per cent after falling as much as 0.9 per cent during the day.
