Every Reference 'The Naked Gun' Reboot Makes to the Original
What the 2025 The Naked Gun does have, just like its 1988 predecessor, is wall-to-wall jokes. Both films value making you laugh far above plot and a storyline that makes sense. It's overflowing with visual gags, double entendres, and comic set-pieces galore. And plenty of them, perhaps unsurprisingly, refer to the 1988 original. Below, we've broken down the key references and callbacks the 2025 Naked Gun makes to the original film.
It's all in the family
Lt Frank Drebin Jr. (Liam Neeson) is the son of…you guessed it, Frank Drebin, played by Leslie Nielsen in the original Naked Gun films. But that's not all. As revealed in a hysterical gag, the entire police force, including Paul Walter Hauser's Capt Ed Hocken Jr, is the son or daughter of someone from the original cast.
Yes, even O.J. Simpson
In that same scene, each officer is crying over their dead father, talking about how much they miss them and want to make them proud. But when it gets to the child of Nordberg (Moses Jones)—notoriously played by O.J. Simpson—he doesn't say he misses his dad, instead turning to the camera with a knowing shake of the head.
Weird Al Yankovic
At the beginning of the '88 Naked Gun, Derbin steps off a plane and speaks at a press conference. He naturally assumes it's for him, but it's actually for singer/songwriter Weird Al Yankovic, who was on the same plane. In the new film, Weird Al has been hired to perform in the bunkers of the ultra-rich once the PLOT (Primordial Law of Toughness) device gets activated.
Bathroom troubles
Both Drebins have a lot in common. One unique thing that bonds them is their unfortunate mishaps involving bathrooms. In the 2025 film, Drebin finds himself in desperate need of a toilet after eating a convenience store hot dog. It gets bad enough that he commandeers the bathroom of a coffee shop, shooting his gun in the air to get the line of people waiting to disperse. Nielsen's Drebin accidentally leaves his microphone on when he goes to the bathroom, leading everyone attending a press conference to be confronted by the sounds of his urinating and ridiculous singing.
Good driving is overrated
Another thing that links the Drebins is a complete inability to drive safely. Neither of them can park a car to save their lives. In both films, they crash into things, run people over, and cause wanton chaos all around the city. Someone revoke their licenses!
Police station problems
Man, Drebin really shouldn't be trusted around a vehicle. Neeson's Drebin receives an electric vehicle as a gift from rich villain Richard Caine (Danny Huston), complete with a charging unit at the police station. Drebin doesn't realize the car is still plugged in and drives off, leading to abject chaos as a prison wall crumbles down and criminals flee. That's not the first time Naked Gun has brought chaos straight to the police station. In the original, Drebin leaves his car on drive, causing it to careen unmanned down a slope outside the station, as he shoots at it and incites panic.
Femme fatales
The femme fatale played an essential role in the noir genre of the 1940s, and they've been a key fixture in cinema ever since. Femme fatales play a key role in both Naked Gun movies, Jane Spencer (Priscilla Presley) in the original, and Beth Davenport (Pamela Anderson). Both films give them a deeply comic bent and the 2025 film considerably ups the silliness factor, bringing real laughs to a traditionally hard-edged archetype.
Running into walls
Speaking of femme fatales, Pamela Anderson isn't the first woman to enchant a Drebin to walk headfirst into a wall. Priscilla Presley also does it during her attempted seduction of Drebin Sr.
Inner monologues
When Drebin meets Jane, his inner monologue takes over, waxing rhapsodically about how beautiful she is. Drebin Jr also has an equally ludicrous inner monologue, which states that Beth has 'a bottom that would make any toilet beg for the brown.' The 2025 movie gives the inner monologues a clever twist: every police officer has an inner monologue, and they all overlap one another in a funny gag.
A 'romantic' montage
When romance heats up for Drebin and Davenport, we're treated to an eye-wateringly funny montage of their budding love, set to Starship's 'Nothing's Gonna Stop Us Now.' It's an amped up version of the montage to the Drebin/Spencer montage set to 'I'm Into Something Good' by Herman's Hermits—though the original doesn't have a magical snowman that wreaks havoc on the new lovers.
Revealing clothes
What's better than a quick change? Neeson's Drebin rips off his police uniform to reveal a cozy cardigan in an attempt to woo Davenport. In the original, the quick change is considerably racier, which makes the new reveal even funnier. When things are about to get hot and heavy, Nielsen's Drebin pulls tears off his suit to reveal…his birthday suit.
Who needs a windshield?
A pitch-perfect visual gag occurs in The Naked Gun when Drebin is in a car chase and his vehicle collides with various street objects, shattering his windshield, and flooding his car with bees. But then Drebin drives into two men carrying a windshield, which perfectly fits into his car, effectively fixing his windshield woes. It's a hilarious scene, and an easy-to-miss callback to the '88 film, where Drebin finds himself in a vehicle driven by a learner, and the car windshield shatters, leaving everyone covered in glass.
Police lights
The montage that opens the 1988 Naked Gun, a fixed view of a cop car driving through outrageous places, like a high school locker room and a family home, is brought back to life in the end credits of the new film, a lovely final nod to the outrageousness of the OG.
Stay for the credits
Even the credits of these movies are funny. While The Naked Gun has a hilarious credits scene, we're actually referring to the credit scroll itself. It's got plenty of gag credits throughout, including 'Netflix Password.' It's a riff on the original, which has plenty of joke credits, including crediting various actors by their single lines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
a day ago
Movie Review: Margaret Qualley shines in 'Honey Don't!' as Philip Marlowe in red lipstick
The skies are blue, the sun unrelenting and the body count escalating in the Bakersfield, California, of 'Honey Don't!,' where Margaret Qualley's private investigator tries to get a handle on the nefarious goings-on in her city with a small-town feel. It's the second film in Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke's so-called 'lesbian B-movie trilogy,' and while this shaggy caper might not add up to anything significant — perhaps part of the 'B-movie' point — it is fun and immensely watchable. That's thanks in large part to Qualley's turn as the smoothly confident Honey O'Donahue, kind of a Philip Marlowe, or maybe Veronica Mars, in cherry-red lipstick, high heels and silks (inspired choices for the sweltering setting by costume designer Peggy Schnitzer). Honey is meant to be strikingly 'other' in this very downtrodden Bakersfield of eccentrics, dropouts and lost souls, where missing teeth seem to be more prevalent than pedicures. It's a carnival of very memorable, very Coen-esque misfits, like a grumpy bartender played by Don Swayze and Charlie Day's clueless police officer Marty Metakawitch. Marty is not the only man in town who has trouble accepting that Honey will never be interested in him. You could play a drinking game with how many times she has to tell hapless men, 'I like girls.' Not only is queer literacy low in this Bakersfield, but many in town seem to have come under the influence of a church leader played by Chris Evans, the Rev. Drew Devlin, whose high-wattage smile and proclivity for flirting have made him a local celebrity. Evans, who seems to be having fun in a weirder role, plays the Rev. Drew as a charismatic creep, an ego-driven and possibly sex-addicted influencer who is also peddling drugs and arranging hits around town. He too has a boss, or bosses, known only as 'the French,' which is amusingly underexplained. And he's often completely, or nearly, naked and involved in some cringey, experimental acts with his naive followers. Not unlike the new 'The Naked Gun,' this saga begins with a suspicious vehicular death. The deceased was an almost-client of Honey's, which sets her off poking around and looking for answers. Most of her cases are of the cheating spouse type, and this is just more interesting. Meanwhile, others start dropping dead too. Some of these deaths feel spiritually, comedically similar to the Mark Pellegrino sequence in 'Mullholland Drive' (not the only Lynchian nod). And all signs are pointing back to the church, though Honey gets a bit distracted with a new fling in Aubrey Plaza's lustful cop MG Falcone and some family drama with her wayward niece Corinne (Talia Ryder). 'Honey Don't' might play more like a pilot episode of a television series than a contained film, but it is a step up from Coen and Cooke's previous effort, 'Drive Away Dolls,' which felt constructed of comedic parts whose shelf life expired 20 years ago. This script, written by Coen and Cooke, is probably just as vintage, technically speaking, but it feels more timeless. With a stable of memorable side characters, including Josh Pafchek as the reverend's assistant and Jacnier as a skittish new drug dealer named Hector, 'Honey Don't' is gory, unapologetically sexual, quippy and dark. It also clocks in at under 90 minutes — they knew just when to get out. As Ethan Coen finds his groove as a solo director, 'Honey Don't' might not be 'The Big Lebowski' or 'Raising Arizona,' but it is a swing in the right direction. At this rate, if we get the pleasure of seeing a third film, it might just be a classic. 'Honey Don't!' a Focus Features release in theaters Friday, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for 'some strong violence, language, graphic nudity, strong sexual content.' Running time: 88 minutes. Three stars out of four.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Movie Review: Margaret Qualley shines in 'Honey Don't!' as Philip Marlowe in red lipstick
The skies are blue, the sun unrelenting and the body count escalating in the Bakersfield, California, of 'Honey Don't!,' where Margaret Qualley's private investigator tries to get a handle on the nefarious goings-on in her city with a small-town feel. It's the second film in Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke's so-called 'lesbian B-movie trilogy,' and while this shaggy caper might not add up to anything significant — perhaps part of the 'B-movie' point — it is fun and immensely watchable. That's thanks in large part to Qualley's turn as the smoothly confident Honey O'Donahue, kind of a Philip Marlowe, or maybe Veronica Mars, in cherry-red lipstick, high heels and silks (inspired choices for the sweltering setting by costume designer Peggy Schnitzer). Honey is meant to be strikingly 'other' in this very downtrodden Bakersfield of eccentrics, dropouts and lost souls, where missing teeth seem to be more prevalent than pedicures. It's a carnival of very memorable, very Coen-esque misfits, like a grumpy bartender played by Don Swayze and Charlie Day's clueless police officer Marty Metakawitch. Marty is not the only man in town who has trouble accepting that Honey will never be interested in him. You could play a drinking game with how many times she has to tell hapless men, 'I like girls.' Not only is queer literacy low in this Bakersfield, but many in town seem to have come under the influence of a church leader played by Chris Evans, the Rev. Drew Devlin, whose high-wattage smile and proclivity for flirting have made him a local celebrity. Evans, who seems to be having fun in a weirder role, plays the Rev. Drew as a charismatic creep, an ego-driven and possibly sex-addicted influencer who is also peddling drugs and arranging hits around town. He too has a boss, or bosses, known only as 'the French,' which is amusingly underexplained. And he's often completely, or nearly, naked and involved in some cringey, experimental acts with his naive followers. Not unlike the new 'The Naked Gun,' this saga begins with a suspicious vehicular death. The deceased was an almost-client of Honey's, which sets her off poking around and looking for answers. Most of her cases are of the cheating spouse type, and this is just more interesting. Meanwhile, others start dropping dead too. Some of these deaths feel spiritually, comedically similar to the Mark Pellegrino sequence in 'Mullholland Drive' (not the only Lynchian nod). And all signs are pointing back to the church, though Honey gets a bit distracted with a new fling in Aubrey Plaza's lustful cop MG Falcone and some family drama with her wayward niece Corinne (Talia Ryder). 'Honey Don't' might play more like a pilot episode of a television series than a contained film, but it is a step up from Coen and Cooke's previous effort, 'Drive Away Dolls,' which felt constructed of comedic parts whose shelf life expired 20 years ago. This script, written by Coen and Cooke, is probably just as vintage, technically speaking, but it feels more timeless. With a stable of memorable side characters, including Josh Pafchek as the reverend's assistant and Jacnier as a skittish new drug dealer named Hector, 'Honey Don't' is gory, unapologetically sexual, quippy and dark. It also clocks in at under 90 minutes — they knew just when to get out. As Ethan Coen finds his groove as a solo director, 'Honey Don't' might not be 'The Big Lebowski' or 'Raising Arizona,' but it is a swing in the right direction. At this rate, if we get the pleasure of seeing a third film, it might just be a classic.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Why Hollywood will never stop remaking, rebooting and recycling the old same stories
The Naked Gun. 28 Days Later. I Know What You Did Last Summer. Jurassic Park. Thought these are all titles from 2025, you could be forgiven for thinking they came from Moviefone. This year's summer blockbuster season has been dominated by nostalgic fare: reboots, remakes and sequels. And while the retold story has been an element of the movie business going back to its earliest days, studios seem to be cashing in more than ever before — and audiences are buying in. From Lilo & Stitch becoming the year's first billion-dollar box office earner, to Happy Gilmore smashing Netflix audience records (47 million watched it on the streaming service in the first three days it was available), to King of the Hill clocking in as Disney's biggest adult animated premiere in five years, the desire for old stories made new seems to have never been higher. "We all look back with, you know, rose-coloured glasses on the times we grew up in as better," Freakier Friday director Nisha Ganatra explained to CBC News in a recent interview. "Right now especially, the world is a little bit of an unsure place. And I think that the comfort of these movies and that collective feeling of togetherness we got when we watch these movies … it's why people are going back to theatres."A return to the well Hollywood's affection for recycled and rehashed stories started right alongside Hollywood itself: going as far back as Georges Méliès' L'Arroseur from 1896, a remake of the previous year's L'Arroseur arrosé. And 1903's The Great Train Robbery was infamously recreated in an essentially a shot-for-shot remake the year after, then numerous times after that. And the trend of journalists pointing out remakes is nearly as old as the remakes themselves. "Remaking old films is really old hat for the cinema people," read a 1937 article from the New York Times. "Although the screen has only recently emerged from its swaddling clothes and managed to crawl just about halfway into its metaphorical knee-pants, it already belies its years and even casts fond, reminiscent glances backward." "More often than not these yearnings for the past have been prompted by pecuniary rather than esthetic motives. Depending upon one's point of view, the studios may be regarded either as taking critical stock of themselves or as cashing in on their old preferred. The latter view seems more consistent with the facts." Other than the flowery language, the complaint that a given year was overloaded with remakes sounds like it could have come from today.'They often miss the soul' "I am not a fan. I continue to not be a fan of live-action remakes because they often miss the soul," explained director Dean DeBlois, despite releasing a live-action remake of How To Train Your Dragon earlier this year. "Too often they feel like they are lesser versions of the animated movie to me." So why have remakes and reboots become the dominant fare of 2025's movie slate? According to ComScore senior media analyst Paul Dergarabedian, it comes down to dollars and cents. The summer blockbuster has been a tentpole for Hollywood going back decades; Dergarabedian notes that it generates roughly forty per cent of North America's total box office. So success often depends on studios launching their surest bets during this "play it safe" period where they have the best chance of satisfying the widest-possible audience. That, Dergarabedian says, is not a recipe for originality."As much as so many people decry the lack of originality in movies, when you look at the top 10 movies of the year, generally speaking, there might be one or two out of the top ten that are true original films," he said. "That right there tells you why studios, marketers, PR folks, advertisers — they love the tried and true and those known brands." Instead, it was a recipe that led to films built around spectacle and excitement, with studios relying on huge franchises and superhero fanaticism to draw in ever-higher box office receipts. But as recently as 2023, a string of blockbuster bombs suggested audiences were no longer as interested in that fare. Chasing those audiences, Dergaradedian says, meant studios started making movies that might appeal to even wider demographics. And over the last two and a half years, he says that's led to PG movies out-grossing PG-13 movies for the first time. That spurred a return to films and shows that people remembered from their own childhoods, he said. Film titles that were already thought of as wholesome and accessible, or were remade to be as inoffensive as possible, as with Lilo & Stitch, a live-action remake with a sanitized ending that drew wide criticism. It was a move foreshadowed by Disney Entertainment co-chairman Alan Bergman, who told the LA Times ahead of the film's premiere that changes were made to the original story because "to do the kind of box office that I think we're going to do, you need to get everybody."The nostalgia impulse Robert Thompson, Syracuse University's professor of television and popular culture, says the desire to return to familiar stories far predates movies; as evidenced by The Odyssey being viewed as a sequel to The Iliad, and both being retellings of ancient Greek myth. Even genre itself is a larger extension of the remake, according to Thompson. Likening it to the auto industry, he says stories — like cars — historically couldn't be made for each individual audience member's tastes. Making narratives similar enough to fit a genre was the solution. "You're not going to make each driver an individual automobile. You've got to churn those things off of an assembly line," he said. "And that's what genre is all about … getting something that works and keep doing it. Over and over again." The problem is what Thompson believes is potentially driving this current cycle of remakes and reboots: A reactionary shift to the digital age's fracturing of pop culture. As the internet and streaming democratized entertainment, we went from consuming media from a few dominant viewpoints to a landscape full of competing productions giving voices to demographics that never had them before. That complicated what sorts of stories and stances were viewed as right or acceptable, Thompson says. The ensuing fear and discomfort some felt fed a desire to return to a simpler time; to recreate a media landscape they viewed as preserving traditional social norms, "because we celebrate this traditional, fictionally perfect past." He suggests our current glut of rose-coloured stories celebrating that past has reverberated through media. "In the sense of, 'Let's just go back to when things were simple. Let's go back to when things were good. Let's make art great again.' "
