War and human civilisation: a moral paradox
The question might sound naive to bellicists, yet it is pertinent in this age of admirable human development and scientific advancements around the world: Can, despite all the claims of human knowledgibility and maturity of consciousness, the raging wars in Gaza and Ukraine be justified, particularly when the war casualties impact the innocent children and women?
After all, what type of future is being bequeathed to the generations to come? Would they not think that the pursuit of knowledge, wisdom, consciousness, scientific progress and human development cannot guarantee a world sans barbarism which human civilisation claims to have left far behind?
Such wars seem to be the telltale signs of human regression towards the Stone Age with animalistic instincts as the law of the jungle. Such bloodshed and genocide with carte blanche remind me of Mark Twain's satirical essay, The Damned Human Race, wherein he proposes a theory and corroborates it with historical details that man is not the highest point of evolution, rather arguably the lowest. He says that unlike humans, animals kill only for a reason, not for fun or greed; they don't conduct wars because they don't possess any religion or patriotism.
Similarly, in the second voyage of The Gulliver's Travels by J Swift, on the Gulliver's proposal to the Brobdingnagian king to use gunpowder against the enemies, the king appallingly summarises the human civilisation: "I cannot but conclude the bulk of your natives to be the most pernicious race of little odious vermin that Nature ever suffered to crawl upon the surface of the Earth."
The so-called guardians designated to keeping or restoring peace on this earthly planet, like the League of Nations and the United Nations Organization, had and have proved incapable of implementing their existential writ the world over. As the former had failed in stopping WWII from happening and died its natural death, the latter too would follow suit if it fails to stop either of the above wars because such wars can balloon into a world war.
These institutions had been established to be proactive to defang the impunity of any group, organisation or country to threaten the world peace, but their inertness shows that peaceful human existence would soon become extinct as it has already become an endangered species due to the species' own self- or auto-destruct practices.
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres branded the war "the deadliest of conflicts" in decades. Speaking of Israeli carte blanche, he highlighted that Israel killed 196 humanitarians, including 175 UN staffers; most of them belonged to the Palestine relief agency UNRWA. "More women and children have been killed in Gaza by the Israeli military over the past year than the equivalent period of any other conflict over the past two decades," says an Oxfam study published on 30th September 2024.
Now the question is not "Will the UN act to play its role in stopping genocide in Gaza?" as it has long been answered with a resounding NO. Instead, the very question arising from the pyre of disappointment with the UN has matured into a philosophical, moral and deeply political one: Is the UN helpless against the impunity of the US and Israel?
"To assuage their collective guilt for their early years of indifference towards one genocide - the Nazi extermination of millions of European Jews - the United States and Europe have prepared the grounds for another," said Arundhati Roy in her acceptance speech on receiving the PEN Pinter Prize 2024. "If the US government withdrew its support of Israel, the war could stop today," she said, calling a spade a spade.
The justification of Israel's egregious human rights violations against Palestinian civilians by labelling the October 7 attack by Hamas as a terrorist attack reminds me of one of the Aesop's fables wherein a wolf cooks up false rationale to attack the lamb.
It would not be wrong to say that the world is under the siege of exploitative capitalistic pursuits. "The nuclear-armed state of Israel was to serve as a military outpost and gateway to the natural wealth and resources of the Middle East for US and Europe," says Arundhati Roy in the speech.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
34 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Sikh repression
Today, Washington DC is hosting the next phase of the Khalistan Referendum being organised by Sikhs for Justice. Thousands are expected to participate, sending a message that New Delhi's efforts to silence the diaspora have failed. For the global Sikh community, the ballot remains the answer to Indian aggression. No UN member state has criminalised these exercises as it is protected under Article 1 of the UN Charter. Democracies too have defended them as legitimate political expression, rejecting India's efforts to brand them as terrorism. New Delhi's response has been increasingly heavy-handed. In June 2023, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared "credible links" of Indian involvement in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Soon after, activist Avtar Singh Khanda died under suspicious circumstances in the UK. In the US, prosecutors charged RAW operatives in a foiled plot to assassinate Gurpatwant Singh Pannun. Similar networks were uncovered in other countries, where Indian operatives spied on and intimidated Sikh activists. India has also pressed for extraditions of referendum leaders, but Western courts have rejected these attempts, citing insufficient evidence and political motivation. Efforts to block referendum content on digital platforms have equally failed, with Google, YouTube and X refusing Indian demands. Instead, the diaspora has leveraged these spaces to mobilise voters. Meanwhile, the opening of a Sikh embassy in Canada has provided the movement with new diplomatic momentum. Driven by a global community of over 25 million, the Khalistan cause has grown into a broad-based diaspora campaign. Many activists now argue that India's tactics mirror colonial patterns of control over minorities, while its branding of dissent as terrorism reflects a slide towards authoritarianism. By resorting to covert operations and censorship, India risks further isolation. Democracies that once sought closer ties with New Delhi now find themselves compelled to expose its activities and protect political freedoms on their soil.
Express Tribune
34 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Deadly floods
The death toll from the recent monsoon floods in upper parts of the country is staggering, with nearly 350 people reported dead, including over 200 in Buner district of K-P alone. Sadly, the death toll is anticipated to rise as a number of people are injured and missing. While most of the loss of life was due to drowning and landslides, roof and bridge collapses also exposed the government's failure to provide reliable infrastructure or housing. It is also unfortunate that despite warnings from government officials and the media, many tourists still went to flood-affected areas or refused to evacuate, leading to resources having to be redirected to rescue them. Over 1,300 tourists were airlifted from K-P's Mansehra alone. It is unfair to call such people victims in the traditional sense, as they chose to put their lives at risk despite warnings. Some countries make such 'victims' pay for the cost of their rescue. Pakistan should do the same if only to discourage similar risk-taking in the future. And while the recent deaths are almost all in K-P and parts of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the National Disaster Management Authority's data shows that over 300 people had died due to monsoon rains across the country before the ongoing disaster began. That we cannot ignore the climate change connection goes without saying. A recent study by several Pakistani and foreign contributors published by Imperial College London noted that human-induced warming increased rainfall by up to 15%, which is the difference between a pleasant monsoon rain and a deadly cloudburst. Meanwhile, the UN launched a multimillion-dollar early warning system for Buner and Shangla less than a month ago. Once things normalise, it will be a fair question to ask whether such systems would have prevented the high loss of life. Failure to build quality infrastructure - or punish those responsible for shoddy infrastructure - must be investigated. Those behind the continuing unchecked construction of homes, including whole housing societies along riverbeds and in flood plains, must also be taken to task.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Shelling of El-Fasher by Sudanese paramilitaries kills 17, injures 25
A member of Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary, which has been fighting the nation's army since last April. PHOTO: REUTERS Sudanese paramilitary forces shelled North Darfur's besieged capital El-Fasher on Saturday, killing at least 17 civilians and injuring 25 others, a medical source told AFP. Speaking anonymously for safety reasons, the source at El-Fasher hospital said these numbers only account for those who reached the hospital, adding that others were buried by their families, unable to access medical centres due to ongoing security challenges. Since May last year, El-Fasher has been under siege by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) which have been battling Sudan's army since April 2023. According to the local resistance committee -- one of hundreds of volunteer groups documenting atrocities during the conflict -- the attack involved heavy artillery shelling by the RSF across several residential neighbourhoods. Also Read: 'Malnutrition in Sudan kills 63 in a week' The bombardment began early Saturday and continued well into the afternoon, the committee said in a statement, describing the assault as one of the deadliest recent attacks on the city, resulting in numerous casualties and severe damage to property and infrastructure. A few kilometres to the north, paramilitaries also shelled the famine-stricken Abu Shouk displacement camp, killing several civilians including a community leader and injuring at least 20 people, according to the camp's Emergency Response Room, which has been coordinating frontline aid throughout the war. Following the RSF's loss of Sudan's capital, Khartoum, to the army in March, El-Fasher and nearby displacement camps have been targeted in renewed attacks. In April, a major RSF offensive on the nearby Zamzam camp displaced tens of thousands, many of whom sought refuge in El-Fasher. The ongoing war between Sudan's army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands, displaced millions and triggered what the United Nations calls the world's largest displacement and hunger crisis. The conflict has effectively divided the country, with the army controlling the north, east and centre while the RSF holds much of Darfur and parts of the south. Last year, famine was declared in three camps near El-Fasher, including Abu Shouk and Zamzam. The UN has warned the crisis would extend into the city itself by last May, although a lack of data has so far prevented an official famine declaration. This month, the World Food Programme (WFP) said thousands of families trapped in El-Fasher are at "risk of starvation". According to the WFP, prices for staple foods like sorghum and wheat -- used to make traditional flatbreads and porridge -- are up to 460 percent higher in El-Fasher compared to other parts of Sudan. Markets and clinics have been attacked while community kitchens that once fed displaced families have largely shut down due to a lack of supplies, the UN agency added. Nearly 40 percent of children under five in El-Fasher are now acutely malnourished, with 11 percent suffering from severe acute malnutrition, according to UN figures. Malnutrition has already claimed 63 lives -- mostly women and children -- in just one week in El-Fasher, a senior health official told AFP last week. At the city's largest community kitchen, organisers say children and women arriving show clear signs of malnutrition, including swollen bellies and sunken eyes. Read More: Israel, South Sudan discuss Gaza relocation The humanitarian crisis is being compounded by a cholera outbreak that is sweeping through overcrowded displacement camps. In April, a major RSF offensive on the nearby Zamzam camp displaced tens of thousands, many of whom sought refuge in El-Fasher. The ongoing war between Sudan's army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands, displaced millions and triggered what the United Nations calls the world's largest displacement and hunger crisis. The conflict has effectively divided the country, with the army controlling the north, east and centre while the RSF holds much of Darfur and parts of the south. Last year, famine was declared in three camps near El-Fasher, including Abu Shouk and Zamzam. The UN has warned the crisis would extend into the city itself by last May, although a lack of data has so far prevented an official famine declaration. This month, the World Food Programme (WFP) said thousands of families trapped in El-Fasher are at "risk of starvation". According to the WFP, prices for staple foods like sorghum and wheat -- used to make traditional flatbreads and porridge -- are up to 460 percent higher in El-Fasher compared to other parts of Sudan. Markets and clinics have been attacked while community kitchens that once fed displaced families have largely shut down due to a lack of supplies, the UN agency added. Nearly 40 percent of children under five in El-Fasher are now acutely malnourished, with 11 percent suffering from severe acute malnutrition, according to UN figures. Malnutrition has already claimed 63 lives -- mostly women and children -- in just one week in El-Fasher, a senior health official told AFP last week. At the city's largest community kitchen, organisers say children and women arriving show clear signs of malnutrition, including swollen bellies and sunken eyes. The humanitarian crisis is being compounded by a cholera outbreak that is sweeping through overcrowded displacement camps.
