On Taiwan's forgotten front line, all the defensive drills in the world may not matter
Within minutes, the order came over the loudspeaker, and the drills began with a series of huge explosions shaking the ground of this small island, located just two kilometres from China.
The rumbling thunder of rockets being launched towards the water could be heard from the edge of the beach. Seconds later, the sound of machine guns and a howitzer split the air while lasers lit up the night sky with orange lines.
The drills taking place at the Houhu Seaside Park on Kinmen's east coast are part of Taiwan's annual Han Kuang military drills. They are hosted there to showcase its military prowess and prepare its troops in the event of a Chinese invasion.
This year, the exercises are the biggest and longest ever, with more than 22,000 reservists deployed for 10 days of weapons training as well as a wide range of field exercises, which have included running through Taipei's subway system in the middle of the night.
The drills on Kinmen are particularly important, given that its proximity to China has earned it the label of Taiwan's 'front line'.
However, those who live on Kinmen, including the troops, believe that this designation may no longer be valid; with some of the world's most advanced weapons, if China wanted to attack Taiwan today, it could go straight for the jugular and hit the capital, Taipei.
'In the past, the military technology was not that advanced so the Chinese communists could only bomb Kinmen Island, but now they can launch missiles across the ocean, even to the United States,' said Yu-Jen Chen, who represents Kinmen in Taiwan's Legislative Yuan – similar to a member of parliament in the UK.
As part of this year's larger Han Kuang drills, they will also involve 'unscripted' portions to more accurately simulate what would happen in the event of an attack.
On Kinmen, this means that some of the soldiers participating in the night-time drills have not been told key information in advance.
'They will only be deployed to the beach, when they receive the order from their commanders,' said a military source who spoke on the condition of anonymity as they are not authorised to speak to the media.
'Previously they would have a planned mobilisation, but this time they don't have an arranged deployment.'
Similar to the rest of Han Kuang, the drills on Kinmen this year are the largest ever, with all 3,000 soldiers stationed on the island taking part.
Nine M60A3 tanks and four CM21 armoured vehicles were seen lining up before launching a torrent of projectiles towards Taiwan island.
There will also be continuous shooting across the main island, neighbouring Lesser Kinmen and nine surrounding islets, marking the first time all 12 are using live fire.
'This is the biggest one in history. While the islets have been included as part of the annual Han Kuang in the past, this year we made adjustments to have simultaneous live-firing on all of them,' Lt Gen Wang Shi-Tu, commander of the Kinmen Defense Command, told The Telegraph.
'This is because of the threats, especially the threats coming from the other side of the Taiwan Strait.'
China claims Taiwan as part of its territory, a stance which the government in Taipei rejects, and has not ruled out the use of force to 'reunify' the country.
However, those who live in Kinmen don't believe that the drills are all that useful.
'I was joking with a general who said that if a war happens they will mobilise their troops to hide in the mountains so we can avoid escalating the battle and minimise the destruction on Kinmen,' said Wang Song-Wei, who works at the Kinmen county government.
There used to be approximately 100,000 troops stationed on Kinmen Island, but over the years this number has decreased to the 3,000 or so here today – hardly enough to defend the island against China's strength of more than two million. Legislator Chen explained that having fewer troops on Kinmen makes the island less of a target.
The island also doesn't look the way you would imagine a frontline to look.
Former military bases have been turned into museums, with artillery used in tourist showcases and old tanks left outside to rust and decay.
All of this is compounded by the greatest disadvantage facing Kinmen – that it would more or less be left to fend for itself in the event of an attack.
Legislator Chen said that the 'official attitude' from the ministry of national defence in Taipei is that if Kinmen were attacked, its people would have to 'fight for ourselves independently'.
This sentiment was echoed by several residents across the island, including Jason Yang, who was born and raised on Kinmen, but before retiring served as one of the highest officials in the military's combat unit on the main island.
'In the event of a possible confrontation with China, it would not be a priority for Taipei to send troops,' he said.
Mr Wang believes one of the reasons that Lai Ching-te, the Taiwan president, decided to increase the scale of the Han Kuang drills this year was to appeal to the United States and, as the 'frontline', Kinmen needed to be included.
The US has long maintained a principle of strategic ambiguity when it comes to Taiwan, refraining from asserting whether it would come to the country's defence in the event of an attack.
The Pentagon has recently been pushing Japan and Australia to clarify what kind of role they would play if Taiwan was attacked.
One unnamed US official said that this was to ensure that 'the United States and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace'.
For his part, Anthony Albanese, the Australian prime minister, rebuffed the efforts, saying that his country would not join a 'hypothetical' conflict with China over Taiwan.
President Donald Trump has echoed this position, while also pushing for Taiwan to do its own part to protect itself, including by increasing its defence budget.
'It is very likely Lai is trying to show off to Trump. He takes action based on loyalty. He wants people to grovel and that is what Lai is doing,' said Mr Wang.
While the threat of an invasion looms over many in Taipei, for those on Kinmen, they don't believe China would attack 'its own family', as one resident put it.
Kinmen and Xiamen, the Chinese city closest to the island, are very close culturally and many residents on both sides have family on the other.
No one understands this better than Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, who served as vice-mayor of the coastal city during the 1980s.
The government in Beijing has been capitalising on these ties in recent years, adopting what has become known as the Kinmen Model. This refers to Chinese coast guard activities aimed at furthering legal cross-strait relations by removing Taipei's authority over the Taiwan Strait.
China has deployed many vessels – both officially and unofficially – into the strait over the years as part of its 'grey zone' efforts to intimidate and coerce Taiwan.
Given this, it came as little surprise to those gathered on the beach that the island's largest drills to date began with the encroachment of a Chinese fishing boat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US and China officials meet in Stockholm to discuss how to ease trade tensions
Top trade officials from China and the United States arrived for a new round of talks in Stockholm on Monday in a bid to ease tensions over trade between the world's two biggest national economies. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng were meeting at the offices of Sweden's prime minister for talks that Bessent has said will likely to lead to an extension of current tariff levels. Analysts say the two envoys could set the stage for a possible meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year to cement a recent thaw in trade tensions. The talks are the third this year between He and Bessent — nearly four months after Trump upended global trade with his sweeping tariff proposals, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. China quickly retaliated, sending global financial markets into a temporary tailspin. The Stockholm meeting — following similar talks in Geneva and London in recent months — is set to extend a 90-day pause on those tariffs. During the pause, U.S. tariffs were lowered to 30% on Chinese goods, and China set a 10% tariff on U.S. products. The Trump administration, fresh off a deal on tariffs with the European Union, wants to reduce a trade deficit that came in at $904 billion overall last year — including a nearly $300 billion trade deficit with China alone. China's Commerce Ministry, for its part, said last week that Beijing wants 'more consensus and cooperation and less misperception' from the Stockholm talks. —— Didi Tang and Josh Boak in Washington contributed to this report.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Miniscule public sector productivity growth is nothing to celebrate
Let us start with the good news. The latest official estimates suggest that public service productivity grew by 1.0 per cent in the first quarter of the year compared to the same period of 2024, led by a 2.7 per cent increase in healthcare. But gosh, was that needed. The annual data show that public service productivity was still 4.2 per cent lower in 2024 than the pre-pandemic peak in 2019. Over this period, the output of public services – such as the number of treatments on the NHS, and lessons provided in state schools – has risen by an average of around 12 per cent. However, the inputs required to produce that output – mainly labour and materials – have risen even further, by almost 17 per cent. The difference between these two numbers is the shortfall in productivity. Worse still, this follows a long period of stagnation which goes back to at least 1997, when comparable data are first available. Over more than a quarter of a century, productivity in public services has improved by a grand total of just 0.3 per cent. This year alone, day-to-day public spending is expected to exceed £500 billion, mainly on health, education and defence. Raising public sector productivity by one per cent a year over five years would therefore allow the government to provide the same services for about £25 billion less. In turn, this could fill the 'black hole' in the public finances without the need for any cuts in services, or yet more tax increases. Of course, this is easier said than done. It is generally harder to raise productivity in services activities than in, say, manufacturing, energy, or communications. This is especially true of activities requiring lots of personal contact, such as medicine and teaching, or the arts and entertainment. But the problems do appear to be much larger in the public than the private sector. Four factors come up over and over again. One is the lack of competition. It is no surprise that sectors where market pressures are stronger also tend to be those where productivity gains are greater. Another is that the public sector is more heavily unionised – and the unions themselves tend to be more militant. This is reflected in greater resistance to change, including more flexible working practices that put service users first. Third, public services are too reliant on the Treasury for funding. This might make sense for genuine public goods, such as defence, which cannot be left to the markets. But it leaves services like the NHS vulnerable to short-termist political choices. Providing any service 'for free' is also unlikely to be good for efficiency. Finally, and related to all the first three, the public sector has been relatively slow to adopt new technologies – as almost anyone who has engaged with the NHS will know. The scope for AI to transform the provision of public services is surely huge. There are at least some encouraging signs. NHS productivity did start to improve in the final years of the last Government, partly thanks to pressure from then-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt. The latest data suggest this trend is continuing and Wes Streeting is certainly making the right noises. However, the scale of the challenge cannot be underestimated either. The public sector is becoming an increasingly unmanageable Leviathan. The Government is taking on more and more functions, while backtracking on commitments to reform in many other areas – from planning regulations to welfare spending. Some real action is needed soon to keep the cost of public services from spiralling out of control.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
China unveils childcare subsidies in push to boost fertility
BEIJING, July 28 (Reuters) - China rolled out on Monday an annual childcare subsidy of 3,600 yuan ($502) until age three, as authorities look to spur a flagging birth rate with fewer young people choosing to have children. The high cost of childcare and education as well as job uncertainty and a slowing economy are among the concerns that have discouraged many young Chinese from getting married and starting a family. Subsidies will start from this year, with partial subsidies for those younger than three who were born prior to 2025, in a policy expected to benefit more than 20 million families of toddlers and infants, the official Xinhua news agency said. The plan was an "important national livelihood policy" and direct cash subsidies would help "reduce the cost of family childbirth and parenting", the National Health Commission said. China's population fell for a third consecutive year in 2024, with experts warning of a worsening downturn, after decades of falling birth rates following a one-child policy adopted from 1980 to 2015, coupled with rapid urbanisation. In the past two years provinces nationwide have started handing out childcare subsidies in amounts that vary considerably, from 1,000 yuan a child to up to 100,000 yuan, including housing subsidies. The central government will fund the new national policy instead of local authorities, Xinhua said. Authorities rolled out a series of "fertility friendly" measures in 2024 to tackle the coming decade's expected challenge of the entry into retirement of roughly 300 million people, equivalent to almost the entire U.S. population. A nationwide scheme may offer some coordination and signal greater central commitment, said demographer Emma Zhang, a professor at Yale University, but called for greater efforts. "Without sustained structural investment in areas like affordable childcare, parental leave, and job protections for women, the effect on fertility is likely to remain minimal," she added. ($1=7.1736 Chinese yuan renminbi)
