Lake District pub can serve alcohol until 2am despite residents' noise concerns
A LAKE District pub can serve alcohol until 2am, despite residents' concerns over noise from the venue, after the proposed variations to its licence were approved this week.
Members of Cumberland Council's licensing sub-committee met at Allerdale House in Workington on Monday (June 2) to consider the application.
Wolverhampton-based Marston's submitted the licensing application to make the changes at Oddfellows Arms in Main Street, Keswick.
The proposed changes included:
The sale of alcohol 2am with the opening hours running until 2.30am;
To match permitted live music hours with sale of alcohol;
The playing of recorded music and late-night refreshment within current licensed areas to be matched with the sale of alcohol.
Speaking after the evidence had been considered committee chairman, councillor John Mallinson (Houghton and Irthington, Conservative), told representatives from Marston's they had considered it very carefully and added: 'And we have decided to grant your application for the following reasons.
'We felt that your presentation was well thought out, well presented, and thoroughly professional.
'We found the designated premises supervisor (DPS) to be experienced and a competent individual who we have confidence in this venture.
'The noise concerns that were raised as an issue, we find that the existing conditions for noise control would appear to be sufficient and working well, and therefore, we grant your application as applied for.'
During the meeting Deborah Fletcher, a council specialist in licensing and compliance, told members that an additional condition relating to a risk assessment on whether to deploy security on Friday and Saturday evenings had been agreed.
Relating to the separate condition the report states: 'The DPS will complete a risk assessment to deploy security on Friday and Saturday evenings or when there is a specific event in the town that would impact the expected customer base, for example, bank holiday weekends, annual events or events that would increase footfall within the town and nighttime economy.
'This risk assessment should be retained on site and available for review by responsible authorities on request.'
A Marston's spokesman told members that the permitted hours were currently 10am to 1.30am and the extra time would allow at a 'staggered' dispersal of customers.
He said that Marston's was a national pub operator and the DPS also ran two other establishments in the Lake District town – The Twa Dogs and The George – and he had more than 22 years of experience in the industry.
Members were told that there were no complaints from neither the police nor environmental health and the residents who had complained had not bothered to turn up for the hearing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
4 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann's intellectual property and fan-favorite labels
NEW YORK (AP) — Craft labels from the now-shuttered fabrics seller Joann are making their way to a new home: Michaels. The Michaels Companies announced on Thursday that it had completed its purchase of Joann's intellectual property and private label brands — in an acquisition that arrives as the Texas-based arts and crafting chain works to expand its own fabric, sewing and yarn offerings. 'We're honored to have the opportunity to welcome JOANN customers into our creative community and are committed to delivering the selection, value, and inspiration they are looking for at Michaels,' Michaels CEO David Boone said in a statement. The deal, he added, allows the company to better 'respond to rising demand' among both new and existing customers. Financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. The Associated Press reached out to Michaels for further information on Friday. With roots dating back to a single Ohio storefront in 1943, Joann had grown into a destination for generations of sewers, quilters, knitters and lovers of other crafts for more than 80 years. But more recently, operational challenges continued to pile up — with the retailer pointing to sluggish consumer demand, inventory shortages and rising competition. Joann announced it would be going out of business back in February, just one month after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the second time within a year. At the time, the company said financial services company GA Group, together with Joann's term lenders, had been selected as the winning bidder to 'acquire substantially all of Joann's assets' and conduct going-out-of-business sales at all store locations. Michaels on Thursday said that its purchase of Joann's IP and private brands included the acquisition of 'Big Twist' yarns, which had become a staple in Joann stores over the years. Those 'Big Twist' labels are now being developed as part of Michaels' portfolio — and will be available in-stores and online later this year, the company said. In the meantime, Michaels has also dedicated a landing page to welcome former Joann customers online. And as part of its overall expansion into fabrics, Michaels said on Thursday that its adding more than 600 new products from new and existing brands — including quilting supplies and fabrics, specialty threads, sewing machines and more. Michaels, founded in 1973, currently operates 1,300 stores across 49 U.S. states and Canada. Its parent company also owns Artistree, a framing merchandise manufacturer.
Politico
8 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to give the go-ahead to carry out a plan to fire almost 40 percent of the Education Department's workforce. In an emergency appeal filed Friday morning, Solicitor General John Sauer asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction a federal judge in Boston issued last month after determining that such sweeping staffing cuts would cripple the agency's ability to carry out functions assigned to it by Congress. While Trump has vowed to eliminate the Education Department, Sauer insisted that the proposed, wide-ranging reductions in force target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to kneecap the agency as the president advocates for its demise. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their proper role and second-guessing executive branch decisions. The Constitution 'does not empower district courts to presume that all 1,400 employees must be reinstated to their previous jobs and functions based on anecdotal speculation about impairment of some of the Department's services,' Sauer wrote, adding: 'The Department remains committed to implementing its statutorily mandated functions.' Joun issued the injunction May 22 in connection with lawsuits brought by Democratic-led states, the Somerville, Massachusetts, public school system and several labor unions. Noting that Trump has repeatedly vowed to shutter the Education Department 'immediately,' the Biden appointee concluded that the layoffs amounted to 'an attempt … to shut down the Department without Congressional approval.' The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's order, although the administration's appeal remains pending. In April, the Supreme Court stepped in at the administration's request to block an order Joun issued in a separate lawsuit involving the Education Department. That directive required the agency to keep funding certain teaching-related grants that Trump appointees had sought to terminate. Four of the high court's nine justices dissented from the stay blocking Joun's order in that case. In an emergency appeal already pending at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is trying to lift a block a federal judge in San Francisco issued on tens of thousands of layoffs at all major federal agencies except for the Education Department.
Boston Globe
21 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Immigration law in the Trump era
Advertisement This isn't just bureaucratic dysfunction. It's part of a larger, deliberate strategy to undermine the legal defense of immigrants, including those who are not considered high priority for removal. The most basic tools attorneys once relied on — timely communication, reliable client locators, and even the ability to visit clients — have been rendered useless by a system apparently designed to keep everyone, lawyers included, in the dark. When the very people who defend immigrants are being blocked at every turn, what hope remains for the clients they're trying to protect? Johanna Herrero, a Boston-based attorney who has been practicing immigration law since 2011, said in an interview that federal government agents are arresting and deporting immigrants they're not supposed to be arresting and deporting, including individuals with no criminal record whatsoever and whose sole offense seems to be that they're in the country illegally. It's as if police suddenly decided to arrest and jail regular citizens for jaywalking, Herrero said. Advertisement Everybody is a priority now, Jonathan Ng, who works for Herrero's law office, told me. From May 2020 to June 2022, Ng worked for the US Department of Homeland Security's office of the principal legal advisor, serving as the government's representative in immigration removal proceedings and litigating removal cases. 'It's absurd to me. It's a waste of resources and taxpayer's dollars,' Ng said. 'It's a waste of law enforcement resources, too. Federal agencies that have nothing to do with immigration — DEA, ATF — are now doing all these things to arrest people without a criminal record.' 'I've had clients with approved Special Immigrant Juvenile (SIJ) cases since 2018, on the path to a green card, and they're being picked up and jailed like criminals,' Herrero said. In the last few months, Herrero said that her entire office did a turnaround where 'everyone's doing bond hearings now and we're hardly even seeing new people come in with asylum claims.' Her caseload used to be around 10 percent people detained; now more than 80 percent is dealing with people in detention centers all over the country. One of the worst aspects of the current system, Herrero and Ng said, is a basic lack of communication. 'Say, a client is detained on a Saturday morning … and we can't even locate where they are for about three to four business days,' Herrero said. 'Or I'm waiting on video for my client, and they're not in that location anymore. I call and they say, 'Oh, she was transferred this morning — now she's in Texas.' Where in Texas? You're talking about 20 different possible detention centers she could be in.' Advertisement Sometimes, bond hearings — where an immigration judge decides whether a detainee can be released from custody while their immigration case is pending and, if so, sets the amount of money (bond) needed to be paid to secure their release — are scheduled and by the time the attorney shows up on the video call or in person, the client has already been deported to their home country. 'No notice. No explanation. Just gone,' Herrero said. Sometimes even showing up for the client is a challenge. 'Every judge has different rules,' Herrero said. 'We've had to fly to New Mexico and Arizona on one day's notice because video hearings were denied.' Even immigrants who are following the government's orders — like By the way, none of these government actions are necessarily illegal, Herrero said. Advertisement Traditionally, though, immigration enforcement prioritized individuals with serious criminal records or those who recently crossed the border illegally, rather than casting a wide net over everyone without legal status. This new, radical approach is akin to pulling over and ticketing every single driver who's even a couple of miles over the speed limit. It's technically possible, but unprecedented and overwhelming. The message is clear: No one is safe. For immigrants caught in an erratic system, the stakes are life-altering. And for the lawyers who defend them, the work has become an exercise in frustration and heartbreak. When the rules change overnight, and justice becomes such a moving target, what are we left with? A diminished rule of law. This is an excerpt from , a Globe Opinion newsletter from columnist Marcela García. . Marcela García is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
