Mali: 22 Men Found Dead After Arrest by Soldiers
Mali 's government should credibly and independently investigate the apparent extrajudicial executions of at least 22 men taken in military custody on May 12, 2025, in the town of Diafarabé, central Mali, Human Rights Watch said today. Residents who saw the bodies three days later said the victims were in two shallow mass graves with their throats slit.
On May 16, the chief of staff of the Malian armed forces announced a gendarmerie investigation into the disappearance of civilians in Diafarabé and that a military team was deployed to the town to collect testimonies and organize searches. A military investigation of an alleged massacre by soldiers raises grave concerns that the inquiry will not be independent or impartial, Human Rights Watch said.
'The killing of at least 22 men in military custody puts a burden on the Malian authorities to demonstrate that its investigation is credible and to make public its findings,' said Ilaria Allegrozzi, senior Sahel researcher at Human Rights Watch. 'Authorities should fully and fairly prosecute all those responsible and promptly provide compensation to the victims' families.'
Between May 13 and 18, Human Rights Watch interviewed by phone five people who witnessed the arrests, one man who was arrested and survived the executions, and five others with knowledge of the incident. Local sources gave Human Rights Watch a list of 22 victims, all ethnic Fulani men between the ages of 32 and 67. The witnesses also said five additional men were arrested, including at least one ethnic Tamasheq, but their names and ages were not known.
Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the arrests took place between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. during a military operation in Diafarabé, along the Niger River in Mali's central Mopti region. They said that Malian soldiers took in custody at least 22 Fulani men who were trading at the local cattle market and took them to the river. There, soldiers apprehended at least five other men, loaded them onto a canoe, and took them across the river.
'Armed soldiers wearing Malian military uniforms entered the market on foot and started arresting Fulani traders,' a 53-year-old trader said. 'They tied their hands behind their back before they took them to the river and blindfolded them.'
Witnesses said at around 2 p.m. on the same day, they saw the soldiers return to town without the arrested men. The following day, women staged a protest in front of the Diafarabé military base calling on soldiers to provide information about their relatives, without success.
Additional residents joined the protest, which continued until May 15, when the military agreed to escort a delegation of approximately 19 people from Diafarabé to the site across the Niger river where the arrested men were taken.
'We found about 22 bodies in two poorly dug mass graves,' said a man whose father was among those killed and went to the location of the killings with soldiers. 'All the men had their throats slashed, some appeared almost decapitated. It was so horrible that even a military commander who was accompanying us had to sit down not to faint.'
The bodies were exhumed and reburied in the two mass graves at the execution site.
A man who was detained and escaped the executions said: 'I was not blindfolded well.… [S]oldiers used our scarves to cover our eyes, but I could see what was going on.' He said that after they crossed the river, the soldiers took them to a place located near the Diafarabé cemetery and ordered them to sit down. 'Then, they took people in small groups of two or three and slit their throats.… I could hear the loud screaming.' He said that when soldiers were coming for him, he ran away. 'As I stood, the scarf covering my eyes fell and I ran as fast as I could … [S]oldiers shot at me three times, but I wasn't hit.… [A] soldier chased me, but I hid … I heard soldiers in the back telling the one chasing me, 'If you don't catch him, we will kill you.'' The survivor said that he waited until soldiers left to cross the river again.
International media also reported on the Diafarabé killings.
On May 16, Human Rights Watch contacted the Malian authorities to share its findings on the events in Diafarabé and seek a response. At the time of publication, the Malian authorities had not responded.
The massacre occurred amid the security and humanitarian crisis that Mali has been grappling with since 2012, when Islamist armed groups linked to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State in the Sahel began carrying out major attacks. These armed groups, which have largely recruited from the Fulani community, have attacked civilians as well as government security forces throughout Mali. The conflict has resulted in the deaths of thousands of civilians and forcibly displaced over 350,000 more.'
Witnesses in Diafarabé said they believe the soldiers targeted Fulani men, whom they accused of collaborating with the Islamist fighters. The Al-Qaeda-linked Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims (Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wa al-Muslimeen, JNIM) is present in the Mopti region where it frequently carries out attacks against the security forces and allied militias.
Human Rights Watch has extensively documented serious abuses by the Malian security forces during counterinsurgency operations across Mali, including mass killings, enforced disappearances of civilians, and unlawful drone strikes.
All parties to Mali's armed conflict are bound by international humanitarian law, notably Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and customary laws of war. Common Article 3 prohibits violence against anyone in custody, 'in particular murder of all kinds.' Individuals who commit serious violations of the laws of war with criminal intent, that is, intentionally or recklessly, may be prosecuted for war crimes. Commanders may be liable for war crimes as a matter of command responsibility if they knew or should have known about abuses by forces under their control but did not stop or punish them.
'The commander of the Diafarabé military base should be immediately suspended pending the outcome of a thorough investigation,' Allegrozzi said. 'The authorities need to take all necessary measures to ensure that survivors and witnesses to this incident are protected.'
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Human Rights Watch (HRW).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 days ago
- The National
Council of Europe set to embrace human rights reform after migration backlash
The Council of Europe has appeared to bow to pressure to reform its human rights convention, as it risks losing members over growing political backlash against migration. Alain Berset, secretary general of the council, said the European Convention for Human Rights (ECHR) needed 'adaptation' and that there would be 'no taboo' in discussions on reform. 'We are witnessing a world where things are changing rapidly,' he told The Times on Thursday. 'It is accelerating. We see this, and it means that it is normal that we must also adapt to this. We need adaptation. We need discussion about the rules that we want to have, and there is no taboo.' Mr Berset, a former president of Switzerland, said he was willing to begin talks with European leaders who have been critical of the convention. 'We need to have political discussions … at the committee of ministers of the CoE, or directly with me because I am in charge of the convention," he said. His comments mark a shift from the position he took less than two weeks ago, when he accused political leaders who had criticised the convention of 'politicising" the issue. Last month, nine European countries, led by Italian and Danish prime ministers Giorgia Meloni and Mette Fredriksen, issued an open letter that challenged the ECHR and called for an amendment. The aim was for governments to have greater freedom to expel migrants who commit crimes in their countries. They said the convention drafted in 1950 was not suitable to modern times and the vast refugee crisis on Europe's borders. "The ideas themselves are universal and everlasting," they said in a letter. "However, we now live in a globalised world where people migrate across borders on a completely different scale." They also referred to "hostile states" who they accused of flooding European borders with migrants. "We need to be able to take effective steps to counter hostile states that are trying to use our values and rights against us. For example, by instrumentalising migrants at our borders," the letter said. In his response then, Mr Berset urged the countries not to 'weaken the convention, but to keep it strong and relevant'. UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper also criticised the framework this week, saying a third of successful asylum claims were being granted on 'exceptional grounds' due to a judge's interpretation of Article 8 of the convention. 'That is not exceptional, that is a much broader proportion,' she said. Mr Berset's comments come as the UK's Conservative party are set to launch an inquiry into whether the country should withdraw from the convention. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is to say in a speech on Friday that she is 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw from the treaty. "I am yet to see a clear and coherent route to change within our current legal structures," she will say. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said he did not take Mr Berset's comments about reform 'very seriously", when speaking to the BBC on Friday morning. Mr Philp said there had been two previous attempts to amend the convention 'that didn't work' and pointed to Mr Berset's immediate 'rebuffing' of the open letter. 'I'm afraid I don't have the view that it can be reformed,' he added. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz blamed migration for the rise of anti-Semitism in his country, calling it a "terrible challenge". "We have a sort of imported anti-Semitism with the big numbers of migrants we have had within the last 10 years," Mr Merz said told US broadcaster Fox News on Thursday. He was responding to a report from the Federal Association of Departments for Research and Information on Anti-Semitism, which documented 8,627 anti-Semitic incidents in 2024 – a 77 per cent increase compared with the previous year.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
US slaps sanctions on four ICC judges over Israel, US cases
The United States on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court including over an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as it ramped up pressure to neuter the court of last resort. The four judges in The Hague, all women, will be barred entry to the United States and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked -- measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials. "The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel, and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel," Rubio said. The court swiftly hit back, saying in a statement: "These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe." Marco Rubio Israel's Netanyahu welcomed the move, thanking US President Donald Trump's administration in a social media post. "Thank you President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio for imposing sanctions against the politicised judges of the ICC. You have justly stood up for the right of Israel," he wrote on Friday. War crimes Human Rights Watch urged other nations to speak out and reaffirm the independence of the ICC, set up in 2002 to prosecute individuals responsible for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. The sanctions "aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amid grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with US complicity," said the rights group's international justice director, Liz Evenson. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to an arrest warrant issued last November for Netanyahu. The court found "reasonable grounds" of criminal responsibility by Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for actions that include the war crime of starvation as a method of war in the massive offensive in Gaza following Hamas's unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. Israel, alleging bias, has angrily rejected charges of war crimes as well as a separate allegation of genocide led by South Africa before the International Court of Justice. The two other judges, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of the court proceedings that led to the authorization of an investigation into allegations that US forces committed war crimes during the war in Afghanistan. Return to hard line Neither the United States nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court. But almost all Western allies of the United States as well as Japan and South Korea, the vast majority of Latin America and much of Africa are parties to the statute and in theory are required to arrest suspects when they land on their soil. Trump in his first term already imposed sanctions on the then ICC chief prosecutor over the Afghanistan investigation. After Trump's defeat in 2020, then president Joe Biden took a more conciliatory approach to the court with case-by-case cooperation. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken rescinded the sanctions and, while critical of its stance on Israel, worked with the court in its investigation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. ICC judges in 2023 issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the war. Both Putin and Netanyahu have voiced defiance over the ICC pressure but have also looked to minimize time in countries that are party to the court. The ICC arrest warrants have been especially sensitive in Britain, a close US ally whose Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a former human rights lawyer. Downing Street has said that Britain will fulfil its "legal obligations" without explicitly saying if Netanyahu would be arrested if he visits. Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban, has parted ways with the rest of the European Union by moving to exit the international court. Orban thumbed his nose at the court by welcoming Netanyahu to visit in April. Agence France-Presse
Zawya
3 days ago
- Zawya
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): Victims still waiting for justice, truth and reparations 25 years on from Kisangani war
Twenty-five years since the six-day war in Kisangani in Democratic Republic of Congo in which hundreds of civilians were killed and thousands more injured, victims are still waiting for truth, justice and, for the most part, reparations, Amnesty International said in a new briefing today. The briefing Is anyone moved by Congo's pain? 25 years without justice for the six-day war in Kisangani, documents how there has not been a single criminal investigation or trial since the bloody conflict between Rwandan and Ugandan forces. During the fighting in the north-eastern city, which started on 5 June 2000, both armies engaged in intense and indiscriminate shelling of heavily populated civilian areas, intentionally killed civilians, raped women and pillaged houses. With the DRC courts' failure to pursue justice and the International Criminal Court's (ICC) lack of jurisdiction over crimes committed in DRC before 2002, those suspected of criminal responsibility for these crimes have never been prosecuted and punished. 'It is utterly unacceptable that for 25 years, not a single person has been held to account for crimes perpetrated in Kisangani, not one,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. 'This lack of criminal accountability for past crimes has led to a cycle of violence in the DRC, with similar actors, similar weapons and similar suffering. Justice cannot wait another 25 years. It is the responsibility of Congolese judicial authorities to investigate and, if there is sufficient admissible evidence, prosecute those suspected of criminal responsibility for crimes committed on DRC territory.' In 2022, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordered Uganda to pay reparations, following a case brought by the DRC against Uganda and Rwanda. The ICJ did not have jurisdiction over Rwanda. In 2024, some victims finally started to receive compensation, but the process by been wrought by complaints of mismanagement and embezzlement. Amnesty International interviewed over 50 people, mostly survivors, as well as civil society organizations and justice sector officials. The 'Three-Day, One-Day and Six-Day wars' in Kisangani The six-day war was one of a series of conflicts between the Ugandan and Rwandan armies in Kisangani between August 1999 and June 2000 that left behind a trail of death and destruction. The first war – 'the three-day war', started on 14 June 1999, with the two armies exchanging indiscriminate fire and shelling, which killed more than 30 civilians and wounded more than 100. After close to a year of relative quiet, fighting started again on 5 May 2000 and lasted only one day. Exactly a month later, the 'six-day war', which was more intense, started. Without differentiating between civilians and combatants, the two armies indiscriminately shelled Kisangani, killing several hundred civilians and injuring thousands. A civil society activist who survived and reported on the three wars in Kisangani recounted: 'For six days there were only bombs falling, we did not know if we were going to live. There were a lot of fatalities…' A woman who was seven at the time of the war, recalled: 'I was walking with my grandmother when I was struck by a bomb in my leg. I didn't know how to get to hospitals, it was dangerous, so we were dealing with the injury at home, but the foot was rotting. On the fifth day I went to the hospital, but it was too late, they cut off my leg. 'A gentleman who could not go home until the war ended, returned at the end of the six days and found his wife and three children dead, their corpses decomposing. The house had been hit by bombs. 'He went mad and died shortly after.' People want truth, justice and reparations Despite the lack of judicial criminal proceedings either in the DRC or internationally, the people's demands for justice and reparations remain strong decades later. A man, who also survived the wars, said: 'My dearest wish was the establishment of courts. This is the wish of the Congolese people. Now we have a sense of frustration in the population. Why were there blockages? It is unclear why crimes that have already been documented have not been tried. Is there nobody emotionally moved by the crimes committed in Congo?' At least 40 people interviewed told Amnesty International that there was no political will to institute criminal proceedings or deliver justice. Lack of judicial independence has also meant that without the support of political leaders, some of whom are former belligerents, judicial officials could not open investigations. The complete lack of prosecutions has led to a loss of trust in the country's justice system and the government. With regards to reparation programmes, the Special Fund for the Distribution of Compensation to Victims of Uganda's Illicit Activities in the DRC (FRIVAO), tasked to manage the millions of dollars Uganda has been ordered to pay for reparations by the ICJ, has been criticised for lack of transparency and adequate consultations with victims of the Kisangani wars. One activist said: 'People have no decency; there has been bloodshed… and they are embezzling funds that were intended for public interest work and victims! That is not what we fought for.' Tigere Chagutah said: 'Amnesty International reminds DRC of its obligations to investigate and, if enough admissible evidence is found, to prosecute in fair trials those suspected of criminal responsibility for the serious crimes committed in the territory of the DRC for over 30 years, including the Kisangani war.' 'The government must also offer adequate, effective and prompt reparations to victims following genuine consultations with survivors and civil society.' Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Amnesty International.
