
'Game of Thrones' inspired tactics behind Israel's Iran strike
Israel's mission to wipe out Iran's top nuclear scientists and military leaders was years in the making and partially inspired by a particularly brutal scene in Game of Thrones. The operation, in which coordinated bombs rained down on Tehran in a stealth attack on June 13, was referred to within Israel's ranks as the 'Red Wedding.' The name references one of the most infamous moments of television history, in which key players from the HBO series were wiped out in one fell swoop during the long-running television series.
Israel's top generals watched as chaos descended upon Tehran from a bunker beneath the air force headquarters, waiting to learn if their meticulous plan had worked. In all at least 30 military officials, including the IRGC chief and Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces, were killed, along with nine top Iranian scientists who were playing key roles in the nation's uranium enrichment program. US President Donald Trump followed up the strikes with an assault of his own, dropping the military's 'bunker busters' o n three of Iran's nuclear sites. He has since claimed the operation 'totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear capacity. As of Wednesday, a total of 1,054 people in Iran, including at least 318 military personnel, have died due to Israel's assault.
To make it happen, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu began a weeks-long campaign of deception, fooling his own son and wife in the process and drawing the US into a fake disagreement to lull Iran's top brass into a false sense of security. He announced he would be taking a short break for a family vacation to celebrate his son Avner's wedding on June 16. In reality, Netanyahu had planned to delay the wedding - a detail he hadn't even shared with his son or his wife, Wall Street Journal reported.
Simultaneously, Netanyahu's team was leaking to journalists details of a rift with Trump over the US position on attacking Iran. Trump kept up appearances by publicly urging Israel not to launch any military strikes and celebrating that the US and Iran were 'fairly close to an agreement.' Netanyahu hoped that Iranian officials would not expect him to attack without explicit approval and support from the US. At this stage, Trump had been briefed about the strikes and was aware of what was to come.
The acts of deception meant that Israel's intelligence on key leaders' daily habits, whereabouts and patterns would would remain relevant, and prevent targets from going into hiding or changing their location. One of the most crucial elements of the plot was to hit Iran's armed forced simultaneously - which was the effort known as the Red Wedding. The plan was to limit Iran's ability to retaliate, giving drones and fighter jets more time to continue bombing missile launchers and nuclear targets.
But in the hours leading up to the strike, Israel's intelligence sources revealed key targets had left their locations. Israeli officials feared the ruse was up and Iran was aware of the imminent strike. But instead of dispersing, these leaders actually gathered together in one place, the report said. This allowed Israel to strike, totally decimating Iran's top military structure.
Mohammad Bagheri (pictured), the commander in chief of Iran's military and second highest commander after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was among the first casualties identified after the strikes. Hossein Salami, commander in chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps was also killed, along with Gholamali Rashid, the deputy commander in chief of the armed forces.
General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the airspace unit of the Revolutionary Guards, Gen. Gholamreza Mehrabi, the deputy intelligence chief of the Armed Forces and Gen. Davood Sheikhian, the commander of air defense, were also wiped out. Simultaneously, bombs exploded at the homes of nine scientists, killing them instantly and at the same time. These targets had long been at the top of Israel's hit list.
A network of Israeli agents had been operating within Iran and watching the way leadership operated for decades, beginning in the 1990s when Israel first identified Iran's attempts to build a nuclear weapons program. In April and October of 2024, Israel launched strikes on Tehran to destroy Iran's advanced air defense systems, a successful mission which came in response to missile fire from Iran over Tel Aviv.
A month later in November 2024, Israel gathered 120 intelligence and air force officials together to draw up a list of priority targets in such a strike. Together, they listed 250 targets ranging from the nuclear scientists to military officials. Spies who had infiltrated Tehran smuggled in explosive-rigged drones and weaponry inside suitcases, trucks and shipping containers and began testing the long range capabilities of some of the drones it had in its arsenal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Spy chief Tulsi Gabbard faces new crushing blow after Trump sidelined her over Iran nuclear strikes
Tulsi Gabbard is facing another blow after President Donald Trump sidelined her during the Iran nuclear strikes. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, the Republican chairman of the Intelligence Committee, has proposed legislation to slash the size of her agency in half. 'ODNI was intended to be a lean organization to align America's intelligence resources and authorities, not the overstaffed and bureaucratic behemoth that it is today,' he said in a statement announcing his proposal. Cotton's bill - if passed - would provide a sweeping overhaul of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), including cutting its staff from 1,600 to 650. It would also shutter the National Intelligence University, a federally chartered research university dedicated to national security. There are indications Trump would sign it into law. He's privately mulled scrapping the ODNI because of his frustrations with Gabbard, The Atlantic reported. And that would hamper Gabbard's political ambitions. Her allies told the magazine that Gabbard sees the director of national intelligence role as a stepping stone to a second run for the presidency after her failed attempt as a Democrat in 2020. Trump has had an uneasy relationship with Gabbard, particularly after she posted a video to social media earlier this month describing her visit to Hiroshima, Japan, and warning of the dangerous threat of a nuclear war. The president berated her for the video, reported The New York Times, saying that a discussion of nuclear annihilation would scare people and she shouldn't discuss it. That meant Gabbard was already on thin ice when Trump began to look at striking Iran's nuclear sites. She had privately expressed concern about the fears of a wider war. And Trump flat out said 'she's wrong' when he was asked about Gabbard's testimony in March that Iran had not decided to build a nuclear weapon. While Gabbard was in the Situation Room during the strike, she became sidelined in the aftermath of the attack. And Gabbard didn't join the classified intelligence briefing for senators on Thursday nor did she join the one for House members on Friday. Her defenders say she is still doing important work for the administration. She has publicly supported the airstrike and she has defended Trump's declaration that Iran's nuclear capabilities were destroyed. 'New intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed,' she wrote on X. But that doesn't mean the two are close. And Gabbard's position is not helped by Trump's inherent distrust of the intelligence community, which goes back to his first presidential campaign and allegations Russia interfered to help him win the White House. A Trump ally told The Atlantic the president appreciates Gabbard's political appeal to disaffected Democrats but doesn't seek her advice on foreign policy or national security. 'She's a nonplayer,' the person said. 'When I want to call someone to influence Trump, I don't even think of her.' Her position in Trump's world was precarious from the start, given her position. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is a smaller agency with a short-lived history. It was created to improve coordination among U.S. spy agencies after the September 11 attacks. It oversees all of the country's 18 intelligence services, including the CIA. But CIA director John Ratcliffe served in Trump's first term and has his own strong relationship with the president. Gabbard has already cut the agency by 25% in line with Trump's efforts at slashing the size of the federal government.


Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
US Supreme Court curbs injunctions that blocked Trump's birthright citizenship plan
Donald Trump's administration will be allowed to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship in the US following a decision by the Supreme Court. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. Under the current rules, nearly anyone born on US territory has automatic citizenship rights - commonly known as "birthright citizenship". But, on his first day back in the White House, Trump signed an executive order aimed at ending that right. A series of lawsuits followed, with district courts issuing nationwide injunctions aiming to block the order from taking effect. The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship, handing a major win to the government. The court granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of nationwide injunctions imposed by judges so that they apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued. That means the birthright citizenship proposal can likely move forward at least in part in the states that challenged it, as well as those that did not. The Supreme Court decision was on cases filed in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. The policy remains blocked for now in one additional state, New Hampshire, as a result of a separate lawsuit that is not before the Supreme Court. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
CNN host warns of ‘slippery slope' to ‘autocratic' rule in Trump White House's outrage over Iran nukes report
CNN anchor Abby Phillip sounded the alarm on Thursday night over the White House's efforts to punish the media for reporting on a preliminary intelligence assessment of the Iran military strikes represent a 'slippery slope to the autocratic governing that Donald Trump claims to be against.' Philip's warning comes after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's fiery press conference on the effectiveness of 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' which featured the one-time Fox News morning host assailing CNN and other news outlets – including a former Fox colleague – for covering an intel report that indicated the bombing raid on three underground facilities only set Iran's nuclear program back a few months. Besides railing against the 'fake news' for publishing articles on the assessment issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon chief outright told journalists on Thursday what they should report and how they should report it. 'How many stories have been written about how hard it is to, I don't know, fly a plane for 36 hours? How about we celebrate that?' Hegseth demanded. 'How about we talk about how special America is, that only we have these capabilities?!'At one point, he even told the press corps: 'Wave an American flag. Be proud of what we accomplished because Americans are responding to [Trump] as commander in chief.' Meanwhile, the president has demanded that CNN fire reporter Natasha Bertrand for breaking the intel assessment story, a call his press secretary Karoline Leavitt has echoed. He's also threatened to sue the network and The New York Times for reporting on the DIA report – which contradicts the president's boast that Iran's nuclear program was 'totally and completely obliterated.' In letters to the Times and CNN, Trump's lawyers claimed the news reports had damaged the president's reputation and demanded that the outlets 'retract and apologize for' the stories since they were 'false' and 'unpatriotic.' A lawyer for the New York Times, however, told the president's legal team that 'no apology will be forthcoming' and 'no retraction is needed,' while CNN responded in similar fashion. At the top of her roundtable show on Thursday night, Phillip took aim at the administration's anti-media campaign amid questions over the effectiveness of the airstrikes in Iran, worrying that the goal is to force the free press to act as state-run propagandists. 'When the state tells you what you should report, say and do, that's a slippery slope to the autocratic governing that Donald Trump claims to be against,' the CNN anchor began. 'But that's what's happening in this surreal episode of outrage over an early intelligence report from his administration, his intelligence community, about his military operation against Iran, a report that CNN and other media outlets are simply reporting the existence of and not casting aspersions at the military operation was a failure,' she continued. Noting that the 'very early assessment' contradicts the president's claims of 'total obliteration of the nuclear program,' which was the reason the administration gave for striking Iran in the first place, Phillip added that the president and his acolytes were taking cues from a well-worn playbook. 'Now, it's nothing new that Trump and his allies will go to great lengths to protect him from scrutiny, but they are now using the military as a shield and the media as a punching bag,' she concluded. 'They want everyone singing from the same songbook, and if you're not compliant, you're in their crosshairs.' Indeed, besides ranting that the coverage of the Iran assessment was 'defamatory' because early intelligence reports are 'almost always wrong,' the White House has also painted CNN and other news organizations as hating the troops because of their reporting. 'I just want to thank our pilots. You know, they were maligned and treated very bad, demeaned by fake news CNN, which is back there, believe it or not, wasting time,' Trump fumed on Wednesday. 'So they just waste a lot of time, wasting my time. And The New York Times, they put out a story that, 'well, maybe they were hit, but it wasn't bad.' Well, it was so bad that they ended the war. It ended the war!' In response to the administration's allegations that CNN was looking to 'demean' the US military, anchor Pamela Brown called the claims 'blatantly manipulative,' 'absolutely false,' and a 'straw man argument.'