European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for White House meeting with Trump
The move in relation to the key White House meeting is an apparent effort to prevent a repeat of the heated encounter Zelenskyy faced when he met Mr. Trump in the Oval Office in February.
The European leaders' presence at Zelenskyy's side, demonstrating Europe's support for Ukraine, could potentially help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Zelenskyy risks being railroaded into a peace deal that Mr. Trump says he wants to broker with Russia.
Von der Leyen, head of the European Union's executive branch, posted on X that "at the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders in the White House tomorrow."
In a quick succession Sunday, a stream of European leaders also announced that they'll be going. They included French President Emmanuel Macron, the chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, and the secretary general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte.
The grouped trip underscored European leaders' determination to ensure that Europe has a voice in Trump's attempted peace-making, after the U.S. president's summit on Friday with Russian leader Vladimir Putin — to which Zelenskyy wasn't invited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marco Rubio confronted by news anchor over past opposition to ‘deal' with Putin
Marco Rubio watched along Sunday as a news anchor played him back his own remarks opposing the idea of striking a 'deal' with Vladimir Putin. The moment occurred after the secretary of state returned to Washington this weekend from Alaska, where he had been part of the delegation to accompany President Donald Trump to a historic summit with the Russian leader. Trump met with Putin for nearly three hours Friday at a U.S. military base in Anchorage. In their first meeting in six years, the two leaders discussed the war in Ukraine. The U.S. president pushed for peace in the region but no ceasefire deal came out of the talks. However on Sunday, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff revealed that Putin had agreed to allow the U.S. and its European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee. On Sunday, NBC's Kristen Welker confronted Rubio with video when he was a senator, shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. In it, he proclaims that western leaders were repeatedly bamboozled by Putin due to the mistaken belief that it was possible the Russian leader would ever keep his word, and had a desire to broker peace agreements and avoid conflict. 'This guy lies. Habitually lies. He's never kept a deal he ever signed, and he lies all the time. And I don't know why--but he plays us like a violin in the west, because we want to cut a deal with everybody,' Senator Rubio said in the clip from three years ago. 'You can't cut a deal with a guy like this. He's a professional, experienced liar.' Welker then asked Rubio: 'Mr. Secretary, given that, what makes you think that if you are able to reach a deal with President Putin, that he would stick to it. Based on what you said, he is a liar.' Rubio replied that Putin's dishonesty was what made a U.S.-backed security agreement for Ukraine so important. Putin's openness to Ukraine inking a Nato-like security guarantee with American or European forces as part of a broader peace agreement, was described as a 'game-changer'by Witkoff. 'That's the point. That's why the deal has to have enforceable mechanisms in it,' Rubio said. 'That's why the deal has to have things like security guarantees.' Trump, however, has not committed publicly to honoring any kind of U.S.-backed security agreement for Ukraine, and often contradicts his own advisers. Trump is set to meet Monday with Zelensky, several European leaders and NATO's secretary-general. In Alaska, Trump and Putin also reportedly agreed that the U.S. would consider backing a Russian proposal that the cession of the Donbas region, including parts occupied by Ukraine, would be part of an agreement for the war to end. Rubio's explanation on Putin is just the latest sign of how the former senator has been put in awkward positions by his new Cabinet role. While in Congress, Senator Rubio was one of the strongest bipartisan voices to address broad reform of the U.S. immigration system, though it ultimately failed. He was also an outspoken opponent of tariffs and after January 6, Rubio was one of many Republicans who denounced Trump, and his supporters who attacked the Capitol. At the time he argued that the attack would damage America's image on the world stage, something he was separately confronted about on ABC News in January. His boss would go on to pardon hundreds of people involved in the attack, including some convicted of assaulting police.
Boston Globe
21 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ukraine weighs Trump's offer of security guarantees with caution
Advertisement European leaders met virtually Sunday afternoon to discuss the aftermath of the Alaska summit, including potential security guarantees. In a show of support for Ukraine, six European leaders, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, announced that they would join Zelensky when he meets with Trump on Monday in Washington. While the specifics of the US proposal remain unclear, Trump said Putin agreed that Ukraine should have strong security guarantees after a settlement, though not under NATO, two senior European officials who were briefed on the call have said. US troops might participate, Trump told the Europeans. Should Trump's proposal come to fruition, it would mark a win for Ukraine, which has long sought postwar security guarantees to prevent a future Russian invasion, but has so far received little beyond vague commitments. Advertisement But Zelensky warned Sunday that 'there are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, what Europe's role will be,' stressing that the proposal still needed to be worked out. 'We need security to work in practice,' he said. An official briefed on Trump's call to Zelensky said the Ukrainian leader would aim to seek clarity on potential security guarantees when he visits Washington on Monday. He will also seek answers on Trump's unexpected shift away from pursuing a cease-fire to instead call for a peace deal that would be likely to see Ukraine cede unconquered territory to Russia. Several Ukrainian lawmakers cautioned that they remained confused about what exactly Trump had in mind and what Putin may have agreed to in Alaska. The officials expressed worries that Trump may have misread what Moscow would be willing to accept and overstated his own proposal to Ukraine. White House officials did not immediately reply to a question about those concerns. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of Italy said that in Trump's call with Zelensky and European leaders, Trump had drawn on her earlier idea of guarantees modeled on Article 5 of the NATO pact that stipulates that an attack on one ally would be defended as an attack on all. While Ukraine would not join NATO under such guarantees, its Western allies would abide by 'a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the United States, ready to take action if it is attacked again,' Meloni said in a statement after the call. Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, said during the Brussels news conference on Sunday that Trump had shown a 'willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine.' Advertisement The idea, while appealing to the Ukrainians, has left them questioning its viability. Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian Parliament, said Meloni's idea was 'too vague' and left room for multiple interpretations that did not necessarily guarantee that Ukraine's allies would immediately come to its defense if Russia were to ever invade again. Solomiia Bobrovska, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament's defense and intelligence committee, said Meloni's idea could be interpreted only as a commitment to provide more financial aid to Ukraine or to send additional ammunition. Ukraine does not want to sign another Budapest Memorandum, a pledge signed in 1994 that was meant to protect the country after it gained independence — but clearly failed. Under that accord, Ukraine agreed to give Russia back old Soviet nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from Russia, the United States, and Britain. But the agreement did not detail those guarantees, and included no promise of military assistance in the event of an attack. Ukrainian officials say the lack of specificity gave Russia free rein to attack their country, as it did starting in 2014. 'In order to avoid the fate of the Budapest Memorandum, these guarantees must be legally binding and also provide for specific steps and an algorithm of actions by the guarantors in the event of repeated aggression against Ukraine,' Yehor Chernev, the deputy chair of the Ukrainian Parliament's defense and intelligence committee, said in a text message. One concrete guarantee that Ukraine has been seeking is the presence of Western troops on the ground — an idea that Trump appeared to entertain, despite previously opposing. Advertisement Ukraine's European allies have already made headway in that direction. In the spring, a group of countries including France, Britain, and Germany formed a 'coalition of the willing' to help safeguard an eventual peace. Some of the countries have said that to do so, they would be willing to send troops to Ukrainian soil after the conflict ends. But the contours of that force have not been ironed out, and details of who is willing to do what remain scarce. The coalition met Sunday afternoon to coordinate ahead of the White House summit. After the meeting, President Emmanuel Macron of France, one of the participants, said several European countries were ready to send troops to Ukraine in a postwar settlement, though not in areas near the frozen front line. Macron added that European leaders would ask Trump how far he would back security guarantees for Ukraine. 'That's what we need to discuss with the Americans: Who is willing to do what?' he said. 'If we are weak today with Russia,' he added, 'we are preparing the conflicts of tomorrow.' This article originally appeared in
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas state senators take first step toward redistricting
State senators in Texas launched a public hearing Sunday on a bill to redraw congressional voting districts in the state, a move that could win Republicans five more seats in the House if the GOP plan works perfectly. The public hearing is a required step before a bill can advance for a vote on the state Senate floor, Nexstar's KXAN reported. Democrats fled the state earlier this summer to prevent Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republicans from having the legislative quorum necessary to pass legislation. But Democrats are expected to attend the new special session after garnering attention with their walkout, and triggering more redistricting efforts around the country. 'We did exactly what we said we needed to do, and that is bringing a spotlight on this issue,' State Rep. Josey Garcia (D-San Antonio) said in an interview with KXAN one day before Abbott called the second special session. Most notably, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is spearheading an effort to change district lines in his state to make up for any potential losses for Democrats in Texas. Democrats released their proposed map on Friday evening. Newsom (D) is vying to hold a special election this fall on a ballot measure that would suspend the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade in an effort to keep up with Republican gerrymandering. Newsom has stressed that bypassing the commission, which Californians approved back in 2008 and 2010, would be temporary, and that redrawing the lines would only be triggered by redistricting in red states. 'They do five seats, we do five seats,' Newsom has said. KXAN reported that Texas House leaders expect that the House will have enough members present Monday to conduct legislative business. GOP State Sen. Phil King told KXAN that the new mapy would be legal and will perform better for Republicans in the state. 'We heard a lot of testimony that the current map had a number of districts that were not compact, were not close together, were not tight, in in their in their design, and in this map, listening to that testimony, we applied it, and this map also is much more compact than the current congressional redistricting map.' The proposed changes target five districts in areas around Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, creating Republican-leaning seats. The Texas push was directed by President Trump, who has also been pushing other states where Republicans are in control of government to look at redistricting to gain Republicans seats. The states considering such options include Missouri and Indiana. Trump was impeached twice in his first term after Democrats regained control of the House. Because the GOP has a very narrow majority in the House and the president's party typically loses seats in the midterm elections, the possibility of Democrats regaining the House majority is a real possibility in 2026.
