
Wife of Briton detained in India speaks of fears for his health
The wife of a British man arrested over extremism claims at an Indian airport at the end of a family holiday has spoken of her fears for his health.
Heiba Khanum, 44, said she had been initially reassured by officers that she would be swiftly be reunited with her husband, who has a heart condition, but that he had since spent more than seven months in a prison cell.
Aziz Ahmed, a British national and father of three who was born in India, was arrested on 30 August at Bengaluru airport after a six-week holiday with his wife and their teenage children.
According to India's National Investigation Agency (NIA), Ahmed was under investigation over allegations that he had been recruiting young people to attend sermons inspired by Hizb ut-Tahrir, an Islamist group proscribed in the UK and defined as a terrorist organisation by the Indian state in October.
Ahmed, 48, who lives with his family in Waldshut-Tiengen, a German town near the Swiss border, denies the allegations. His wife also described the NIA's claims as 'nonsense'.
'As a wife, I can say he's not the type at all,' she said. 'He may just be an engineer by certification, but he is literally a teacher on the go, and he's a student for life.
'He's always had this never-ending thirst for knowledge. He's still learning about all the plants that are there in the prison; he's found a person who can teach him about the scientific names of those plants.
'That's that's how he is, even with the kids. In fact, when we were on the way to the airport, he was just talking to the kids about relative velocity. Little did I know that the quicker we were heading to the airport, the quicker we were losing him.'
Khanum said their 16-year-old son asked her every day when what she had done to get his father home. 'He's just trying to find out when his dad is coming back,' she said. 'How do I tell him that I'm trying?'
Khanum said her husband, who is a freelance business consultant, had suffered from a serious heart complaint for which he had surgery in 2023 but that the operation had left him with reduced lung capacity.
Their summer visit to see family in Bengaluru had been an opportunity to skip the waiting list at home and seek medical treatment, she added.
'Since the time he's been in prison, his palpitations have started again,' she said. 'The same problem he had the surgery for has restarted.
'It is scary, because there have been times when I have literally had to keep my hand in front of his nose just to see his breathing. There have been months I haven't slept because of how serious this could get.'
She added that she struggled to cope with the thought that her husband's case might emulate that of the British Sikh activist Jagtar Singh Johal, who has been detained in an Indian jail for seven years despite being acquitted of all the charges against him.
She said: 'I just want this nightmare to end. I thought that we would lose him to Covid. My son used to have blackouts, thinking that he's going to lose his father due to his health. Little did we know that we have he has been taken away from us by other means.'
The NIA arrested six other alleged members of Hizb ut-Tahrir in May. Ahmed is accused of conspiring with them to hold secret sermons with the intention of establishing an Islamic caliphate in India.
Khanum said that the authorities had refused requests for Ahmed to receive private medical treatment and that he had been without his prescribed inhaler for 'almost a month'.
Ahmed was alone when he was arrested as he had decided to leave the family holiday two days early in order to make a pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. 'It is something that we feel has a healing effect,' she said.
Indian media reports have suggested that Ahmed was charged last month. His wife said she had not seen any such paperwork and that their lawyers would be petitioning for his release at a bail hearing on 16 April.
She said he had also been encouraged to sign documents that he had not read and that he was left at one stage in the same room as two tuberculosis patients while receiving treatment in hospital during a brief time away from his cell.
A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office said: 'We are supporting a British national detained in India and are in contact with the local authorities.'
The Indian high commission has been approached for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Jay Slater detective addresses murder theory people are 'totally obsessed' with
Mark Williams-Thomas, who has worked on some of the world's most high profile missing persons cases, has issued a blunt message to people who have become "totally obsessed with Jay's death" A former British police detective has shared his final thoughts on the Jay Slater case and issued an important message to people who have become "obsessed" with the case. Jay is believed to have gone to an Airbnb apartment in the early hours, and then subsequently vanished and was reported missing on June 18. His body was found in a steep and inaccessible area by a mountain rescue team from the Spanish Civil Guard near the village of Masca on July 15. Shocking new details and eyewitness testimony has emerged about the Jay Slater case - including his last conversation with a friend before he went missing on the Spanish island of Tenerife. The new details have been shared by investigator Mark Williams-Thomas in a two-part podcast. In the podcast Mark says the key to knowing why Jay, 19, ended up in the north of the Spanish island of Tenerife, far away from his accommodation, was easy to understand. A post-mortem found Jay had consumed alcohol and drugs in the hours before he fell down a ravine. An inquest into Jay's death was adjourned after his mum Debbie plead for more witnesses to come forward. She said: "We want these people to be sat in front of us, because our son went on holiday and didn't come back, so there's questions we need to ask." Now, Mark has issued a final message on X addressing the murder theories many people still seem to believe in. Mark Williams-Thomas took to X to post a final video on the Jay Slater case, he captioned it: "Why are some people unable to accept that Jay Slater died as a result of a tragic accident? The significance of the location is ignored by many of these people , but it is at the heart of the case." In the three-minute video Mark says: "I know the family have seen a lot of the materrial generated by those who have become totally obsessed with Jay's death determind to make it a murder, accused most of the people at some stage of wrongdoing. I'd like to say to people who put those posts up, please consider thee family before you say things, and the friends, because they are really hurtful." Mark has been sharing updates on X for a number of weeks now and sadly he has been subject to some online hate. He called out online trolls this week who branded him a "laughing stock" and and "absolute disgrace". Sharing the DM Mark captioned the post: "Never have a problem engaging with anyone - hence why my DM's are open - but if you are rude I won't. @Dispirito49 takes rudeness to another level …."


Spectator
4 hours ago
- Spectator
The right rape gang inquiry
Another inquiry into child sexual abuse, another minister insisting that this time it will be different. Yvette Cooper promises arrests, reviews, a new statutory commission and the largest ever national operation against grooming gangs. But for the victims there is only one question that matters: what will this new inquiry do that the last one didn't? The last one, of course, was IICSA: the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, led by Professor Alexis Jay. It took seven years, £180 million and 15 separate investigations to complete. And yet for survivors and campaigners, the abiding feeling at the end of it all was futility. IICSA had all the grandeur of a public reckoning but little of the justice. It was supposed to examine how institutions failed victims. Instead, it often resembled a procedural exercise: detailed, solemn, but ultimately toothless. Grooming gangs – the most politically explosive scandal of all – were only one part of the report, and not even the most central part. It's worth remembering what IICSA didn't do. It didn't summon senior officials under oath from the councils and police forces most complicit in cover-ups. It didn't re-open the Rotherham files or interrogate why officers in Rochdale turned a blind eye. It didn't assign blame. No one was sacked or prosecuted. And the abuse of white working-class girls by Pakistani men has continued. What went wrong? In part, the answer lies in IICSA's vastness. It was tasked with investigating abuse 'in any institution'. It tried to do everything, and so did very little. Dame Lowell Goddard, its first substantive chair, resigned after a year, amid press reports alleging she had in private connected paedophilia in Britain to the prevalence of 'Asian men'. Although she denied this, some commentators suggested she was pushed out of her position because she was willing to pursue the racial aspect of the scandal too vigorously for the Establishment's taste. When Professor Jay took over, the inquiry quickly became a compromise. Less testimony under oath, more closed sessions. More 'survivor forums' in place of public hearings. The kind of scrutiny that might have terrified local councillors or police officers – some of whom we now know were complicit – never materialised. Jay was praised for her 2014 report into Rotherham, but under her leadership IICSA avoided detailed scrutiny of grooming gangs and limited the use of public hearings or sworn testimony. Instead we got another nod to 'institutional failure', another recommendation for a new 'Minister for Children'. It was bureaucratic musical chairs, the default response of the British state when it is confronted with a horror it would rather avoid. Then, in January, Baroness Casey, a former Victims' Commissioner, was commissioned by the Home Secretary to carry out a rapid national audit into grooming gangs. Her findings included a recommendation to hold a full national inquiry, which was duly announced by Cooper on Monday. Her report did what IICSA refused to: it focused on the racial dimension and acknowledged institutional evasion. Casey confirms that Pakistani men are disproportionately represented among grooming gang offenders, and that many local agencies avoided confronting the issue for fear of being called racist. For all the praise her audit has earned, it still falls short. It is full of faddish red herrings about the 'adultification' of adolescent girls. Did the perpetrators target pubescent white girls because they were subconsciously 'adultifying' them? Of course not. This drivel is harmful, as it reframes a specific problem – British Pakistani men targeting vulnerable white girls – into a wider critique of society and its attitude towards adolescent girls, for which we are all allegedly culpable. One part of the review, quoted by Cooper in her speech, featured a line from a police officer who stated that 'If Rotherham were to happen again today it would start online'. This statement not only implies that Rotherham was a one-off historic incident; it again recasts the issue of racialised grooming into a Luddite whinge about the online world. The fact that the police would prefer the focus of the inquiry to be on the internet, which they can access from the safety of their offices – rather than the real world in which racialised grooming happens – is unsurprising. What should this new national review aim to do? First, it must treat the scandal as an ongoing national emergency. As recently as January, eight Pakistani men in Keighley were sentenced for the sexual abuse of girls as young as 13. Some survivors believe the problem is worse today than it's ever been. Cooper has announced that more than 1,000 closed cases are being reopened. But the new inquiry must map the networks in the same way that the Metropolitan police's old Gangs Violence Matrix did, before it was shut down in 2022 over accusations of racism. Second, this inquiry must make full use of its statutory powers. IICSA excluded Rotherham, Rochdale and Oxford from thereport on the grounds that 'independent investigations' had already taken place. The result was an evasion of accountability. Key individuals were never questioned. Blame was dispersed into a haze of lessons and reviews. This time, there can be no excuses. If police chiefs ignored abuse warnings, they must be named. If senior council officers buried reports to avoid accusations of racism, they should explain themselves. Justice demands that individuals, not just systems, are held to account. We must make an example out of those who prioritised their own comfortable lives over preventing the abuse of children. Third, it must ask the difficult questions that IICSA and others wouldn't. Was religious doctrine used to justify this abuse? Were vulnerable white girls seen as 'fair game' because they were not Muslim? Did authorities look the other way because they feared that to intervene would be to inflame racial or religious sensitivities? How far were the police complicit? Did Pakistani gangs intimidate witnesses and social workers? These are not conspiratorial talking points – they are evidenced in transcripts from trials and elsewhere. An inquiry must drag these questions into the light without bogus, cowardly equivocation around 'Islamophobia'. Success in this review will not look like victim panels and 'enhanced data-sharing'. Instead, it will look like accountability in parts of the country which we know to be afflicted by racialised rape gangs. Take Bradford. It has never had a full public inquiry, yet its story is one of the most shocking. Fiona Goddard, a survivor, says she was raped by more than 50 men while living in a council–run children's home. David Greenwood, the solicitor who played a key role in exposing Rotherham, believes Bradford could be worse still. Based on safeguarding statistics, he estimates up to 72,000 children may have been at risk of exploitation there since 1996. That figure seems implausible until you learn that in just eight months, 2,500 children were classed as 'at risk' by local authorities. Yet Bradford's institutions resist scrutiny. Susan Hinchcliffe, Bradford Council's leader, refused to commission a local inquiry in October 2021, and Tracy Brabin, the West Yorkshire mayor, refused similar calls on the grounds of limited local resources which would be better spent protecting women and girls today instead of investigating 'the past'. Here is the test: this new national inquiry must force a reckoning in Bradford. If it confines itself to the usual places and people, the usual bland conclusions, it will have failed. Bradford doesn't need community cohesion statements or survivor focus groups. It needs summonses. It needs officials under oath. It needs the truth. Anything less will just be a repeat of IICSA and its shortcomings.


Metro
8 hours ago
- Metro
Tributes pour in for mum found strangled after husband charged with her murder
A popular mum who was found dead in her home has been remembered as 'beautiful inside and out'. Artist Isobella Knight, 32, was discovered by police at her semi-detached home in Burton Latimer, Northamptonshire, on Friday. Officers attended the property on Donnington Road after originally being called to reports of a car crashing into a nearby McDonald's restaurant. A post-mortem examination found mum-of-two Isobella, known as Izzy, had died as a result of pressure being applied to her neck. Her husband, Paul Knight, 35, has been charged with her murder. Izzy's family have penned poignant tributes to the 'kind, gentle and much-loved' mum who put her two little girls before anything else.' Her mum, Helena, said: 'She made it so easy to be a mum, and her good nature was something that would never leave her. 'As Izzy grew up, she became a beautiful, gentle, quietly confident young woman who loved getting up early and seizing the day, had a strong network of friends, and gave birth to two girls who became her world. 'If anyone was born to be a mum, it was Izzy. She would go without to give her two girls the best possible life, and she took them to so many clubs and classes, including gymnastics, swimming, drama and dance.' Izzy worked as an artist after studying Fine Art at the University of Hertfordshire and ran her own portrait business. Her mum added: 'She never had a bad word to say about anyone – she was truly beautiful inside and out, and she wouldn't hurt a fly. 'I want everyone to know that Izzy was so much more than a victim. She was a loving mother, a treasured daughter, a best friend in sister form, a talented artist, and a great friend.' Izzy's dad Tim, also issued a moving statement recalling his daughter as a 'totally devoted' mum. 'Being Izzy's dad has been the greatest joy, a pleasure and a privilege. She has been taken so tragically and now we must all somehow learn to live on without her,' he said.' More Trending 'As her family we respectfully continue to ask for privacy.' Senior investigating officer Detective Inspector Torie Harrison said: 'Our thoughts and condolences are with Izzy's family and friends at this incredibly difficult time. 'She was a much-loved daughter, sister and mother and the devastation caused by her death is immeasurable. 'Our team continue to work at pace to ensure her loved ones have the answers they need, and to secure justice for Izzy.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Drug mule mum jailed after cannabis bust at Manchester Airport MORE: British man shot dead in Mexico was 'in the wrong place at wrong time' MORE: Man found 'tortured' to death in home was bound by ankles, court hears