War of words over anti-Semitism and university protests
Whether these sites remained places of legitimate protest or hotbeds for anti-Semitic activity is due to be explored on Monday.
The University of Sydney, UNSW, academics and student groups are among scores of stakeholders weighing into a NSW parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism on university campuses.
It will also examine anti-Semitic attacks in recent months, including graffiti sprayed on cars and homes and a firebombing of a childcare centre near a synagogue.
In its submission, the Australasian Union of Jewish Students said universities had become "flashpoints for anti-Semitic activity."
The union pointed to the proportion of Jewish-Australians who identify as Zionist.
Zionism is widely understood as a political movement that called for the founding of the state of Israel, but the union said it was much more than that.
"Jewish students may not consider themselves politically Zionist but may still have strong emotional or religious connection to Israel," it said.
"Given that the majority of Jewish Australians identify as Zionist, it is not credible to claim that threats or acts of hostility directed at 'Zionists' cannot also be acts of anti-Semitism."
Conservative Jewish groups have lambasted chants heard at weekly demonstrations and on uni campuses as anti-Semitic, most notably "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free."
But many submissions by Jewish Australians disputed the conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
The stance feeds "into a politicised and divisive discourse which seeks to label any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic," the progressive Jewish Council of Australia said.
Civil libertarians warned about its impact on political communication.
"Conflating legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism at a time when Israel is justifiably being criticised for failing to meet international human rights standards ... is dangerous," the NSW Council for Civil Liberties said.
"(It) treats Jewish people as having monolithic political beliefs, a view that is itself anti-Semitic."
Australia's 39 universities unanimously endorsed a new definition of anti-Semitism in February.
The definition, which includes harassment that impedes Jews' ability to participate as equals in educational and social life, has been contested by human rights groups as curbing political speech.
A Senate inquiry has also examined the student encampments that sprang up in 2023 in response to Israel's bombing and ground assault on Gaza.
More than 52,000 Palestinians, including about 18,000 children, have been killed so far in Gaza, according to the United Nations.
It was sparked by Hamas, a militant group in the blockaded enclave, killing more than 1200 Israelis and capturing 250 hostages in a cross-border attack on October 7, 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
28 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘A very big threat': Australia defends PBS as Trump flags 250% tariffs on medicines
Health Minister Mark Butler is planning to speed up medicines approvals as United States President Donald Trump threatens to put tariffs of up to 250 per cent on pharmaceutical products, which could affect $2 billion worth of Australian exports. Butler said Trump's latest threat would not change the discount Australians received on medicines through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, but revealed he would get advice within days about accelerating the approvals process for new drugs in Australia – a key issue that US pharmaceutical giants have raised with Trump. Speeding up the timeframe for US medicines to land on pharmacy shelves could improve the Australian government's standing with the Trump administration, although it does not deal with the White House's bigger concern that Americans pay more for medicines than citizens of other countries. Trump's anger with what he called 'foreign freeloading nations' prompted him to threaten tariffs of up to 250 per cent on drug imports this week. Butler said it was a 'a very big threat'. 'It's one we're working very hard to engage with the Americans on,' Butler said on Thursday. Loading 'The numbers are jumping around … They were 200 per cent a couple of weeks ago, and now they're 250 per cent potentially. They are very, very big tariffs. 'We are making the case very strongly, but I'm not going to pretend that the US Administration doesn't appear to be pretty serious about this.' Australia's PBS – under which the government subsidises drugs and Australians can buy expensive medicines for a maximum price of $31.60, soon to become $25 – has been brought up repeatedly during Trump's trade wars as US pharmaceutical companies push the president to punish countries that limit their market access.
The Age
28 minutes ago
- The Age
‘A very big threat': Australia defends PBS as Trump flags 250% tariffs on medicines
Health Minister Mark Butler is planning to speed up medicines approvals as United States President Donald Trump threatens to put tariffs of up to 250 per cent on pharmaceutical products, which could affect $2 billion worth of Australian exports. Butler said Trump's latest threat would not change the discount Australians received on medicines through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, but revealed he would get advice within days about accelerating the approvals process for new drugs in Australia – a key issue that US pharmaceutical giants have raised with Trump. Speeding up the timeframe for US medicines to land on pharmacy shelves could improve the Australian government's standing with the Trump administration, although it does not deal with the White House's bigger concern that Americans pay more for medicines than citizens of other countries. Trump's anger with what he called 'foreign freeloading nations' prompted him to threaten tariffs of up to 250 per cent on drug imports this week. Butler said it was a 'a very big threat'. 'It's one we're working very hard to engage with the Americans on,' Butler said on Thursday. Loading 'The numbers are jumping around … They were 200 per cent a couple of weeks ago, and now they're 250 per cent potentially. They are very, very big tariffs. 'We are making the case very strongly, but I'm not going to pretend that the US Administration doesn't appear to be pretty serious about this.' Australia's PBS – under which the government subsidises drugs and Australians can buy expensive medicines for a maximum price of $31.60, soon to become $25 – has been brought up repeatedly during Trump's trade wars as US pharmaceutical companies push the president to punish countries that limit their market access.
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Brave' plan to lift GST offers $3300 payment carrot
A bold proposal to give Australians an extra $3300 per year in exchange for a rise in the goods and services tax is being treated with caution by the major parties. Independent MP Kate Chaney calls for the implementation of a "progressive GST model" as the federal government looks for ways to reinvigorate Australia's languishing productivity and strengthen the budget at an economic roundtable. Under the plan first proposed by economist Richard Holden, Australia would lift the rate of the consumption tax from 10 to 15 per cent and apply it to exempt items like food, education and health. But to mitigate the impact on those with lower incomes, all Australians aged 18 and older would be given a $3300 rebate, meaning they would effectively pay no GST on the first $22,000 of their annual expenses. While the GST-free threshold would cost Australia $68.8 billion, increasing the tax and removing exemptions for certain categories would raise $92.7 billion, adding $23.8 billion to the Commonwealth's budget. "The major parties like to talk about tax cuts and spending but they're less willing to discuss where the money will come from," Ms Chaney said. "We have to have courageous conversations about other revenue sources to avoid handballing this problem to future generations." With the government's economic roundtable to convene later in August, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not respond to every proposal in the meantime. "Governments make government policy," he told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. "Our tax policy - the only tax policy that we're implementing - is the one that we took to the election ... which is reducing income taxes." Opposition finance spokesman James Patterson said he was concerned two-thirds of revenue generated by Ms Chaney's proposal would be used to compensate Australians for the tax it collects. He warned against tax on spending in areas carved out of the GST when it was introduced more than two decades ago, such as education and health. "The Howard government recognised that people who spend their money on private health or private education are actually taking a burden off the public purse, and therefore it would be unjust to tax them on top of that," he told Sky News. It would be an "incredibly brave government" that put a tax on top of insurance and private education fees, Senator Patterson said. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Social Service has called for a halving of the capital gains tax discount, a 15 per cent tax on superannuation retirement accounts and a commonwealth royalty payment for offshore gas. It urges the government to strengthen the not-for-profit sector by supporting digital transformation and making service users the centrepiece of governance and program design. All policies developed at the roundtable should be assessed on how they improve the wellbeing of people and the natural environment while taking gender and other factors into account, the council said. "We must better prepare and train people for jobs and finally lift income support to levels that don't trap people in poverty and destitution," Dr Goldie said. A bold proposal to give Australians an extra $3300 per year in exchange for a rise in the goods and services tax is being treated with caution by the major parties. Independent MP Kate Chaney calls for the implementation of a "progressive GST model" as the federal government looks for ways to reinvigorate Australia's languishing productivity and strengthen the budget at an economic roundtable. Under the plan first proposed by economist Richard Holden, Australia would lift the rate of the consumption tax from 10 to 15 per cent and apply it to exempt items like food, education and health. But to mitigate the impact on those with lower incomes, all Australians aged 18 and older would be given a $3300 rebate, meaning they would effectively pay no GST on the first $22,000 of their annual expenses. While the GST-free threshold would cost Australia $68.8 billion, increasing the tax and removing exemptions for certain categories would raise $92.7 billion, adding $23.8 billion to the Commonwealth's budget. "The major parties like to talk about tax cuts and spending but they're less willing to discuss where the money will come from," Ms Chaney said. "We have to have courageous conversations about other revenue sources to avoid handballing this problem to future generations." With the government's economic roundtable to convene later in August, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not respond to every proposal in the meantime. "Governments make government policy," he told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. "Our tax policy - the only tax policy that we're implementing - is the one that we took to the election ... which is reducing income taxes." Opposition finance spokesman James Patterson said he was concerned two-thirds of revenue generated by Ms Chaney's proposal would be used to compensate Australians for the tax it collects. He warned against tax on spending in areas carved out of the GST when it was introduced more than two decades ago, such as education and health. "The Howard government recognised that people who spend their money on private health or private education are actually taking a burden off the public purse, and therefore it would be unjust to tax them on top of that," he told Sky News. It would be an "incredibly brave government" that put a tax on top of insurance and private education fees, Senator Patterson said. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Social Service has called for a halving of the capital gains tax discount, a 15 per cent tax on superannuation retirement accounts and a commonwealth royalty payment for offshore gas. It urges the government to strengthen the not-for-profit sector by supporting digital transformation and making service users the centrepiece of governance and program design. All policies developed at the roundtable should be assessed on how they improve the wellbeing of people and the natural environment while taking gender and other factors into account, the council said. "We must better prepare and train people for jobs and finally lift income support to levels that don't trap people in poverty and destitution," Dr Goldie said. A bold proposal to give Australians an extra $3300 per year in exchange for a rise in the goods and services tax is being treated with caution by the major parties. Independent MP Kate Chaney calls for the implementation of a "progressive GST model" as the federal government looks for ways to reinvigorate Australia's languishing productivity and strengthen the budget at an economic roundtable. Under the plan first proposed by economist Richard Holden, Australia would lift the rate of the consumption tax from 10 to 15 per cent and apply it to exempt items like food, education and health. But to mitigate the impact on those with lower incomes, all Australians aged 18 and older would be given a $3300 rebate, meaning they would effectively pay no GST on the first $22,000 of their annual expenses. While the GST-free threshold would cost Australia $68.8 billion, increasing the tax and removing exemptions for certain categories would raise $92.7 billion, adding $23.8 billion to the Commonwealth's budget. "The major parties like to talk about tax cuts and spending but they're less willing to discuss where the money will come from," Ms Chaney said. "We have to have courageous conversations about other revenue sources to avoid handballing this problem to future generations." With the government's economic roundtable to convene later in August, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not respond to every proposal in the meantime. "Governments make government policy," he told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. "Our tax policy - the only tax policy that we're implementing - is the one that we took to the election ... which is reducing income taxes." Opposition finance spokesman James Patterson said he was concerned two-thirds of revenue generated by Ms Chaney's proposal would be used to compensate Australians for the tax it collects. He warned against tax on spending in areas carved out of the GST when it was introduced more than two decades ago, such as education and health. "The Howard government recognised that people who spend their money on private health or private education are actually taking a burden off the public purse, and therefore it would be unjust to tax them on top of that," he told Sky News. It would be an "incredibly brave government" that put a tax on top of insurance and private education fees, Senator Patterson said. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Social Service has called for a halving of the capital gains tax discount, a 15 per cent tax on superannuation retirement accounts and a commonwealth royalty payment for offshore gas. It urges the government to strengthen the not-for-profit sector by supporting digital transformation and making service users the centrepiece of governance and program design. All policies developed at the roundtable should be assessed on how they improve the wellbeing of people and the natural environment while taking gender and other factors into account, the council said. "We must better prepare and train people for jobs and finally lift income support to levels that don't trap people in poverty and destitution," Dr Goldie said. A bold proposal to give Australians an extra $3300 per year in exchange for a rise in the goods and services tax is being treated with caution by the major parties. Independent MP Kate Chaney calls for the implementation of a "progressive GST model" as the federal government looks for ways to reinvigorate Australia's languishing productivity and strengthen the budget at an economic roundtable. Under the plan first proposed by economist Richard Holden, Australia would lift the rate of the consumption tax from 10 to 15 per cent and apply it to exempt items like food, education and health. But to mitigate the impact on those with lower incomes, all Australians aged 18 and older would be given a $3300 rebate, meaning they would effectively pay no GST on the first $22,000 of their annual expenses. While the GST-free threshold would cost Australia $68.8 billion, increasing the tax and removing exemptions for certain categories would raise $92.7 billion, adding $23.8 billion to the Commonwealth's budget. "The major parties like to talk about tax cuts and spending but they're less willing to discuss where the money will come from," Ms Chaney said. "We have to have courageous conversations about other revenue sources to avoid handballing this problem to future generations." With the government's economic roundtable to convene later in August, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not respond to every proposal in the meantime. "Governments make government policy," he told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. "Our tax policy - the only tax policy that we're implementing - is the one that we took to the election ... which is reducing income taxes." Opposition finance spokesman James Patterson said he was concerned two-thirds of revenue generated by Ms Chaney's proposal would be used to compensate Australians for the tax it collects. He warned against tax on spending in areas carved out of the GST when it was introduced more than two decades ago, such as education and health. "The Howard government recognised that people who spend their money on private health or private education are actually taking a burden off the public purse, and therefore it would be unjust to tax them on top of that," he told Sky News. It would be an "incredibly brave government" that put a tax on top of insurance and private education fees, Senator Patterson said. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Social Service has called for a halving of the capital gains tax discount, a 15 per cent tax on superannuation retirement accounts and a commonwealth royalty payment for offshore gas. It urges the government to strengthen the not-for-profit sector by supporting digital transformation and making service users the centrepiece of governance and program design. All policies developed at the roundtable should be assessed on how they improve the wellbeing of people and the natural environment while taking gender and other factors into account, the council said. "We must better prepare and train people for jobs and finally lift income support to levels that don't trap people in poverty and destitution," Dr Goldie said.
