logo
Trump Tells Europeans He Is Open to U.S. Security Guarantees in Ukraine

Trump Tells Europeans He Is Open to U.S. Security Guarantees in Ukraine

Hindustan Times9 hours ago
President Trump told European leaders that he was open to offering U.S. security guarantees to Ukraine , according to several European officials, a significant shift in his stance toward America's role in any end to the war.
The officials, who spoke with Trump after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, said Trump told them Putin wouldn't stop fighting during any peace talks and insisted Ukraine cede territory in the country's east in exchange for a freeze of the front line elsewhere.
Putin accepted, Trump said, that any peace would need to include the presence of Western troops in Ukraine as a way of ensuring its durability, according to four of the officials.
European leaders had been told by the U.S. ahead of the summit in Anchorage that Moscow had indicated to Washington that it was willing to accept a temporary cease-fire and would attend a second round of talks toward a longer-term peace, according to three of the European officials.
But in a call from Air Force One on his way home from the summit, Trump relayed to the Europeans that Putin wanted to keep fighting, the officials said.
Kyiv has long sought U.S. security guarantees as a bulwark against future Russian aggression under any peace deal. But some U.S. officials have insisted that the U.S. wouldn't act as a guarantor for Kyiv. Zelensky's determination to win some kind of security guarantee from Washington contributed to the angry confrontation between Trump and the Ukrainian president at the Oval Office in February.
The White House hasn't spoken publicly about security guarantees for Ukraine since Trump arrived in Alaska for the meeting with Putin.
Trump's apparent shift on the matter, indicated to the Europeans, is notable because for months he had rejected Zelensky's request for such a U.S. role, fearing it would mire the U.S. in a foreign war. Trump also hadn't responded to a European request to provide some form of backstop to any European troops potentially deployed to Ukraine as part of a peace deal.
U.S. security guarantees could potentially enable Zelensky to compromise in talks with Putin, provided Russia is ready to negotiate in good faith, some of the European officials who took part in the call said.
Three people familiar with the call said Trump indicated guarantees could include U.S. military support for a European-led security force in Ukraine but didn't commit to American forces stationed on the ground.
The security guarantees as described by Trump on the call included bilateral security commitments and financial and military support for Ukraine's armed forces by a Western coalition of the willing including the U.S., three of the European officials said.
The people on the calls gave different interpretations of Trump's position on whether there would be a U.S. military component in any security guarantee.
In a joint statement Saturday after calls with Trump and among themselves, European leaders appeared to reference the president's offer for security guarantees.
'We are clear that Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity,' the leaders of Germany, France, Britain, Poland, Italy, Finland and the European Union institutions said in the statement. 'We welcome President Trump's statement that the US is prepared to give security guarantees.'The Kremlin didn't respond to a request for comment.
Trump also told European leaders he wants a trilateral meeting with Zelensky and Putin by the end of next week to advance the peace process, the European officials said.
Trump and Zelensky are set to meet in the Oval Office on Monday for talks, which will be attended by at least one other European leader. Trump said that if that meeting goes well, he would schedule a meeting with Putin.
The European leaders on Saturday said in their statement they were ready to support Ukraine in a trilateral summit between Russia, Ukraine and the U.S.
Putin's senior aide Yuri Ushakov, who attended the meeting with Trump in Alaska, told state media that a second summit could be discussed, but that the proposal of holding a trilateral talks between the two presidents and Zelensky has 'not been touched upon.'
The highly billed summit in Alaska yielded few concrete steps toward ending the war in Ukraine, which is now well into its fourth year. Trump and Putin signaled that some agreements had been reached but there was no clear breakthrough. The U.S. president left Anchorage without the cease-fire deal he was determined to bring home.
'There will be very severe consequences,' Trump said ahead of the meeting in response to a question about what he would do if Putin failed to offer a cease-fire.
Hours after meeting Putin, however, he dropped his demand in a post on his Truth Social platform, in which he argued in favor of going straight to negotiations for a full peace agreement following his discussions with the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and other European nations.
'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up,' Trump wrote.
The move echoes Putin's preferred approach and would allow the fighting to continue until a deal is reached—something Ukraine has argued against.
Putin told legislators Saturday that the meeting with Trump went well and that the conflict in Ukraine could only be pacified by removing what he called 'root causes,' which the Kremlin defines as Kyiv's drift toward the West and its aspirations to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
'We, of course, respect the position of the American administration, which sees the need for a speedy end to military action,' Putin said, according to a Kremlin transcript. 'Well, we would also like this and would like to move on to resolving all issues by peaceful means.'
Trump and the European leaders also touched on a proposal by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, which would provide Ukraine with a security guarantee modeled on the Article 5 collective-defense clause of the NATO, according to two people briefed on the call.
During the call around 3 a.m. Central European Time on Saturday, Trump told European leaders that he had been working 24 hours straight and appeared tired and irritated with Putin, according to the officials who took part in the call. They said Trump said he would only consider renewing his threat of immediate sanctions against Russia if the trilateral talks failed to deliver progress toward peace.
Write to Bojan Pancevski at bojan.pancevski@wsj.com, Laurence Norman at laurence.norman@wsj.com and Daniel Michaels at Dan.Michaels@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India welcomes progress in peace talks
India welcomes progress in peace talks

Hans India

time10 minutes ago

  • Hans India

India welcomes progress in peace talks

New Delhi: The world wants to see an early end to the conflict in Ukraine, India said on Saturday, welcoming the summit talks in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. The two Presidents had held extensive talks on Friday but couldn't reach an agreement for a ceasefire in Ukraine. "India welcomes the Summit meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said. "Their leadership in the pursuit of peace is highly commendable," it said in a statement.

Three Republican-led states to deploy National Guard troops to US capital
Three Republican-led states to deploy National Guard troops to US capital

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Three Republican-led states to deploy National Guard troops to US capital

The Republican governors of three states are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., at the request of the administration of President Donald Trump, who has portrayed the city as awash in crime. The announcements on Saturday of troops from hundreds of miles away in West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio came a day after DC officials and the Trump administration negotiated a deal to keep Mayor Muriel Bowser's appointed police chief, Pamela Smith, in charge of the police department after D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit to block the federal takeover of the department. Trump, a Republican, said this week he was deploying hundreds of DC National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the Democratic-led city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency. Justice Department data, however, showed violent crime in 2024 hit a 30-year low in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey's office said in a statement he was deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to D.C. in 'a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation.' The statement said he also was providing equipment and specialized training. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster responded to a Pentagon request by announcing that 200 of his state's National Guard troops would be sent. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police members in the coming days, adding none of them were 'currently serving as law enforcement officers in the state.' After the announcements, Mayor Bowser posted on X: 'American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican.' The National Guard serves as a militia that answers to the governors of the 50 states except when called into federal service. The D.C. National Guard reports directly to the president. Trump, who has suggested he could take similar actions in other Democratic-controlled cities, has sought to expand the powers of the presidency in his second term, inserting himself into the affairs of major banks, law firms and elite universities. In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials. South Carolina's McMaster said his troops would immediately return to South Carolina if needed to respond to a possible hurricane or other natural disaster. Hurricane Erin, now northeast of Puerto Rico, has become a catastrophic Category 5 storm that could bring ocean swells to the U.S. East Coast early next week, the U.S. National Hurricane Center said on Saturday. National Guard troops often respond to natural disasters and rarely police U.S. civilians. Drew Galang, a spokesperson for West Virginia's Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to D.C. late on Friday and was working to organize the deployment. A White House official said on Saturday that more National Guard troops would be called in to Washington to 'protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime.' A U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a formal order was expected to go out that would authorize National Guard troops in D.C. to carry firearms. The official said this order would affect mostly military police officers with sidearms. Reuters has reported that the National Guard troops would have weapons nearby, such as in their vehicles. The White House said on Saturday that D.C. National Guard members have conducted patrols on foot and in vehicles around the National Mall and Union Station. The White House said the National Guard troops are not making arrests now and that they may be armed. It is not clear how the administration could deploy National Guard troops elsewhere. A federal judge in San Francisco is expected in the coming weeks to issue a ruling on whether Trump violated the law with the Los Angeles deployments.

The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon; Europe is pushing back
The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon; Europe is pushing back

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon; Europe is pushing back

The future of U.N. peacekeepers in Lebanon has split the United States and its European allies, raising implications for security in the Middle East and becoming the latest snag to vex relations between the U.S. and key partners like France, Britain and Italy. At issue is the peacekeeping operation known as UNIFIL , whose mandate expires at the end of August and will need to be renewed by the U.N. Security Council to continue. It was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon after Israel's 1978 invasion, and its mission was expanded following the monthlong 2006 war between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah. The multinational force has played a significant role in monitoring the security situation in southern Lebanon for decades, including during the Israel-Hezbollah war last year, but has drawn criticism from both sides and numerous U.S. lawmakers, some of whom now hold prominent roles in President Donald Trump's administration or wield new influence with the White House. Trump administration political appointees came into office this year with the aim of shutting down UNIFIL as soon as possible. They regard the operation as an ineffectual waste of money that is merely delaying the goal of eliminating Hezbollah's influence and restoring full security control to the Lebanese Armed Forces that the government says it is not yet capable of doing. After securing major cuts in U.S. funding to the peacekeeping force, Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed off early last week on a plan that would wind down and end UNIFIL in the next six months, according to Trump administration officials and congressional aides familiar with the discussions. Live Events It's another step as the Trump administration drastically pares back its foreign affairs priorities and budget, including expressing skepticism of international alliances and cutting funding to U.N. agencies and missions. The transatlantic divide also has been apparent on issues ranging from Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza and the Russia-Ukraine conflict to trade, technology and free speech issues. Europeans push back against a quick end to UN peacekeeping in Lebanon Israel has for years sought an end to UNIFIL's mandate, and renewal votes have often come after weeks of political wrangling. Now, the stakes are particularly high after last year's war and more vigorous opposition in Washington. European nations, notably France and Italy, have objected to winding down UNIFIL. With the support of Tom Barrack, U.S. ambassador to Turkey and envoy to Lebanon, they successfully lobbied Rubio and others to support a one-year extension of the peacekeeping mandate followed by a time-certain wind-down period of six months, according to the administration officials and congressional aides, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. Israel also reluctantly agreed to an extension, they said. The European argument was that prematurely ending UNIFIL before the Lebanese army is able to fully secure the border area would create a vacuum that Hezbollah could easily exploit. The French noted that when a U.N. peacekeeping mission in Mali was terminated before government troops were ready to deal with security threats, Islamic extremists moved in. With the U.S. easing off, the issue ahead of the U.N. vote expected at the end of August now appears to be resistance by France and others to setting a firm deadline for the operation to end after the one-year extension, according to the officials and congressional aides. French officials did not respond to requests for comment. The final French draft resolution, obtained by The Associated Press, does not include a date for UNIFIL's withdrawal, which U.S. officials say is required for their support. Instead, it would extend the peacekeeping mission for one year and indicates the U.N. Security Council's "intention to work on a withdrawal." But even if the mandate is renewed, the peacekeeping mission might be scaled down for financial reasons, with the U.N. system likely facing drastic budget cuts, said a U.N. official, who was not authorized to comment to the media and spoke on condition of anonymity. One of the U.S. officials said an option being considered was reducing UNIFIL's numbers while boosting its technological means to monitor the situation on the ground. The peacekeeping force has faced criticism There are about 10,000 peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, while the Lebanese army has around 6,000 soldiers, a number that is supposed to increase to 10,000. Hezbollah supporters in Lebanon have frequently accused the U.N. mission of collusion with Israel and sometimes attacked peacekeepers on patrol. Israel, meanwhile, has accused the peacekeepers of turning a blind eye to Hezbollah's military activities in southern Lebanon and lobbied for its mandate to end. Sarit Zehavi, a former Israeli military intelligence analyst and founder of the Israeli think tank Alma Research and Education Center, said UNIFIL has played a "damaging role with regard to the mission of disarming Hezbollah in south Lebanon." She pointed to the discovery of Hezbollah tunnels and weapons caches close to UNIFIL facilities during and after last year's Israel-Hezbollah war, when much of the militant group's senior leadership was killed and much of its arsenal destroyed. Hezbollah is now under increasing pressure to give up the rest of its weapons. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said UNIFIL continues to discover unauthorized weapons, including rocket launchers, mortar rounds and bomb fuses, this week, which it reported to the Lebanese army. Under the U.S.- and France-brokered ceasefire, Israel and Hezbollah were to withdraw from southern Lebanon, with the Lebanese army taking control in conjunction with UNIFIL. Israel has continued to occupy five strategic points on the Lebanese side and carry out near-daily airstrikes that it says aim to stop Hezbollah from regrouping. Lebanon supports keeping UN peacekeepers Lebanese officials have called for UNIFIL to remain, saying the country's cash-strapped and overstretched army is not yet able to patrol the full area on its own until it. Retired Lebanese Army Gen. Khalil Helou said that if UNIFIL's mandate were to abruptly end, soldiers would need to be pulled away from the porous border with Syria, where smuggling is rife, or from other areas inside of Lebanon - "and this could have consequences for the stability" of the country. UNIFIL "is maybe not fulfilling 100% what the Western powers or Israel desire. But for Lebanon, their presence is important," he said. The United Nations also calls the peacekeepers critical to regional stability, Dujarric said. UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti said deciding on the renewal of the mandate is the prerogative of the U.N. Security Council. "We are here to assist the parties in implementation of the mission's mandate and we're waiting for the final decision," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store