logo
Uganda's parliament introduces bill to let military courts try civilians

Uganda's parliament introduces bill to let military courts try civilians

Straits Times13-05-2025
KAMPALA - The Ugandan government introduced a bill in parliament on Tuesday that would allow military tribunals to prosecute civilians, months after the country's Supreme Court ruled the practice unconstitutional.
The top court's January verdict forced the government to transfer the trial of opposition politician and former presidential candidate Kizza Besigye to a civilian court, where state prosecutors have charged him with several crimes including treason.
Political allies and lawyers for Besigye, who has lost to President Yoweri Museveni in four elections, say the accusations are politically motivated.
Minister of Defence Jacob Marksons Oboth introduced the "Uganda People's Defence Forces Bill, 2025" on the floor of the House on Tuesday, where it was referred to a House committee for scrutiny.
Civilians may be tried under military law in exceptional circumstances, such as when they are in "unlawful possession of arms, ammunition or equipment ordinarily being the monopoly of the defence forces," according to the draft law seen by Reuters.
Besigye was forcefully removed from the Kenyan capital Nairobi in November, and presented in a military court in neighbouring Uganda a few days later, where he was charged with offences including the illegal possession of firearms.
Kenya's government denied involvement in what it called Besigye's abduction.
The new bill also includes crimes of abetting or aiding a soldier to commit crimes including treason, murder and aggravated robbery, among others.
Human rights activists and opposition politicians have long accused Museveni's government of using military courts to prosecute opposition leaders and supporters on politically motivated charges.
The new law will be used to "persecute regime opponents and deal with the growing resistance against the regime," said David Lewis Rubongoya from the National Unity Platform (NUP), Uganda's largest opposition party.
Information Minister Chris Baryomunsi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NUP's leader Bobi Wine said on Friday he plans to contest the presidential ballot due in January, in which Museveni is widely expected to seek reelection. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai acting PM Phumtham dismisses rumours Paetongtarn will resign as PM
Thai acting PM Phumtham dismisses rumours Paetongtarn will resign as PM

Asia News Network

time11 hours ago

  • Asia News Network

Thai acting PM Phumtham dismisses rumours Paetongtarn will resign as PM

August 12, 2025 BANGKOK – Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai on Monday dismissed as unfounded the speculation that suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra would resign after the passage of the fiscal 2026 budget bill. 'From whom did you get that news? There is no such news, as no one has said so. Khun Paetongtarn has never said it either,' Phumtham quipped when asked by a reporter to confirm the rumour. Paetongtarn has been suspended by the Constitutional Court after a group of senators petitioned for her removal, alleging that she had breached the prime ministerial code of ethics in a conversation with a Cambodian leader that, they claimed, suggested she had betrayed the nation and sided with Cambodia in the border dispute. Phumtham said Paetongtarn intended to prove her innocence in court and had no intention of stepping down. 'Don't stitch bits and pieces together to create an issue in society, as it will only cause trouble. I affirm there has been no such plan, and the prime minister has never said it. That's it,' Phumtham said. It has been speculated that Paetongtarn might resign to avoid a Constitutional Court ruling, stepping down after the House passes the fiscal 2026 budget bill in its second and third readings on August 13, 14 and 15. Asked whether Pheu Thai had prepared a contingency plan in case Paetongtarn resigned, Phumtham replied: 'Nothing. The prime minister will defend herself in court and there will be no issue. Everything will proceed in accordance with the system. Pheu Thai has made no move because the prime minister has said clearly that she will face the justice system.'

US judge will not unseal grand jury papers in Epstein and Maxwell cases
US judge will not unseal grand jury papers in Epstein and Maxwell cases

Straits Times

time19 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US judge will not unseal grand jury papers in Epstein and Maxwell cases

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A protester calling for a release of the Epstein files holds a sign in Washington, DC on Aug 6. WASHINGTON - A US federal judge on Aug 11 denied the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime companion of Epstein who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sexually exploiting and abusing teenage girls. Unsealing the transcripts would mean applying a 'special circumstances' exception to the secrecy of grand juries, wrote the judge supervising Maxwell's case, Paul A. Engelmayer. Permitting such an exception 'casually or promiscuously' would erode confidence in people called to testify before future grand juries, Mr Engelmayer wrote. The ruling comes as US President Donald Trump tries to subdue criticism and conspiracy theories from his supporters about Epstein and his circle by pushing for the transcripts' disclosure. Epstein's death six years ago in a cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center spurred improbable theories, including that he was killed by Democrats and that he was blackmailing rich and famous people. His death was ruled a suicide. Maxwell was arrested a year after Epstein's death and in December 2021 was found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges. Her conviction was affirmed on appeal. She has asked the Supreme Court to review her case. Maxwell's lawyers have argued that she had been scapegoated by federal prosecutors who had no one else to prosecute after Epstein died. The lawyers had resisted the government's request to release the transcripts. 'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain,' they said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump signs order extending China tariff truce by 90 days, White House says World Trump seizes control of Washington police, deploys National Guard Opinion For Singapore, the AI revolution is coming just in time Asia Death of student in Sabah raises hurdle for Malaysian PM Anwar as he faces tough state polls soon Opinion Sumiko at 61: Hearing loss is linked to dementia risk. Here's what you risk by ignoring it Business S'pore start-up among 5 global picks for Japan construction group Kajima's mentorship and funding Business Lower-wage retail workers to receive up to 6% pay bump from Sept 1 Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1? The Aug 11 order came weeks after a federal judge in Florida denied a request by the US government to release grand jury transcripts from an investigation in that state into Epstein. Protesters demanding the US government be transparent over its handling of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in Washington DC on Aug 6. PHOTO: REUTERS Government officials argued that there was significant public interest in the case. In his order on Aug 11, Mr Engelmayer noted the public interest argument, saying he had given it 'careful consideration'. However, he wrote, because the government has 'conceded that the information it proposes to release is redundant of the public record,' there is no need to unseal the grand jury materials. 'Contrary to the government's depiction, the Maxwell grand jury testimony is not a matter of significant historical or public interest,' he wrote. 'Far from it. It consists of garden-variety summary testimony by two law enforcement agents.' NYTIMES

Iran will not allow Trump-backed corridor linking Azerbaijan to exclave: Khamenei aide
Iran will not allow Trump-backed corridor linking Azerbaijan to exclave: Khamenei aide

CNA

time3 days ago

  • CNA

Iran will not allow Trump-backed corridor linking Azerbaijan to exclave: Khamenei aide

TEHRAN: Iran will not allow the creation under a US-brokered peace deal of a corridor near the Iranian border linking Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave, an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Saturday (Aug 9). The planned corridor, dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity", is a key part of a peace deal signed at the White House on Friday between Azerbaijan and its longtime foe Armenia. However, the proposed route, in which the United States will have development rights, passes near the Iranian border and Khamenei's international affairs adviser Ali Akbar Velayati said Iran would not accept it. "With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered," Velayati told the Tasnim news agency, He said the planned corridor was "an impossible notion and will not happen", while the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries". Iran has long opposed the planned transit route, also known as the Zangezur corridor - fearing it would cut the country off from Armenia and the rest of the Caucasus, and bring a foreign presence to its border. "We have the right to defend our interests in a completely powerful manner," Velayati said, adding that Iran had held multiple military exercises in the area to show its "readiness". Iran's foreign ministry welcomed "the finalisation of the text of the peace agreement" between Armenia and Azerbaijan but expressed "concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders". It added that such a move would "disrupt the security and lasting stability of the region". Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have feuded for decades over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. They went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Asked what Armenia stood to gain from Friday's deal, a White House official said it was "an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world: the United States of America".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store