Appeal lodged over refusal of planned Waterford city apartment blocks
The development would have consisted of the demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of a mixed-use development consisting of three buildings ranging in height from four to five storeys with 53 residences.
Building A would comprise four storeys with 20 apartments and two commercial units on the ground floor. Building B would consist of a four-storey building including two communal units on the lower ground floor, two apartments on the ground floor with two duplexes above.
Building C would include 29 residential apartment units over five floors. The application also proposed the provision of an open space, provision of foul and surface water connections and surface water attenuation systems, boundary treatments, bicycle storage, soft and hard site landscaping and all other development works.
The proposed development aimed to transform an irregularly shaped brownfield site, currently occupied by Soundstore and its associated car park and warehouses, 'into a vibrant, sustainable, and attractive residential and commercial hub,' according to an architectural impact assessment report.
The application attracted around 40 submissions and observations. The council refused planning permission on Tuesday, June 3, for two main reasons.
Firstly, having regard to the existing character and the prevailing pattern of development, the location and setting of the site - which is partially located within a designated architectural conservation area (ACA) - council planners 'considered that the proposed development, by reason of its overall scale, height and massing would be out of scale with its surroundings'.
'[It] would seriously detract from the architectural character and setting of the surrounding area and of the streetscape generally.
'The proposed development would, therefore, seriously detract from the architectural heritage and visual amenities of the area,' and would contravene policy objectives of the Waterford City and County Development Plan 2022-2028 which seek to preserve the special character and settings of ACA.
'The proposed development would, therefore, be contrary to the policies and objectives of the Waterford City and County Development Plan 2022-2028 and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Secondly, 'the proposed development would seriously detract from and negatively impact on the existing residential amenities of properties in the vicinity of the site, in particular Clashrea Place,' and as such would be contrary to a policy objective of the city and county development plan 2022-2028, which seeks to 'protect the residential amenities of adjacent residential properties in terms of privacy and availability of daylight and sunlight.'
The council's decision was subsequently appealed by Ferryhill Properties Ltd to An Coimisiún Pleanála on June 26 and the case is due to be decided by October 29 next.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
6 days ago
- Irish Independent
Tourism key as Waterford apartments blocked by An Coimisiún Pleanála
Oakshade Holdings Ltd applied to Waterford City and County Council on October 27, 2023, for permission to build the mixed use housing development at Pebble Beach, Riverstown, Tramore, Co Waterford. The plans were to change the existing ground floor mixed use development from commercial to residential, to provide for three two-bedroom apartments, along with the construction of a new second floor to the existing two-storey building. The new second floor would have provided for five new apartments consisting of one two-bedroom apartment, two one-bedroom apartments, and two studio apartments, with the provision of a new three-storey extension to the front of the building to provide a new stairwell and lift access to the new second floor. There would have been modifications to all existing facades, together with retention permission for modifications to existing external windows and doors and all associated site development works and associated site services. The council requested further information in December 2023, and this was received in July 2024. Local residents Mary Egan and Donal Blackwell made observations at the planning stage. The observations stated that the development would encroach on the observers' property within the ground floor of the premises. They maintained that a planning report recommended refusal on the grounds of the site being zoned 'tourism' and that the change of use and construction of an additional floor would be incompatible with the pattern of uses in the area. The observations also stated the drawings submitted did not represent the existing configuration. The council gave the go-ahead on October 11, 2024, subject to 12 conditions. Mary Egan and others appealed this decision to An Coimisiún Pleanála on November 11, 2024. The commission issued its ruling on Wednesday, July 30, refusing permission for the proposed development. The authority said the site was within an area zoned 'tourism' in the Waterford City and County Development Plan 2022-2028, where the land use zoning objective is 'to provide for tourist uses' and that the development plan 'zoning matrix' states that a residential scheme is not permitted in the 'tourism' land use zoning area. 'It is considered that the nature of the development of apartments for residential use as proposed would be incompatible with the area and would materially contravene the land use zoning objective 'to provide for tourist uses' of the Waterford City and County Development Plan 2022-2028, and, accordingly, would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.'
Agriland
02-08-2025
- Agriland
ICMSA: Criticial tax measures for farmers must be retained
The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers' Association (ICMSA) said that Budget 2026 must retain key tax supports for farmers. The chair of the association's farm business committee, Pat O'Brien, urged the government to renew three critical tax measures for farmers. The Young Trained Farmer Stamp Duty Relief, Farm Consolidation Relief, and the Accelerated Capital Allowance (ACA) for Slurry Storage are all set to expire at the end of 2025. 'These supports are not optional extras—they are essential tools for keeping family farms viable and encouraging future generations to stay in farming,' O'Brien said. The ICMSA said that the Young Trained Farmer Relief has played a central role in reducing the financial burden of succession, while Farm Consolidation Relief helps address the ongoing issue of fragmented land holdings. 'We keep hearing about the need for generational renewal. These reliefs are practical ways to support that goal, and removing them would send completely the wrong message. 'Consolidation Relief is helping solve one of Irish farming's biggest structural problems – land fragmentation," O'Brien said. "We are also calling for the Stamp Duty and Consolidation Reliefs to be placed on a permanent footing. "ICMSA would argue that long-term planning by farm families is undermined by uncertainty around key supports, and that permanence would reflect the long-term nature of land management and succession," he added. With planning exemptions due in Autumn, possible increases in slurry storage requirements, and pressure from the nitrate's regime, the ICMSA said many farmers are facing significant capital expenditure. 'Farmers are being asked to invest tens of thousands of euros just to stand still,' O'Brien said. 'They're not expanding or upgrading—they're complying with ever changing targets and limits. The ACA offers some financial respite and must be retained,' he said. The ICMSA called on Minister of Finance Paschal Donohoe to "renew these key supports in Budget 2026".
Irish Independent
31-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Way now clear for billionaire James Dyson to build helicopter landing area at sprawling Waterford estate
The ruling by An Coimisiún Pleanála follows a decision by Waterford City and County Council to grant planning permission for the landing pad as well as a new wastewater treatment for Ballynatray House on the Ballynatray Estate on the Cork-Waterford border outside Youghal. The plans for the helicopter landing area had been criticised for disturbing local wildlife 'for the sake of one person's travelling convenience'. The planning application was made in the name of Christopher Nicholson, the manager of Ballynatray Estate. Dyson – one of Britain's richest individuals and one of the strongest advocates in support of the Brexit campaign for Britain to leave the EU – bought Ballynatray House, a protected structure, and its 850-acre estate for €29.25m last year. Its previous owner, Henry Gwyn-Jones, a British property developer, had bought the estate for more than €11m in 2004. In a letter on the planning files, Dyson confirmed he was the ultimate beneficial owner of the property, which is held on his behalf by Glashedy Fitzwilliam Trustees Limited. Ballynatray House had been operated as an exclusive country house with guest accommodation by its previous owner, but planning files show Dyson intends to use the mansion as a single residence. The proposed helicopter landing area is located around 525 metres to the north-east of Ballynatray House in an agricultural field screened from the mansion by planting. An environmental report submitted with the planning application said it had been 'objectively concluded that the proposed development will not adversely affect the integrity of Natura 2000 sites and there is no reasonable scientific doubt in relation to this conclusion'. Natura 2000 is a network of protected areas covering Europe's most valuable and threatened species and habitats. A consultant hired by the applicant said the ecological impact would be 'low and localised in the long term' He added: 'Although there may be short-term disturbance during the work phase, no significant impacts on birds or important mammals are expected to occur.' Other reports also said the proposed development would have no impact on the house, which was constructed in 1795-1797. The objector, David Orr, who lives across from Ballynatray House on the opposite side of the Blackwater, said the landing area would have a high impact on the surrounding environment from helicopters approaching, taking off and landing. Mr Orr claimed the relatively low-level approach currently used by a helicopter landing at Ballynatray House was directly over Ardsallagh Woodlands, which was part of a Special Conservation Area. He said it posed 'a high risk of disturbance to wildlife within the surrounding area' that was home to a large number of species of birds and mammals. Mr Orr said the woodlands were an important nesting site for a range of birds including herons, egrets, cormorants, owls and buzzards as well as being a habitat for otters, red squirrels, badgers, foxes, fallow deer and stoats. He claimed that 'this little oasis' was very vulnerable to disturbance and that the intrusion of helicopters into an environmentally sensitive area would be detrimental. 'It seems to be that for the sake of one person's travelling convenience a large number of both human and non-human inhabitants of this area are going to be disturbed,' Mr Orr said. Planning documents submitted on behalf of Dyson noted that the responsibility of taking on such an important estate and designed landscape was understood. They revealed that long-term plans included woodland management and the continued repair and conservation of Molana Abbey and Templemichael Church, which are located within the estate. An Coimisiún Pleanála ruled that Mr Orr's appeal was invalid as it was not accompanied by an acknowledgement by Waterford City and County council of his original submission on the planning application.
