Israel sends delegation to Qatar for Gaza talks ahead of Netanyahu trip to U.S.
An Israeli delegation left for Qatar on Sunday for talks on a possible Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal, an Israeli official said, hours before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was due to head to Washington to meet U.S. President Donald Trump.
Public pressure is mounting on Netanyahu to secure a permanent ceasefire and end the war in Gaza, a move opposed by some hardline members of his right-wing coalition. Others, including Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, have expressed support.
Palestinian group Hamas said on Friday it had responded to a U.S.-backed Gaza ceasefire proposal in a "positive spirit", a few days after Trump said Israel had agreed "to the necessary conditions to finalize" a 60-day truce.
But in a sign of the potential challenges still facing the two sides, a Palestinian official from a militant group allied with Hamas said concerns remained over humanitarian aid, passage through the Rafah crossing in southern Israel to Egypt and clarity over a timetable for Israeli troop withdrawals.
Netanyahu's office also said in a statement that changes sought by Hamas to the ceasefire proposal were "not acceptable to Israel". However, his office said the delegation would still fly to Qatar to "continue efforts to secure the return of our hostages based on the Qatari proposal that Israel agreed to".
Netanyahu, who is due to meet Trump on Monday, has repeatedly said Hamas must be disarmed, a demand the militant group has so far refused to discuss.
HOSTAGES
On Saturday evening, crowds gathered at a public square in Tel Aviv near the defence ministry headquarters to call for a ceasefire deal and the return of around 50 hostages still held in Gaza. The demonstrators waved Israeli flags, chanted and carried posters with photos of the hostages.
Some family members of those held in Gaza who had joined the protests said they were concerned that the deal might not return all the hostages immediately.
"I think unfortunately, it's going to be a partial deal, but what Prime Minister Netanyahu and all the team keep on saying is that (it) is not a partial deal," said Dalia Cusnir, the sister-in-law of one of the hostages.
"We are afraid but we understand that if this is what we have and this is how we can save lives, we will embrace it and hope and keep working so all the hostages are back," she added.
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, displaced the population, mostly within Gaza, and left the territory in ruins.
Around 20 of the remaining hostages are believed to be still alive. A majority of the original hostages have been freed through diplomatic negotiations, though the Israeli military has also recovered some.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump imposes 25% tariffs on Japan, South Korea
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks on his "Liberation Day" tariffs at the White House on April 2. © Reuters KEN MORIYASU WASHINGTON -- U.S. President Donald Trump released the first batch of letters, to allies Japan and South Korea, notifying them of the terms of trade with America going forward. The president noted that goods from the two countries will be charged 25% tariffs, respectively. The 25% rate marks a one-point increase for Japan from the initially announced "reciprocal" tariff on April 2, and the same rate for South Korea.
NHK
5 hours ago
- NHK
Israel strikes targets in Yemen, including seized ship operated by Japanese firm
The Israeli military says it has carried out airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and that the targets include a seized commercial vessel operated by a Japanese company. The Houthis, anti-government rebels in Yemen, have repeatedly launched missile and drone attacks against Israel as a show of solidarity with the Islamic group Hamas. The Israeli military said on Monday that it struck ports and other targets in western Yemen to retaliate against the Houthis. It said that among the targets was the Galaxy Leader, a cargo vessel operated by Japanese shipping firm NYK Line. The Houthis seized the ship as an Israeli vessel in November 2023. The Israeli military says Houthi forces installed a radar system on the ship and have been using it to "facilitate further terrorist activities." When the ship was seized, no Japanese nationals were among the crew. In January this year, the Houthis released all 25 crewmembers, including those from the Philippines and other countries.
The Mainichi
6 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial
BOSTON (AP) -- A federal bench trial begins Monday over a lawsuit that challenges a Trump administration campaign of arresting and deporting faculty and students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations and other political activities. The lawsuit, filed by several university associations against President Donald Trump and members of his administration, would be one of the first to go to trial. Plaintiffs want U.S. District Judge William Young to rule the policy violates the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act, a law governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. "The policy's effects have been swift. Noncitizen students and faculty across the United States have been terrified into silence," the plaintiffs wrote in their pretrial brief. "Students and faculty are avoiding political protests, purging their social media, and withdrawing from public engagement with groups associated with pro-Palestinian viewpoints," they wrote. "They're abstaining from certain public writing and scholarship they would otherwise have pursued. They're even self-censoring in the classroom." Several scholars are expected to testify how the policy and subsequent arrests have prompted them to abandon their activism for Palestinian human rights and criticizing Israeli government's policies. Since Trump took office, the U.S. government has used its immigration enforcement powers to crack down on international students and scholars at several American universities. Trump and other officials have accused protesters and others of being "pro-Hamas," referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Many protesters have said they were speaking out against Israel's actions in the war. Plaintiffs single out several activists by name, including Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, who was released last month after spending 104 days in federal immigration detention. Khalil has become a symbol of Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. The lawsuit also references Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was released in May from a Louisiana immigration detention. She spent six weeks in detention after she was arrested walking on the street of a Boston suburb. She claims she was illegally detained following an op-ed she co-wrote last year that criticized the school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. The plaintiffs also accuse the Trump administration of supplying names to universities who they wanted to target, launching a social media surveillance program and used Trump's own words in which he said after Khalil's arrest that his was the "first arrest of many to come." The government argued in court documents that the plaintiffs are bringing a First Amendment challenge to a policy "of their own creation." "They do not try to locate this program in any statute, regulation, rule, or directive. They do not allege that it is written down anywhere. And they do not even try to identify its specific terms and substance," the government argues. "That is all unsurprising, because no such policy exists." They argue the plaintiffs case also rest on a "misunderstanding of the First Amendment, "which under binding Supreme Court precedent applies differently in the immigration context than it otherwise does domestically." But plaintiffs counter that evidence at the trial will show the Trump administration has implemented the policy a variety of ways, including issuing formal guidance on revoking visas and green cards and establishing a process for identifying those involved in pro-Palestinian protests. "Defendants have described their policy, defended it, and taken political credit for it," plaintiffs wrote. "It is only now that the policy has been challenged that they say, incredibly, that the policy does not actually exist. But the evidence at trial will show that the policy's existence is beyond cavil."
