Privately rented property licenses will 'improve living standards'
The council said it carried out a feasibility study which included data about demographics and the condition of rental accommodation in the borough.Officers said the initial scheme led to considerable improvements and helped the landlords understand their responsibilities and "what good property management looks like".If introduced, the scheme - which would include 60% of the borough's private-rented housing - would not be allowed to make a profit. Running costs would be covered by a proposed licence fee of £784 for landlords.
Paul Cunningham, chairman of the Eastern Landlords Association said: "I have brought this to the attention of the MP to say this is a pointless exercise."It is another way of Great Yarmouth Borough Council alienating landlords. Of all the local authorities I work with GYBC is the most difficult to deal with. They are anti-landlord and are the only council in Norfolk to look at selective licensing."The cost will be passed on to tenants and therefore the rents will be increase and more and more landlords will sell."There is already a lack of landlords across the area and country, and this will make housing asylum seekers look more attractive."
Mr Wells added: ''Generally, we have responsible landlords, but not everyone has a home that is safe, warm and good quality. This scheme would mean landlords must comply with a number of licence conditions."Bad housing has a detrimental impact on the lives of people and our residents deserve better where there are problems."
He added: ''We already have some powers related to housing, but this scheme will allow us to more effectively deal with a range of issues that impact people. "We will be better able to tackle health hazards and overcrowding – which is a real problem for some of our residents.''We would be able to systematically inspect properties to make sure things like gas and electric certification are up to date, rather than simply reacting to complaints as we currently do.''Where necessary, we could refuse to issue a licence and hold people accountable.''
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MIMI SPENCER invented the 5:2 Fast diet with Dr Michael Mosley. Now she shares food routine that means she's happier in her own body than ever at 57... and a dark warning on weight-loss jabs
When I wrote about intermittent fasting in The Fast Diet with the late Michael Mosley in 2012, we often stated, sagely and with good reason, that weight-loss took effort, commitment, focus and loads of boring, difficult things that no one really wanted to do. There is no silver bullet, we said, no magic wand.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
British businesses 'are facing a cacophony of risk': Labour's sent confidence to an all-time low, bosses say
Business confidence has collapsed to its lowest level on record as firms face a 'cacophony of risk' under Labour, bosses of industry warned last night. In a report that raises fresh questions over Rachel Reeves ' handling of the economy, the Institute of Directors said optimism has evaporated in the face of higher taxes, rising employment costs and red tape. Bosses called on the Chancellor to 'urgently quash rumours of further tax rises for business this autumn' to help restore shattered confidence – now lower than during Covid lockdowns. Critics argue the £25 billion increase in employer national insurance (NI) contributions and higher minimum wage meted out in last October's Budget have hammered the wider economy – snuffing out growth, costing jobs and driving up prices. While the economy is slowing, inflation is the highest in the G7 at 3.6 per cent and unemployment has surged to a four-year high of 4.7 per cent. Next chief executive Simon Wolfson yesterday said he expects 'UK employment opportunities to continue to diminish' this year following the NI hike. 'We believe that this will increasingly dampen consumer spending as the year progresses,' he added. The IoD's monthly Economic Confidence Index crashed to minus 72 in July from minus 53 in June. That was the lowest reading since the survey started in July 2016. The index stood at plus 7 in July last year – underlining just how fast confidence has collapsed under Labour. IoD chief economist Anna Leach urged Labour to rule out further tax hikes on business. 'Damaging speculation around tax rises in the lead-up to the 2024 Budget caused many firms to pause investment and hiring decisions – contributing to six months of near-zero economic growth,' she said. 'With ripple effects through the economy from tax changes and signs of consumer retrenchment, many firms report that they are struggling to plan amid a cacophony of risk. 'The Government must urgently quash rumours of further tax rises for business this autumn.' Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said: 'Labour have spent the last year attacking private enterprise with the zeal of a Left-wing student union so it's no surprise IoD members have lost confidence.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
My father finally acknowledged my stepmother's cruelty. How do I ask him to reconsider their marriage?
I have a stepmother who my brother and I really despise. She has made our relationship with our dad really hard, and has tried to stop him seeing us at points. She has resented us since we were little. My dad has recently admitted that he thinks she is jealous of us and has a lot of regret for the way we were treated in the past. The trouble lies in the fact that he has said if anything happens to him (ie if he dies first) we would need to make an effort with her will-wise, to ensure we were treated fairly, as he doesn't quite trust she would do the right thing. It feels incredibly hard to acknowledge this and agree when he has essentially admitted he doesn't trust her with his dying wish. I also find it really hard to deal with the fact he is finally acknowledging how cruel she has been, but still insists we have a relationship. It makes me think he's a coward. I really want to bring this up to him, but have no idea how to say: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the way in which you have shown you don't trust your wife, and believe she is jealous of your children?' Eleanor says: First non-philosophical thing: if you haven't already, I think you should get legal advice about the will. Is it that he might die intestate, and he's hoping you'll all sort it out? Or has he made arrangements, but worries she might challenge them? Legal advice would clarify what can be done now to avoid a horrible tangle later. That's hard – nobody likes to get into the details about their dad's death. Or indeed their own. But it'll be so much harder, emotionally and legally, if your first advice about a possible estate conflict only comes after he's died. To your question. You said you weren't sure how to say what you wanted to say. When we say 'I can't figure out how to say such-and-such', I always think the answer is to just say the such-and-such. You wrote it: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the ways you don't trust your wife, and believe she's jealous of your children?' A heady thing to say, for sure. But it's not the word choice that makes it heady. You'd be asking your dad why he's still married. You can soften the phrasing, but it's the content of that question that makes us flinch, not the way of asking it. More frightening still is the fact that he might have an answer. Through your (and my) eyes that question is almost rhetorical: why stay married to someone you don't trust and who's mean to your kids? However, the fact that they are still married and that he wants you to have a relationship with her means that, for him, there might well be an answer. He might have considerations on the other side of the scale that outweigh the fact that she's mean to his kids. Maybe he likes her enough. Maybe he doesn't want to be alone. Maybe he thinks he's too old, he's not willing to make the change. Maybe he thinks the conflicts between her and his kids aren't his concern. Maybe what look like obvious dealbreakers to you are just some considerations among many for him. The point is, your real question for him might be an even bigger flinch. Not just 'why won't you act on your judgment?', but 'why isn't it your judgment that you should leave?' It's possible he has bona fide answers – things that, to him, are more important than the way she treats you. It is hard to say which would hurt more: him not being brave enough to act on what he values, or this being exactly what it looks like when he does. I truly don't know which of these it is. I feel for you the same in both cases. I don't know whether you should ask him either question out loud; I don't know how conversations with him tend to go, or whether his answer would make you feel better. I do know that when someone isn't acting on what they say they see, it isn't always that they lack the courage of their convictions. Sometimes they're showing us their convictions through inaction.
