This is the world's best city right now, according to Travel + Leisure
But Time Out isn't the only authority on city life out there, and Travel + Leisure's 2025 World's Best Awards (now back for their 30th year, no less) includes a category on the planet's best cities.
The rankings are all based on an annual survey of readers' opinions, and topping the publication's list for this year? It's (drum roll, please!) San Miguel de Allende!
That's right – this colonial-era city in México was rated as the best one in the world by Travel + Leisure readers, and while we're hardly surprised, it's great to see a lesser-known spot beating the likes of heavyweights like Tokyo, Bangkok and Jaipur.
At its foundation, San Miguel de Allende is an integral symbol of the Mexican Revolution. It was the birthplace of two of the movement's heroes, Ignacio Allende and Juan Aldama, and is also home to historic landmarks such as Santuario de Jesús Nazareno de Atotonilco, a Baroque church where the rebel army stopped to pray for blessing.
But today, it's brimming with a lively nightlife culture, brilliant shopping (head to the Mercado de Artesanías and Tianguis Orgánico Artesanal Mxli), and is also a great base to explore the nearby wine regions.
Chiang Mai in Thailand claimed second place, and Tokyo claimed third, but read on for the full top 10 according to Travel + Leisure's 2025 World's Best Awards.
These are the world's 10 best cities right now
San Miguel de Allende, México
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Tokyo, Japan
Bangkok, Thailand
Jaipur, India
Hoi An, Vietnam
Mexico City, Mexico
Kyoto, Japan
Ubud, Bali
Cuzco, Peru
Best cities in the world? We've got some opinions – check out Time Out's roundup of the 50 best cities on the planet, as well as the top places for eating, nightlife, and soaking up some culture.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
My autistic son ran off at airport and boarded easyJet flight to WRONG country – despite not having ticket or passport
A MUM told of her nightmare yesterday after her son ran off at an airport before boarding a plane to the wrong country. Fiona Robinson, 48, was buying souvenirs ahead of a flight from Minorca to Stansted when Ruben, 14, had an autism episode. 6 6 6 Incredibly, with no ticket or passport, he got on an easyJet plane flying to Milan at 9.25am on Monday. On landing in the Italian city, agitated Ruben was met by police and medics, taken to hospital and sedated. Fiona flew to Barcelona, then Milan, and yesterday the reunited pair travelled home to Kettering, Northants. Relieved Fiona said: 'You think stuff like this can only happen in the movies. 'It's been a nightmare. He has severe autism, he won't have had a clue what was happening to him. I'm just glad he's safe and sound. 'Ruben had lost his ear defenders on holiday and was getting stressed, so I told him we'd go soon. There was a big queue in duty free. Ruben said, 'Mum, I'm gonna go', then he was gone.' He was gone for four hours before security and police realised he was airside, and plane crew confirmed he was aboard. Mum-of-three Fiona, who has mobility issues after a knee op, said the week abroad was their first trip since Covid, adding: 'Ruben deserved a holiday but next time we'll stay in the UK.' She is 'upset and angry' at easyJet, which is investigating. The airline said: 'Our team and the authorities met the passenger in Milan and we provided arrangements for a family member to meet them. 'We remain in touch to offer our support.' Travel chaos as TWO flights have mid-air emergencies within A MINUTE at major UK airport 6 6 6
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
US requires Zambia, Malawi citizens to pay up to $15,000 bond for some visitor visas
WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration will require visa applicants from Zambia and Malawi to pay bonds up to $15,000 for some tourist and business visas under a pilot program launching in two weeks, the State Department said on Tuesday. "Starting August 20, 2025, any citizen or national traveling on a passport issued by one of these countries who is found otherwise eligible for a B1/B2 visa must post a bond in amounts of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, determined at time of visa interview," the State Department said in a notice on its website. A notice about the program, which gives U.S. consular officers worldwide the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, appeared on the Federal Register on Monday but no country names had been mentioned. A State Department spokesperson on Monday said countries would be identified based on "high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations." The spokesperson, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the list of countries may be updated from time to time. The bond amount will be returned to the applicant if the applicant leaves the U.S. within the allowed window of time in line with their visa and complies with all the terms of their visa status. President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people who are in the U.S. illegally. He issued a travel ban in June that fully or partially blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the U.S. on national security grounds. Numerous countries in Africa, including Burundi, Djibouti and Togo, also had high overstay rates, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data from fiscal year 2023. Visa holders who have posted a visa bond must arrive and depart the United States via three specific ports of entry, the State Department notice said on Tuesday. It listed those as Boston Logan Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York and Washington Dulles Airport. It warned that if such travelers arrive or depart from anywhere else, they could be denied entry or their departure may not be appropriately registered.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Are online travel agents cleaning up their acts?
On Thursday I will fly on British Airways from London to Denver. The return trip cost £621. But I could have bought the same flights for around £30 cheaper going through an online travel agent (OTA). Odd though it may seem, the practice of selling some seats at deep discounts through a middleman has some merit from the airlines' point of view. The roots of the practice lie in the bad old days of heavily regulated fares. On many routes airlines could not be seen to sell tickets cheaper than the official fares. So they sold through companies called 'consolidators' who punted out cheap seats though retail agencies known as 'bucket shops'. Often the ticket would show an official fare that bore no relation to the amount paid – eg £1,200 for a trip that actually cost £500. That maintained the fiction that every airline was adhering to super-high fares. Thankfully, these days – in most circumstances – airlines can charge what they like. Yet they still often pay a modest commission to online agents who undercut them. Airlines use intermediaries to provide additional sales power. They want to be relevant in the intensely fare-sensitive part of the market, such as people who search on Skyscanner and other price-comparison sites. Take my flight from London to Denver this week. BA knows that there are plenty of us who will book direct, in order to minimise problems when things go wrong – and, in the case of buying on the benefit of a cooling-off spell of 24 hours in which to cancel for a full refund. To meet this demand, the airline can apply a modest premium. But for those who are simply interested in the lowest fare, BA seats are likely to be available more cheaply through an OTA. My rule is only to use an online travel agent if the saving is 10 per cent or more. In this case, it was under five per cent. Not enough to persuade me to agree to the online agent's terms and conditions. The OTA reserves the right to apply credit card surcharges, and has a 'confirmed quotation' stage – after which point, fares could be increased, with little choice but to pay the extra. What if the airline cancels the flight? The online agent doesn't even mention the word 'refund', even though this is the traveller's legal right in the event of a cancellation. As we discovered during the Covid pandemic, many OTAs took a cut of the airline's refund (and some just hung on to the customer's cash, blaming the carrier). In the EU, though, the rules are being redrawn in the traveller's favour. This week, the European Commission said that it had agreement from two giants, Expedia and that money will be handed back in full within two weeks of the cancellation. Similar undertakings have been made by other big OTAs, including Etraveli. You may not know this Swedish firm, but its brands include GoToGate and MyTrip. I used the latter to buy a ticket for a JetStar flight from Singapore to Melbourne earlier this year – which was cancelled at the gate. The cash took 17 days to come back. In contrast, still holds some of my money for a booking that fell victim to Covid five years ago. I shall revisit that transaction and see if the new agreement works to my advantage. It may be that UK travellers get a windfall from the EU's work – despite our bold decision to reap the many benefits of Brexit that we are now enjoying.
