logo
Kashmiris will no longer tolerate violence: Sajad Lone on Pahalgam attack

Kashmiris will no longer tolerate violence: Sajad Lone on Pahalgam attack

The barbaric attack on innocent tourists in Pahalgam has awakened the people of Kashmir, who will no longer tolerate violence, Peoples Conference Chairman Sajad Gani Lone said on Monday.
Speaking on a resolution passed by the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly to condemn the April 22 terror attack that claimed the lives of 26 people, mostly tourists, Lone asserted that the people must be engaged positively rather than pushed back by punitive actions.
He said several areas of Jammu and Kashmir are earning their livelihoods from the tourism sector, and the dastardly terror attack was a direct attempt to uproot a generation.
"We are thankful to our nation, which woke up after 35 years to unequivocally condemn the attack on our guests.
"Leaving politics aside, I am of the opinion that the violence has some sort of acceptance in our society as some people have accepted it as a legitimate thing, but their number is continuously declining," Lone said.
A former minister whose father and Hurriyat leader Abdul Gani Lone was also assassinated by terrorists, Lone said there was a social sanctity to violence in the Kashmiri society, but that has changed post the Pahalgam incident.
"We saw people coming out in every nook and corner to mark the social stigmatisation of violence. The people are no more ready to accept the violence this is the start of the end of social sanctity of violence," he said.
However, he asserted that there is a need to create such an atmosphere where the mindset linked to the social sanctity of violence must be changed.
"The biggest challenge for the law enforcers in the last 37 years was, at times, not being able to distinguish between an innocent and a terrorist. For capturing a terrorist, we have seen four innocents getting killed and villages burnt down in the past three decades, he said.
Lone requested that the law enforcement agencies not do anything intentionally or unintentionally where a mindset is forced on people against their wishes.
"I do not want to make any accusation against anyone, but people like Syed Adil Hussain Shah, who sacrificed his life saving tourists, need to be created in thousands. Police and army have a limited role as it is the inhabitants of this place who will eventually defeat violence. The law enforcers can only contain violence," he said.
Lone, a former minister, said the atmosphere in the country changed altogether after lakhs of people came out against the terror attack, but we need to make necessary corrections to keep the tempo (against terrorism) going and also engage all the stakeholders in a positive manner.
Lone also paid tributes to the victims of the attack and lauded their family members for showing maturity and making statements that lowered tempers across the country.
He also hailed the Kashmiri youngsters who, without caring for their lives, helped the tourists after the terror attack.
CPI(M) leader M Y Tarigami cautioned people against the Hindu-Muslim divide and said the terrorists have no religion, as was evident from the fact that the majority of the people who lost their lives in the last 35 years are Muslims.
He asked people not to fall prey to the propaganda of the vested interests and uphold their unity at all costs to defeat terrorism.
National Conference MLA from Pahalgam, Altaf Ahmad Wani, said that after 25 years, such an incident has happened, and no words are enough to condemn this brutal act. He said the people of Kashmir, especially Pahalgam, need to be appreciated for providing selfless services and care to the injured tourists and others.
PDP's Waheed ur Rehman Parra said the Pahalgam incident is a crime against humanity and not only a terrorist act.
People from all walks of Kashmir condemned it and showed that we are against terrorism through a series of peaceful rallies and candlelight marches, he said, and sought martyr status for the victims.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India to become world's largest Muslim country in..., population will cross..., Hindus will be...
India to become world's largest Muslim country in..., population will cross..., Hindus will be...

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

India to become world's largest Muslim country in..., population will cross..., Hindus will be...

India to become world's largest Muslim country in…, population will cross…, Hindus will be… Hindu-Muslim Population of India: According to a study that was published in 2015 by the United States-based Pew Research Center, the Muslim population in India is expected to increase to such an extent that it will become the country with the largest Muslim population in the world. Currently, Indonesia has the largest population of Muslims. However, India's rapidly growing population, combined with a high growth rate of the Muslim community, may change the scenario soon. According to the report, by 2050 the total population of India will be 166 crores, in which the population of Hindus is expected to be 130 crores. The population of Muslims will be 31 crores by then. In 2050, the country's share in the total world's Muslim population will be 11 percent. This change will majorly impact demographics and consequently, social, cultural, and political discussions. How Many Hindus-Muslims Between 1951 And 2011? From 1951 to 2011, in India, the trend of population growth has witnessed a drastic change on the basis of religion. As per Pew Research's data, the fastest growth has been recorded in the Muslims of the country. In 1951, the population of Muslims in India was 3 crore 54 lakh, which has increased to 17.20 crore in 2011. A jump of 386 percent was recorded in the population of Muslims during this period. Between 1951 and 2011, the Hindu population grew from 300 million to 960 million, a 218% increase. This growth rate was significantly lower than that of the Muslim population. However, the Muslim population's rapid growth is tempered by a concurrently declining fertility rate. Over the same period, the Sikh and Christian populations increased by 235% and 232%, respectively. Decline In Fertility Rates The Pew Research Report also revealed that there has been a clear decline in the fertility rate in both Muslim and Hindu communities, a positive sign towards population stabilisation. If we look at the fertility rate among Muslims, the fertility rate of women was 4.4 percent in 1992-93, which recorded 2.3 in 2022. Meanwhile, a decline of 47 percent was recorded. The fertility rate of Hindu women was 3.3 in 1992-93, which became 1.9 in 2022, with a decline of 42 percent. Is Population Growth A Matter Of Social Concern? Analysis of religious population data reveals that the growth of the Muslim population in India is attributable to socioeconomic factors like access to education and wealth, rather than being a cause for political or social alarm. A consistent decline in fertility rates is observed across all religious groups. Consequently, India's population is projected to be multi-religious but increasingly socially homogenous by 2050.

Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump
Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump

In his war with Harvard, President Trump has sought to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding from the school and strip its tax exemptions, measures the White House initially tied to perceived antisemitism at the school amid Israel's war in Gaza. In recent weeks, long-simmering Republican anger over Harvard's links to China has increasingly gained traction. In escalating calls to punish the school, a training event two years ago in the Chinese city of Kunming has emerged as Exhibit A. The training, on the bland topic of healthcare financing, was co-hosted by a Harvard professor and involved a few dozen provincial-level bureaucrats. Among them was at least one representative from Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a large Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization in the country's far west that also handles civilian government services, including managing hospitals. U.S. authorities in 2020 imposed sanctions against the Xinjiang corps, accusing it of ethnic and religious abuses against Uyghurs and other mostly Muslim minorities and forbidding U.S. persons from providing it 'funds, goods, or services." On Wednesday, as Trump moved to bar Harvard from enrolling foreign students, his order cited the event, charging that in exchange for Chinese funding the school 'has, among other things, 'repeatedly hosted and trained members of a Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization.' " Harvard, which didn't respond to questions, hasn't publicly addressed the allegations involving the Xinjiang corps. The school is fighting Trump in court, calling some of the administration's measures illegal. To its detractors, Harvard epitomizes American elite universities' dependence on Beijing as a profit center—and how that helps the country's rulers, the Chinese Communist Party, challenge the U.S. The conservative Heritage Foundation took aim at higher education in its Project 2025 recommendations, saying, 'Universities taking money from the CCP should lose their accreditation, charters, and eligibility for federal funds." Chinese citizens represent some 23% of Harvard's international students, and Education Department data show that in recent decades individuals and companies from China and Hong Kong together have been the university's No. 2 source of large foreign gifts and contracts, behind only England. In 2023 and 2024 combined, the data show, Harvard reported $55.6 million in gifts of $250,000 or more from China, including Hong Kong, plus $13.7 million in contracts, some 13% and 8.2% respectively among all large-scale funding from non-U.S. partners. The Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps booth during a 2021 trade fair in Beijing. In previous responses to questions about its China exposure, such as acceptance of financial gifts, the school has cited its broad global alumni network across over 200 nations. With some 90 million members, the Chinese Communist Party has a deep reach into Chinese society. But while some tuition payments and funding might ultimately be traced to decisions by Chinese Communist Party officials, neither China's government nor the party would be likely to directly underwrite activities involving universities abroad, and there is no indication of such payments to Harvard. The Xinjiang corps, colloquially known as Bingtuan, is central to the Chinese Communist Party's ironclad rule over Xinjiang. Widespread evidence shows its paramilitary operations have played a leading role in Beijing's suppression of Uyghurs, including the detention of more than a million people. In imposing sanctions on the corps and its leaders in 2020, the Treasury Department cited 'their connection to serious human-rights abuse." The organization also has a massive administrative role in providing social services to ordinary citizens, such as managing hospitals and healthcare systems, the topic of the 2023 Harvard training, co-hosted by Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Analysts say the Xinjiang corps's participation in the training—organized by a Chinese health-insurance regulator, the National Healthcare Security Administration—was hardly the kind of nefarious activity American sanctions are designed to halt. Still, U.S. sanctions laws don't differentiate between types of interaction, said Julian Ku, a law professor at New York's Hofstra University. ​ 'Providing services to a blocked entity is prohibited, so Harvard does indeed face some possible liability here," he said. Trump indicated that his concern about the Xinjiang corps was based on findings of a House Select Committee on China. Its chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar (R., Mich.), late last month wrote to Harvard President Alan Garber, demanding explanations about university activities that 'create risks to U.S. national security and further the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) genocide in Xinjiang." Harvard President Alan Garber A China committee statement about Moolenaar's letter charged that Harvard researchers did transplant studies with 'PRC-based collaborators, amid mounting evidence of the CCP's forced organ harvesting practices." Allegations that Beijing is engaged in institutionalized theft from prisoners and others of body parts for organ transplants have recently gained traction among Republican China critics. While few human-rights groups make that claim today, the anti-Beijing spiritual group Falun Gong has forcefully promoted the issue. The Moolenaar letter described a number of Harvard studies as problematic, including one on cardiac transplants involving mice, detailed in a March 2024 scientific paper that indicated one of the 20 researchers had an affiliation with a hospital in northern China. A spokeswoman for Harvard Medical School's Brigham and Women's Hospital told The Wall Street Journal that the study was done at that institution and had no association with China. By the time the paper was published, she said, one researcher had joined the Chinese hospital. Harvard hasn't responded to Moolenaar's May 19 letter, which was also signed by Reps. Tim Walberg (R., Mich.) and Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.), but by no Democrats on the China committee. Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health In a response to questions, Moolenaar called the Xinjiang corps 'a sanctioned, paramilitary organization complicit in genocide" and said, 'I stand by the letter, and I will continue demanding answers from those enabling or ignoring the CCP's abuses." Criticism over the Xinjiang organization's participation in the 2023 healthcare event originated in a late April report by Strategy Risks, a research firm run by Isaac Stone Fish, a New York-based journalist, which concluded that Harvard's behavior raised doubts about its effectiveness in 'limiting [Chinese Communist Party] and authoritarian influences." The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a New York public-policy organization, funded the report but hasn't independently published the findings. Last month the report found an audience with Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.), who cited Strategy Risks in an open letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that urged an investigation into Harvard's potentially 'prohibited behavior" with the Xinjiang organization. Rep. John Moolenaar Four days later, Moolenaar and his fellow House members sent their letter to Harvard's Garber, noting the Xinjiang organization's role in mass detentions and describing healthcare efforts in Xinjiang as a 'fig leaf" to whitewash crimes. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem then called out the training as she moved to strip Harvard of its right to educate foreign students. Harvard's public materials on the meetings don't say how the corps came to participate in the training, an iteration of a series on healthcare finance basics known as the Flagship Program developed by the World Bank and Harvard in the 1990s. It has been offered to bureaucrats in dozens of low- and middle-income nations; the 2023 version in China had a special focus on eldercare insurance. A Chinese-language website published by Harvard said the Xinjiang group joined the annual training in 2019, but an internet archive tool showed that reference to its participation was later deleted. Yip, far left, at healthcare-finance training event in China in 2023. The congressional letter also took issue with a photo Harvard published from the 2023 event that blurred out name plates in front of four speakers, which the politicians charged 'raises questions about why Harvard wanted to keep their identities hidden." It couldn't be determined who had obscured the nametags; the photo had previously been widely published that way in China. Key participants are nonetheless easily identified, including the Harvard professor, Yip. Write to James T. Areddy at

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid immigration enforcement row
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid immigration enforcement row

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid immigration enforcement row

The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen AP Washington President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the US by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear, Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting. Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose terrorism-related and public-safety risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had deficient screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay US visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. US officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. This policy is not about national security it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States, said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organisation. Venezuela President Nicols Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterising it in a statement as a stigmatization and criminalisation campaign against Venezuelans. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store