Boy, 14, in court on murder charge after death of 16-year-old
A 14-year-old boy has appeared in court charged with murder following the death of a 16-year-old after a disturbance on a beach.
Kayden Moy, from East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, was found seriously injured on Irvine beach in North Ayrshire after police were called to the area at about 6.45pm on May 17.
He was taken to Crosshouse Hospital in Kilmarnock where he died a short time later.
The 14-year-old was charged with murder when he appeared in private at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court on Thursday.
He was also charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice.
The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, did not enter a plea and was remanded in custody.
Two 17-year-old youths appeared in court on separate days last month charged with murder following the incident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
Daughter of Benidorm attack victim in plea for answers
The daughter of a British man who died after being attacked by a stranger in a Spanish resort city in 2018 has renewed her call for information to help find his killer. Mike Rydings, 48, from Wythenshawe in Manchester, was celebrating a friend's 50th birthday and watching the World Cup at a bar in Benidorm when he was set upon in the early hours of 23 June. His daughter Hayley Barker said witnesses saw him backing away "with his hands up" before he was punched in the face, leaving him with a broken nose and serious head injures after falling on to the concrete. Mr Rydings was treated in a Spanish hospital before being moved to Salford Royal, but died 14 months later. Ms Barker said an investigation by both Spanish and Greater Manchester Police (GMP) had failed to find identify the attacker, despite GMP interviewing a range of British holidaymakers who were at the Hippodrome Bar at the time. "It makes me feel angry," she told BBC Radio Manchester. "My dad was stolen from me in such cruel circumstances, whoever has done this still gets to live their life."We can't move forward as such because we don't have justice." She called for anyone who may have new information that could help to contact GMP. "It would mean the world - we'd actually get some answers, it's what we deserve as a family," Ms Barker said. GMP said while the investigation was the responsibility of Spanish authorities, they were ready to assist if required. She said her father was 5ft 10ins (1.55m), had a stocky build and was wearing a red Hugo Boss t-shirt and glasses at the time of the attack. While Ms Barker said she had great memories of her dad being "the life and soul of the party" before his attack, her children had no memory of him. She said she was pregnant with her first child, a daughter, when Mr Rydings was attacked. "He never even got to hold her because of the condition he was left in before he passed away," she said. "In 2022 I had a son who would have been his only grandson, so that was very sad." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Women are dying while domestic murder reviews plod along'
"There are women dying while these reviews are plodding along."Poppy Devey Waterhouse was 24-years-old when she was murdered by her ex-boyfriend Joe was described by her family as "a bright button" who loved to travel and who was excited about the next chapter of her instead, this was "cruelly and senselessly cut short", when Atkinson failed to come to terms with the end of their three-year repeatedly stabbed Poppy in a rage at their flat in Leeds in 2018 using a kitchen knife that left her with more than 100 has taken more than five years for a Domestic Homicide Review (DHR) to be completed to find out whether lessons could be learnt from Poppy's has been a process which her mother, Julie Devey, from Frome in Somerset, describes as "excruciating"."You have no idea it's going to be like that," she said."You get the review and you read it and as I turned the pages, I couldn't understand it, it wasn't Poppy's voice, it was his voice, it was all about him." The review into Poppy's death was published by the Home Office in May - more than five years and eight versions said that the final report was "vastly different" to how the first one was written."We are very happy with how its written [now]," she added."He [Atkinson] is represented in it, but it's not 'poor me, poor me'. There are a few recommendations, but they were small things."Atkinson, 25, who admitted Poppy's murder, was jailed in 2019 for a minimum of 15 years and 310 Poppy's death, a DHR was commissioned by Safer Leeds, a safety partnership made up of local organisations including the council, police and health care found Poppy's death was neither predictable or review recommended raising awareness of domestic abuse and delivering a public or education focused campaign on the risks that might be present during the separation of a relationship. This would include recognising what could be considered obsessive, controlling and stalking behaviour. If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this story, support and advice is available via BBC Action Line. Every domestic killing or suicide involving people aged 16 and over in England and Wales is subject to a DHR, recently renamed as a domestic abuse-related death review (DARDR).They examine the role of professionals who had contact with the victim or the perpetrator before an attack, but do not issue Office guidance states the reviews, which make recommendations to help prevent other people being killed by partners or family members, should be finished within six BBC research has revealed just 1% of reviews into domestic abuse-related deaths in England and Wales are being completed in the recommended time, with most taking years. But for Julie, it was not only delays that made the review process difficult."There were endless examples of language used [in the report] that took away the responsibility from his decision making," she said."It was arduous, you'd send it back with recommended changes and then it would come back, and you'd have to do it all over again."Poppy needed to be the centre of this review - as her mum I had to represent her."Despite this, Julie - who has also been campaigning for tougher sentences for those who commit domestic murders - believes DHRs are important as it has provided the family with a thorough picture of the last few months before Poppy died."But the length of time they are taking is excruciating," she added."The idea is to find out if the death was preventable or predictable, and to come up with recommendations to save other lives."There are women dying while these are plodding along."A Leeds City Council spokesperson said Safer Leeds has been improving the review processes and expressed its "apologies for the delays in completing this review"."Unfortunately, the process involved does not lend itself to completion within six months with reviews often having to be paused. There are a number of factors that can cause a delay to a report, including coronial or judicial processes and we recognise that this does add to a family's trauma," they said. Julie is one of a number of bereaved families that the BBC has spoken to who have criticised the length of time the reviews Jane Monckton-Smith, a criminologist specialising in domestic homicide at the University of Gloucestershire, said when done properly DHRs can bring about real change."I do think there are ways that we could make them more efficient and perhaps more effective," she said."I'm not sure we need a big panel of people sitting for multiple meetings for every review."Prof Monckton-Smith, who has chaired several reviews, said six months - the recommended time for completion - is "too short" but four or five years is "far too long" for families to wait. Minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, Jess Phillips, said DHRs offer "a really important opportunity" for agencies to improve their safeguarding practices and ultimately prevent these deaths from happening."But we know that more needs to be done to ensure these reviews are effective and timely, which is why we are cracking on with action to improve the way they are undertaken," she government is now creating a new oversight board with publicly appointed members to make the process for reviewing reports faster, she added. Julie said that during conversations with Safer Leeds it has "taken onboard several ideas that we thought would help other families and those writing it". "One simple thing we asked for was that a photo of the victim is always present when the DHR is being completed, so it takes it away from being an administrative task and so the victim is the centre of all the conversations taking place," she said."We also thought there should always be a person on the panel who is from a women's organisation to ensure there is no victim blaming language."Leeds City Council added that every review is now reviewed at draft stage by a senior manager specifically to ensure that it "focuses on the voice and life of the victim and not the perpetrator"."Safer Leeds will continue to work to improve the timeliness of reports, putting bereaved families at the forefront of the review," it added.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
More than a dozen ICE officers are trapped in sweltering shipping container with the migrants they deported
More than a dozen ICE officers alongside a group of eight migrants that had been placed on a deportation flight originally bound for South Sudan are now being held in a converted shipping container on a US naval base in Djibouti in the stifling heat, in horrendous conditions. The men and their guards are dealing with baking hot temperatures, smoke from nearby burn pits and the looming threat of rocket attacks, the Trump administration said. Neither the officers or migrants can leave container until the matter has been resolved by the courts, which could take weeks. Officials outlined grim conditions in court documents filed before a federal judge overseeing a lawsuit challenging Immigration and Customs Enforcement efforts to swiftly remove migrants to countries they didn't come from. Authorities landed the flight at the base in Djibouti, about 1,000 miles from South Sudan, more than two weeks ago after US District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found the Trump administration had violated his order by swiftly sending eight migrants from countries including Cuba and Vietnam to the east African nation. The judge said that men, which include murderers and sexual abusers from Myanmar, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Mexico and South Sudan must have a real chance to raise fears about dangers they could face in South Sudan. All eight were accused of being convicted criminals by the Trump administration and deported in late May after their respective origin countries all rejected them being returned. The men's lawyers have still not been able to talk to them, said Robyn Barnard, senior director of refugee advocacy at Human Rights First, whose stated mission is to ensure the United States is a global leader on human rights. 'This Massachusetts District judge is putting the lives of our ICE law enforcement in danger by stranding them in Djibouti without proper resources, lack of medical care, and terrorists who hate Americans running rampant,' DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said in a post on X. 'Our @ICEgov officers were only supposed to transport for removal 8 convicted criminals with final deportation orders who were so monstrous and barbaric that no other country would take them. This is reprehensible and, quite frankly, pathological.' On Friday, Barnard spoke at a hearing of Democratic members of Congress and said some family members of the men had been able to speak with them on Thursday. The migrants have been previously convicted of serious crimes in the US, and President Donald Trump's administration has said that it was unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The Justice Department has also appealed to the Supreme Court to immediately intervene and allow swift deportations to third countries to resume. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by the Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The legal fight became another flashpoint as the administration rails against judges whose rulings have slowed the president's policies. The Trump administration said the converted conference room in the shipping container is the only viable place to house the men on the base in Djibouti, where outdoor daily temperatures rise above 100F, according to the declaration from an ICE official. Nearby burn pits are used to dispose of trash and human waste, and the smog cloud makes it hard to breathe, sickening both ICE officers guarding the men and the detainees, the documents state. The stench is so bad and the air so polluted that some officers now sleep with face masks on. Officers and detainees became sick within 72 hours of landing in Djibouti. So far, thirteen ICE officials have fallen ill and are suffering from respiratory infections, together with the extreme heat and cramped living conditions. The ICE officials are experiencing 'coughing, difficulty breathing, fever, and achy joints,' the court documents state. They don't have access to all the medication they need to protect against infection, and the ICE officers were unable to complete anti-malarial treatment before landing, an ICE official said. 'It is unknown how long the medical supply will last,' Mellissa B. Harper, acting executive deputy associate director of enforcement and removal operations, said in the declaration. The group also lacks protective gear in case of a rocket attack from terrorist groups in Yemen, a risk outlined by the Department of Defense, the documents state. Along with the deportees, the ICE agents are forced to stay in the makeshift detention center with just six beds between the entire group. The detainees are also facing uncomfortable conditions only being able to shower once every other day while being subjected to 'pat-downs and searches' every time they need to use the restroom, some 40 yards away from the container in where they're being held. 'The conference room in which the aliens are housed is not equipped nor suitable for detention of any length, let alone for the detention of high-risk individuals,' Harper wrote. 'Notably, the room has none of the security apparatus necessary for the detention of criminal aliens. If an altercation were to occur, there is no other location on site available to separate the aliens, which further compromises the officers' safety.'
