logo
What growing up Pakistani taught me about India and how those feelings changed in Canada

What growing up Pakistani taught me about India and how those feelings changed in Canada

CBC15-05-2025

Social Sharing
This is a First Person column by Zahra Khozema, a Pakistani Canadian journalist who lives in Toronto. For more information about CBC's First Person stories, please see the FAQ.
I was nine, standing in the dusty courtyard of my school in Karachi, Pakistan, yelling death to India, along with my other classmates.
"India murdabad, India murdabad." (Death to India, Death to India.)
It was a chant I didn't fully understand, but I did it anyway because it earned nods from teachers and cheers from classmates.
Nationalism like this always would typically peak in Pakistan during cricket matches with our neighbour or when a new Bollywood movie, yet again, portrayed Muslims and Pakistanis as a bloodthirsty villain who want to steal the honour of a Hindi queen or detonate bombs to harm civilian life in India. It also surges in times like now, when political tensions are high and the possibility of another full-out war looms overhead.
A deadly militant attack in Kashmir, in which 24 Hindu tourists, one Christian tourist and a guide were executed, sparked this particular conflict. Pakistan denies India's claims that it was behind the attack, and the militaries of the two countries were engaged in one of their most serious confrontations in decades.
War is always devastating, but what makes hostility in this region worse is that India and Pakistan are both nuclear powers.
Despite a fragile ceasefire, tensions remain high. My phone keeps buzzing. Non-South Asian friends are "checking in" and asking if my family back home is safe as disinformation is propagated and debunk ed. Some forward memes mocking the situation. The comment sections of these posts reek with racist remarks like "the smelliest war" when anti-South Asian sentiment in Canada is already on the rise. Others want my "thoughts," as if I'm the designated spokesperson for Pakistanis.
India-Pakistan ceasefire expected to be fragile in early days: Eurasia security expert
4 days ago
Duration 9:36
The ceasefire between India and Pakistan — two nuclear-armed powers that looked increasingly willing to engage in an all-out war — appeared to be holding into Sunday. Kamran Bokhari, former senior director of the Eurasian security and prosperity portfolio at the New Lines Institute, says ceasefire violations are 'to be expected' in the early hours or days before it becomes a formal truce 'but we aren't yet there.' Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/1.7532274
What do you say when it feels like so many people are waiting for you to spew hate?
I can't do that.
After my family immigrated from Pakistan to Toronto in 2005, some of the people who made me feel most welcome were Indian. I didn't speak English then, so my teacher paired me with a classmate who could translate — a Kashmiri Indian girl who spoke Punjabi.
I spoke Urdu, not Punjabi, but it was close enough. That girl — my first encounter with someone who I thought was an "enemy" — was 10 and wore pigtails. She sat with me when no one wanted to associate with the new kid who went to English as a second language (ESL) class. We didn't talk much because of the language barrier, but I'll always remember her as my first friend in Canada.
By the time I'd gained the confidence to thank her in English, I had moved schools.
Soon enough, the idea that Indians hated us, or that Hindus hated Muslims, had already started to unravel in the face of lived experience. I spent the rest of my elementary school years dancing to Bollywood bangers at talent shows and trading my samosa lunches for khaman dhoklas with Gujarati friends. The lines that once felt so rigid back home had begun to blur here.
BBC Asia Network's Haroon Rashid said it best: "In the world of the West … we were all one. We were often seen with the same lens, abused by the same words, treated, in some cases, with the same sense of otherness." As South Asian immigrants, we are "united by food and fashion and films and music and culture and language and upbringing," he added.
But I started to see past the propaganda when, at age 16, I became one of the lucky few Pakistanis granted a visa to visit India.
The animosity between the two countries rarely allows for cross-border travel, so on this visit, my mom insisted we go to Siddhpur, a small town in Gujarat. It's where our family lived for generations before Partition in 1947 — the violent and chaotic division of British India into two separate countries that triggered mass migration and ongoing conflict. My grandparents were all born on the "other side" of the border and we still have some distant relatives who live in India.
My mother's eyes lit up as we drove past our once-ancestral home — the one her mom had described in stories — on a street lined with the city's iconic colourful bungalows. It seemed so familiar to her, even though it had been three decades since her last visit. I, however, felt conflicted. It felt disloyal to the country I was born in, and I didn't appreciate that my mom was trying to connect me to the one her mother had left behind.
We also visited the graveyard where my great-grandmother was buried, but we couldn't find her because the tombstones were etched in Gujarati, a script we couldn't read. We were too nervous to ask for help. I was told you don't admit you're Pakistani there – it's just not done. But we still felt strangely at home since we spoke the language and blended in.
That's why I can't give in to this forced binary of choosing sides. I love my country and have opinions. I see the rise of Hindu nationalism in India, the erasure of Islamic heritage and the brutal crackdown on Kashmiris. I see it and I grieve it deeply, just as I grieve the growing religious extremism in Pakistan, the growing censorship and the crackdown on political deviation that mirrors the very forces we claim to oppose. In trying to defeat each other, we've become a bitter symmetry.
And I'm not the only one feeling this way. While political tensions and cricket rivalries often dominate headlines, many Pakistanis do not harbour animosity toward Indians. The hostility seen online is often amplified by echo chambers and doesn't always reflect the nuanced perspectives of everyday people.
Years later, I crossed paths with that same Kashmiri Indian girl from elementary school. We worked together at a fast-food joint in high school and often bumped into each other on our university campus.
A few years ago, she invited me to her wedding. It was my first time witnessing a Hindu ceremony that wasn't on a TV screen. Indian soap operas had made them seem so dramatic with intense camera zoom-ins and excessive crying. But in reality, it was quiet and intimate — just a boy and a girl sitting with a priest, surrounded by loved ones.
That friend and I keep weaving in and out of each other's lives, gently dismantling the narratives we grew up with. And in those ordinary moments of seated silence, post-work vent sessions and shared celebrations, I'm reminded how much more there is that connects us than divides us.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A top Taliban official offers amnesty to Afghans who fled the country and urges them to return
A top Taliban official offers amnesty to Afghans who fled the country and urges them to return

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

A top Taliban official offers amnesty to Afghans who fled the country and urges them to return

A Taliban fighter stands guard near the Shah-Do Shamshira Mosque as people attend the Eid al-Adha prayer in Kabul, Afghanistan, Saturday, June 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi) A top Taliban official said on Saturday that all Afghans who fled the country after the collapse of the former Western-backed government are free to return home, promising they would not be harmed if they come back. Taliban Prime Minister Mohammad Hassan Akhund made the amnesty offer in his message for the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as the 'Feast of Sacrifice.' The offer comes days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a sweeping travel ban on 12 countries, including Afghanistan. The measure largely bars Afghans hoping to resettle in the United States permanently as well as those hoping to go to the U.S. temporarily, such as for university study. Trump also suspended a core refugee program in January, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the U.S. and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded. Afghans in neighboring Pakistan who are awaiting resettlement are also dealing with a deportation drive by the Islamabad government to get them out of the country. Almost a million have left Pakistan since October 2023 to avoid arrest and expulsion. Akhund's holiday message was posted on the social platform X. 'Afghans who have left the country should return to their homeland,' he said. 'Nobody will harm them.' 'Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,' he added, and instructed officials to properly manage services for returning refugees and to ensure they were given shelter and support. He also used the occasion to criticize the media for making what he said were 'false judgements' about Afghanistan's Taliban rulers and their policies. 'We must not allow the torch of the Islamic system to be extinguished,' he said. 'The media should avoid false judgments and should not minimize the accomplishments of the system. While challenges exist, we must remain vigilant.' The Taliban swept into the capital Kabul and seized most of Afghanistan in a blitz in mid-August 2021 as the U.S. and NATO forces were in the last weeks of their pullout from the country after 20 years of war. The offensive prompted a mass exodus, with tens of thousands of Afghans thronging the airport in chaotic scenes, hoping for a flight out on the U.S. military airlift. People also fled across the border, to neighboring Iran and Pakistan. Among those escaping the new Taliban rulers were also former government officials, journalists, activists, those who had helped the U.S. during its campaign against the Taliban. The Associated Press

Letters to the editor, June 7: ‘The AI revolution needs thoughtful regulation'
Letters to the editor, June 7: ‘The AI revolution needs thoughtful regulation'

Globe and Mail

time7 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Letters to the editor, June 7: ‘The AI revolution needs thoughtful regulation'

Re 'In its bid to rescue Afghans, Ottawa is fracturing their families' (Opinion, May 31): I can only imagine the relentlessly pounding and debilitating terror one must feel while anxiously awaiting safe passage out of Pakistan. I cannot understand why the Canadian immigration system is unable or, I shudder to think, unwilling to fix its flaw and expedite family unification on Canadian soil, given that many of these Afghans were indispensable allies for Canadians stationed in Afghanistan during the war. Perhaps a few terse pointers from Mark Carney could do the trick. Elsewhere, nearly 60 Afghan women's rights defenders have also been hiding in Pakistan ('Afghan women activists in Pakistan fear deportation as country cracks down on refugees' – April 22). Surely the Canadian government can do something to help these courageous women escape the awaiting brutality of both the Pakistani police and the Taliban. L.H. MacKenzie Vancouver Re 'A real reform mandate for the first federal AI minister' (Editorial, May 31): The artificial intelligence revolution needs thoughtful regulation. Another important AI-specific element of Evan Solomon's mandate letter should be policies to promote deployment of digital technologies by Canadian business to reskill and upskill our workforce, and to develop new products and services. Canada lags many countries, especially the United States, with the digital economy previously estimated by the Bank of Canada to account for as little as 5.5 per cent of GDP. Moreover, research shows that Canada faces serious digital skill shortages that are impacting labour supply, business efficiencies and growth. In the Industrial Revolution, it was the deployment of the steam engine that spurred economic growth through innovations worldwide. We should keep in mind that in the past, shared prosperity emerged only when technological advances were made to work for everyone. Which brings us back to the importance of sound regulation. Paul Jenkins Ottawa Re 'How to win a trade war: Canada, Trump and a delicate dance in asymmetric warfare' (Report on Business, May 31): 'Play defence: Reform our corporate tax regime.' One thing I am almost certain of in life is that corporate tax experts will never say such taxes are too low; they are always too high. The result is a race to the bottom, where less and less government revenue comes from corporate taxes. Where that process ends is obvious to me. How about approaching the issue from a different perspective: Who benefits from government spending? Canada has a track record of providing a safe, law-abiding environment within which corporations and their shareholders can have confidence that business can prosper. Should not the beneficiaries of programs requiring government expenditures to create that environment (defence spending being an example) pay their fair share of the costs? If for no other reason than to reverse income disparities between the very rich and the very poor, corporate taxes should not be cut any further. Peter Love Toronto Re 'How a Montreal family, a Baghdad embassy and the French government became entwined in a legal drama' (May 30): I would like to add another piece to your fascinating story on the Lawee family home being used as the French embassy in Baghdad. In the summer of 1981, I led a 10-person team in Baghdad for the initial research phase of Canadian architect Arthur Erickson's master plan for a 3.5-kilometre stretch of the Tigris riverfront and adjacent inland areas. Our team members were responsible for the detailed inventory and assessment of all 1,400 buildings within the Abu Nuwas Conservation/Development Project. They recalled one morning sitting in the office of our client, the chief architect of Baghdad, when it somehow came out that the French embassy was slated for demolition that day. When they hastily pointed out that the building had been earmarked in our report as heritage to be saved, our client picked up the phone, then and there, and the destruction was halted. Alan Bell Vancouver Re 'The perils of keeping identity hidden from kids conceived by sperm donors' (Opinion, May 31): Contributor Aviva Coopersmith details her bumpy conception story and the excruciatingly slow pace that donor-conceived persons in Canada and the greater world endure to maybe, possibly, someday gain greater access to their genetic past so they can fully own their present and future. My heart goes out to Ms. Coopersmith. I am the dad of a perfect two-year-old donor-conceived girl. I often lie awake at night worrying that my daughter will grow up with similar worries and wonderings. This is why I joined the board of Donor Conception Canada, a non-profit that helps people grappling with donor conception, be they prospective parents, active parents, donors or donor-conceived persons. We are all in this together. Joshua Levy Montreal Re 'Cattle have roamed Cambridge's city centre for hundreds of years. GPS is keeping the tradition going' (June 4): Very charming tradition. However, one minor – major? – problem has not been mentioned. I am talking about the rather copious amounts of 'pasture pastry' from each of the lovely beasts. How does the city deal with it: Cow diapers? Udder underwear? Just asking. Baily Seshagiri Ottawa Re 'I no longer knew how to find God, so nature became my church' (First Person, June 5): In a COVID-19 world, some have not returned to church. However, as rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel wrote, 'faith is faithfulness.' Authentic worship is a discipline, an exercise. It is not only about what we receive, it is about what we give. As the essay-writer acknowledges, there is no similar community in communing with nature. I used to say that the church would always be there when people choose to return to it. Not any more. Many congregations struggle to survive. When people do not attend their local church, they often do not support it. If she chooses to go back to church one day, I hope it is there for her. Keith McKee Reverend London, Ont. I appreciate the essay-writer's awakening to the world around her in nature. I call nature God's first scripture. The parallels between outdoor sanctuary and wooden pews and stained glass are true: They are spaces to inspire, to inhale the spirit. I don't go to church to meet God; God is everywhere. I go to meet others along the way, and am determined to create a space where we are awakened, comforted, tear-soaked and then sent outdoors to nature ready to bring love to feed the lost and lonely creatures of the world. For me, there is a call to engage and transform the world, one goldfinch or silver-haired human at a time. John Pentland Reverend Hillhurst United Church; Calgary .................................................................................................................................. Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@

Experts warn of Bill C-2 as 'anti-refugee' and 'anti-immigrant' giving Canada 'unchecked powers' like the U.S.

time14 hours ago

Experts warn of Bill C-2 as 'anti-refugee' and 'anti-immigrant' giving Canada 'unchecked powers' like the U.S.

Mbonisi Zikhali came to Canada in 2009 from Zimbabwe to pursue a master's in journalism at Carleton University. Post-graduation, the international student found himself homeless in Windsor and applied for refugee status – a privilege soon unavailable if Bill C-2 becomes the law. The bill is unnecessary and not sympathetic at all to people's well-being, Zikhali said. Many experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada agree. They are calling the Liberal government's sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, anti-immigrant and anti-refugee, and say they hoping the legislation does not become law. Zikhali said he came on scholarship and in 2012 found himself in Windsor picking tomatoes at a greenhouse. Soon enough, he was living on the streets, and lost his passport which also had his study permit in it. Applying for refugee status, Zikhali said, was his saving grace and worries this bill will deprive vulnerable people of a safe haven. What is Bill C-2? The legislation proposes changes to a number of laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Specifically it allows officials to cancel, suspend or change immigration documents immediately, pause the acceptance of new applications and cancel applications already in process if deemed in the public interest. Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Critics say new border legislation aligns Canada's immigration system with the U.S. 2 days agoDuration2:43The Liberal government proposed new border legislation this week. But critics say they worry the law will do more harm than good. The CBC's Pratyush Dayal reports. Asylum claims would also have to be made within a year of entering the country, including for international students and temporary residents. Take this hypothetical: An Afghan international student who came to study here in July 2020. When the Taliban takes over in August 2021 and things become uncertain back home, that student could have applied for asylum. But with this bill, the one-year time period would have lapsed and they would be ineligible. The immigration changes would also require irregular border crossers — people who enter Canada between official ports of entry — to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada. Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab is defending the measures (new window) . There's a lot of applications in the system. We need to act fairly, and treat people appropriately who really do need to claim asylum and who really do need to be protected to stay in Canada, Diab told CBC News. We need to be more efficient in doing that. At the same time, Canadians demand that we have a system that works for everyone. 'Very U.S.-like' bill: refugee help centre director says Windsor's Matthew House gives refugees a place to live and helps them with resettlement. Mike Morency, the organization's executive director, says he worries this bill will put more vulnerable people at greater harm. It continues to align our immigration system with that of the United States, Morency said. Refugee claimants are not the problem. The one year-ban is a major concern for us. The other major concern for us is the ability of the government to declare an emergency and suspend applications. That one to me feels very U.S.-like. Morency said he understands the government's will to try to cut back on international students and migrant workers making a refugee claim as a way to stay in Canada, but worries for people who have a legitimate need for protection being unfairly targeted. It also feels very much like a workaround to our commitment to the Geneva Convention. If the government wants to step out of the Geneva Convention, then then we need to do it with integrity and we need to approach the UN and say we're going to withdraw, he said. Syed Hussan, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network, agrees saying the bill violates Canada's most basic legal obligations and is immoral . 'Gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status': Migrant Rights Network Hussan asserts the bill infringes upon Canada's legal commitments and ethical standards by granting the government excessive authority to cancel permits. Every refugee gets to have the right to have their case heard. That's now being taken away, he said. Collectively it's a bill that gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status… This is an anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bill. It's illegal. Without any ability for people to appeal or have their case individually heard, Hussan said, the bill allows the government to make people undocumented or just throw people out of the country in the hundreds of thousands . Syed Hussan says the Migrant Rights Network condemns Bill C-2's anti-Refugee and mass deportation provisions. Photo: CBC The changes also allow the federal immigration department to share information more widely with different agencies within Canada. Hussan said anyone who was not a citizen or later became a citizen will have their data impacted by the bill. Hassan said this is similar to the US immigration policies. This is Carney's first test and he's failed it. He's no different from Donald Trump. 'Major rollback of rights,' 'disservice to refugees': Queen's university law professor Sharry Aiken, professor of law at Queen's University, also finds the bill troubling. Very disappointing. It's a betrayal of many Canadians that supported this government in the most recent election, she said, noting these issues weren't part of the Liberal election campaign. The omnibus bill, she said, is quite complicated with 16 different parts and neither serves to reform the asylum system nor address Canadians' privacy rights. Typically, omnibus bills don't get the degree of parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, she said, which is concerning. Aiken said the one year-bar for asylum claimants represents a major rollback of rights . No longer are these claimants eligible for a hearing before the Refugee Protection Division, she said. The division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) hears and decides claims for refugee protection in Canada. Aikens said this arbitrary bill will also very quickly develop a backlog. The bill proposes a legislative fix for a problem that doesn't require new law. It requires operational intervention, she said. This one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and what has been the subject of extensive international criticism… This bill does a disservice to refugees and betrays the Canadian public's trust in the Liberal government for ensuring a fair refugee determination system consistent with international standards. She urges the MPs to separate out the provisions having the issues desegregated. 'Will make the process more cumbersome': immigration lawyer Toronto-based immigration lawyer, Mario Bellissimo, said with the bill creating arbitrary distinctions of 14 days and one year after June 2020, an individualized assessment approach is being taken away. While the number of refugee claimants have recently dipped, Bellissimo said the bill signals that Canada wants to potentially limit immigration. It wants to send messages to individuals who want to traverse the system over many years without legitimate claims that this is not a destination of choice for you, he said. Bellissimo agrees that targeting individuals who impact the immigration system in a negative way is important but the bill will end up targeting individuals in genuine need of assistance. Pratyush Dayal (new window) · CBC News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store