Confederacy group sues Georgia park for planning an exhibit on slavery and segregation
Stone Mountain's massive carving depicts Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Gen. Robert E. Lee and Thomas 'Stonewall' Jackson on horseback. Critics who have long pushed for changes say the monument enshrines the 'Lost Cause' mythology that romanticizes the Confederate cause as a state's rights struggle, but state law protects the carving from any changes.
After police brutality spurred nationwide reckonings on racial inequality and the removal of dozens of Confederate monuments in 2020, the Stone Mountain Memorial Association, which oversees Stone Mountain Park, voted in 2021 to relocate Confederate flags and build a 'truth-telling' exhibit to reflect the site's role in the rebirth of the Klu Klux Klan, along with the carving's segregationist roots.
The Georgia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans also alleges in the lawsuit filed Tuesday that the board's decision to relocate Confederate flags from a walking trail violates Georgia law.
'When they come after the history and attempt to change everything to the present political structure, that's against the law,' said Martin O'Toole, the chapter's spokesperson.
Stone Mountain Park markets itself as a family theme park and is a popular hiking spot east of Atlanta. Completed in 1972, the monument on the mountain's northern space is 190 feet (58 meters) across and 90 feet (27 meters) tall. The United Daughters of the Confederacy hired sculptor Gutzon Borglum, who later carved Mount Rushmore, to craft the carving in 1915.
That same year, the film 'Birth of a Nation' celebrated the Reconstruction-era Ku Klux Klan, which marked its comeback with a cross burning on top of Stone Mountain on Thanksgiving night in 1915. One of the 10 parts of the planned exhibit would expound on the Ku Klux's Klan reemergence and the movie's influence on the mountain's monument.
The Stone Mountain Memorial Association hired Birmingham-based Warner Museums, which specializes in civil rights installations, to design the exhibit in 2022.
"The interpretive themes developed for Stone Mountain will explore how the collective memory created by Southerners in response to the real and imagined threats to the very foundation of Southern society, the institution of slavery, by westward expansion, a destructive war, and eventual military defeat, was fertile ground for the development of the Lost Cause movement amidst the social and economic disruptions that followed," the exhibit proposal says.
Other parts of the exhibit would address how the United Daughters of the Confederacy and the Sons of Confederate Veterans perpetuated the 'Lost Cause' ideology through support for monuments, education programs and racial segregation laws across the South. It would also tell stories of a small Black community that lived near the mountain after the war.
Georgia's General Assembly allocated $11 million in 2023 to pay for the exhibit and renovate the park's Memorial Hall. The exhibit is not open yet. A spokesperson for the park did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The park's board in 2021 also voted to change its logo from an image of the Confederate carveout to a lake inside the park.
Sons of the Confederate Veterans members have defended the carvings as honoring Confederate soldiers.
The exhibit would 'radically revise' the park's setup, 'completely changing the emphasis of the Park and its purpose as defined by the law of the State of Georgia,' the lawsuit says.
___
Kramon is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Kramon on X: @charlottekramon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions
LONDON, July 3 (Reuters) - A trade deal announced by the U.S. and Vietnam creates new question marks for sportswear and clothing retailers like Nike and Adidas that source shoes and clothes from factories in the Southeast Asian country, industry experts said on Thursday. The U.S. will impose a 20% tariff on many imports from Vietnam, while "transshipping" from third countries through Vietnam will face a 40% levy, President Donald Trump said on Wednesday. Garment and shoe factories in Vietnam rely heavily on yarns, polyester fabrics, and trims like buttons and zippers imported from neighbouring China. It was not immediately clear whether such products assembled in Vietnam from Chinese inputs would be vulnerable to the transshipment tariff. Typically, transshipment would designate a product mostly made in China, shipped to Vietnam and then relabelled and exported as made in Vietnam. U.S. customs already watches for that practice, but the Trump administration has hardened its stance on it, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying that "a huge amount" of trade from Vietnam is transshipment from China, in a CNBC interview Thursday. Many questions remain over the trade agreement, said Sheng Lu, professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware. "Strictly speaking, transshipment is illegal, whereas using foreign components in compliance with rules of origin requirements is common practice," said Lu. "Confusing these two distinct practices will only create greater uncertainty and risk further supply chain disruption." Vietnam has been a top destination for retailers and brands looking to reduce their reliance on factories in China, but has also become a target of Trump's aggressive trade policy. Vietnam is a key producer of sports shoes for Nike, accounting for 50% of Nike branded shoes overall in the company's fiscal year 2024, and is also Adidas' biggest supplier country, producing 27% of the German brand's products. A Nike spokesperson said the company is still looking into the details of the deal. Adidas declined to comment. "With this new change and with the potential for this transshipment tariff, I think it's going to cause a lot of importers to really question, is Vietnam really a good other option?" said Lila Landis, a customs compliance consultant based in Fort Worth, Texas. While details are still not confirmed, the 40% tariff could possibly be stacked atop the correct China duty for any given product, making it highly punitive, Landis added. Overall, the U.S. imported 274 million pairs of shoes from Vietnam last year, according to industry group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA), which on Wednesday called the tariffs unnecessary and said they would hit American consumers. "There's disappointment in the 20% on the Vietnam side," said Joe Jurken, managing director at supply chain management company The ABC Group. The announced tariff on Vietnam narrows the gap with China, which the U.S. has hit with a 55% tariff, and may even tempt some brands to stick with China, Jurken said, instead of switching suppliers which is lengthy and costly. "There's a lack of capacity in Vietnam because there's not enough factories, and there's an overabundance of capacity in China... so the Chinese factories, in our opinion, will benefit from this over the short term," Jurken said. Still, the 20% tariff rate is better than the 25-30% rate the market feared, according to analysts at Raymond James. And the deal announcement goes some way to end uncertainty, and could encourage some retailers that were considering Vietnam to go ahead and place orders, said Jim Kennemer, managing director at Cosmo Sourcing. "It's going to be nearly impossible to get a 100% not-China supply chain," he said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EPA takes brutal action after employees sign 'declaration of dissent' against Trump policies
Lee Zeldin's EPA placed 139 employees on administrative leave pending an investigation into what the agency calls an attempt to illegally sabotage Donald Trump 's agenda. In a 'declaration of dissent' published Monday, the employees wrote via an organization formed called 'Stand Up 4 Science' that the agency is no longer living up to its mission to protect human health and the environment. The letter represented rare public criticism from agency employees who knew they could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. In a statement to the agency declared that the rebel employees were attempting to undermine Trump's mandate. 'The Environmental Protection Agency has a zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging, and undercutting the administration's agenda as voted for by the great people of this country last November,' a spokesperson said. Zeldin also spoke out, telling The Daily Caller: 'Unfortunately, a small number of employees signed onto a public letter, written as agency employees, using their official work title, that was riddled with misinformation regarding agency business.' Employees were notified that they had been placed in a 'temporary, non-duty, paid status' for the next two weeks, pending an 'administrative investigation,' according to a copy an email sent out. 'It is important that you understand that this is not a disciplinary action,' the email read. In a statement released Thursday night, Stand Up 4 Science said the employees were unclear about where they stood, as Zeldin never directly responded to their letter. 'Though we are still gathering information on this situation, we condemn these actions. These are dedicated civil servants whose career goal is to keep Americans safe,' Colette Delawalla, the head of the of the activist organization said. More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move in June, when nearly 100 employees signed a declaration that assailed Trump administration 'policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe.' An additional 250 of their colleagues endorsed the declaration without using their names. But no one at NIH has been placed on administrative leave for signing the declaration and there has been no known retribution against them, Jenna Norton, a lead organizer of the statement, told AP on Thursday. Norton oversees health disparity research at the agency´s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, in his confirmation hearings, had pledged openness to views that might conflict with his own, saying dissent is the 'essence of science.' A former Congressman, Zeldin has attempted to serve the efforts of both the Trump administration and the Department of Government Efficiency to cut waste, fraud and abuse at the EPA. In February, Zeldin identified where $20 billion of climate-related funds purposefully wasted by the Biden administration landed. He It all came to light in a recent 'disturbing' video showing a Biden EPA political appointee. The employee bragged abut how the administration was 'tossing gold bars off the Titanic' and rushing to get 'billions of your tax dollars out the door before Inauguration Day,' Zeldin said in a video. 'The gold bars were tax dollars, and tossing them off the Titanic meant the Biden administration knew they were wasting it.' Zeldin said his team discovered where exactly the billions were intentionally placed by the outgoing Biden officials after they bragged about handing the money over to nonprofits to make it harder for Republicans to recover the funds. Critics of Zeldin say he has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA´s research and development office as part of his push to slash its budget and gut its study of climate change and environmental justice. And he´s seeking to roll back pollution rules that an AP examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. The EPA responded to the employees' letter earlier this week by saying policy decisions 'are a result of a process where Administrator Zeldin is briefed on the latest research and science by EPA´s career professionals, and the vast majority who are consummate professionals who take pride in the work this agency does day in and day out.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
UNAids chief ‘shaken and disgusted' by US cuts that will mean millions more deaths
The head of the global agency tackling Aids says she expects HIV rates to soar and deaths to multiply in the next four years as a direct impact of the 'seismic' US cuts to aid spending. Winnie Byanyima, the executive director of UNAids, said that if the funding permanently disappeared, the world faced an additional 6 million HIV infections and 4 million Aids-related deaths by 2029. 'It is a deadly funding crisis, a global response knocked totally off course. This is a pandemic, and pandemics have no borders,' she said in an interview with the Guardian at the UN international development funding summit this week in Seville, Spain. Byanyima, a Ugandan aeronautical engineer and politician who has led UNAids since 2019, said seeing the impact of Donald Trump's cuts had been the worst experience of her life. 'Personally I am devastated. Appalled. Shaken and disgusted. I don't have the English words to use,' she said, admitting that the sheer scale of the challenge in the face of such massive cuts had made her consider resigning from her role. 'But I can't run away. I told myself I'm going to fix it. I need to take my gloves off.' US global health funding has stagnated over the past few years, and countries including the UK have been actively moving away from investment in aid from the target spending of 0.7% of GDP that UN member states set themselves in 2015. But in February, Trump abruptly halted Pepfar – the president's emergency plan for Aids relief set up by Republican George Bush in 2003 to provide treatment, prevention and care for people living with or affected by HIV/Aids. A later vaguely worded waiver on certain parts of Pepfar funding had not had an effect on the ground, said experts. 'Every year, donors were reducing and the war in Ukraine saw that accelerate,' Byanyima said. 'But the shock … Pepfar was 60% of my budget. 'It is a drop, a drop of money that is nothing in one of these rich G7 countries,' she said. 'And it did so much for people who are so vulnerable. And yet you are spending so much more on wars. The rich men at the top take away from the poorest at the bottom. 'To create such crisis, such pain and such anger on the ground. This cut, that's dedicated people losing jobs, loyal support gone, research ended, vulnerable people abandoned. And it is deaths. What went away immediately was prevention services, so we are very worried about the new infections and about deaths. Then support services and clinics. Now research, cutting edge research, is going. 'I myself had to have therapy to keep myself strong to be there for others. We have to make sure people who are staying do not burn out to try to even out our workload. 'This is a huge shift because it is so connected to geopolitics and to power shifts. It is seismic. But after the first wave of panic, and of pain, we have now to work hard, on less than half of what we had, to get change quickly to save lives. 'We already lost 12 million people we should not have lost if ARVs [antiretrovirals] had been shared immediately around the world instead of held on to by the pharmaceutical companies making money. We now face this, more deaths. Health is a human right, no one should die if we can prevent it. 'But of course many people will die, so many vulnerable people have already lost support, young girls, men who have sex with men, these are people who hide, who are shunned. 'There will be an additional 6 million newly infected persons in the world,' she said. 'That has started already.' Byanyima said the loss of overseas development assistance on all sides was now focusing attention on the unfair way in which Africa was treated by the west in terms of financing, debt interest and risk rates, and regarding illicit funding flows. 'African countries are struggling. Some much more than others. But they are not lying down and dying, and they are not holding out a begging bowl for more aid. Huge efforts are being made to fill the funding gaps in smart ways. 'We need debt justice, we need tax justice. The amount of money flowing from the south to the north has been greater than what has gone the other way for a long time and that is clear to see. 'The message for us all is clear too. The aid model cannot stand any more, it's too unpredictable, the future has to be less about charity and more about international solidarity.'
