Why Columbia University will pay $9 million to settle national ranking lawsuit
The lawsuit stemmed from a 2022 scandal over how Columbia earned a No. 2 spot in the magazine's annual 'Best Colleges' rankings that year, acing a process that is a powerful driver of prestige and applications for American universities.
Believing there were flaws in the data underpinning the university's score, a Columbia mathematician investigated and published a blog post asserting that several key figures were 'inaccurate, dubious or highly misleading.' The discrepancies caused Columbia to drop to No. 18 in the rankings. The next year, Columbia opted out of the rankings altogether.
The proposed settlement, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Monday (June 30), did not require Columbia to formally admit wrongdoing. But the university said in a statement Tuesday (July 1) that it 'deeply regrets deficiencies in prior reporting.' The settlement agreement covers some 22,000 former undergraduate students who attended Columbia College, Columbia Engineering, or Columbia's School of General Studies between 2016 and 2022 and will be eligible to apply for a slice of the award. If all the students applied, taking into account likely lawyers' fees, they would each receive about $273.
The lawsuit claimed that Columbia had artificially inflated its ranking by consistently reporting false data, including that 83% of its classes had fewer than 20 students. Michael Thaddeus, the mathematician who first revealed the flaws in the data, said Tuesday that he found the settlement gratifying 'because it amounts to an admission that the students' complaint has merit.'
'Columbia did report false data over many years, and it reported false data about several things, not just class sizes,' he said. He added that it would have been even better if Columbia had made an 'honest attempt to explain its actions,' perhaps with an independent investigation addressing questions like why and how the false data were reported in the first place. 'The discovery stage of this lawsuit might have illuminated those questions,' he said.
The scandal had a broader impact, leading to skepticism in how people view the U.S. News & World Report rankings, which largely rely on data self-reported by universities. At Columbia, it also prompted improvements in how the university reports its own data. Since 2022, the university has published 'Common Data Sets,' which 'are reviewed by a well-established, independent advisory firm to ensure reporting accuracy,' a spokesperson said.
The lawsuit was first filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in July 2022 by Ravi Campbell, a student who claimed he had overpaid based on false advertising. Several other students then sued, and the suits were combined to create a class action.
What comes next?
The motion to settle the case must still be approved by a judge. A Columbia official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that while the university denied the allegations of misreporting and other misconduct, it was entering into the settlement agreement to avoid protracted and costly litigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
47% of motorcyclists in Delhi exceed speed limit after dark
One of the dangers on city roads, especially at night, is the motorcycle that whizzes by at a speed in excess of the limits. A study by an American organisation showed that the average speed of motorcycles that exceeded the mandated limits in Delhi was 66 kmph, much higher than the average of 43 kmph of those riding within speed limits. The study also found that 47 per cent of all motorcyclists exceeded speed limits at night compared with 33 per cent in daytime. The study by Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit and Bloomberg Philanthropies Initiative for Global Road Safety (BIGRS) also showed that at known traffic blackspots, speeding motorcycles were even faster, averaging 68 kmph. The tendency to speed varied by road type, with 33 per cent of motorcycles speeding on arterial roads against 28 per cent on local and collector roads and only 18 per cent on expressways. The speed limits on various roads range from 50kmph to 60kmph. Weekends see a noticeable uptick in speeding among motorcyclists, with the percentage of speedsters being as high as 44 per cent in April 2024 against 38 per cent on weekdays in the same period. While motorcycles account for a significant portion of speeding vehicles, it is actually the heavy vehicles that are the most notorious offenders, with nearly half of them (49%) exceeding speed limits. Commercial vehicles too are habitual violators at 42 per cent but light motorcars are more respectful of the limits with 33 per cent of them exceeding them. The outcome of the study is corroborated on the ground, with two-wheeler riders comprising 38 per cent of road accident deaths in 2023. Specifically, 549 motorcyclists died in road crashes that year. A traffic officer said that speeding, reckless driving, drunk driving and failure to use safety accessories like helmets were the main factors for the fatalities. The officer also conjectured that motorcyclists tended to speed at night and on arterial roads because of availability of road space, less traffic and fewer police patrols. Weekend spikes in speeding might be linked to recreational travel, less cautious behaviour and drunk driving. Poor policing and drawbacks in road infrastructure also fail to deter speeding, he said. In all aptness, chief minister Rekha Gupta formally launched the 'helmet wearing consequences' campaign from Connaught Place on Thursday. She said the objective of the campaign was to highlight how the negligence of not wearing a helmet can endanger the riders' lives and of their loved ones. The broader trend in Delhi shows the proportion of speeding vehicles among all vehicles increased from 27 per cent in dec 2021 to a peak at 42 per cent in April 2024 before declining slightly to 35 per cent by April this year. Despite the recent dip, the data points to a worrying tendency towards speeding in the past few years, particularly among commercial and heavy vehicles. Experts warn that speeding on motorcycles, especially during risky hours and on major roads, substantially increases the likelihood of accidents and severe injuries. They urged the authorities to implement targeted enforcement and safety campaigns to curb this dangerous behaviour, focusing also on late-night riders and weekend speedsters.
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Trump, Putin arrive in Alaska for high-stakes talks on Ukraine
New Delhi, Aug 15 (UNI) US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Alaska this evening for their high stakes meeting for peace in Ukraine. Immediately after dismounting from their respective aircraft, both leaders shook hands. Both leaders are accompanied by high-level delegations indicating that the talks could also include issues like trade and economy, besides peace in Ukraine. President Putin is accompanied by his Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Foreign Policy Aide Yuri Ushakov, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Special Envoy on foreign investment and economic cooperation Kirill Dmitriev. The US delegation includes Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and other senior members. According to reports these include Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Steve Witkoff, Special Envoy for peace missions. Ahead of the meeting Yury Ushakov said the programme for the leaders' meeting has been agreed upon. He said that everything will start at approximately 11:30 local time with a one-on-one between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. Following this the talks will continue in a delegation format, extending into a working breakfast. He said that given the highly sensitive and critical topics will be discussed, the negotiating parties have been limited to a select group. On the Russian side, the delegation will include Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Special Presidential Representative for Investment and Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries Kirill Dmitriev, besides Ushakov himself. The composition of the American delegation is also known, though it would be appropriate to await an official announcement from our American partners. Thus, in addition to the presidents themselves, each delegation will include five members. Naturally, expert teams will also be present nearby. After the talks, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will hold a joint news conference to sum up the results of the negotiations. Regarding the summit's agenda, it is evident to all that the central topic will be the settlement of the Ukraine crisis, including considerations from the discussions held in the Kremlin on August 6 with the participation of the US President's Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. However, broader issues related to ensuring peace and security, as well as pressing international and regional matters, will also be addressed. An exchange of views on the further development of bilateral cooperation, including in the trade and economic spheres, is also expected. ''It is worth noting that this cooperation holds immense, yet regrettably underutilised, potential.'' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said ahead of the talks that Ukraine is ready to work as productively as possible to bring the war to an end. ''We count on a strong position from America. Everything will depend on this – the Russians factor in American strength. Russia must end the war. The killings must stop. A meeting of leaders is needed–at the very least, Ukraine, America, and the Russian side–and it is precisely in such a format that effective decisions are possible. Security guarantees are needed. Lasting peace is very much needed,'' Zelenskyy said. UNI RB 0040
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
A Trump Intel stake could make national security the new ‘too big to fail'
US President Donald Trump is preparing to direct the government to take a direct stake in Intel, according to multiple media reports, as the White House continues to extend its influence into corporate America citing national security concerns. Intel, once one of the world's most important chip makers and a vital part of the U.S. tech landscape, has struggled to match the pace of growth from Asia-based rivals such as Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung. It has been eclipsed in the race to develop artificial intelligence chips by domestic players Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. That has left the U.S. reliant on foreign tech supply chains, a shift that both the president and former President Joe Biden have deemed a threat to national security. However, while the Biden administration looked to address those concerns through the CHIPS and Science Act, which earmarked $53 billion in support for the semiconductor sector, the Trump administration looks set to take a more direct route. According to the Wall Street Journal, how the government could take a stake in Intel is now being hashed out. Intel declined to comment to Barron's. White House spokesman Kush Desai said reports of deals not announced by the administration should be regarded as speculation. 'It's tricky to think about how this could work, and it is unprecedented in terms of the marriage of politics and private enterprise" said Paul Argenti, professor of management and corporate communication at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, during an interview with CNBC on Friday. 'Semiconductors are a really strategic asset, there's no question about that," he added. 'But government as a shareholder brings real governance risks." In fact, the president is taking a new tack when it comes to U.S. industrial policy. He has made deals tied to the China-based sales of Nvidia and AMD and taken a so-called golden share in the $14 billion takeover of U.S. Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel. The Defense Department is taking a $400 million stake in the rare-earth metals producer MP Materials. An Intel stake, if such a deal happens, would be different. The closest parallel is to the government's broader effort to bail out Wall Street during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, which involved the U.S. taking a large stake in the insurer American International Group. Deeming AIG 'too big to fail," the government provided it with loans and equity in the region of $182 billion, exiting the group with a $23 billion profit in 2012. Intel is like AIG in that it is critical to an important element of the U.S. economy, the tech sector, as the largest American company that both designs and manufactures its own chips. Although it lost around $2.9 billion last quarter, it still carries an investment-grade credit rating and has a market value of more than $100 billion. Its plans to build a $30 billion factory hub in northern Ohio, however, have been replete with delays. The hub isn't likely to be up and running until early next decade. While Intel isn't close to failing, its role in the tech sector and potential for it to be a player in AI means it is important for it to succeed. 'Winning the AI Race is nonnegotiable," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said late last month. 'America must continue to be the dominant force in artificial intelligence to promote prosperity and protect our economic and national security." Earlier this year, Trump administration officials looked into a possible deal that would have allowed Taiwan Semi to operate Intel's foundry business as part of a joint ownership structure. The Wall Street Journal reported, however, that the president wasn't sold on the idea of foreign control of a business seen as critical to national security. A government stake in Intel would give lenders to the company the reassurance of the nation's ironclad credit rating as a backstop, likely removing any concerns about access to capital for its Ohio project. But it could also leave Intel vulnerable to dictates from the White House as it attempts to define its strategy under new CEO Lip Bu-Tan. 'Intel is simultaneously dealing with tough competition, a lack of an AI pipeline, and a capex-intensive manufacturing business that continues to generate heavy losses and which remains well-behind industry leader TSMC that is rapidly building a U.S. presence," said Bank of America analyst Vivek Arya in a recent client note. That level of complexity makes the government's decision to get involved directly even more challenging, particularly in a sector that is undergoing rapid change. Government stakes in key industries aren't always profitable, either. The AIG investment ultimately paid off, but taxpayers lost around $10 billion from the rescues of Ford Motor, General Motors, and Ally Financial at around the same time. They also haven't seen a dime of profit from the U.S.'s five decades of support for the passenger railroad Amtrak. 'Picking winners in real time carries major risks," said Argenti of Dartmouth College. 'If Intel delivers, this is going to look like a genius, visionary move. If not, it becomes a very expensive lesson in government overreach, which I think is potentially what we're looking at here."
