
Iowa farmers call for building trade ties with handshakes, not tariffs
People shop at a Walmart store in Rosemead, California, the United States, on May 15, 2025. (Photo by Qiu Chen/Xinhua)
MANNING, United States (June 10): The Renze family's fleet stretches from six-monitor John Deere tractors to a pristine 1929 Ford Model A, a symbol of a time when farming was hands-on, not high-tech.
At 97, Melvin Renze, the family patriarch, still drives his Ford down Main Street to Deb's Corner Café. On other days, he wanders into the fields, running his fingers through the soil and offering advice to his sons: 'You ought to do this, or that!'
'I'm busy all the time,' he said. 'I was born a farmer. It's in my blood. If I had a do-over, I'd do exactly the same. I like farming. I did like farming.'
The Renzes have farmed in western Iowa for generations, managing thousands of acres of farmland and a significant number of livestock. Melvin's son, Scott, stays in the field, dealing with unpredictable markets, precision technology and the ripple effects of U.S.-China trade friction. His brother, Randy, took a different path, branching into international agribusiness.
Despite the support of advanced technologies, such as GPS-guided tractors, cloud-connected feeding systems and data-informed crop decisions, their concerns revolve around cost, policy consistency and international cooperation.
Randy Renze speaks in an interview with Xinhua in West Des Moines, Iowa, the United States, on May 23, 2025. (Xinhua/Liu Yanan)
FLICKER OF RELIEF
A temporary 90-day suspension of tariffs between the United States and China in May brought a flicker of relief. But Randy, who spent 34 years navigating global trade standards at leading tractor maker John Deere, sees a more complicated picture.
'When tariffs were imposed the first time, it cost John Deere. It cost the American farmer,' he told Xinhua in a recent interview. 'Those soybean markets we lost, someone else filled.'
Scott felt the impact firsthand. 'By spring, we've already spent hundreds of thousands on seed, fertilizer and chemicals,' he said. 'No policy from Washington is going to stop us short-term. But next year? We'll have to rethink everything.'
Noting that a single breakdown can cost tens of thousands of dollars, Scott said: 'With tight margins, even a 10-percent drop in prices can shake everything (up) — land payments, equipment loans and family income.'
Today, most of their corn heads to nearby ethanol plants; some goes to livestock feed; the rest is exported. However, tariffs are rebalancing that mix, Scott said. China was once the largest buyer, but now 'I can't tell you the amount. We're constantly renegotiating,' he added.
Technology shapes every aspect of their operation. The Renzes manage a digital command center and use apps to track weather, monitor soil, mix cattle feed and hedge commodity prices. 'We're not just farmers anymore. We're managers, marketers, engineers,' said Scott.
Still, it's not necessarily easier. 'Physically, sure. It's less labor. But mentally, it's exhausting. You're troubleshooting tech, watching markets, managing risks every day,' he added.
'WE HEDGE, WE WATCH, AND WE ADJUST'
Every growing season is a gamble. 'Some years, you make 100 U.S. dollars an acre. Another year, you lose 50 dollars,' Scott said. 'One hailstorm, one drought, and everything changes,' he added, noting that insurance only offers limited safety, as coverage is costly and incomplete.
That's farming in 2025: sophisticated, strategic and still uncertain.
Despite that, Scott stays committed. 'We've got apps, data, tech. We do everything right. But we can't control tariffs, politics or the weather. So we hedge, we watch, and we adjust.'
Asked whether tariffs come up often in conversation, Scott shrugged. 'Tariffs? That's beyond our control. We leave it to the government and hope they manage it well,' he said. 'We just try to survive it.'
Even with the help of high-tech machinery, managing thousands of cattle and vast stretches of land comes with real pressure.
'Farming today isn't blue-collar or white-collar,' Randy said. 'It's both. You need the brains and the back.'
The same tech that boosts efficiency also drives up costs. 'That planter? 300,000 dollars,' said Scott. 'We'll spend another 15,000 dollars a year just to maintain it.'
Competition from Brazil, Argentina and elsewhere is also mounting. 'You've got to be the best. Efficient, informed and relentless,' he said.
Tariffs are now another variable.
'Tariffs won't affect the next two to five months,' Randy said. 'But come next season, it'll impact what we plant and what we sell and buy.'
U.S. President Donald Trump shows an executive order on 'reciprocal tariffs' at the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, D.C., the United States, on April 2, 2025. (Xinhua/Hu Yousong)
BUILDING TRADE TIES WITH HANDSHAKES
Randy has visited China many times, working with farmers, officials and engineers. That experience taught him patience and pragmatism.
'China takes the long view,' he said. 'Thousands of years of history puts a few years of friction into perspective.'
Randy sees people-to-people diplomacy as vital, especially when politics turn tense.
'You don't build trade relationships with speeches. You build them over years through handshakes, visits, and showing up,' he said. 'That work doesn't stop just because leaders change.'
He was frank about the U.S. administration's trade policies: 'There was a lot of disruption,' he said. 'Tariffs were imposed without much planning. Markets were lost. Costs rose. Relationships strained.'
Instead of fine-tuning agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement or joining alliances like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, 'we scrapped and restarted,' he said. 'It may look strong on paper, but it makes long-term planning impossible for companies and farmers alike.'
DEEPER MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING NEEDED
Randy still has the old slides from John Deere's presentation in China, photos with Chinese friends and every business card he received. On his wall hangs a map of China, marked with stickers from every city he has visited.
'It wasn't just business,' he said. 'It was relationships, understanding and trust.'
He hopes Chinese friends can understand American farmers, as well as their resilience, hopes and joy over a good harvest.
What's needed, he said, is deeper mutual understanding.
Now retired, Randy volunteers at the World Food Prize Hall of Laureates in Des Moines, capital of Iowa.
'I grew up in industrial agriculture. The Prize is about developing countries,' he said. 'It's been fascinating — a way to give back.'
Through that work, he has expanded his knowledge of global food issues, China-Iowa ties and agricultural diplomacy.
'We can be part of the solution,' he said. 'I hope we continue to be.' agricultural China farmers tariffs

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US ocean container imports tumble in May as China tariffs take hold
LOS ANGELES: US seaborne imports of goods from China dropped 28.50 per cent year-on-year in May, the sharpest decline since the pandemic, as President Donald Trump's 145 per cent tariffs took hold, supply chain technology provider Descartes said on Monday. China is the top US supplier of goods that enter through seaports, including the nation's busiest in Los Angeles/Long Beach. Domestic businesses ranging from retailer Walmart to automaker Ford depend on those goods to operate. Overall US seaborne imports in May tumbled 7.20 per cent from the year earlier to 2.18 million 20-foot equivalent units — snapping a streak of near-record increases fuelled by companies frontloading goods to avoid higher duties. "The effects of US policy shifts with China are now clearly visible in monthly trade flows," Descartes said in a statement. West Coast ports are more dependent on China trade and bore the brunt of the declines. From April to May, the nation's busiest seaports in Long Beach and Los Angeles experienced steep drops in goods from China, 31.60 per cent and 29.90 per cent, respectively, Descartes said. Top imports from China included furniture, bedding, plastic goods, machinery, toys and sporting goods. The United States and China agreed to a 90-day pause on punitive tit-for-tat tariffs last month. US and Chinese officials met in London on Monday to defuse the high-stakes trade dispute between the world's largest economies. Port executives and shipping consultants expect volume from China to rebound during the tariff truce, albeit at a more moderate level. That's because the US lowered the tariff for many goods from China to 30 per cent during the pause. "China-origin imports may continue to soften in the months ahead as importers reassess sourcing strategies amid rising landed costs," Descartes said.

The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
China-US trade talks to focus on rare earths
Win-win results: A trucker moves out of a container yard at the port of Oakland in California. As trade talks between the United States and China resume, there is growing optimism on both sides that agreements can be reached. — Reuters LONDON: The United States and China are set to resume trade negotiations in London in a bid to further defuse tensions over rare earth minerals and advanced technology following a phone call between leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jin Ping last week. Both sides have accused the other of reneging on a deal in Geneva in May, when they reached an agreement to at least temporarily lower tariffs that had climbed to more than 100%. After reaching an understanding with Xi on resuming flows of critical minerals, Trump said he expected the London meeting to go 'very well'. China said on Saturday it approved some applications for rare earth exports, without specifying which countries or industries were involved. 'We want the rare earths, the magnets that are crucial for cell phones and everything else to flow just as they did before the beginning of April, and we don't want any technical details slowing that down,' Kevin Hassett, the head of the National Economic Council at the White House, said on Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation. US-China trade tensions escalated this year as Trump hiked duties on Chinese goods, prompting retaliation from Beijing. While the Geneva deal was meant to pave the way for a broader de-escalation, subsequent talks quickly stalled amid mutual recriminations. The United States complained about a decline in shipments of rare earth magnets essential for American electric vehicles and defence systems. China bristled at US restrictions on artificial intelligence chips from Huawei Technologies Co, software for designing chips, plane engines and visas for upwards of 280,000 Chinese students. In London, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were to meet a Chinese delegation led by Vice-Premier He Lifeng. The addition of Lutnick, who's in charge of curbs on the sale of advanced technology, signals Trump may be willing to consider reversing some of the restrictions that threaten to hobble China's long-term growth ambitions. While the call between Trump and Xi last week generated some hope on Wall Street for lower duties between the trading partners, investor optimism was limited. While promising to reshape US trading relationships, Trump so far has reached only one new trade agreement – with the United Kingdom. Trump's reprieve on US tariffs for Chinese goods runs out in August, unless he decides to extend it. If deals aren't reached, the White House has said Trump plans to restore tariff rates to the levels he first announced in April, or lower numbers that exceed the current 10% baseline. The confusion after the Geneva meeting underscored the challenge of deal-making between China and the United States. 'They left too many things open to interpretation and they all paid the price for it in the intervening weeks,' said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. The United States and China just 'want to get back to where they were in Switzerland with a few more agreements put down on paper to actually understand what is gonna be licensed'. For now, Xi appears to be betting that a reset in ties will lead to tangible wins in the weeks and months ahead, including tariff reductions, an easing of export controls and a less-fraught tone. After the Trump call, Xi said he expected the United States to 'remove the negative measures taken against China'. While Xi flexed his muscles with the rare earths restrictions, China's economic woes, seen by persistent deflation and concerns about unemployment, give him reasons to come to strike a lasting deal. — Bloomberg

The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
India's textile boom hits a wall
IN a garment hub in south India, RK Sivasubramaniam is fielding requests from American retail chains Walmart and Costco who want to sidestep higher US tariffs faced by rival Asian suppliers. But rows of idle sewing lines at his factory lay bare his biggest challenge. 'Even if orders come, we need labour. We don't have sufficient labour,' said the managing director of Raft Garments which supplies underwear and t-shirts priced as low as US$1 to US brands. Considered India's knitwear capital, Tiruppur, in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, accounts for nearly one-third of the country's US$16bil in apparel exports, and is staring at a huge opportunity as US buyers explore ramping up sourcing from India in the face of heftier tariffs on other Asian hubs. US President Donald Trump plans to hit India, the world's sixth largest textile and apparel exporter, with a 26% tariff from July, below the 37% imposed on Bangladesh and 46% on Vietnam, all of which are bigger American suppliers. Those tariffs will make apparel from India much more competitive. But the mood is somber at the Tiruppur textile park as it faces a reality check: India's hopes of capitalising on its tariff advantage are hindered by a skilled labour crunch, limited economies of scale and high costs. Raft Garments wants to expand production to tackle new orders but is importing high-end machines to automate some stitching processes, given the business for now heavily depends on migrant labour, which is very tough to find or retain. Garment exporters in India say workers have to be trained and many leave within months to work at smaller, unorganised units that allow longer hours and pay more. The larger manufacturers can't match them due to foreign clients' requirements on cost and workers' conditions, according to interviews with 10 manufacturers and apparel exporter trade groups representing 9,000 businesses. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has for years courted foreign investors to his 'Make in India' programme to turn the South Asian nation into a global manufacturing hub. A shortage of skilled workers in a nation where 90% of the labour force operates in the informal sector is seen as a big roadblock, especially in labour-intensive sectors like garments. Tiruppur offers a glimpse of India's labour strain. 'We need at least 100,000 workers,' said Kumar Duraiswamy of the exporters association in Tiruppur, where he said more than a million people currently work. Modi's government last year said it was extending a programme to specifically train 300,000 people in textile-related skills, including garment making. In the textile hub, some have taken matters into their own hands. Amid a hum of sewing machines at the Cotton Blossom factory, which makes 1.2 million garments a month – including for American sporting goods retailer Bass Pro Shops – Naveen Micheal John said he has set up three centres thousands of kilometres away to train and source migrant workers. And even then, most return to their hometowns after a few months. 'We skill them there for three months, then they are here for seven months. Then they return back,' John said during a tour of his garment unit, adding he wants to look at other states where labour and government incentives both may be better. Capacity woes China's US$16.5bil worth of apparel exports, Vietnam's US$14.9bil and Bangladesh's US$7.3bil made them the three biggest suppliers to America in 2024, when India shipped garments worth US$4.7bil, according to US government data. US companies have for years been diversifying their supply chains amid geopolitical tensions. And even before the news of tariffs in April, now paused until July, Bangladesh's garment industry began losing its sheen amid political turmoil there. A survey of 30 leading US apparel brands by the United States Fashion Industry Association showed that India had emerged as the most popular sourcing hub in 2024, with nearly 60% of respondents planning to expand sourcing from there. A worker inspecting a yarn spinning machine. — Reuters With the tariffs, India's exports would cost US$4.31 per sqm of apparel, compared with US$4.24 for Bangladesh, a sharp improvement on India's competitiveness without the levies, according to Reuters calculations based on 2024 import data from the US Office of Textiles and Apparel. But it's in the economies of scale where India loses. The Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association says an average garment factory there has at least 1,200 workers, whereas in India, according to its Apparel Export Promotion Council, there are only 600 to 800. 'Bangladesh capacities are huge ... We have issues of capacity constraint, lack of economy of scale due to smaller size of factories, labour unavailability during peak seasons,' said Mithileshwar Thakur of the Indian trade group. To address those challenges, garment makers have started to set up factories in states where migrant workers come from, he said. A worker putting cloth into a giant trolley. — Reuters In Tiruppur, its exports association says the largest 100 exporters contributed 50% of its US$5bil sales last fiscal year, with the rest from 2,400 units, a telling sign of the fragmented and largely smaller-scale operations. Raft makes 12 million garment pieces a year with a workforce of just 250 people. A US client is close to placing an order for three million units, which will stretch the factory to its limit and force it to consider expansion. 'This one order is more than enough for us,' said Sivasubramaniam. Pricing roadblock Data from shipping consultants Ocean Audit showed that Walmart imported 1,100 containers of household goods and clothing between April 2 and May 4 from India, nearly double the same period last year, including cotton shirts and pleated maxi skirts. In a statement, Walmart said it sources from more than 70 countries around the world as it aims to find the right mix of suppliers and products. While US retailers are lodging more queries in Tiruppur, pricing negotiations remain contentious due to higher labour and other costs. Indian brokerage Avendus Spark said in March that Bangladesh's cost of labour stood at US$139 per month, compared to India's US$180. P. Senthilkumar, a senior partner at India's Vector Consulting Group, said India had stricter rules for overtime policies and worker shifts, further raising costs. In Dhaka, Anwar-ul-Alam Chowdhury of Evince Group said most of their US buyers were sticking with Bangladesh, given the 'large production capacity, lower costs, and reliable quality give us a clear edge'. In India, though, Tiruppur exporters said they are in hectic talks with many US clients who love the Bangladesh cost advantage and are aggressively bargaining. At Walmart-supplier Balu Exports, Mahesh Kumar Jegadeesan said US clients had conveyed 'we will not budge on the price' and were willing to move some orders only if Indian exporters can match prices. Inside the nearby Raft Garments factory, where women were stitching underwear, the smile on managing director Sivasubramaniam's face sparked by 14 new business inquiries of recent weeks faded quickly. 'All want us to match Bangladesh prices. Price is a big problem,' he said. — Reuters