logo
Top Australian soldier loses appeal over war crimes defamation case

Top Australian soldier loses appeal over war crimes defamation case

Saudi Gazette16-05-2025

SYDNEY — Australia's most-decorated living soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, has lost an appeal against a landmark defamation judgement which found he committed war crimes.
A judge in 2023 ruled that news articles alleging the Victoria Cross recipient had murdered four unarmed Afghans were true, but Roberts-Smith had argued the judge made legal errors.
The civil trial was the first time in history any court has assessed claims of war crimes by Australian forces.
A panel of three Federal Court judges on Friday unanimously upheld the original judgement, though Roberts-Smith has said he will appeal the decision to the High Court of Australia "immediately".
"I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations," he said in a statement.
Roberts-Smith, who left the defence force in 2013, has not been charged over any of the claims in a criminal court, where there is a higher burden of proof.The former special forces corporal sued three Australian newspapers over a series of articles alleging serious misconduct while he was deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012 as part of a US-led military coalition.At the time the articles were published in 2018, Roberts-Smith was considered a national hero, having been awarded Australia's highest military honour for single-handedly overpowering Taliban fighters attacking his Special Air Service (SAS) platoon.The 46-year-old argued the alleged killings occurred legally during combat or did not happen at all, claiming the papers ruined his life with their reports.His defamation case - which some have dubbed "the trial of the century" in Australia - lasted over 120 days and is now rumored to have cost up to A$35m ($22.5m; £16.9m).In June 2023 Federal Court Justice Antony Besanko threw out the case against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, and The Canberra Times, ruling it was "substantially true" that Roberts-Smith had murdered unarmed Afghan prisoners and civilians and bullied fellow soldiers.He also found that Roberts-Smith lied to cover up his misconduct and threatened witnesses.Additional allegations that he had punched his lover, threatened a peer, and committed two other murders were not proven to the "balance of probabilities" standard required in civil cases.The "heart" of the appeal case was that Justice Besanko didn't given enough weight to Roberts-Smith's presumption of innocence, his barrister Bret Walker, SC said.There is a legal principle requiring judges to proceed carefully when dealing with civil cases that involve serious allegations and in making findings which carry grave consequences.Walker argued that meant the evidence presented by the newspapers fell short of the standard required.Months after the appeal case had closed, Roberts-Smith's legal team earlier this year sought to reopen it, alleging misconduct by one of the reporters at the center of the case.They argued there was a miscarriage of justice because Nick McKenzie, one of the journalists who wrote the articles at the center of the case, allegedly unlawfully obtained details about Roberts-Smith's legal strategy.The legal team pointed to a leaked phone call between McKenzie and a witness — which The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, and The Canberra Times said may have been recorded illegally.But on Friday, the trio of judges rejected that argument too.They said "the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support the findings that the appellant murdered four Afghan men"."To the extent that we have discerned error in the reasons of the primary judge, the errors were inconsequential," they added.They also ordered Roberts-Smith to pay the newspapers' legal costs.In a statement, McKenzie called the ruling an "emphatic win".He thanked the SAS soldiers who "fought for the Australian public to learn the truth", and paid tribute to the Afghan "victims of [Mr] Roberts-Smith"."It should not be left to journalists and brave soldiers to stand up to a war criminal," he said. "Australian authorities must hold Ben Roberts-Smith accountable before our criminal justice system." — BBC

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After decades in Assad jails, political prisoner wants justice
After decades in Assad jails, political prisoner wants justice

Arab News

time18 minutes ago

  • Arab News

After decades in Assad jails, political prisoner wants justice

DAMASCUS: Syrian fighter pilot Ragheed Tatari was 26 when he was arrested. Now 70, the country's longest-serving political prisoner is finally free after Bashar Assad's fall, seeking justice and accountability. Tatari, arrested in 1981 and sentenced to life behind bars, was among scores of prisoners who walked free when longtime ruler Assad was overthrown on December 8 in an Islamist-led offensive. He has made it out alive after 43 years in jail, but tens of thousands of Syrian families are still searching for their loved ones who disappeared long ago in Syria's hellish prison system. 'I came close to death under torture,' Tatari told AFP in his small Damascus apartment. Since a military field court gave him a life sentence for 'collaborating with foreign countries' — an accusation he denies — Tatari was moved from one prison to another, first under late president Hafez Assad and then his son Bashar who succeeded him in 2000. Showing old pictures of him in his pilot uniform, Tatari said he was not seeking revenge, but stressed that 'everyone must be held accountable for their crimes.' 'We do not want anyone to be imprisoned' without due process, said Tatari. More than two million Syrians were jailed under the Assad dynasty's rule, half of them after anti-government protests in 2011 escalated into civil war, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor. The Britain-based monitor says around 200,000 died in custody. Diab Serriya, co-founder of the Association of Detainees and Missing Persons of Saydnaya Prison, said that Tatari was 'the longest-serving political prisoner in Syria and the Middle East.' Rights group Amnesty International has called the notorious Saydnaya prison outside Damascus a 'human slaughterhouse.' Tatari had been detained there, but he said his 15 years in the Palmyra prison in the Syrian desert were the most difficult. The Palmyra facility operated 'without any discipline, any laws and any humanity,' Tatari said. Detainees were 'not afraid of torture — we wished for death,' he added. 'Everything that has been said about torture in Palmyra... is an understatement.' 'A guard could kill a prisoner if he was displeased with him,' Tatari said, adding that inmates were forced under torture to say phrases like 'Hafez Assad is your god,' although he refused to do so. In 1980, Palmyra witnessed a massacre of hundreds of mostly Islamist detainees, gunned down by helicopters or executed in their cells after a failed assassination attempt on Hafez Assad. Tatari said he was completely disconnected from the outside world there, only learning of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union through a prisoner who had returned from a hospital visit. In Sweida prison in the south, where Tatari was transferred after the 2011 revolt began, some inmates had phones that they would keep hidden from the guards. 'The cell phone gets you out of prison, it makes you feel alive,' he said, recalling how he used to conceal his device in a hole dug in his cell. But after his phone was discovered, he was transferred to a prison in Tartus — his final detention facility before gaining freedom. Tatari was one of several military officers who were opposed to Syria's intervention in Lebanon in 1976, and to the violent repression in the early 1980s of the Muslim Brotherhood, Syria's main opposition force at the time. 'Many of us were against involving the army in political operations,' he said. After two of his fellow pilots defected and fled to Jordan in 1980, he escaped to Egypt and then on to Jordan. But he returned when security forces began harassing his family and was arrested on arrival. His wife was pregnant at the time with their first and only son. For years, the family assumed Tatari was dead, before receiving a proof of life in 1997 after paying bribes, a common practice under the Assads' rule. It was then that Tatari was finally able to meet his son, then aged 16, under the watchful eye of guards during the family's first authorized prison visit that year. 'I was afraid... I ended the meeting after 15 minutes,' Tatari said. His wife has since died and their son left Syria, having received threats at the start of the protest movement, which had spiralled into war and eventually led to Assad's overthrow. During his time behind bars, Tatari said he 'used to escape prison with my thoughts, daydreams and drawing.' 'The regime getting toppled overnight was beyond my dreams... No one expected it to happen so quickly.'

Afghan women UN staff forced to work from home after threats
Afghan women UN staff forced to work from home after threats

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

Afghan women UN staff forced to work from home after threats

UNAMA confirmed that UN staff had been threatened'Several United Nations female national staff members in the Afghan capital Kabul have been subjected to threats,' it saidKABUL: Afghan women working for the United Nations in Kabul have been threatened by unidentified men because of their jobs, the organization and several women told AFP on women working for various UN agencies told AFP on condition of anonymity they had been threatened on the street and over the phone by men warning them to 'stay home.'UN staffer Huda — not her real name — said that for weeks she has been bombarded with messages abusing her for 'working with foreigners.''The messages keep coming and they are always harassing us... saying, 'Don't let me see you again, or else',' the young woman told said her office had advised her to work from home until further United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) confirmed that UN staff had been threatened.'Several United Nations female national staff members in the Afghan capital Kabul have been subjected to threats by unidentified individuals related to their work with the UN,' it said in a the threats 'extremely serious,' the UN has taken 'interim' measures 'to ensure the safety and security of staff members,' it Taliban government, accused by the UN of imposing a 'gender apartheid' against women since returning to power in 2021, has denied any ministry spokesman Abdul Mateen Qani said such threats were a 'crime' and that police would take said the authorities had opened an seizing power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have severely restricted Afghan women from working and it is the only country in the world where women are banned from education beyond primary government in 2022 banned women from working for domestic and international NGOs, which was extended to include the UN's offices in the country the following policy has some exceptions including for women working in health care and education, and has not been consistently UN has previously called the policy 'deeply discriminatory.'Selsela, in her 30s, said while returning from the office last week she was approached by unknown men who told her she should be 'ashamed' and that she must 'stay home.''They said, 'We told you nicely this time, but next time you'll have another thing coming',' she told AFP.'I was very scared,' she said, explaining how she struggles to work efficiently from home in a country where electricity and Internet are unreliable.'The situation for women is getting worse every day.'Another woman, Rahila, said she and two other women colleagues were stopped by men while traveling home in a UN vehicle and told not to go to the office anymore.'They said, 'Don't you know that you are not allowed?',' Rahila said, adding that she has also received threatening messages from unknown numbers.'I am very worried, I need my job and my salary,' she of Afghanistan's population of some 45 million people struggle to meet their daily needs, according to the UN, with the country facing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.

Afghans who helped America during the war plead for an exemption from Trump travel ban
Afghans who helped America during the war plead for an exemption from Trump travel ban

Arab News

time3 hours ago

  • Arab News

Afghans who helped America during the war plead for an exemption from Trump travel ban

ISLAMABAD: Afghans who worked for the US during its war against the Taliban urged President Donald Trump Thursday to exempt them from a travel ban that could lead to them being deported to Afghanistan, where they say they will face persecution. Their appeal came hours after Trump announced a US entry ban on citizens from 12 countries, including Afghanistan. It affects thousands of Afghans who fled Taliban rule and had been approved for resettlement through a US program assisting people at risk due to their work with the American government, media organizations, and humanitarian groups. But Trump suspended that program in January, leaving Afghans stranded in several locations, including Pakistan and Qatar. Pakistan, meanwhile, has been deporting foreigners it says are living in the country illegally, mostly Afghan, adding to the refugees' sense of peril. 'This is heartbreaking and sad news,' said one Afghan, who worked closely with US agencies before the Taliban returned to power in 2021. He spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue, fearing Taliban reprisals and potential arrest by Pakistani authorities. He said the travel ban on an estimated 20,000 Afghans in Pakistan could encourage the government to begin deporting Afghans awaiting resettlement in the US 'President Trump has shattered hopes,' he told The Associated Press. He said his life would be at risk if he returned to Afghanistan with his family because he previously worked for the US Embassy in Kabul on public awareness campaigns promoting education. 'You know the Taliban are against the education of girls. America has the right to shape its immigration policy, but it should not abandon those who stood with it, risked their life, and who were promised a good future.' Another Afghan, Khalid Khan, said the new restrictions could expose him and thousands of others to arrest in Pakistan. He said police had previously left him and his family alone at the request of the US Embassy. 'I worked for the US military for eight years, and I feel abandoned. Every month, Trump is making a new rule,' said Khan. He fled to Pakistan three years ago. 'I don't know what to say. Returning to Afghanistan will jeopardize my daughter's education. You know the Taliban have banned girls from attending school beyond sixth grade. My daughter will remain uneducated if we return.' He said it no longer mattered whether people spoke out against Trump's policies. 'So long as Trump is there, we are nowhere. I have left all of my matters to Allah.' There was no immediate comment on the travel ban from the Taliban-run government. Pakistan previously said it was working with host countries to resettle Afghans. Nobody was available to comment on Trump's latest executive order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store