
Introducing Fast Company's Queer Changemakers
For the past five years, Fast Company published an annual list of 50 LGBTQ+ people who were shaping the worlds of business, tech, politics, and culture. As the list evolves—and given the continued attacks on queer and trans people—we've decided to change the format this year, looking more deeply into the contributions of eight notably impactful individuals.
The leaders we chose to profile for 2025 are at the forefront of their fields. Chase Strangio is the first openly transgender person to argue in front of the Supreme Court. He spoke with nonbinary Olympian Nikki Hiltz about their work, and what it's like to be so visible during this moment.
You'll also read about Rose Marcario, former CEO of Patagonia and current partner at ReGen Ventures, who calls on other business leaders to double down on their values during a time when many executives are growing quiet, and Audrey Tang, who is working to spread pro-democracy ideas to combat negative sentiments on social media.
As anti-trans legislation and rhetoric continue to escalate across the U.S.—from sweeping state-level bans on gender-affirming care to renewed efforts to bar trans people from public life—trans nonbinary elite runner Nikki Hiltz and ACLU's LGBTQ+ rights lawyer Chase Strangio find themselves at the intersection of justice and representation. Read more.
Rose Marcario is doubling down on her values
When she was CEO of Patagonia, Rose Marcario stood out as one of the most outspoken voices in business against President Donald Trump during his first term. Under her leadership, Patagonia even sued the Trump administration after he issued a proclamation to shrink public land in two national monuments.
The final deadline for Fast Company's Next Big Things in Tech Awards is Friday, June 20, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top economist warns America is heading toward economic disaster the Fed can't fix
Euro Pacific Asset Management Chief Economist Peter Schiff voiced some criticism of the Federal Reserve and sounded the alarm about the economy during an appearance Wednesday on "The Claman Countdown." Schiff's comments on the show came not long after the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) wrapped up its latest meeting in the afternoon, electing to keep the central bank's benchmark interest rate at its current level. Federal Reserve Chain Jerome Powell subsequently gave remarks to the media about the decision. Schiff told host Liz Claman the "biggest takeaway is that Powell basically admitted that they have no idea what's going to happen." Federal Reserve Leaves Key Interest Rate Unchanges For Fourth Straight Meeting "They don't really know what's going to happen to consumer prices. They don't know what's going to happen to employment," Schiff argued. "I don't even think their forecasts are educated guesses so much as wishful thinking." Read On The Fox Business App The benchmark federal funds rate will stay at a current range of 4.25% to 4.5% after the Fed's latest decision. FOMC policymakers also released a summary of economic projections, known as the so-called "dot plot," which showed members anticipate two interest rate cuts in 2025, followed by one cut each in 2026 and 2027. They also project PCE inflation will rise to 3% this year before declining to 2.4% in 2026 and 2.1% the following year. Real gross domestic product (GDP) is seen as slowing to 1.4% in 2025 before growth picks up to 1.6% next year and 1.8% in 2027. Unemployment is seen as rising to 4.5% in 2025 and 2026, before dipping to 4.4% in 2027. Schiff said he thought inflation will be "a lot higher" than the Fed expects and that the U.S. economy will be "a lot weaker." He acknowledged the Fed "brought their inflation forecast up a bit" for the near-term and "their growth forecast down" but added that such changes weren't "big enough." According to Schiff, the "big problem" for inflation is "all of the inflation chickens that the Fed has been releasing for more than a decade are coming home to roost" rather than the Trump administration's recent spate of tariffs on imports from foreign countries. "We have a lot of dollars sloshing around the world thanks to years and years of artificially low interest rates and quantitative easing, and more of those dollars are going to be coming home as foreigners get out of U.S. financial asset," Schiff told Claman. "You're seeing a global exodus out of U.S. stocks, out of U.S. bonds, and all that cash is going to come back home, bidding up prices." Schiff predicted the U.S. will experience stagflation "with a recession and much higher inflation happening at the same time, really complicating the defense ability to try to do something about either problem." Lower interest rates will not help the U.S. economy, he also argued, labeling them as the "cause." "The solution involves much higher interest rates," he said. "Now, I understand that's going to be very painful, given the economy that we've created, built on a foundation of cheap money." Trump Slams 'Stupid' Fed Chair Powell Ahead Of Interest Rate Decision "It means stock prices come down, real estate prices go down, companies fail," he added. "There's going to be bankruptcies. There's going to be defaults. There's going to be a protracted recession, probably a much worse financial crisis than 2008, but all that has to happen because the alternative to that is even worse." The U.S. is on the path to "runaway inflation" that could become "hyperinflation," Schiff predicted. The latest meeting of the FOMC was the fourth time it has gotten together this year. The FOMC also chose not to change the rate at the three previous meetings in January, March and May. In late May, the personal consumption expenditures Index showed a 0.1% month-over-month and a 2.1% year-over-year increase in inflation for April. Eric Revell contributed to this article source: Top economist warns America is heading toward economic disaster the Fed can't fix


New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
An Iran Strategy for Trump
Nobody, perhaps even President Trump himself, knows for sure whether the United States will wind up joining Israel in launching military strikes on Iran. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' he said on Wednesday. But with a third U.S. aircraft carrier on its way to the region and the president calling for Iran's 'unconditional surrender,' the chance of war seems higher than ever — particularly now that Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, has gruffly rebuffed Trump's demand. If the U.S. does attack, the most obvious target will be the Fordo nuclear site, a deeply buried facility where Iran enriches uranium and which, by most reports, can be knocked out only by a 15-ton bomb known as a Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP. Less well known but surely on the U.S. target list is a new, still unfinished subterranean facility south of Iran's main (and now largely destroyed) enrichment plant at Natanz. American pilots would also almost certainly join their Israeli counterparts in attacking Iranian ballistic missile launchers and bases. And then what? Nobody doubts the U.S. can do a lot of damage to Iran's nuclear capabilities, at least in the short term. What comes afterward is harder to predict. Proponents of an American strike believe that we have no realistic choice other than to help Israel do as thorough a job as possible in setting back Iran's nuclear ambitions not just for months but years — more than enough time to allow benign forces to shape events, including the possibility of Iranians overthrowing their widely detested rulers. By contrast, skeptics fear that the lessons Iran's leaders will draw from an American attack is that they should have gotten a bomb much sooner — and that the appropriate response to such an attack is to be more repressive at home and less receptive to diplomatic overtures from abroad. Skeptics also expect that Iran will respond to an attack by ramping up its malign regional activities, not least to embroil the U.S. in another Middle East war the Trump administration desperately wants to avoid. I'm with the proponents. A nuclear-armed Iran, fielding missiles of ever-growing reach, is both an unacceptable threat to U.S. security and a consequential failure of U.S. deterrence. After years of Iran's prevarications, which led even the Biden administration to give up on diplomacy, to say nothing of Iran's cheating on its legal commitments — detailed last month in a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency — the world had run out of plausible nonmilitary options to prevent the regime from going nuclear. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Wall Street Journal
29 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Fed's Hawkish Tone Stirs Placid Market
The Federal Reserve kept interest rates on hold Wednesday afternoon but Chair Jerome Powell and other members of the central bank struck a more hawkish tone than some investors expected, causing markets to wobble. Stock and bond prices were rising steadily until the midafternoon release from the Fed's open market committee shook confidence that the central bank would cut rates twice later this year. Powell further damped animal spirits with a warning about inflation in his public comments.