A Novel That Offers a Chilling Peek Into U.S. Intelligence
Rav Grewal-Kök's intriguing novel seems intent on unsettling us from its opening pages, with coolly precise prose that sneaks nimbly around the periphery of its characters' darkest thoughts and actions. In that sense, you might say that this accomplished debut, 'The Snares,' has adopted the techniques of the world it depicts — a realm of shadowy intelligence dominions where even the deadliest actions are carried out with calm detachment.
We view this world largely through the eyes of Neel Chima, who, as the son of Punjabi Sikh immigrants, has never felt fully accepted by America even after graduating from an Ivy, serving as a naval officer, marrying a patrician young woman from the Beltway suburbs, and becoming a deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice.
As a federal prosecutor, he catches the attention of two mysterious schemers deep within the C.I.A., who see in Neel a bright young man with yearnings and vulnerabilities that might be leveraged to make him do their bidding, even when their plans go beyond the usual moral and legal boundaries of clandestine service.
They engineer his hiring as a deputy director of the Freedom Center, which, with its newness, vague powers and bunkerlike headquarters in Northern Virginia, feels like a fictional version of the National Counterterrorism Center, an agency created in 2004.
The book is set about seven years after 9/11, in the final months of the George W. Bush administration and the first term of President Barack Obama, who, in attempting to establish his toughness against foreign adversaries, liberally employed some of the deadliest tools at his disposal, especially drones.
At the Freedom Center, Neel is expected to assess and identify worthy targets for those strikes. His sponsors' stated goal for Neel — to build the Freedom Center's influence with the White House by orchestrating high-value killings — comes with its own emotional costs, which weigh heavily on him from the beginning. But it is their enlistment of Neel in even more sensitive plans — involving targets on U.S. soil — that alerts him to the depths of the morass he has entered, especially after they entrap him with a compromising event designed to keep him more firmly under their thumb.
In chronicling Neel's descent, Grewal-Kök offers us vivid glimpses into one room after another of push-button remote warriors, not just the trailers in the Nevada desert where crews pilot drones thousands of miles away, but also the cavernous operations chambers of the Freedom Center, where Neel's commands play out on video screens with horrifying results. Richer still is the author's depiction of rival agencies as they compete for influence, at war with one another as bitterly as with their enemies abroad.
Grewal-Kök's icily clean prose is one of the novel's greatest strengths, yet also its most off-putting feature. While delivering the necessary chill with such precision, at times he holds us at arm's length from his characters. Neel often does the same with everyone in his orbit, including his wife and children, and only heightens this distancing effect. Some of the book's most oddly intimate scenes occur when Neel encounters other dark-skinned players within his world of secrets. In those moments, a code seems to arise organically between them, allowing them to finally speak freely of the hurdles and barriers they have faced since birth.
The ending, arising with a jarring suddenness, feels like a bit of a puzzle — either a hapless stab at redemption or a surrender posing as resistance. But the chill, at least, is finally gone.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
DOJ attorney who quit over Eric Adams case dismissal joins Pa. 7th Congressional District race
Democratic 7th Congressional District candidate Ryan Crosswell (Crosswell for Congress) A third Democrat in the Lehigh Valley is running for the party's nomination to challenge Republican Congressman Ryan Mackenzie in next year's midterm election. Ryan Crosswell is a former Department of Justice lawyer who prosecuted public corruption and resigned when President Donald Trump demanded the DOJ drop the bribery case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Crosswell talks about his stand for democracy and 'everyday Americans' in a video posted Sunday announcing his candidacy to run against Mackenzie, who Crosswell accuses of 'colluding with big tech and corporate monopolies to rig the economy.' Before challenging Mackenzie, Crosswell will face longtime Northampton County Executive LaMont McClure and first-time candidate Carol Obando-Derstine in the Democratic primary next spring. His opponents wasted no time pointing out that Crosswell was a registered Republican until recently. 'Ryan Crosswell is a lifelong Republican who has never lived in the Lehigh Valley. Even worse, Crosswell spent four years working for the Trump Department of Justice as they attacked civil rights, voting rights, and women's rights — and only resigned to run for Congress,' McClure said. 'Ryan Crosswell isn't running for Congress to help Pennsylvania families. He's running to help himself.' Crosswell is a Pottsville, Schuylkill County, native and said in his campaign website he decided to move from New York to Allentown with his family after resigning from the DOJ. Obando-Derstine's campaign is centered around her two decades in the Lehigh Valley where she worked as an aide to former U.S. Sen. Bob Casey. 'Voters don't want a D.C.-backed Republican parachuting into this district. They want someone who understands their struggles and has deep roots in this community. That's Carol,' her campaign manager Robert Phillips said. The 7th Congressional District covers Lehigh, Northampton, and parts of Carbon and Monroe counties. Democrats held a 5% registration advantage before last fall's presidential election. Mackenzie, who served six terms in the Pennsylvania House before running for Congress, defeated incumbent U.S. Rep. Susan Wild by only one percentage point,despite Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris losing to Trump by more than three points.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FilmLA Warns Production Permits May Be Denied Amid ICE Protests
Los Angeles film office FilmLA has advised filmmakers that areas in and around downtown Los Angeles, specifically near City Hall and the nearby federal building, may be off-limits for productions until further notice as protests against immigration raids continue in the area. 'The City of Los Angeles' permit authority, LAPD, asked that FilmLA reassure the industry that requests to film on-location will continue to be reviewed and evaluated on a case-by-case basis,' the advisory read. 'In the City of Los Angeles and in other jurisdictions, filming is allowed in all areas except those where protest activity is concentrated.' FilmLA also says that it is unaware of any active productions that have been interrupted by this past weekend's protests, which have been concentrated around the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) field office and the adjacent Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, both located on the intersection of Los Angeles and Temple St. a block southeast from City Hall. FilmLA also noted a labor protest being held at City Hall in support of SEIU California president David Huerta, whom the union says was injured and arrested by federal agents while observing the immigration raids. Huerta, a U.S. citizen, was charged with interfering with federal agents and is set to appear in court today, with U.S. Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla sending a letter to the Trump Administration demanding answers as to why he was arrested. 'We are unable to give more specific boundaries for affected areas at this time as the situation is fluid. Care for crew safety is important, as is making room for protected free speech,' FilmLA said. While FilmLA has reported a major decline in on-location shooting in Los Angeles County, downtown remains a common shooting location, with shows like '9-1-1' and 'Suits L.A.' among the recent productions to shoot in the area. Movies such as 'L.A. Confidential,' 'Inception' and 'La La Land' are among those who have also shot in downtown. Over the weekend, the Trump Administration launched widespread immigration raids throughout Los Angeles. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said in a Saturday social media post that it had arrested 118 immigrants during operations in the city last week. Community groups have deployed rapid response networks as news of the raids spread to warn of federal officials' presence while protests have been staged outside the USCIS office throughout the weekend. In response to the protests, President Trump called for the deployment of 2,000 members of the California National Guard against the wishes of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who announced that the state would sue the Trump Administration over the deployment. The post FilmLA Warns Production Permits May Be Denied Amid ICE Protests appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Domestic abusers could have easier path to getting gun rights back under Trump proposal
The Trump administration is proposing a change to how people convicted of crimes can have their gun rights restored, raising concerns over what this means for victims of domestic violence. The Democratic Women's Caucus and the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Robert Hinchman, senior counsel at the Department of Justice (DOJ), criticizing an interim final rule that would move the responsibility for determining if someone gets their gun rights back from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to the Office of the Attorney General. While the ATF is part of the DOJ, the letter says the proposal would create 'an apparent lack of an objective, holistic process for making' these decisions. In the letter, shared exclusively with The 19th, these U.S. House members underscored that the 'restoration of firearm rights should not come at the expense of a woman's right to live free of violence.' The Department of Justice pointed to the Q&A section on the ATF website about restoring gun rights and said the attorney general can grant such restoration if they believe 'the applicant will not be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety and that the granting of relief would not be contrary to the public interest.' It did not directly respond to a question on the reason for the rule change. Emma Brown, executive director of the gun violence prevention group GIFFORDS, which endorsed the letter, said the rule change could have a significant impact because it jettisons an established process without clearly replacing it. 'The state of safety for American women is dire and the Trump administration is making it worse,' Brown said. Approximately half of all women murdered in the United States are killed by a current or former domestic partner and guns are the most common weapons used in domestic violence homicides. Additionally, nearly two-thirds of all mass shooters have histories of domestic violence. Since the inception of the federal background check system, over half a million domestic abusers have been blocked from buying firearms. The letter also raises concerns about the potential abuse of power, pointing to congressional testimony by a former DOJ pardon attorney who said she lost her job after refusing to recommend that actor Mel Gibson, a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump who pleaded guilty to domestic violence charges in 2011, have his gun rights restored. The attorney also said the DOJ was processing appeals 'without a consistent and objective process for making restoration decisions.' Brown said she was concerned that friendship with the president was a reason to get gun rights restored. 'If the administration decides that it can restore firearms access to anybody, no matter what their history is on domestic violence, just because they're an ally of the president, we have a situation where we're re-arming domestic abusers across the country, which is a problem for the women that have been abused, but it's also a problem for the public,' she said. The potential new rule comes amid changes by the Trump administration that have weakened domestic violence services and prevention work. Funding pauses, cuts, firings and information purges have destabilized the infrastructure that helps victims of abuse. At the same time, federal teams dedicated to preventing sexual violence are being decimated. Departments in charge of administering grants that fund shelters for those fleeing assault have been deemed 'duplicative, DEI or simply unnecessary.' Last week, the administration asked Congress to rewrite federal law to fold the Office of Violence Against Women within the Justice Department into a broader grantmaking office while also cutting its funding. Approximately 4.5 million women alive today have been threatened by an intimate partner with a firearm; 1 million have been shot or shot at by an intimate partner. Approximately 70 percent of intimate partner homicides involve a gun and the presence of a gun in a domestic violence situation increases the chance that the victim will die by 500 percent. The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited people convicted of certain crimes, including those with misdemeanor domestic violence convictions, from having firearms and ammunition. Just last year, the United States Supreme Court upheld a related law in an 8-1 ruling that prevents someone under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing firearms. Rep. Debbie Dingell, Michigan Democrat and a childhood survivor of domestic violence, said she knows firsthand how frightening being in a domestic violence situation can be, especially for women and children. 'I lived it. I lived it,' Dingell said. 'I kept my father from killing my mother. I hid in that closet. And when [a domestic abuser has] access to a firearm, it's five times more likely that a woman will be killed.' Dingell stressed that she believes in Second Amendment gun rights but also that some people should have their access to guns restricted. 'I have tried very hard to figure out how do you protect people that need protection without taking away the rights of others and we have been working really hard to accomplish this. What they're doing is just making it more dangerous,' Dingell said of the administration's proposed change. Rep. Mike Thompson, a California Democrat and the chair of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, described the proposed rule as 'kind of a rubber stamp where if someone has had their ability to own a firearm prohibited, now you're going to bring them up and just say, 'Well I hope you learned your lesson. Here's your gun.'' Thompson acknowledged that given the Republican majority in Congress and the power held by Trump, 'I don't think they're going to read our letter and have a 'come to Jesus' and all of a sudden change their ways, but I think it's important to highlight this so everybody knows how incredibly insensitive, how incredibly stupid, how incredibly dangerous these activities are.' In a statement shared with The 19th, Rep. Gwen Moore, a Wisconsin Democrat, one of the co-chairs of the Democratic Women's Caucus and a domestic violence survivor, said: 'I know what it's like to have a gun to my head. I know what it's like to fear for my life. We cannot make it easier for abusers to access guns. Gun rights should never take priority over a survivor's right to stay alive. That's why we're sounding the alarm on this Administration's proposed rule.' The public comment period for the interim final rule closes June 18. Federal agencies should then review the comments and decide whether the rule will be published, revised or withdrawn. The post Domestic abusers could have easier path to getting gun rights back under Trump proposal appeared first on The 19th. News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
