logo
Proposed bare-knuckle boxing match in Perth sparks debate

Proposed bare-knuckle boxing match in Perth sparks debate

The WA Combat Sports Commission says it has received a preliminary application to hold a bare-knuckle fight in Perth, understood to be planned for July.
The commission, part of the Department of Local Government, Sport and Creative Industries, has responsibility for the regulation of all so-called combat sports, including boxing, kickboxing and mixed martial arts.
Chair of the commission, former WA health minister Bob Kucera, told Nadia Mitsopoulos on ABC Radio Perth the commission first received an application for bare-knuckle fighting to be approved as a contact sport about six months ago.
He said the commission subsequently developed a set of rules fight promoters would have to comply with.
"In conjunction with … the combat sports industry, we put together a set of rules which went up to the previous [sports] minister, Minister Templeman, for approval," he said.
"They were approved.
He said permits had to comply with this particular set of rules.
"The rules here are very different to the other [combat] sports because in this particular discipline … they don't have any padding on their hands," he said.
"And the only strikes that are allowed are with the hands.
The commission has received its first application, which Mr Kucera said would be scrutinised.
He said a raft of rules would apply if the application was approved.
They included requiring participants to have a minimum of seven years of fighting and 10 professional bouts behind them.
Two doctors must be present at the ringside and if a boxer is knocked down, the bout must stop.
He said boxers would also have to have serology tests to make sure they had no bloodborne diseases, and must get clearance from a doctor if there was any history of concussion.
Mr Kucera said he understood many would regard the idea of bare-knuckle fighting with distaste, but he believed it was better for the government to regulate the practice rather than banning it outright.
"In countries where they've said, 'we're going to ban this kind of thing', what happens is it goes underground, and then you have no control at all over it," he said.
"If indeed it is approved, it is highly controlled.
"And the level of injuries we see in these things are probably less than what you get on the football field, because these people defend themselves."
Premier Roger Cook said that while the sport was not his "cup of tea", he agreed it was better to regulate the events.
"It's important that the Combat Sports Commission can make sure that we don't drive combat sports underground," Mr Cook said.
Numerous members of the community have slammed the idea, including WA president of the Australian Medical Association, Michael Page.
"We know that any sport that involves repetitive knocks to the head — and this is quite clearly that — puts people at risk of not only acute concussion and acute brain injury, but also chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), which is where people, years after they've been involved in these sports, progressively develop personality changes, memory difficulties and dementia."
Nationals WA deputy leader Peter Rundle also objected to the WA government approving such an event.
"The premier and the government seem to be sanctioning and normalising that violence."
Callers to ABC Radio Perth also objected.
"This is beyond insane," caller Branko said.
"Look at the rates of domestic violence, and I would probably not accept any nonsense about this not having any influence on boys. It does."
Caller Sheila said she was "absolutely appalled".
"We are rightly spending millions on domestic violence," she said.
"We are trying to educate our children that violence is not the right way, and then the government subsidise this bare-knuckle fighting."
But caller Alex was a supporter.
"If you want to hop in a ring and hurt yourself, why not? We're not a nanny state."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australian Jewish groups branding Netanyahu's attack on PM as ‘unhelpful'
Australian Jewish groups branding Netanyahu's attack on PM as ‘unhelpful'

Sky News AU

time28 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Australian Jewish groups branding Netanyahu's attack on PM as ‘unhelpful'

Liberal Senator Dave Sharma discusses Benjamin Netanyahu's attempts to 'intervene' in Australian domestic politics. On Wednesday, the Israel-Australia relationship hit a new low after the turmoil following the Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Mr Netanyahu called Mr Albanese 'weak' and accused him of abandoning Jewish Australians. 'You have already seen the reaction from organised parts of the Australian Jewish community saying they find this incredibly unhelpful,' Mr Sharma said.

Western Sydney mum pushes for new retail safety standards after her two-year-old nearly lost an eye from low hanging merchandise rack
Western Sydney mum pushes for new retail safety standards after her two-year-old nearly lost an eye from low hanging merchandise rack

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Western Sydney mum pushes for new retail safety standards after her two-year-old nearly lost an eye from low hanging merchandise rack

A western Sydney mum is looking to change the safety measures in retail stores after an incident nearly left her two-year-old blinded. Maureen Ahluwalia was with her daughter Amaira and sister-in-law at her local Blacktown Westpoint shopping centre on July 8 when the incident occurred. Mrs Ahluwalia said her daughter was walking right beside her – as she commonly does – when the scary incident happened. 'She's just turned and the rack hook's gone in her eye. I tried to calm her down, literally her eyelid was inside out,' she told NewsWire. 'I saw when she opened her eye that there's blood coming into it.' Mrs Ahluwalia's sister-in-law advised taking Amaira to Specsavers in the shopping centre, who took her in immediately and gave some relieving news. 'They said she didn't scratch her cornea, she was very lucky to miss it by less than a millimetre. If it was, she would have had some damage to her vision or even blindness.' After repeated requests, Mrs Ahluwalia said she finally received a call from Harris Scarfe more than six days later, a courtesy call from the risk management team. They also declined to provide the CCTV footage. 'They weren't interested in looking into why this happened or if we need to change our hooks or anything … it wasn't a priority for them.' Left with a growing blood clot, Amaira eventually recovered, but not before her mother came across a string of similar incidents that shocked her. Kmart, Target and Rebel Sport were among the first to respond back in 2020, adding soft rubbers and plastics over the ends of apparel hooks, however, Mrs Ahluwalia is now putting a different question to shops. 'Why are we not doing more? And why do these hooks still exist at toddler height? 'Kids have lost their vision over it, kids have ended up in hospital, with permanent damage. 'That's when I knew this is a real problem, this is not a parent's fault. It's is beyond that.' The mother has since begun a NSW parliamentary petition to adjust the safety standards of retail fixtures in Australia, requiring 20,000 votes to be heard in parliament. The petition will be presented by Labor MP for Blacktown Stephen Bali, who has backed the move. While she has received messages of encouragement, Mrs Ahluwalia has also been met with backlash from users online claiming the incident was a personal fault. 'Keep your kids in the car. A lot safer there,' one user responded. 'Preventable with a parent doing their job' another claimed. But she has backed her stance, citing her plea to push for better safety standards for children. 'It's the same as having a fence around the pool. Why do we do that? Why do have booster seats for kids? These are all safety measures to prevent what can possibly happen,' she said. 'This is not about paying attention to your kids. My daughter was two steps away from me. 'I'd never spoken about compensation, it's not something I'm interested in. 'But no money could ever bring back my daughter's eye if she had lost it.'

Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply
Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply

Rules holding back superannuation funds from investing potential billions of dollars into housing and renewables projects could face a shake up, after broad agreement at Canberra's productivity roundtable that there is a need for change. Super funds are required to meet a "performance benchmark", under laws designed to ensure funds are performing and maintaining the retirement savings of their members. But critics have said the rules around those benchmarks discourage investment in some assets, including a rule that requires stamp duty to be disclosed as a fee in a way that they say discourages housing investment. The government flagged it was seeking to rewrite the benchmark after a 2023 review similarly found it could unintentionally be discouraging investment in some assets. Rebecca Mikula-Wright, who heads the Investor Group on Climate Change, said there had been broad agreement at this week's summit that changing those rules could accelerate housing and renewables investment. "The Your Future Your Super performance benchmark was discussed a lot in the session I was in yesterday, and really around how that is constraining the ability of super funds to invest in higher risk projects they really want to invest into," Ms Mikula-Wright told the ABC. 'The treasurer did indicate he is likely to revisit those reforms." After a day of talks focused on finding agreement on one of the thorniest issues impacting housing and the environment — Australia's "broken" environmental approvals process — Treasurer Jim Chalmers expressed his pleasure at the "real prospect of a useful consensus" emerging on some of the country's key economic challenges. "Day two of the reform roundtable was really dominated by how we can boost housing supply, how we can responsibly reduce and improve regulation and speed up approvals," Mr Chalmers said. "I'm really encouraged by the consensus in the room for economic reform in these areas, and we're enthusiastic about some of the policies that participants put on the table." Ms Mikula-Wright said there had also been good support for a Productivity Commission recommendation to establish a "strike team" that could land faster approvals for key infrastructure projects, particularly around renewables. "We're competing with markets that are getting projects up faster and cheaper, so we have to do the same. Then we can attract more capital and get those projects rolling out," she said. After warnings from Housing Minister Clare O'Neil that red tape was dragging down housing approvals — and leaked Treasury documents indicating the government was considering a pause on the National Construction Code — attendees also agreed such a move should take place. The National Construction Code lays out minimum requirements for buildings on everything from fire exits and accessibility to insulation and capacity for electric vehicle chargers. But while changes to safety standards could continue, attendees discussed possible pauses on "non-essential" rules of the construction code, such as new requirements to lift energy efficiency standards. New South Wales Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said a pause on the code was needed, though the finer details were being worked through. "The pause is something that is where the conversation was concentrated on. In terms of how long it needs to be paused, who would do the review, what's the terms of reference, that work can be pursued," he said, "I think we will have a few more conversations at the roundtable and beyond to sort out those levels of detail." The ABC understands the government hopes to move fast on a pause, and not have discussions drag out for several months. After two successive terms of government failing to find a path through the thicket of reform on Australia's Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, attendees of today's roundtable were cautiously welcoming what appeared to be some progress. The complicated laws govern the environmental approval process for major projects, such as energy and mining projects, as well as housing and other developments where they potentially impact threatened species or significant cultural sites. But a major review of those decades-old laws published in 2020 concluded that they were no longer working for business or the environment — a view that today's roundtable attendees were agreed on. However, attempts under former environment minister Tanya Plibersek to update the laws were abandoned before the federal election — with a key sticking point being a plan to introduce a federal watchdog that could independently monitor EPBC approvals. Mining and other business groups did not support that proposed Environmental Protection Agency. But after extended talks today, they left saying they would be prepared to support an EPA, with a caveat that the final say would rest with the environment minister. There are still devils in the detail, including a desire from environment groups to see the EPA also given final approval powers on projects. But it marks the first significant advancement in EPBC discussions since they stalled last term. Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive, Kelly O'Shanassy, said there was agreement in the room that an EPA was needed but there remained different views on how it should operate. "There is a lot of support for efficient decision making, transparent decision making, accountability — that is not the current process," Ms O'Shanassy said. "You need to have an independent regulator that is held to account for the speed of its decisions and the quality of its decisions." Business Council of Australia chief executive, Bran Black, said a federal EPA should effectively be set-up in the same way as existing state-based authorities. "We take the view that it's really important to have a separation between the entity that is ultimately responsible for compliance and the entity that's ultimately responsible for approvals," Mr Black said. "In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to go down the path of creating multiple bodies at all [but] the government has committed to a new EPA. It's made it very clear, that's a point that it's taken to two elections now." "The question then is: what does this EPA do?" Environment Minister Murray Watt said, however, there was strong support around the table for "stronger" environmental protections and "faster and simpler" project approvals, through a more transparent process for businesses. "These are objectives our government supports, but we will ultimately need support across the parliament for reform. It was therefore very useful for the shadow treasurer, as a roundtable participant, to hear the depth of support for change," Senator Watt said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the Coalition was willing to work constructively with the government to see reforms to the environment laws passed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store